Re: [DRAFT] Announcement: FlexJS and FalconJX 0.0.1 Released!
I can't get infra to build our site so we'll delay pushing everything until I can bug them tomorrow. Time for bed for me. -Alex On 4/22/14 11:08 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I ran 5 installs on my Windows box. All succeeded. However if I had some >other apps open and macafee on-access scanning on, I noticed that the >scrollbar was not so smooth during some tasks and once I even saw "not >responding". It might be that folks are seeing this and bailing. I've >run many installs on my Mac and haven't seen anything like that. Not sure >what we could do about that. > >-Alex > >On 4/22/14 8:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>> Interesting. No failures on Mac. I'll run some installs on my Windows >>> box tonight. >> >>JFYI - there was a couple of failures on mac for other packages. >> >>Justin >
AW: Flex unit 4.2.0
Oh ... just saw that it is built using ANT ... I couldn't find any pom.xml files in it. Quess I had to manually write the poms the last time I deployed them :-( Well I guess it would be a good idea to do so. I would fefinitely volunteer to deploy FlexUnit as this would make using it in Flexmojos a lot easier :-) But first we would have to decide on what group Id we should use. I ould suggest on using the following data: org.apache.flex.flexunit flexunit 4.2 What to you think? Chris Von: Justin Mclean Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 09:04 An: Christofer Dutz Betreff: Re: Flex unit 4.2.0 Hi, > Have the libs actually been released to Maven Central yet? All I can see is > 4.2-beta. I would guesss not as you're probably the only person on the PMC who knows how to do that or what it even means :-) > Has the Maven goupId been changed to org.apache.something? No idea - sorry. What was required to do that? Justin
AW: Flex unit 4.2.0
Ok, so I'll add this to my todo ... so I would assume if I checkout the release revision and build that, I would have some pom files generated. I would manually adjust these to the GroupId and version 4.2.0 (I like 3-segment versions too) and would deploy this to sonatype and have that mirrored to maven central? Is that Ok for me to do, or does there need to be some sort of vote on this? I would then update to trunk and update the pom template to generate the correct pom files in future releases. Chris Von: Justin Mclean Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 09:15 An: Christofer Dutz Betreff: Re: Flex unit 4.2.0 Hi, > Oh ... just saw that it is built using ANT ... I couldn't find any pom.xml > files in it. There a pom.template in the root directory but it's incorrect and has old flexunit information in it - we'll need to fix that. > But first we would have to decide on what group Id we should use. > I ould suggest on using the following data: > > >org.apache.flex.flexunit >flexunit >4.2 > > > What to you think? Looks good to me - may want to make it 4.2.0 just in case we have a 4.2.1 release. Justin
Re: Flex unit 4.2.0
Hi, > Ok, so I'll add this to my todo ... so I would assume if I checkout the > release revision and build that, I would have some pom files generated. Looks line ant -f utils.xml does that for you. This has not been tested, but probably should of been. > Is that Ok for me to do, or does there need to be some sort of vote on this? I'm out of my depth here but I think we been to publish to https://repository.apache.org/ and that is mirrored in several repos. This should help: http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html Justin
AW: Flex unit 4.2.0
Well having a look at the template it certainly needs adjusting, as the scm section references the old flexunig github repo ... this should be changed to the apache flexunit one. There will probably be a set of other things to change, but I'll have a look at this as soon as I'm home from work. Thanks for the links ... especially the second I didn't know yet ... so I would get working on this ... after all I'm currently refactoring the mavenizer to produce FDKs we could publish there too. So this would be a good test-run ;-) If you are all ok with this I would like to volunteer to handle maven deployment tasks as this does fit quite nicely into my area of involvement ;-) Chris Von: Justin Mclean Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 09:36 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Flex unit 4.2.0 Hi, > Ok, so I'll add this to my todo ... so I would assume if I checkout the > release revision and build that, I would have some pom files generated. Looks line ant -f utils.xml does that for you. This has not been tested, but probably should of been. > Is that Ok for me to do, or does there need to be some sort of vote on this? I'm out of my depth here but I think we been to publish to https://repository.apache.org/ and that is mirrored in several repos. This should help: http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html Justin
Re: Flex unit 4.2.0
Hi, > Well having a look at the template it certainly needs adjusting, as the scm > section references the old flexunig github repo Yep. I fixed the obvious issues in develop. Probably means that once this is sorted we need to make a new release of FlexUnit. > Thanks for the links ... especially the second I didn't know yet ... All I know how to do is "mvn compile" and "mvn test" :-) > If you are all ok with this I would like to volunteer to handle maven > deployment tasks as this does fit quite nicely into my area of involvement ;-) I can't see why there would be any objections there, you obviously the best person for the job. Thanks, Justin
Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
