Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

2020-02-24 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
Ok, will make ticket, no problemo

вс, 23 февр. 2020 г., 23:28 Denis Magda :

> Alex, thanks for helping with the documentation. Frankly, the tickets will
> be useful to get a complete list of all the updates pages with the goal of
> extracting info for blog post(s) - we'll be preparing at least one blog for
> Ignite 2.8 and can create an ML specific blog as well. Also, the tickets
> might simplify the review process between you and Artem.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:18 AM Alexey Zinoviev 
> wrote:
>
>> I've created a draft pages on apache.readme.io and will continue my work
>> there during next 2 weeks.
>> Should I create any tickets for that? Or could miss that step?
>>
>> Will notify in this thread than the work will be done!
>>
>> чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 12:16, Alexey Zinoviev :
>>
>>> Yes, there are a lot of changes in ML from 2.7, I'm going to prepare new
>>> documentation  and create documentation related tickets for the ML
>>> component.
>>> After some consultation and review from Artem side I'll add new
>>> documentation on readme.io.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 02:34, Denis Magda :
>>>
 Artem,

 Thanks for stepping in and preparing the list of top priority
 documentation tasks! How about labeling those tickets somehow and creating
 a filter similar to this one [1] but for "Required & Unresolved
 Documentation Tasks"? I would simply add this as a new section to the
 Ignite 2.8 release wiki page for ease of tracking and start working with
 the guys contributed improvements directly. Will see the names of the
 authors who need to be involved ;)

 *Alexey Zinoviev*, there are many ML related changes coming in the
 release. Could you check existing ML docs and suggest any changes?

 [1]
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks

 -
 Denis


 On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:14 AM Artem Budnikov <
 a.budnikov.ign...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maxim,
>
> One note from my side, I think we can move disk page compression [1]
> > to the 2-nd priority, but definitely must document WAL page
> > compression first [2]
>
>
> OK, good to know.
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:48 PM Maxim Muzafarov 
> wrote:
>
> > Artem,
> >
> >
> > Thank you for starting this thread.
> > One note from my side, I think we can move disk page compression [1]
> > to the 2-nd priority, but definitely must document WAL page
> > compression first [2]
> >
> >
> > The list of important tasks [3].
> > The list of documentation tasks [4].
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10330
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11336
> > [3]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Themostimportantreleasetasks
> > [4]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 18:15, Artem Budnikov
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > As the release of Ignite 2.8 is getting closer, let's discuss which
> > features should be documented. I created a list of features based on
> the
> > release notes and the documentation tickets in jira (see below).
> Much more
> > has been added, but these seemed to have first priority. It's not to
> say
> > that other features are not important, but given the limited
> resources a
> > list of high-priority task would help to schedule the time of those
> who
> > will help with the docs.
> > >
> > > Here is the list of features:
> > >
> > > Disk page compression
> > > Metrics and System Views documentation
> > > Default Ignite work dir location
> > > Baseline auto-adjust feature
> > > Cluster (de)activation events documentation
> > > Remove SqlQuery documentation
> > > Partition awareness for thin clients
> > > Transactions support in thin clients
> > > KILL QUERY command
> > > Move rebalance configuration properties to the IgniteConfiguration
> level
> > > Renamed IGNITE schema to SYS
> > > JDBC: Support for query cancellation
> > > JDBC: Support for query timeout
> > > suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
> > >
> > > Now, two really big questions here:
> > >
> > > If you want to add anything else to the documentation, please let
> us
> > know in this thread.
> > > If you are the author of any of the features listed above, please
> share
> > the details on the feature. You can do it by creating a documentation
> > ticket. If you want to contribute a page or section to the existing
> docs,
> > you can write directly on apacheignite.readme.i

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

2020-02-24 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
Please, could you post in this thread a few examples of the documentation
tickets in JIRA for the current release, to create them correctly?

