RE: Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 11.0.0 (incubating) RC2 release
Please test this release We need some more votes to be able to create the release Best regards Alin Jerpelea -Original Message- From: Xiang Xiao Sent: den 14 september 2022 19:53 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 11.0.0 (incubating) RC2 release +1 with tools/checkelease.sh: ./tools/checkrelease.sh --release 11.0.0-RC2 Downloading release files from https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/11.0.0-RC2/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3KyhsDOg$ gpg: directory '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg' created gpg: keybox '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created gpg: /tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created gpg: key E1B6E30DB05D6280: public key "Brennan Ashton " imported gpg: key 2B8C7F0EAB22000E: public key "Abdelatif Guettouche (CODE SIGNING KEY) " imported gpg: key 4137A71698C5E4DB: public key "Alin Jerpelea " imported gpg: key 9E711BAD3264C061: public key "Alin Jerpelea " imported gpg: key A57CE1279F1E7328: public key "Alin Jerpelea (CODE SIGNING KEY) < jerpe...@apache.org>" imported gpg: key 6E72660F995FBC42: public key "Brennan Ashton < bash...@brennanashton.com>" imported gpg: Total number processed: 6 gpg: imported: 6 OK: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/KEYS__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3QOvIo50$ is imported. Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512... OK: apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches. Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature: gpg: Signature made Fri Sep 9 19:17:06 2022 CST gpg:using RSA key 9208D2E4B800D66F749AD4E94137A71698C5E4DB gpg: Good signature from "Alin Jerpelea " [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 9208 D2E4 B800 D66F 749A D4E9 4137 A716 98C5 E4DB OK: apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches. Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files: OK: all required files exist in nuttx. Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512... OK: apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches. Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature: gpg: Signature made Fri Sep 9 19:17:11 2022 CST gpg:using RSA key 9208D2E4B800D66F749AD4E94137A71698C5E4DB gpg: Good signature from "Alin Jerpelea " [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 9208 D2E4 B800 D66F 749A D4E9 4137 A716 98C5 E4DB OK: apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches. Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files: OK: all required files exist in apps. Trying to build nuttx sim:asan... OK: we were able to build sim:asan. Trying to run nuttx sim:asan... ==25236==WARNING: ASan is ignoring requested __asan_handle_no_return: stack top: 0x7ffd0b573000; bottom 0x63123000; size: 0x1ced0b55 (31804422946816) False positive error reports may follow For details see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/189__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3WBSDneE$ OK: ostest with ASAN pass. On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:28 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > Hello all, > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0 RC2 has been staged under [1] and > it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will > seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > are required to pass. > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > our project wiki and can be found here [4]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > Thank you all, > Alin Jerpelea > SCM Information: > Release tag: nuttx-11.0.0-RC2 > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > d32555f3e0492b8f4caeb407db55de23322724ef > Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > 8b43f9f9ca30f44c1cccae9a9078d5d45b776d35 > > [1] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/inc > ubator/nuttx/11.0.0-RC
Re: Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 11.0.0 (incubating) RC2 release
FYI I will start to get involved with release testing but I have too many in-progress new drivers, and fixes to 10.3 , for my board and arch for it to be viable at this time. And I’m on holiday 🙂 Regards, Tim. > On 19 Sep 2022, at 10:53, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: > > Please test this release > We need some more votes to be able to create the release > > Best regards > Alin Jerpelea > > > -Original Message- > From: Xiang Xiao > Sent: den 14 september 2022 19:53 > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 11.0.0 (incubating) RC2 release > > +1 with tools/checkelease.sh: > ./tools/checkrelease.sh --release 11.0.0-RC2 Downloading release files from > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/11.0.0-RC2/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3KyhsDOg$ > gpg: directory '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg' created > gpg: keybox '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created > gpg: /tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created > gpg: key E1B6E30DB05D6280: public key "Brennan Ashton " > imported > gpg: key 2B8C7F0EAB22000E: public key "Abdelatif Guettouche (CODE SIGNING > KEY) " imported > gpg: key 4137A71698C5E4DB: public key "Alin Jerpelea " > imported > gpg: key 9E711BAD3264C061: public key "Alin Jerpelea " > imported > gpg: key A57CE1279F1E7328: public key "Alin Jerpelea (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > jerpe...