Hi, I am currently completeley refactoring the Mavenizer to consist of independent modules for converting AIR, Flash and Flex separately. I need this in order to use those modules in the new Flexmojos verify-mojo that should take care of downloading and mavenizing air and flash artifacts. This is needed in order for us to be able to officially publish flex in a public maven repo. However, in order to use these in Flexmojos I would need them to be publically available (Even if I should be safe to have them in some SNAPSHOT version). How in general would the process of releasing these modules be? (as they are only a part of the utilities sub-project). Are we able to release parts of this independently from the rest of the utilities module? Otherwise I would stick to adding a clone of the code to Flexmojos for now and work with that till we have settled any release problems. Chris
Flex iOS IntelliJ IDEA development introduction tutorial
Hi, just want to post here a basic introduction tutorial to develop with IntelliJ IDEA and Flex for iOS: http://www.madeinflex.com/desarrollo-flex-para-ios/ a english machine translation for non-spanish users: http://www.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madeinflex.com%2Fdesarrollo-flex-para-ios%2F&sandbox=1 Hope it could we useful for some of you Best, -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
Are you talking about the flex-utilities repo? You can definitely release and subset of source code from that repo. All you need is an ant script that does the packaging and building. The Installer is a subset of that repo. -Alex On 4/23/14 1:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > > >I am currently completeley refactoring the Mavenizer to consist of >independent modules for converting AIR, Flash and Flex separately. I need >this in order to use those modules in the new Flexmojos verify-mojo that >should take care of downloading and mavenizing air and flash artifacts. >This is needed in order for us to be able to officially publish flex in a >public maven repo. > > > >However, in order to use these in Flexmojos I would need them to be >publically available (Even if I should be safe to have them in some >SNAPSHOT version). How in general would the process of releasing these >modules be? (as they are only a part of the utilities sub-project). Are >we able to release parts of this independently from the rest of the >utilities module? Otherwise I would stick to adding a clone of the code >to Flexmojos for now and work with that till we have settled any release >problems. > > > >Chris
Re: Flex unit 4.2.0
Go for it Chris! On 4/23/14 1:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Well having a look at the template it certainly needs adjusting, as the >>scm section references the old flexunig github repo >Yep. I fixed the obvious issues in develop. Probably means that once this >is sorted we need to make a new release of FlexUnit. > >> Thanks for the links ... especially the second I didn't know yet ... >All I know how to do is "mvn compile" and "mvn test" :-) > >> If you are all ok with this I would like to volunteer to handle maven >>deployment tasks as this does fit quite nicely into my area of >>involvement ;-) >I can't see why there would be any objections there, you obviously the >best person for the job. > >Thanks, >Justin
Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit feature. There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have never had time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and really helpful. I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told anyone about it. So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache release. It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give someone guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this task as I don't have enough time to actually write it up. Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to contribute. Thanks, Mike
RE: Flex unit 4.2.0
>> If you are all ok with this I would like to volunteer to handle maven >>deployment tasks as this does fit quite nicely into my area of >>involvement ;-) If I can help with anything let me know, else please do this :)
AW: Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
Yes I am talking about the flex-utilities repo. Well the sdk converter is built by maven and would probably be released using mavens built-in release process. Here the same steps can be done as with Ant ... all the packaging, signing, deploying etc. Think it would also be a good test for a maven based apache release. The thing I was unsure about was that if it is possible to release parts of a repo. Bui I would assume that it is. Chris Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 15:28 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)? Are you talking about the flex-utilities repo? You can definitely release and subset of source code from that repo. All you need is an ant script that does the packaging and building. The Installer is a subset of that repo. -Alex On 4/23/14 1:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > > >I am currently completeley refactoring the Mavenizer to consist of >independent modules for converting AIR, Flash and Flex separately. I need >this in order to use those modules in the new Flexmojos verify-mojo that >should take care of downloading and mavenizing air and flash artifacts. >This is needed in order for us to be able to officially publish flex in a >public maven repo. > > > >However, in order to use these in Flexmojos I would need them to be >publically available (Even if I should be safe to have them in some >SNAPSHOT version). How in general would the process of releasing these >modules be? (as they are only a part of the utilities sub-project). Are >we able to release parts of this independently from the rest of the >utilities module? Otherwise I would stick to adding a clone of the code >to Flexmojos for now and work with that till we have settled any release >problems. > > > >Chris
