Re: [DISCUSSION] Separate Jira project and Confluence space for Ignite 3
+1 Since we've agreed that there are two projects (that are Ignite2 and Ignite3), separate development environments seem to be logical and natural course of things. > On 18 Sep 2021, at 12:42, Alexander Polovtcev wrote: > > +1 > This is a welcome proposal, because we already have some pending Ignite 3 > specific documents, and it is not clear where to put them at the moment. > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 4:22 AM Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Igniters, >> >> I think it's clear to all of us that Ignite 2.x and 3.x will coexist for a >> while. They are developed in separate Git repos, but we still accumulate >> the tickets for both versions in the same Jira project, which seems to >> complicate the ticket management. >> >> For example, we use the "ignite-3" label for 3.x tickets, but this approach >> is fragile. If someone forgets to add the label to a new ticket, it's >> likely to be lost. We need a better separation. >> >> All the above is true for Wiki as well - we use a single Confluence space. >> >> I suggest creating a new Jira project and a new Confluence space for Ignite >> 3 and moving all the relevant tickets and pages there. >> >> Any thoughts or objections? >> >> -Val >> > > > -- > With regards, > Aleksandr Polovtcev
Move Azure, AWS, GCE to the ignite-extensions
Folks, I've created an issue [1] to move all cloud-based IP-finders to the ignite-extensions. The motivation is the same as with migration of Spring Data integration - to remove integration dependency of the release cycle on Ignite releases. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15541
Re: Move Azure, AWS, GCE to the ignite-extensions
Perfect, thanks, Maxim! - Denis On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:29 AM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Folks, > > > I've created an issue [1] to move all cloud-based IP-finders to the > ignite-extensions. The motivation is the same as with migration of > Spring Data integration - to remove integration dependency of the > release cycle on Ignite releases. > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15541 >
A new feedback has been added : 10
A new feedback has been added, go to bugyard.io to see all the details... https://bugyard.io A new feedback has been added "Looks like [Running Ignite with Java 11 or later] link is broken." by tim239 View feedback https://app.bugyard.io/web/app/rycqZJDyY/f/61488444507c91001448c81c
[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ignite 2.11.0 Released
The Apache Ignite Community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ignite 2.11.0. Apache Ignite® is a Distributed Database For High-Performance Computing With In-Memory Speed. https://ignite.apache.org The Apache Ignite Community has fixed a lot of bugs in the 2.11.0 release and made some valuable improvements. You can check this blog post for more information: https://blogs.apache.org/ignite/entry/apache-ignite-2-11-stabilization For the full list of changes, you can refer to the RELEASE_NOTES list which is trying to catalogue the most significant improvements for this version of the database: https://ignite.apache.org/releases/2.11.0/release_notes.html Download the latest Ignite version from here: https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi Please let us know if you encounter any problems: https://ignite.apache.org/community/resources.html#ask Regards, Maxim Muzafarov on behalf of the Apache Ignite community.
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Ignite 2.11.0 RC2
Maxim, thanks for driving the release and preparing the announcement article! A few questions: - Should "dev" be replaced with "2.11" on the picture of the cellular clusters deployment section? - Will the article be published on our blogs.apache.org page? - Denis On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 9:36 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Pavel, > > > I've prepared a draft blog post [1] for the 2.11 release announcement > message, however, this post doesn't include changes related to the > .NET part of the Apache Ignite. Will you prepare a dedicated post > related to the .NET changes or I should include them in this one? > > Folks, > all the comments are welcome. > > > [1] > https://github.com/Mmuzaf/mmuzaf.github.io/blob/main/_post/Release_Newsletter_211.md > > > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 17:21, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > > > Hello, Igniters! > > > > Apache Ignite 2.11.0 release (RC2) has been accepted. > > > > 5 - "+1" votes received. > > 1 - "+0,5" vote received. > > > > Here are the votes received: > > > > - Pavel Tupitsyn (binding) > > - Alex Plehanov (binding) > > - Nikolay Izhikov (binding) > > - Ilya Kasnacheev > > - Ivan Daschinsky > > - Zhenya Stanilovsky > > > > > > Here is the link to the voting thread - > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rab233aa7d737b84b678fb74c81a867e3aad270471a2aac85a4d35cb8%40%3Cdev.ignite.apache.org%3E > > > > Thank you! >
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Ignite 2.11.0 RC2
Denis, The post is added: https://blogs.apache.org/ignite/entry/apache-ignite-2-11-stabilization I've fixed the image according to your suggestions. On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 21:35, Denis Magda wrote: > > Maxim, thanks for driving the release and preparing the announcement > article! > > A few questions: > >- Should "dev" be replaced with "2.11" on the picture of the cellular >clusters deployment section? >- Will the article be published on our blogs.apache.org page? > > - > Denis > > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 9:36 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > > Pavel, > > > > > > I've prepared a draft blog post [1] for the 2.11 release announcement > > message, however, this post doesn't include changes related to the > > .NET part of the Apache Ignite. Will you prepare a dedicated post > > related to the .NET changes or I should include them in this one? > > > > Folks, > > all the comments are welcome. > > > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/Mmuzaf/mmuzaf.github.io/blob/main/_post/Release_Newsletter_211.md > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Sept 2021 at 17:21, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > > > > > Hello, Igniters! > > > > > > Apache Ignite 2.11.0 release (RC2) has been accepted. > > > > > > 5 - "+1" votes received. > > > 1 - "+0,5" vote received. > > > > > > Here are the votes received: > > > > > > - Pavel Tupitsyn (binding) > > > - Alex Plehanov (binding) > > > - Nikolay Izhikov (binding) > > > - Ilya Kasnacheev > > > - Ivan Daschinsky > > > - Zhenya Stanilovsky > > > > > > > > > Here is the link to the voting thread - > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rab233aa7d737b84b678fb74c81a867e3aad270471a2aac85a4d35cb8%40%3Cdev.ignite.apache.org%3E > > > > > > Thank you! > >
