Re: QuickLogic Open Source MCU + FPGA

2020-06-25 Thread Erdem MEYDANLI 
@Brennan: Have you received the dev board from QuickLogic? I also ordered
one last week. However, when I check from my account, I see that the order
is still being processed.

Erdem

Adam Feuer , 18 Haz 2020 Per, 23:10 tarihinde şunu yazdı:

>- 80 MHz ARM Cortex M4-F
>- UART only, no USB
>- FPGA has 2400 logic cells
>- Open Source software for development
>
> It's pretty low-power, but that last part is amazing– it would be great to
> have an RTOS+FPGA that was programmable by all open source software.
>
> I will have to think of something I can do with it. My next project will
> probably have an largish FPGA on it... this one is too small for that.
>
> -adam
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:11 AM Erdem MEYDANLI 
> wrote:
>
> > It looks like a promising platform, but the shipping cost to the EU is
> > unbelievable. :). I want to support porting efforts, but let's see first
> if
> > I can receive it via a freight-forwarder service.
> >
> > Erdem
> >
>
>
> --
> Adam Feuer 
>

Re: QuickLogic Open Source MCU + FPGA

2020-06-25 Thread Brennan Ashton 
Yes I have two of them as of last night and started the port. The start is
here but it really is just getting structure in place so don't judge the
quality yet :p .
https://github.com/btashton/incubator-nuttx/pull/6

Also the company is engaged along with other people in the community.
https://twitter.com/btashton/status/1275900896111517697?s=19

--Brennan

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, 10:51 AM Erdem MEYDANLI  wrote:

> @Brennan: Have you received the dev board from QuickLogic? I also ordered
> one last week. However, when I check from my account, I see that the order
> is still being processed.
>
> Erdem
>
> Adam Feuer , 18 Haz 2020 Per, 23:10 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
>
> >- 80 MHz ARM Cortex M4-F
> >- UART only, no USB
> >- FPGA has 2400 logic cells
> >- Open Source software for development
> >
> > It's pretty low-power, but that last part is amazing– it would be great
> to
> > have an RTOS+FPGA that was programmable by all open source software.
> >
> > I will have to think of something I can do with it. My next project will
> > probably have an largish FPGA on it... this one is too small for that.
> >
> > -adam
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:11 AM Erdem MEYDANLI 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It looks like a promising platform, but the shipping cost to the EU is
> > > unbelievable. :). I want to support porting efforts, but let's see
> first
> > if
> > > I can receive it via a freight-forwarder service.
> > >
> > > Erdem
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adam Feuer 
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

2020-06-25 Thread Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES) 
Hi, Xiang and all,

-1

I've been checking the nuttx-9.1.0-RC0 with qemu and several boards
and found that ELF loading do​es not work. (nuttx-9.0.0 was OK but
the latest master branch has the same issue)

And finally, I noticed that apps/sysmtab_apps.c has no symbols.

Xiang, do you notice this issue?
Perhaps, something is wrong with the build system.

Thanks,
Masayuki


From: Brennan Ashton 
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 15:36
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

Hello all,
Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote
on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final release approval
from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.

Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity involved
in the build process.  We have tried to make some improvements around this for
new people to the project and are in the process of updating our sites and wiki
to simplify the getting started process.
Two starting points:
 * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is extensive.
 * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently unofficial
   opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers.


A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
are required to pass.

The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4]
"Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
source code package,
compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own
platform, along
with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF
policy on releases."

A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
our project wiki
and can be found here [5].  I did try to walk through this document,
but please comment
if you find anything not clear.

[ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
items in [5])
[ ] -1 reject (explanation required)

Thank you all,
Brennan Ashton

SCM Information:
  Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC0
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
5d5e6f7192d24a6241aa3e22c729a85eda7afe2d
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
6fd57ba0712a78b20bd3ce49022924810a5552c7

[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/9.1.0-RC0/
[2] 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-9.1.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes
[3] https://nuttx-companion.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
[4] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
[5] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release

RE: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

2020-06-25 Thread Xiang Xiao 
Here is the fix we sent two days ago:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/303

 

 

From: Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES)  
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 10:13 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org; Xiang Xiao 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

 

Hi, Xiang and all,

 

-1

 

I've been checking the nuttx-9.1.0-RC0 with qemu and several boards

and found that ELF loading do​es not work. (nuttx-9.0.0 was OK but

the latest master branch has the same issue)

 

And finally, I noticed that apps/sysmtab_apps.c has no symbols.

 

Xiang, do you notice this issue? 

Perhaps, something is wrong with the build system.

