[GitHub] [cxf] reta opened a new pull request, #1040: Fix org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.RequestResponseTest test cases which fail with 'Can't receive the Conduit Message in 10 seconds'

[GitBox]

reta opened a new pull request, #1040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1040

   Fix `org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.RequestResponseTest` test cases which fail 
with `Can't receive the Conduit Message in 10 seconds`


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1040: Fix org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.RequestResponseTest test cases which fail with 'Can't receive the Conduit Message in 10 seconds'

[GitBox]

reta commented on code in PR #1040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1040#discussion_r1045304456


##
rt/transports/jms/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/jms/AbstractJMSTester.java:
##
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ public static void startServices() throws Exception {
 addressSettings.setAutoCreateQueues(true);
 addressSettings.setAutoDeleteQueues(false);
 addressSettings.setAutoDeleteAddresses(false);
-config.setAddressesSettings(Collections.singletonMap("#", new 
AddressSettings()));
+config.setAddressSettings(Collections.singletonMap("#", new 
AddressSettings()));

Review Comment:
   Not related (replaced deprecated API usage)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

[Jim Ma]

Did we already start the 4.0 release work ?
I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now :
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build result
was 7 days ago.




On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko  wrote:

> Hi Colm,
>
> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look,
> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3],
> may need a bump to next version. Thank you.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
>
> Best Regards,
> Andriy Redko
>
> COh> Hi Andriy,
>
> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or
> COh> else bumped to the next release?
>
> COh> Colm.
>
> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them
> >> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations
> fixes work.
> >> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate the
> >> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks!
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796
> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Andriy Redko
> >>
> >> > I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next
> >> > releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned?
> >>
> >> > Colm.
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >> >  wrote:
> >> >> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko  on two
> >> >> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to go.
> >> >> Colm.
> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma 
> wrote:
> >> >>> Thanks Andriy and Dan !
> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko 
> wrote:
> >>  Works for me, thanks a lot Dan!
> >>
> >>  Best Regards,
> >>  Andriy Redko
> >>  On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp 
> wrote:
> >> >> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward!
> @Colm @Dan
> >>
> >> > do
> >> >> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as
> well? With
> >> >> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully),
> the 3.4.x
> >> > is
> >> >> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release.
> >> > I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime
> before the
> >> > end of the year.  Thus, we could do a full set of releases.   I
> have a
> >> > bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work
> for
> >> > everyone?  That would give a week to get any final updates in.
> >> > Dan
> >> >> Thank you guys!
> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >>Andriy Redko
> >> >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma 
> wrote:
> >> >>> Hi Andriy,
> >> >>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing
> left we
> >> > need
> >> >>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ?
> >>
> >> >>> @Daniel Kulp  Can you please help do the
> release
> >>  when
> >> >>> it's convenient for you?
> >>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> Jim
> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net
> >> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>  +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release.
> >>
> >>  Regards
> >>  JB
> >>  On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma 
> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> > After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all
> issues
> >>  for
> >> > Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed:
> >> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ and
> we can
> >> > say
> >>  that
> >> > CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support
> Jakarta
> >>
> >>  EE9.1).
> >> > To get cxf jakarta artifacts/binary available for the CXF
> community
> >> > especially the user who asked for this jakarta artifacts like
> [1]
> >>  and
> >>  get
> >> > more feedback from our community, do you think it's time to
> release
> >> > the
> >>  CXF
> >> > 4.0.0 and what else do you think we should have in this new
> jakarta
> >>
> >>  release
> >> > ?
> >> > [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kwfg2s5gj72tkgn5c5vdcsvtgdkdm6dl
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jim
> >> > --
> >> > Daniel Kulp
> >> > dk...@apache.org 
> >> > Talend - https://talend.com 
> >>
>
>

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

[Andriy Redko]

Hi Jim,

I disabled this build (and https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ 
as well)
because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were quite 
useful when
the main branch was unstable,  but the pipeline should be sufficient now. 
Please let me 
know if you have any concerns, thank you.

[1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/

Best Regards,
Andriy Redko

JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ?
JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now :
JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build result
JM> was 7 days ago.




JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko  wrote:

>> Hi Colm,
>>
>> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look,
>> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3],
>> may need a bump to next version. Thank you.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Andriy Redko
>>
>> COh> Hi Andriy,
>>
>> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or
>> COh> else bumped to the next release?
>>
>> COh> Colm.
>>
>> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey guys,
>> >>
>> >> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them
>> >> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations
>> fixes work.
>> >> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate the
>> >> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
>> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796
>> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Andriy Redko
>> >>
>> >> > I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next
>> >> > releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned?
>> >>
>> >> > Colm.
>> >>
>> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
>> >> >  wrote:
>> >> >> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko  on two
>> >> >> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to go.
>> >> >> Colm.
>> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma 
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> Thanks Andriy and Dan !
>> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko 
>> wrote:
>> >>  Works for me, thanks a lot Dan!
>> >>
>> >>  Best Regards,
>> >>  Andriy Redko
>> >>  On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp 
>> wrote:
>> >> >> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward!
>> @Colm @Dan
>> >>
>> >> > do
>> >> >> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as
>> well? With
>> >> >> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully),
>> the 3.4.x
>> >> > is
>> >> >> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release.
>> >> > I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime
>> before the
>> >> > end of the year.  Thus, we could do a full set of releases.   I
>> have a
>> >> > bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work
>> for
>> >> > everyone?  That would give a week to get any final updates in.
>> >> > Dan
>> >> >> Thank you guys!
>> >> >> Best Regards,
>> >> >>Andriy Redko
>> >> >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma 
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> Hi Andriy,
>> >> >>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing
>> left we
>> >> > need
>> >> >>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ?
>> >>
>> >> >>> @Daniel Kulp  Can you please help do the
>> release
>> >>  when
>> >> >>> it's convenient for you?
>> >>
>> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >> >>> Jim
>> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> j...@nanthrax.net
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>  +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release.
>> >>
>> >>  Regards
>> >>  JB
>> >>  On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma 
>> wrote:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> > After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all
>> issues
>> >>  for
>> >> > Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed:
>> >> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/ and
>> we can
>> >> > say
>> >>  that
>> >> > CXF successfully migrated to Jakarta namespace(and support
>> Jakarta
>> >>
>> >>  EE9.1).
>> >> > To get cxf jakarta artifacts/binary available for the CXF
>> community
>> >> > especially the user who asked for this jakarta artifacts like
>> [1]
>> >>  and
>> >>  get
>> >> > more feedback from our community, do you think it's time to
>> release
>> >> > the
>> >>  CXF
>> >> > 4.0.0 and what else do you think we should have in this new
>> jakarta
>> >>
>> >>  

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

[Jim Ma]

Hi Andriy,
Thanks for the quick update. Good to see this is running with the jenkins
pipeline and all tests are green.
Did it include all things for the CXF 4.0.0 release ?

Thanks,
Jim





On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:06 AM Andriy Redko  wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> I disabled this build (and
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well)
> because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were
> quite useful when
> the main branch was unstable,  but the pipeline should be sufficient now.
> Please let me
> know if you have any concerns, thank you.
>
> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/
>
> Best Regards,
> Andriy Redko
>
> JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ?
> JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now :
> JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build
> result
> JM> was 7 days ago.
>
>
>
>
> JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko  wrote:
>
> >> Hi Colm,
> >>
> >> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look,
> >> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3],
> >> may need a bump to next version. Thank you.
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Andriy Redko
> >>
> >> COh> Hi Andriy,
> >>
> >> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or
> >> COh> else bumped to the next release?
> >>
> >> COh> Colm.
> >>
> >> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko 
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them
> >> >> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations
> >> fixes work.
> >> >> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate
> the
> >> >> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
> >> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
> >> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796
> >> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
> >> >>
> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> Andriy Redko
> >> >>
> >> >> > I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next
> >> >> > releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned?
> >> >>
> >> >> > Colm.
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >> >> >  wrote:
> >> >> >> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko  on
> two
> >> >> >> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to
> go.
> >> >> >> Colm.
> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma 
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> Thanks Andriy and Dan !
> >> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko 
> >> wrote:
> >> >>  Works for me, thanks a lot Dan!
> >> >>
> >> >>  Best Regards,
> >> >>  Andriy Redko
> >> >>  On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp 
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward!
> >> @Colm @Dan
> >> >>
> >> >> > do
> >> >> >> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as
> >> well? With
> >> >> >> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully),
> >> the 3.4.x
> >> >> > is
> >> >> >> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release.
> >> >> > I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime
> >> before the
> >> >> > end of the year.  Thus, we could do a full set of releases.   I
> >> have a
> >> >> > bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work
> >> for
> >> >> > everyone?  That would give a week to get any final updates in.
> >> >> > Dan
> >> >> >> Thank you guys!
> >> >> >> Best Regards,
> >> >> >>Andriy Redko
> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma 
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> Hi Andriy,
> >> >> >>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing
> >> left we
> >> >> > need
> >> >> >>> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ?
> >> >>
> >> >> >>> @Daniel Kulp  Can you please help do the
> >> release
> >> >>  when
> >> >> >>> it's convenient for you?
> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>> Jim
> >> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> >> j...@nanthrax.net
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>  +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release.
> >> >>
> >> >>  Regards
> >> >>  JB
> >> >>  On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma  >
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> > After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all
> >> issues
> >> >>  for
> >> >> > Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed:
> >> >> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/
> and
> >> we can
> >> >> > say
> >> >>  that
> >> >> > CXF succ