пн, 24 февр. 2020 г. в 14:53, Alexey Zinoviev :

> Ok, will make ticket, no problemo
>
> вс, 23 февр. 2020 г., 23:28 Denis Magda :
>
>> Alex, thanks for helping with the documentation. Frankly, the tickets
>> will be useful to get a complete list of all the updates pages with the
>> goal of extracting info for blog post(s) - we'll be preparing at least one
>> blog for Ignite 2.8 and can create an ML specific blog as well. Also, the
>> tickets might simplify the review process between you and Artem.
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:18 AM Alexey Zinoviev 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've created a draft pages on apache.readme.io and will continue my
>>> work there during next 2 weeks.
>>> Should I create any tickets for that? Or could miss that step?
>>>
>>> Will notify in this thread than the work will be done!
>>>
>>> чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 12:16, Alexey Zinoviev :
>>>
 Yes, there are a lot of changes in ML from 2.7, I'm going to prepare
 new documentation  and create documentation related tickets for the ML
 component.
 After some consultation and review from Artem side I'll add new
 documentation on readme.io.



 чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 02:34, Denis Magda :

> Artem,
>
> Thanks for stepping in and preparing the list of top priority
> documentation tasks! How about labeling those tickets somehow and creating
> a filter similar to this one [1] but for "Required & Unresolved
> Documentation Tasks"? I would simply add this as a new section to the
> Ignite 2.8 release wiki page for ease of tracking and start working with
> the guys contributed improvements directly. Will see the names of the
> authors who need to be involved ;)
>
> *Alexey Zinoviev*, there are many ML related changes coming in the
> release. Could you check existing ML docs and suggest any changes?
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:14 AM Artem Budnikov <
> a.budnikov.ign...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Maxim,
>>
>> One note from my side, I think we can move disk page compression [1]
>> > to the 2-nd priority, but definitely must document WAL page
>> > compression first [2]
>>
>>
>> OK, good to know.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:48 PM Maxim Muzafarov 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Artem,
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank you for starting this thread.
>> > One note from my side, I think we can move disk page compression [1]
>> > to the 2-nd priority, but definitely must document WAL page
>> > compression first [2]
>> >
>> >
>> > The list of important tasks [3].
>> > The list of documentation tasks [4].
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10330
>> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11336
>> > [3]
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Themostimportantreleasetasks
>> > [4]
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks
>> >
>> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 18:15, Artem Budnikov
>> >  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > >
>> > > As the release of Ignite 2.8 is getting closer, let's discuss
>> which
>> > features should be documented. I created a list of features based
>> on the
>> > release notes and the documentation tickets in jira (see below).
>> Much more
>> > has been added, but these seemed to have first priority. It's not
>> to say
>> > that other features are not important, but given the limited
>> resources a
>> > list of high-priority task would help to schedule the time of those
>> who
>> > will help with the docs.
>> > >
>> > > Here is the list of features:
>> > >
>> > > Disk page compression
>> > > Metrics and System Views documentation
>> > > Default Ignite work dir location
>> > > Baseline auto-adjust feature
>> > > Cluster (de)activation events documentation
>> > > Remove SqlQuery documentation
>> > > Partition awareness for thin clients
>> > > Transactions support in thin clients
>> > > KILL QUERY command
>> > > Move rebalance configuration properties to the
>> IgniteConfiguration level
>> > > Renamed IGNITE schema to SYS
>> > > JDBC: Support for query cancellation
>> > > JDBC: Support for query timeout
>> > > suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
>> > >
>> > > Now, two really big questions here:
>> > >
>> > > If you want to add anything else to the documentation, please let
>> us
>> 

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12716) Ignite support for spark-3.0.0

2020-02-24 Thread Shenson Joseph (Jira)
Shenson Joseph created IGNITE-12716:
---

 Summary: Ignite support for spark-3.0.0
 Key: IGNITE-12716
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12716
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: spark
Affects Versions: 2.7.6, 2.7.5, 2.7
Reporter: Shenson Joseph


Ignite support for spark-3.0.0



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)