 

Thanks,

Masayuki

 

  _  

From: Brennan Ashton mailto:bash...@brennanashton.com> >
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 15:36
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org   mailto:dev@nuttx.apache.org> >
Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release 

 

Hello all,
Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote
on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final release approval
from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.

Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity involved
in the build process.  We have tried to make some improvements around this for
new people to the project and are in the process of updating our sites and wiki
to simplify the getting started process.
Two starting points:
 * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is extensive.
 * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently unofficial
   opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers.


A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
are required to pass.

The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4]
"Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
source code package,
compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own
platform, along
with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF
policy on releases."

A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
our project wiki
and can be found here [5].  I did try to walk through this document,
but please comment
if you find anything not clear.

[ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
items in [5])
[ ] -1 reject (explanation required)

Thank you all,
Brennan Ashton

SCM Information:
  Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC0
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
5d5e6f7192d24a6241aa3e22c729a85eda7afe2d
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
6fd57ba0712a78b20bd3ce49022924810a5552c7

[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/9.1.0-RC0/
[2] 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-9.1.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes
[3] https://nuttx-companion.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
[4] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
[5] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

2020-06-25 Thread Brennan Ashton 
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:10 PM Xiang Xiao  wrote:
>
> Here is the fix we sent two days ago:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/303
>
Backports PRs are available for both this and the RISCV elf bug

https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1306
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/309

--Brennan

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

2020-06-25 Thread Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES) 
I forgot to see the PR.
Thanks for the information. It works.
I've just merged to the master.

Masayuki
​

From: Xiang Xiao 
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 14:10
To: Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES) ; 
dev@nuttx.apache.org 
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release


Here is the fix we sent two days ago:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/303





From: Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES) 
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 10:13 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org; Xiang Xiao 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release



Hi, Xiang and all,



-1



I've been checking the nuttx-9.1.0-RC0 with qemu and several boards

and found that ELF loading do​es not work. (nuttx-9.0.0 was OK but

the latest master branch has the same issue)



And finally, I noticed that apps/sysmtab_apps.c has no symbols.



Xiang, do you notice this issue?

Perhaps, something is wrong with the build system.



Thanks,

Masayuki





From: Brennan Ashton 
mailto:bash...@brennanashton.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 15:36
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org 
mailto:dev@nuttx.apache.org>>
Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release



Hello all,
Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote
on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final release approval
from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.

Because this project targets embedded systems there is more complexity involved
in the build process.  We have tried to make some improvements around this for
new people to the project and are in the process of updating our sites and wiki
to simplify the getting started process.
Two starting points:
 * README.txt -- This is found in the Apache NuttX source and is extensive.
 * Unofficial NuttX Companion -- Located at [3], this is a currently unofficial
   opinionated guide maintained by some of the project committers.


A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
are required to pass.

The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [4]
"Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
source code package,
compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own
platform, along
with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF
policy on releases."

A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
our project wiki
and can be found here [5].  I did try to walk through this document,
but please comment
if you find anything not clear.

[ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
items in [5])
[ ] -1 reject (explanation required)

Thank you all,
Brennan Ashton

SCM Information:
  Release tag: releases/9.1.0-RC0
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
5d5e6f7192d24a6241aa3e22c729a85eda7afe2d
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
6fd57ba0712a78b20bd3ce49022924810a5552c7

[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/9.1.0-RC0/
[2] 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-9.1.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes
[3] https://nuttx-companion.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
[4] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
[5] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release

2020-06-25 Thread Disruptive Solutions 
+1

Op wo 24 jun. 2020 02:40 schreef Brennan Ashton :

> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:36 PM Brennan Ashton
>  wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:35 PM Brennan Ashton
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:31 PM Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I’ve not done a full check (which I will do) but I would be -1 on
> this release as it looks like it’s been signed with an expired key:
> > > >
> > > > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton "
> [expired]
> > > > gpg: Note: This key has expired!
> > > >
> > > > It's also a good idea to sign with an “@apache.org” email address.
> > > This key is not expired and has been signed by my apache.org email
> > > address as well:
> > >
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=0x3554D78458CEB6954B020E12E1B6E30DB05D6280&fingerprint=on&op=index
> > > This is also indicated here:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nuttx/KEYS
> > >
> > > --Brennan
> >
> > Hmm I take that back about the KEYS file.  I must have messed up my
> > SVN foo, because I certainly updated my local copy of that file...
>
> Sorry for all the emails... Wrong link, the KEYS file in dev is correct.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/KEYS
> If you can let me know what is wrong here I will be happy to fix it,
> but this seems correct to me.
>
> --Brennan
>