@apache.org>" imported > gpg: key 6E72660F995FBC42: public key "Brennan Ashton < > bash...@brennanashton.com>" imported > gpg: Total number processed: 6 > gpg: imported: 6 > OK: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/KEYS__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3QOvIo50$ >is > imported. > Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512... > OK: apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature: > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep 9 19:17:06 2022 CST > gpg:using RSA key 9208D2E4B800D66F749AD4E94137A71698C5E4DB > gpg: Good signature from "Alin Jerpelea " [unknown] > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 9208 D2E4 B800 D66F 749A D4E9 4137 A716 98C5 E4DB > OK: apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files: > OK: all required files exist in nuttx. > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512... > OK: apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature: > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep 9 19:17:11 2022 CST > gpg:using RSA key 9208D2E4B800D66F749AD4E94137A71698C5E4DB > gpg: Good signature from "Alin Jerpelea " [unknown] > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 9208 D2E4 B800 D66F 749A D4E9 4137 A716 98C5 E4DB > OK: apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files: > OK: all required files exist in apps. > > Trying to build nuttx sim:asan... > OK: we were able to build sim:asan. > > Trying to run nuttx sim:asan... > ==25236==WARNING: ASan is ignoring requested __asan_handle_no_return: stack > top: 0x7ffd0b573000; bottom 0x63123000; size: 0x1ced0b55 > (31804422946816) > False positive error reports may follow > For details see > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/189__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3WBSDneE$ > OK: ostest with ASAN pass. > >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:28 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0 RC2 has been staged under [1] and >> it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will >> seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. >> >> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 >> are required to pass. >> >> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] >> "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed >> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting >> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the >> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." >> >> A document to walk through some of this process has been published on >> our project wiki and can be found here [4]. >> >> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated -
Re: Cache
Hi Tim, Please find the following code in arch/arm/src/armv7-a/arm_head.S. The ICache and DCache will be enabled by default. #undef CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE #undef CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE #if !defined(CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE) && !defined(CONFIG_SMP) /* Dcache enable * * SCTLR_CBit 2: DCache enable */ orr r0, r0, #(SCTLR_C) #endif #ifndef CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE /* Icache enable * * SCTLR_IBit 12: ICache enable */ orr r0, r0, #(SCTLR_I) #endif Best Rds On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:05 PM TimH wrote: > I found that the up_enable_dcache function is there, with a call to > cp15_enable_dcache, yes; and that function is in my system.map. But > nothing calls it that I can find? > > >-Original Message- > >From: Alan Carvalho de Assis > >Sent: 13 September 2022 15:01 > > > >I don't know about sama5, but probably it is done here: > arch/arm/src/armv7- > >a/ > > > >On 9/13/22, TimH wrote: > >> I will probably hit send then find it.but, right now, I can't see if > >> there's anything I need to do to enable DCACHE? > >> > >> > >> > >> My .config has CONFIG_ARCH_DCACHE set, and that seems to "enable" all > >> the various cache functions, including up_enable_dcache, but I can't > >> find any calls to that function in sama5 related code. > >> > >> > >> > >> Any clues appreciated!! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
Re: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA
Hi Tim, SAMA5D2 has 2 XDMA controllers and the definition of peripherals channel is also different with SAMA5D3 and SAMA5D4. I will raise a pull request of adding SAMA5D2 XDMA definition to NuttX. But I didn't test the XDMA driver on any SAMA5Dx platform. I run NuttX on SAMA5D3 and SAMA5D2, the maxtouch driver and LCD driver were OK. Here is a blog introducing running NuttX graphics on SAMA5D3 Xplained with LCD display driver. https://blog.csdn.net/oldman147/article/details/73410473?spm=1001.2014.3001.5502 Best Rds On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:45 PM TimH wrote: > Thanks Greg - I'm sure someone would have tripped over all of this if > they'd tried to get DMA working. I will at the very least get it tested as > best as I can on SAMA5D2 - which it definitely seems I am the