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc person these days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past five or six years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of course. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit feature. > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have never had > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and really helpful. > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told anyone about it. > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache release. > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give someone > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this task as I > don't have enough time to actually write it up. > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to contribute. > > Thanks, > Mike > > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ http://portfolio.cottage14.com https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At least there you can work together with the people in the know, and have your stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably take the entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the repo... If you agree, Alex has the karma to grant you edit privileges on the wiki. EdB On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc person these > days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past five or six > years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. > > Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of course. > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > > > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit feature. > > > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have never > had > > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and really > helpful. > > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told anyone about > it. > > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache release. > > > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give someone > > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this task as > I > > don't have enough time to actually write it up. > > > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to > contribute. > > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
Sure: that sounds fine. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At least > there you can work together with the people in the know, and have your > stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably take the > entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the repo... > > If you agree, Alex has the karma to grant you edit privileges on the wiki. > > EdB > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Wetmore > wrote: > > > I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc person > these > > days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past five or > six > > years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. > > > > Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of course. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < > > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit > feature. > > > > > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have never > > had > > > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and really > > helpful. > > > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told anyone about > > it. > > > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache release. > > > > > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give someone > > > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this task > as > > I > > > don't have enough time to actually write it up. > > > > > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to > > contribute. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ http://portfolio.cottage14.com https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
If you can create an account for the Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+Wiki Then we can ask Alex to give that account edit privileges. EdB On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > Sure: that sounds fine. > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik de Bruin > wrote: > > > Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At least > > there you can work together with the people in the know, and have your > > stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably take > the > > entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the repo... > > > > If you agree, Alex has the karma to grant you edit privileges on the > wiki. > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Wetmore > > wrote: > > > > > I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc person > > these > > > days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past five or > > six > > > years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. > > > > > > Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of course. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < > > > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit > > feature. > > > > > > > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have > never > > > had > > > > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and really > > > helpful. > > > > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told anyone > about > > > it. > > > > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache > release. > > > > > > > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give > someone > > > > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this task > > as > > > I > > > > don't have enough time to actually write it up. > > > > > > > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to > > > contribute. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: AW: Releasing The SDK-Converter (Mavenizer)?
