Re: Bugs to close
Hi, Thank you David for triaging them. Kudos. Best Piotr On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 21:10, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > What is the “Apache way” concerning closing out old issues? > > DataFusion has a surprisingly large number of open issues. Of the 243 > open issues labelled as a bug, here are 12 that should be closed. > > I think we are just waiting for someone to help curate / review them. As > you know it takes time to review and verify and given that we are all > working together any help in this area is most appreciated > > I'll look at the ones you flag now > > > I’m used to seeing more aggressive closing of old bug records, when > there’s no reproducer or when there are existing comments stating things > are fixed now. > > I agree it would be great to be more aggressive. If you see any that should > be closed, feel free to mention the other active maintainers (you can check > who has been merging PRs recently, for example) or send another note here. > > > And FWIW, I’m not a fan of auto-closing old bugs just because they’re > old. Better to consciously curate the bug list on occasion, I think. > > Also 100% agree > > Thank you, > Andrew > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 4:05 PM David Rauschenbach wrote: > > > What is the “Apache way” concerning closing out old issues? DataFusion > has > > a surprisingly large number of open issues. Of the 243 open issues > labelled > > as a bug, here are 12 that should be closed. I’m used to seeing more > > aggressive closing of old bug records, when there’s no reproducer or when > > there are existing comments stating things are fixed now. > > > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1558 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/494 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/604 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1271 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1233 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1577 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1952 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2147 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3285 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3778 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/4408 > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/4947 > > > > And FWIW, I’m not a fan of auto-closing old bugs just because they’re > old. > > Better to consciously curate the bug list on occasion, I think. > > > > David >
Bugs to close
What is the “Apache way” concerning closing out old issues? DataFusion has a surprisingly large number of open issues. Of the 243 open issues labelled as a bug, here are 12 that should be closed. I’m used to seeing more aggressive closing of old bug records, when there’s no reproducer or when there are existing comments stating things are fixed now. https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1558 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/494 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/604 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1271 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1233 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1577 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1952 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2147 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3285 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3778 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/4408 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/4947 And FWIW, I’m not a fan of auto-closing old bugs just because they’re old. Better to consciously curate the bug list on occasion, I think. David
Re: Bugs to close
> What is the “Apache way” concerning closing out old issues? > DataFusion has a surprisingly large number of open issues. Of the 243 open issues labelled as a bug, here are 12 that should be closed. I think we are just waiting for someone to help curate / review them. As you know it takes time to review and verify and given that we are all working together any help in this area is most appreciated I'll look at the ones you flag now > I’m used to seeing more aggressive closing of old bug records, when there’s no reproducer or when there are existing comments stating things are fixed now. I agree it would be great to be more aggressive. If you see any that should be closed, feel free to mention the other active maintainers (you can check who has been merging PRs recently, for example) or send another note here. > And FWIW, I’m not a fan of auto-closing old bugs just because they’re old. Better to consciously curate the bug list on occasion, I think. Also 100% agree Thank you, Andrew On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 4:05 PM David Rauschenbach wrote: > What is the “Apache way” concerning closing out old issues? DataFusion has > a surprisingly large number of open issues. Of the 243 open issues labelled > as a bug, here are 12 that should be closed. I’m used to seeing more > aggressive closing of old bug records, when there’s no reproducer or when > there are existing comments stating things are fixed now. > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1558 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/494 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/604 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1271 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1233 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1577 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1952 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/2147 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3285 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3778 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/4408 > https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/4947 > > And FWIW, I’m not a fan of auto-closing old bugs just because they’re old. > Better to consciously curate the bug list on occasion, I think. > > David