only actual > user of with NuttX! Lucky me lol. > > >-Original Message- > >From: Gregory Nutt > > > > I did the D3 and D4 ports years ago and I am not aware of any other use > of > >those boards. DMA was partially functional then, but was not well tested > and > >was still buggy. There were problems documented in > >https://github.com/apache/incubator- > >nuttx/blob/master/boards/arm/sama5/sama5d4-ek/README.txt > >which look like the same issues with the SAMA5D3x-EK in > >https://github.com/apache/incubator- > >nuttx/blob/master/boards/arm/sama5/sama5d3x-ek/README.txt > > > >The D2 was more an effort of several people and was based initially on the > >D4 (which was based on the D3). > > > >On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 8:30 AM TimH wrote: > > > >> Aargh...too quick to retract. I think definitions for ATSAMA5D3 and > >> ATSAMA5D4 are swapped and there *may* be inconsistencies, based on a > >> comparison to datasheets. I don't think anyone has used it as I am 99% > >> sure it wouldn't have worked as best as I can tell. File with issues is: > >> > >> arch/arm/src/sama5/sam_dmac.h > >> > >> It was the right file I was looking at, got confused by the presence > >> of sam_xdmac.h as well as sam_dmac.h. > >> > >> I will had "# warning" for ATSAMA5D3 and ATSAMA5D4, and add a new > >> section for SAMA5D2 which at least I hope to be able to check and > >> confirm as working. > >> > >> >-Original Message- > >> >From: TimH > >> >Sent: 12 September 2022 14:54 > >> >To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > >> >Subject: RE: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA > >> > > >> >Scrap that for now - was looking in the dma not xdma files > >> > > >> >>-Original Message- > >> >>From: TimH > >> >>Sent: 12 September 2022 14:14 > >> >>To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > >> >>Subject: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA > >> >> > >> >>I am reworking DMA to get it working for the SAMA5D2. It seems to me > >> >>that there are also errors and inconsistencies in the DMA code for > >> >>the > >> >>SAMA5D3 and D4 family. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>For now I have added "# warning" pre-processor statements. I have no > >> >>means to check ATSAMA3 or ATSAMA4 devices - so unless someone can > >> >>confirm that DMA does actually work for those 3 families and I've > >> >>misunderstood something I will suggest that the warnings remain in > >> >>place when I > >> >eventually > >> >>submit a PR for my work. > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >
Re: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA
I have reworked the DMA for ATSAMA5D2 but not tested it yet. I will compare to yours and hopefully spot any differences or errors, thank you! Regards, Tim. > On 19 Sep 2022, at 17:18, NXWorld Lee wrote: > > Hi Tim, > SAMA5D2 has 2 XDMA controllers and the definition of peripherals channel is > also different with SAMA5D3 and SAMA5D4. > I will raise a pull request of adding SAMA5D2 XDMA definition to NuttX. > But I didn't test the XDMA driver on any SAMA5Dx platform. > > I run NuttX on SAMA5D3 and SAMA5D2, the maxtouch driver and LCD driver were > OK. > Here is a blog introducing running NuttX graphics on SAMA5D3 Xplained with > LCD display driver. > https://blog.csdn.net/oldman147/article/details/73410473?spm=1001.2014.3001.5502 > > > Best Rds > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:45 PM TimH wrote: >> >> Thanks Greg - I'm sure someone would have tripped over all of this if >> they'd tried to get DMA working. I will at the very least get it tested as >> best as I can on SAMA5D2 - which it definitely seems I am the only actual >> user of with NuttX! Lucky me lol. >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Gregory Nutt >>> >>> I did the D3 and D4 ports years ago and I am not aware of any other use >> of >>> those boards. DMA was partially functional then, but was not well tested >> and >>> was still buggy. There were problems documented in >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator- >>> nuttx/blob/master/boards/arm/sama5/sama5d4-ek/README.txt >>> which look like the same issues with the SAMA5D3x-EK in >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator- >>> nuttx/blob/master/boards/arm/sama5/sama5d3x-ek/README.txt >>> >>> The D2 was more an effort of several people and was based initially on the >>> D4 (which was based on the D3). >>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 8:30 AM TimH wrote: >>> Aargh...too quick to retract. I think definitions for ATSAMA5D3 and ATSAMA5D4 are swapped and there *may* be inconsistencies, based on a comparison to datasheets. I don't think anyone has used it as I am 99% sure it wouldn't have worked as best as I can tell. File with issues is: arch/arm/src/sama5/sam_dmac.h It was the right file I was looking at, got confused by the presence of sam_xdmac.h as well as sam_dmac.h. I will had "# warning" for ATSAMA5D3 and ATSAMA5D4, and add a new section for SAMA5D2 which at least I hope to be able to check and confirm as working. > -Original Message- > From: TimH > Sent: 12 September 2022 14:54 > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > Subject: RE: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA > > Scrap that for now - was looking in the dma not xdma files > >> -Original Message- >> From: TimH >> Sent: 12 September 2022 14:14 >> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org >> Subject: SAMA5D3 and D4 DMA >> >> I am reworking DMA to get it working for the SAMA5D2. It seems to me >> that there are also errors and inconsistencies in the DMA code for >> the >> SAMA5D3 and D4 family. >> >> >> >> For now I have added "# warning" pre-processor statements. I have no >> means to check ATSAMA3 or ATSAMA4 devices - so unless someone can >> confirm that DMA does actually work for those 3 families and I've >> misunderstood something I will suggest that the warnings remain in >> place when I > eventually >> submit a PR for my work. > >> >>