On 4/23/14 6:44 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Yes I am talking about the flex-utilities repo. > >Well the sdk converter is built by maven and would probably be released >using mavens built-in release process. >Here the same steps can be done as with Ant ... all the packaging, >signing, deploying etc. >Think it would also be a good test for a maven based apache release. I don't have any particular objection to you using Maven instead of Ant. Some folks did object to us using any non-built-in features of Ant like the contrib library. Not sure if you'll get objections to using third-party libraries in Maven and if you'll need to use one to prompt someone for license acceptance. > >The thing I was unsure about was that if it is possible to release parts >of a repo. Bui I would assume that it is. Yes. Have Fun, -Alex
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
My account there is for cottage14 / Andrew Wetmore / and...@cottage14.com On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > If you can create an account for the Wiki: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+Wiki > > Then we can ask Alex to give that account edit privileges. > > EdB > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Andrew Wetmore > wrote: > > > Sure: that sounds fine. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik de Bruin > > wrote: > > > > > Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At > least > > > there you can work together with the people in the know, and have your > > > stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably take > > the > > > entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the repo... > > > > > > If you agree, Alex has the karma to grant you edit privileges on the > > wiki. > > > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Wetmore > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc person > > > these > > > > days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past five > or > > > six > > > > years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. > > > > > > > > Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < > > > > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit > > > feature. > > > > > > > > > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have > > never > > > > had > > > > > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and really > > > > helpful. > > > > > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told anyone > > about > > > > it. > > > > > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache > > release. > > > > > > > > > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give > > someone > > > > > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this > task > > > as > > > > I > > > > > don't have enough time to actually write it up. > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to > > > > contribute. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ http://portfolio.cottage14.com https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
Alex, Can you use your magic to give Andrew some Wiki powers? EdB On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > My account there is for cottage14 / Andrew Wetmore / and...@cottage14.com > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin > wrote: > > > If you can create an account for the Wiki: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+Wiki > > > > Then we can ask Alex to give that account edit privileges. > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Andrew Wetmore > > wrote: > > > > > Sure: that sounds fine. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik de Bruin > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At > > least > > > > there you can work together with the people in the know, and have > your > > > > stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably > take > > > the > > > > entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the repo... > > > > > > > > If you agree, Alex has the karma to grant you edit privileges on the > > > wiki. > > > > > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Wetmore > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc > person > > > > these > > > > > days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past five > > or > > > > six > > > > > years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. > > > > > > > > > > Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of > > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < > > > > > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit > > > > feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have > > > never > > > > > had > > > > > > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and really > > > > > helpful. > > > > > > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told anyone > > > about > > > > > it. > > > > > > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give > > > someone > > > > > > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this > > task > > > > as > > > > > I > > > > > > don't have enough time to actually write it up. > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to > > > > > contribute. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > > > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
Once we have it in the Wiki, it would be great if somebody added a page into the tutorial on the website as well. -Nick On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Alex, > > Can you use your magic to give Andrew some Wiki powers? > > EdB > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Andrew Wetmore > wrote: > > > My account there is for cottage14 / Andrew Wetmore / > and...@cottage14.com > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin > > wrote: > > > > > If you can create an account for the Wiki: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+Wiki > > > > > > Then we can ask Alex to give that account edit privileges. > > > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Andrew Wetmore > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Sure: that sounds fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik de Bruin > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At > > > least > > > > > there you can work together with the people in the know, and have > > your > > > > > stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably > > take > > > > the > > > > > entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the > repo... > > > > > > > > > > If you agree, Alex has the karma to grant you edit privileges on > the > > > > wiki. > > > > > > > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Wetmore < > cottag...