[dpdk-dev] Would DPDK run on AMD processors

2014-06-01 Thread Daniel Kaminsky
Hi Parshant,

I ran DPDK on a system with AMD processor without any problem or any
modification.

Daniel


On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Prashant Upadhyaya 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Has anybody attempted to run DPDK on AMD processors.
> Does it run straightforward or would there be some obvious issues where
> porting would be needed, I welcome any comments.
>
> Regards
> -Prashant
>


[dpdk-dev] L2 FWD / L3 FWD performance with Rx and Tx ports on different sockets

2014-06-01 Thread Venkat Thummala
Hi,

I guess, the current L2 FWD / L3 FWD performance numbers are observed with
both Rx and Tx ports connected to the same Socket.

Does anyone have the performance numbers with Rx and Tx ports on two
different sockets?

How does DDIO come in to picture in this case?
I believe DDIO comes in to picture only on the local socket.
What will happen on the remote socket in this case?

Regards
Venkat


[dpdk-dev] IMPORTANT: feature freeze for version 1.7.0

2014-06-01 Thread Ouyang, Changchun
Hi Thomas,
For the item "the link up/down",
Its subject is changed from "Support administrative link up and link down"
into "Support setting link up and link down" according to Ivan's comments.

And the v2 patch for it is also be acked by Ivan, please see the attachment.

Wish you have a happy vacation! :-)

Thanks very much and best regards,
Changchun


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:12 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] IMPORTANT: feature freeze for version 1.7.0

Hello all,

We have a lot of new features mostly ready for DPDK 1.7.0.
It's now time to be sure that they are well reviewed and integrated.
Then release candidate should be tagged in mid-June in order to have some 
validation tests before end of June (planned released date).

So requests for integration of features which have not yet been sent will be 
delayed to next version. Only reworks or small fixes of pending patches should 
be accepted.

A new branch "rebased-next" will be created for patches which are reviewed and 
waiting next version. This branch will be regularly rebased on master HEAD.

Being currently on vacation, I won't be very active until Monday, 9th.
During this time, I'd like to see some reviews/acknowledgements for these
patches:
- socket id detection fallback
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-April/001987.html
- fix rte_free run time in O(n) free blocks
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002296.html
- fix mbuf corruption in pcap_tx
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002919.html
- igb_uio fixes
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002428.html
- vfio
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002914.html
- ethernet enhancements
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002436.html
- splitted statistics
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002707.html
- mtu/flow control
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002752.html
- link up/down
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002660.html
- Tx rate limitation
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002696.html
- lpm optimization
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002703.html
- generic filter
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002740.html
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002577.html
- ip_frag
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002930.html
- distributor
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002598.html
- link bonding
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002922.html
- acl
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002945.html
- packet framework
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002820.html

Thanks for your participation
--
Thomas