Re: Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 11.0.0 (incubating) RC2 release
Guys, please help!!! The idea is to have the NuttX 11.0.0 available before this weekend (guess why?) https://nuttx.events/2022/09/19/list-of-presentation-of-the-nuttx-international-2022/ BR, Alan On 9/19/22, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: > Please test this release > We need some more votes to be able to create the release > > Best regards > Alin Jerpelea > > > -Original Message- > From: Xiang Xiao > Sent: den 14 september 2022 19:53 > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 11.0.0 (incubating) RC2 release > > +1 with tools/checkelease.sh: > ./tools/checkrelease.sh --release 11.0.0-RC2 Downloading release files from > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/11.0.0-RC2/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3KyhsDOg$ > gpg: directory '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg' created > gpg: keybox '/tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created > gpg: /tmp/nuttx-checkrelease/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created > gpg: key E1B6E30DB05D6280: public key "Brennan Ashton > " > imported > gpg: key 2B8C7F0EAB22000E: public key "Abdelatif Guettouche (CODE SIGNING > KEY) " imported > gpg: key 4137A71698C5E4DB: public key "Alin Jerpelea " > imported > gpg: key 9E711BAD3264C061: public key "Alin Jerpelea > " > imported > gpg: key A57CE1279F1E7328: public key "Alin Jerpelea (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > jerpe...@apache.org>" imported > gpg: key 6E72660F995FBC42: public key "Brennan Ashton < > bash...@brennanashton.com>" imported > gpg: Total number processed: 6 > gpg: imported: 6 > OK: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/KEYS__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3QOvIo50$ > is > imported. > Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512... > OK: apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature: > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep 9 19:17:06 2022 CST > gpg:using RSA key 9208D2E4B800D66F749AD4E94137A71698C5E4DB > gpg: Good signature from "Alin Jerpelea " [unknown] > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 9208 D2E4 B800 D66F 749A D4E9 4137 A716 98C5 E4DB > OK: apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files: > OK: all required files exist in nuttx. > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512... > OK: apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature: > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep 9 19:17:11 2022 CST > gpg:using RSA key 9208D2E4B800D66F749AD4E94137A71698C5E4DB > gpg: Good signature from "Alin Jerpelea " [unknown] > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 9208 D2E4 B800 D66F 749A D4E9 4137 A716 98C5 E4DB > OK: apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches. > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-11.0.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files: > OK: all required files exist in apps. > > Trying to build nuttx sim:asan... > OK: we were able to build sim:asan. > > Trying to run nuttx sim:asan... > ==25236==WARNING: ASan is ignoring requested __asan_handle_no_return: stack > top: 0x7ffd0b573000; bottom 0x63123000; size: 0x1ced0b55 > (31804422946816) > False positive error reports may follow > For details see > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/189__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!_AM2wqhyvJXbdzPcQZFOXYpkBNNnZwGoKQnKS8BvvYvbskS3DKRb8iVUnDSCivUymvfOiZxGdtm_vcSa2jG3WBSDneE$ > OK: ostest with ASAN pass. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:28 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > >> Hello all, >> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 11.0.0 RC2 has been staged under [1] and >> it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will >> seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr. >> >> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 >> are required to pass. >> >> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] >> "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed >> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting >> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the >> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." >> >> A document to walk through some of this process has been published on >> our project wiki and can be found here [4]. >> >> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM >> items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject