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc > > person > > > > > these > > > > > > days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past > five > > > or > > > > > six > > > > > > years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. > > > > > > > > > > > > Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of > > > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < > > > > > > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit > > > > > feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I > have > > > > never > > > > > > had > > > > > > > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and > really > > > > > > helpful. > > > > > > > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told > anyone > > > > about > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give > > > > someone > > > > > > > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring > this > > > task > > > > > as > > > > > > I > > > > > > > don't have enough time to actually write it up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to > > > > > > contribute. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > > > > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > > > > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > > > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > > > > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > > > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
RE: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
>I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc person these >days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past five or >six >years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. Awesome, Amy Blankenship started on some of this a while back. If she is on this list she might have some to contribute as well. In the meantime, here are the tests that go along with the feature: https://github.com/apache/flex-flexunit/tree/master/FlexUnit4Test/src/org/flexunit/events/rule/cases To give some context, the EventRule is supposed to be a really, really easy way to handle testing of things that use Events as their primary communication mechanism. It supposed to be an easier version of something like this (which was for FlexUnit .9): http://blogs.adobe.com/tomsugden/2008/01/post.html In General, Rules are a way to add extensibility to the flexunit framework. So the EventRule is basically an extensibility package for testing events. The important starting point of all of these tests is: [Rule] public var expectEvent:EventRule = new EventRule(); Take a look at those to start. Feel free to ask tons of questions. I am happy to answer. This may all seem a bit obtuse at first but this is one of those gems no one knows about. Thanks, Mike
AW: Flex unit 4.2.0
By the way ... It's not actually trivial to find where to get the Apache FlexUnit sources from. Perhaps it would be a good idea to add that to the http://flex.apache.org/dev-sourcecode.html page Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 15:39 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: RE: Flex unit 4.2.0 >> If you are all ok with this I would like to volunteer to handle maven >>deployment tasks as this does fit quite nicely into my area of >>involvement ;-) If I can help with anything let me know, else please do this :)
Re: AW: Flex unit 4.2.0
It's been added, but CMS is broken so we haven't been able to update the site. On 4/23/14 8:58 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >By the way ... It's not actually trivial to find where to get the Apache >FlexUnit sources from. >Perhaps it would be a good idea to add that to the >http://flex.apache.org/dev-sourcecode.html page > >Chris > > > >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 15:39 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: RE: Flex unit 4.2.0 > >>> If you are all ok with this I would like to volunteer to handle maven >>>deployment tasks as this does fit quite nicely into my area of >>>involvement ;-) > >If I can help with anything let me know, else please do this :)
Ready to publish Flex Site?
Nick (and others) I'm ready to push the Apache Flex site. It looked like you were still fiddling with some stuff. Are you ready? -Alex
Re: Spare Cycles to Document FlexUnit Feature
OK, Andrew should have wiki write access now. On 4/23/14 8:23 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" wrote: >My account there is for cottage14 / Andrew Wetmore / and...@cottage14.com > > >On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin >wrote: > >> If you can create an account for the Wiki: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+Wiki >> >> Then we can ask Alex to give that account edit privileges. >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Andrew Wetmore >> wrote: >> >> > Sure: that sounds fine. >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik de Bruin >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At >> least >> > > there you can work together with the people in the know, and have >>your >> > > stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably >>take >> > the >> > > entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the repo... >> > > >> > > If you agree, Alex has the karma to grant you edit privileges on the >> > wiki. >> > > >> > > EdB >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Wetmore >> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I have been looking for a way to contribute. I am mainly a doc >>person >> > > these >> > > > days, although I have built a bunch of Flex apps over the past >>five >> or >> > > six >> > > > years. I would be happy to take on documenting the EventRule. >> > > > >> > > > Would need to know how or where to contribute what I write, of >> course. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Michael A. Labriola < >> > > > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Anyone have spare cycles they could use the document a FlexUnit >> > > feature. >> > > > > >> > > > > There is a feature of FlexUnit called the EventRule which I have >> > never >> > > > had >> > > > > time to document. It's actually extraordinarily useful and >>really >> > > > helpful. >> > > > > I slipped it into an older FlexUnit release but never told >>anyone >> > about >> > > > it. >> > > > > So, it could be the first feature we publicize from the Apache >> > release. >> > > > > >> > > > > It has unit tests to look at and I am more than willing to give >> > someone >> > > > > guidance and input, but I find myself continually deferring this >> task >> > > as >> > > > I >> > > > > don't have enough time to actually write it up. >> > > > > >> > > > > Let me know if anyone is willing. This would be a great way to >> > > > contribute. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Mike >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Andrew Wetmore >> > > > >> > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >> > > > http://portfolio.cottage14.com >> > > > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Ix Multimedia Software >> > > >> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> > > 3521 VB Utrecht >> > > >> > > T. 06-51952295 >> > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Andrew Wetmore >> > >> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >> > http://portfolio.cottage14.com >> > https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > > > >-- >Andrew Wetmore > >http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >http://portfolio.cottage14.com >https://sites.google.com/site/mvplaywrights/home
