[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [5882651] needs to be handled

2021-02-20 Thread dpavlov . tasks
Hi Igniters,

 I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than 
welcomed to help.

 If your changes can lead to this failure(s): We're grateful that you were a 
volunteer to make the contribution to this project, but things change and you 
may no longer be able to finalize your contribution.
 Could you respond to this email and indicate if you wish to continue and fix 
test failures or step down and some committer may revert you commit. 

 *New test failure in master-nightly 
IoStatisticsSelfTest.testPersistentIOGlobalStat 
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=819520953627395091&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails
 Changes may lead to failure were done by 
 - aleksey plekhanov  
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewModification.html?modId=917288
 - atri sharma  
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewModification.html?modId=917319
 - mikhail petrov  
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewModification.html?modId=917314

 - Here's a reminder of what contributors were agreed to do 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute 
 - Should you have any questions please contact dev@ignite.apache.org 

Best Regards,
Apache Ignite TeamCity Bot 
https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot
Notification generated at 14:21:56 20-02-2021 


Apache Ignite 3.x: order in repository

2021-02-20 Thread Petr Ivanov
Hi, Igniters!


When we started Ignite 3.x in new repository, not only we have received a 
chance to cleanup codebase, but to maintain some order in development tools, 
like GitHub.
Currently in 2.x repository we have lots of stalled PRs and branches, which not 
only clog the repository, but also indirectly influence TC performance (due to 
necessity to check for updates every ref: branches and PRs).

Could I suggest we devise some recommendations for using PR's and branches in 
new repo and add some rules about stalled PRs at least, like closing them if 
inactive for some time.
Also we can activate some settings in repo's configuration, like auto delete 
branch after PR is merged.


WDYT?

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14216) control.sh --cache list . --seq: NullPointerException

2021-02-20 Thread Surkov Aleksandr (Jira)
Surkov Aleksandr created IGNITE-14216:
-

 Summary: control.sh --cache list . --seq: NullPointerException
 Key: IGNITE-14216
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14216
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: control.sh
Affects Versions: 2.9.1
Reporter: Surkov Aleksandr
 Attachments: full-stack-trace.txt

Executing the following command throws an error: _control.sh --cache list . 
--seq_


  
  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


Re: Apache Ignite 3.x: order in repository

2021-02-20 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
+1

- Close inactive PRs (1 month or so?)
- Enable main branch protection (no force pushes, require linear history,
require status checks)

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 2:31 PM Petr Ivanov  wrote:

> Hi, Igniters!
>
>
> When we started Ignite 3.x in new repository, not only we have received a
> chance to cleanup codebase, but to maintain some order in development
> tools, like GitHub.
> Currently in 2.x repository we have lots of stalled PRs and branches,
> which not only clog the repository, but also indirectly influence TC
> performance (due to necessity to check for updates every ref: branches and
> PRs).
>
> Could I suggest we devise some recommendations for using PR's and branches
> in new repo and add some rules about stalled PRs at least, like closing
> them if inactive for some time.
> Also we can activate some settings in repo's configuration, like auto
> delete branch after PR is merged.
>
>
> WDYT?