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Hi Erik, Swcs: the FlexJS SDK contains several swcs. For the test project I use the following swcs: playerglobal.swc Halo.swc FlexJSJX.swc FlexJSUI.swc MXMLCClasses.swc Do you think this could be the default set for any FlexJS project. At FDT we plan to add a new project type for FlexJS projects. Any project type contains a default set of swcs. Debugging: This problem occured during debugging of the SWF generated with FlexJS: The UI radio buttons () are not clickable. They ignore any mouse interaction. Is there something missing in the DataBindingTest example? Regards, Stephanie Swiderski -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-RC1-tp36757p37166.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 RC1
Hi Steffi, On 4/23/14 6:42 AM, "Steffi" wrote: >Hi Erik, > > >Swcs: >the FlexJS SDK contains several swcs. For the test project I use the >following swcs: > > playerglobal.swc > Halo.swc > FlexJSJX.swc > FlexJSUI.swc > MXMLCClasses.swc > Halo.swc should not be use by FlexJS applications, but may be needed to keep the compiler from complaining. If you can build without it, then it is best to leave it out. >Do you think this could be the default set for any FlexJS project. >At FDT we plan to add a new project type for FlexJS projects. >Any project type contains a default set of swcs. That sounds great to me. > >Debugging: >This problem occured during debugging of the SWF generated with FlexJS: >The UI radio buttons () are not clickable. >They ignore any mouse interaction. >Is there something missing in the DataBindingTest example? There is a bug in radio button/checkbox that clicking on the actual graphic does not work, but clicking on its label should work. Let us know if clicking on the label does not work. Thanks, -Alex
Re: Ready to publish Flex Site?
Please do push. I'm on IRC with infra and they can manually tickle buildbot to push stuff to both staging and production. It's not automatic yet. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Nick (and others) > > I'm ready to push the Apache Flex site. It looked like you were still > fiddling with some stuff. Are you ready? > > -Alex > >
Re: Ready to publish Flex Site?
The publish button seemed to work. FlexUnit is top news on the home page. FlexJS is on the list of downloads. I will send the announcement email to the users and dev lists. Blogs.a.o is still down so when it comes up we can draft and post a blog announcement and add it to latest news. -Alex On 4/23/14 10:10 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >Please do push. I'm on IRC with infra and they can manually tickle >buildbot to push stuff to both staging and production. It's not automatic >yet. > > >On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> Nick (and others) >> >> I'm ready to push the Apache Flex site. It looked like you were still >> fiddling with some stuff. Are you ready? >> >> -Alex >> >>
[ANNOUNCE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 Released
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the initial (alpha) release of Apache FlexJS SDK 0.0.1 and Apache Flex FalconJX Compiler 0.0.1. Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently on all major browsers, desktops and devices (including smartphones, tablets and tv). Apache FlexJS is a next-generation Flex SDK that enables developers to use MXML and ActionScript to not only create SWFs but also cross-compile the same MXML and ActionScript to HTML/JS/CSS so applications can run natively in browsers. The cross-compiled code can also be used in Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap) mobile applications. Apache Flex FalconJX is a next-generation MXML and ActionScript cross-compiler. It extends the next-generation SWF compiler known as Falcon. Both are contained in the release package and are used by the FlexJS package to compile SWFs or cross-compile to HTML/JS/CSS. This is the initial release of FlexJS and FalconJX. It is 'alpha' quality. The purpose of this release is to gather feedback about the features and implementation strategies, and recruit new contributors as we grow these code bases into an SDK and tool chain that delivers the highest productivity developing applications that can run in the most places. These releases may not handle production needs. Expect lots of bugs and missing features. Please file bugs at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX/ For questions about how to use FlexJS and FalconJX, send email to us...@flex.apache.org. Please try to prefix the subject with [FlexJS] or [FalconJX] so it is clear the questions refer to this release and not the Flex SDK and MXMLC compiler. For questions and feedback on the development of the source code in these release, send email to dev@flex.apache.org. Again, please prefix the subject with [FlexJS] or [FalconJX]. Apache FlexJS and Apache Flex FalconJX are available in source and binary form from the following download page: http://flex.apache.org/download-flexjs.html When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes. A simple way to try these releases is to use a pre-release of the InstallApacheFlex 3.0 application which is available at the following url: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc7/binaries/ Choose Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 and it will create an Adobe Flash Builder-compatible SDK that uses the Falcon and FalconJX compilers to generate SWFs and HTML/JS/CSS output. See the README or the FlexJS wiki for more information. The FlexJS section of the wiki is at the following url: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS For more information on Apache Flex, visit the project home page: http://flex.apache.org Please try FlexJS and become involved in shaping the future of Flex. The Apache Flex Community
Re: Ready to publish Flex Site?
They were just working on blogs. ETA is late evening/tomorrow. Won't be much longer, hopefully. -Nick On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > The publish button seemed to work. > > FlexUnit is top news on the home page. > FlexJS is on the list of downloads. > > I will send the announcement email to the users and dev lists. Blogs.a.o > is still down so when it comes up we can draft and post a blog > announcement and add it to latest news. > > -Alex > > On 4/23/14 10:10 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > >Please do push. I'm on IRC with infra and they can manually tickle > >buildbot to push stuff to both staging and production. It's not automatic > >yet. > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > >> Nick (and others) > >> > >> I'm ready to push the Apache Flex site. It looked like you were still > >> fiddling with some stuff. Are you ready? > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> > >
New installer errors
Hi, Over the last few days and not looking good. Anyone have any idea to what the issue(s) may be and why we getting so many installs failing? There seems to be more issues on windows (permissions, https issue?) or perhaps we just have a few bad mirrors out there (anyway to check this?) or perhaps it reporting failures when it actually works? Flex 4.12 windows 9 success (5 people) 13 failures (5 people) Flex 4.12 osx 1 success 1 failure Flex 4.11 windows 1 failure Flex SDK Nightly windows 4 failures (3 people) Flex JS windows 2 success 2 failures Flex JS mac 3 success 1 failure Have a mail log to dev list button on the log window would be a useful thing I think. Thanks, Justin
RE: Question about mobile StageText pool
I have just committed a fix for this issue, based on the "alternative option": - removed both StageText => ScrollableStageText and ScrollableStageText => StageText maps from StageTextPool - SST maintains a reference to its latest StageText , so the maps are not needed anymore - added some sanity checks so that savedStageText cannot be used if it has been disposed by the cyclical purge, or reused by another TextInput. I did two tests with both persistent TI container (same instance added/removed), and non-persistent. In both cases, GC is done properly (in the profiler) CheckinTests and Mustella Mobile/TextInput test pass. So it's looking good to me. Can someone please review the changes, in case I missed something: Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/diff/36cece0d Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : mercredi 23 avril 2014 02:12 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Question about mobile StageText pool > I'm surprised that each skin instance doesn't have its own > ScrollableStageText. I would think only the StageText instances are pooled. Actually, this is the case: only StageText are cached. SST acts as a *key* in the reverse dictionary (SST => ST). Stage text is released (and put into the cache) when SST is removed from the stage. If the same SST is added back to the stage, and it's ST is still in the cache, then it gets the same ST instance. That's why a map SST to ST is needed. > I think you also have the option of making the back referencing pool a weak > reference dictionary. It's already using weak keys: private var map_StyleableStageText_to_StageText:Dictionary = new Dictionary(true); private var map_StageText_to_StyleableStageText:Dictionary = new Dictionary(true); It's worse than what I thought: I replaced all the event listeners to use weak references, still does not work. This is because each SST instance that is used as a key in the pool reverse map is still referencing: - TextInputSkin (in styleName, parent, owner, automationParent, automationOwner) - TitleWindowSkin (in document, parentDocument)... - probably other referenced I didn't see ... So it's locking them (TextInputSkin and TitleWindowSkin) in memory. I tried nulling the references when the SST is removed from stage, does not work. I also tried to disable the pool, => the instances are correctly released, so at least we know where the problem is, but this is not an option. I thought about another possibility would be to use the SST itself as a map, instead of a static map (SST => ST) . This could be done as follows: - each SST will have a "savedStageText" variable, which contains the last StageText instance, when the SST is not on the stage - whenever the SST is put back to stage, if it has a 'savedStageText', it will be used instead of allocating a new SST. - new SST will get a StageText from the pool of unused stage texts (as currently) - we also need a mechanism to avoid having too many savedStageText instances (which would overflow the OS memory). Maybe something like a counter I will sleep on it ... Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 19:58 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageText pool I think I understand your description, but I'm surprised that each skin instance doesn't have its own ScrollableStageText. I would think only the StageText instances are pooled. It seems ok to use removeFromStage to cut any references between the StageText and the ScrollableStageText since a Skin not on the display list has no need for a StageText. I think you also have the option of making the back referencing pool a weak reference dictionary. -Alex On 4/22/14 10:31 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >>When I look at SkinnableTextBase.partAdded it looks like it is adding >>a listener to the 'textDisplay'. I assume that 'textDisplay' isn't a >>StageText in a pool. If that's true, >the SkinnableTextBase.as is >>correct. > >I would expect that 'textDisplay' is a StageTextInputSkin and >internally it should be adding weak reference listeners to the actual >StageText's in the pool. Or are those >bad assumptions? > >It's a little trickier than that, because StageText itself is wrapped >in a ScrollableStageText (or StyleableStageText depending on the skin) > >So SkinnableTextBase.textDisplay is the ScrollableStageText which is a >(pooled) wrapper around StageText. > >And the pool has two static dictionaries ( SST => ST and ST => SST). > >So seeting the listeners on the SST locks the TI, because the SST are >also referenced in the pool dictionary. > >Makes sense to you? > >Maurice > >-Message d'origine- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 >19:20 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Question about mobile >StageText pool > > > >On 4/22/14 10:07 AM, "Maurice Amse
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 Released
Hi Alex, I've spread the word to my social network in China, any web traffics to http://flex.apache.org/download-flexjs.html that comes from China, should prove how many Chinese developers are interested. Also hoping the Flex SDK Installer 3.0 would release soon. DarkStone 214-04-24 -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-FlexJS-0-0-1-and-Apache-Flex-FalconJX-0-0-1-Released-tp37184p37188.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.1 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 Released
Excellent! Thanks! On 4/23/14 5:47 PM, "DarkStone" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I've spread the word to my social network in China, any web traffics to >http://flex.apache.org/download-flexjs.html that comes from China, should >prove how many Chinese developers are interested. > >Also hoping the Flex SDK Installer 3.0 would release soon. > > >DarkStone >214-04-24 > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-FlexJ >S-0-0-1-and-Apache-Flex-FalconJX-0-0-1-Released-tp37184p37188.html >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: New installer errors
I'm going to try to ask in a different way. Watch for a new thread. On 4/23/14 4:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Over the last few days and not looking good. Anyone have any idea to what >the issue(s) may be and why we getting so many installs failing? > >There seems to be more issues on windows (permissions, https issue?) or >perhaps we just have a few bad mirrors out there (anyway to check this?) >or perhaps it reporting failures when it actually works? > >Flex 4.12 windows 9 success (5 people) 13 failures (5 people) >Flex 4.12 osx 1 success 1 failure >Flex 4.11 windows 1 failure >Flex SDK Nightly windows 4 failures (3 people) >Flex JS windows 2 success 2 failures >Flex JS mac 3 success 1 failure > >Have a mail log to dev list button on the log window would be a useful >thing I think. > >Thanks, >Justin
Have you used InstallApacheFlex 3.0 in the last two days?
Hi, Our usage tracking is showing that folks using the Apache Flex Installer 3.0 are reporting lots of failed or aborted installs on Windows. If you've installed an Apache Flex SDK over the last two days or so and didn't complete the install, can you tell us why? Thanks, -Alex
Re: Have you used InstallApacheFlex 3.0 in the last two days?
HI, Perhaps CC to users as well? (However with the number of installs I'd guess less than 10% of people are signed up to either list.) Justin