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

[Daniel Kulp]

On Dec 11, 2022, at 9:36 PM, Jim Ma  wrote:
> 
> Hi Andriy,
> Thanks for the quick update. Good to see this is running with the jenkins
> pipeline and all tests are green.
> Did it include all things for the CXF 4.0.0 release ?

I didn’t do the 4.0.0 release as I kind of ran out of time.   My basic tests 
don’t work with java11, but I didn’t really get time to figure out why yet.   
I’m trying to figure out if it’s still actually compatible with java11 or not.  
 If not, we should bump the jdk.version up.   


Dan


> 
> Thanks,
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:06 AM Andriy Redko  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> I disabled this build (and
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well)
>> because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were
>> quite useful when
>> the main branch was unstable,  but the pipeline should be sufficient now.
>> Please let me
>> know if you have any concerns, thank you.
>> 
>> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>>Andriy Redko
>> 
>> JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ?
>> JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now :
>> JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build
>> result
>> JM> was 7 days ago.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko  wrote:
>> 
 Hi Colm,
 
 I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look,
 would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3],
 may need a bump to next version. Thank you.
 
 [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
 [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
 
 Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
 
 COh> Hi Andriy,
 
 COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or
 COh> else bumped to the next release?
 
 COh> Colm.
 
 COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey guys,
>> 
>> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them
>> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations
 fixes work.
>> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate
>> the
>> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks!
>> 
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796
>> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>>Andriy Redko
>> 
>>> I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next
>>> releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned?
>> 
>>> Colm.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
>>>  wrote:
 It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko  on
>> two
 fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to
>> go.
 Colm.
 On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma 
 wrote:
> Thanks Andriy and Dan !
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko 
 wrote:
>> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan!
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>>Andriy Redko
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp 
 wrote:
 I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward!
 @Colm @Dan
>> 
>>> do
 we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as
 well? With
 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully),
 the 3.4.x
>>> is
 approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release.
>>> I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime
 before the
>>> end of the year.  Thus, we could do a full set of releases.   I
 have a
>>> bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work
 for
>>> everyone?  That would give a week to get any final updates in.
>>> Dan
 Thank you guys!
 Best Regards,
   Andriy Redko
 On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma 
 wrote:
> Hi Andriy,
> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing
 left we
>>> need
> to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ?
>> 
> @Daniel Kulp  Can you please help do the
 release
>> when
> it's convenient for you?
>> 
> Thanks,
> Jim
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
 j...@nanthrax.net
> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma >> 
 wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> After 9 

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

[Jim Ma]

Thanks for the update, Dan.  Are these basic tests failed because Spring6
is built with java17 and it isn't compatible with
java11 anymore ?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:01 AM Daniel Kulp  wrote:

>
> On Dec 11, 2022, at 9:36 PM, Jim Ma  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andriy,
> > Thanks for the quick update. Good to see this is running with the jenkins
> > pipeline and all tests are green.
> > Did it include all things for the CXF 4.0.0 release ?
>
> I didn’t do the 4.0.0 release as I kind of ran out of time.   My basic
> tests don’t work with java11, but I didn’t really get time to figure out
> why yet.   I’m trying to figure out if it’s still actually compatible with
> java11 or not.   If not, we should bump the jdk.version up.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:06 AM Andriy Redko  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >> I disabled this build (and
> >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well)
> >> because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were
> >> quite useful when
> >> the main branch was unstable,  but the pipeline should be sufficient
> now.
> >> Please let me
> >> know if you have any concerns, thank you.
> >>
> >> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>Andriy Redko
> >>
> >> JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ?
> >> JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now :
> >> JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build
> >> result
> >> JM> was 7 days ago.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko 
> wrote:
> >>
>  Hi Colm,
> 
>  I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look,
>  would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3],
>  may need a bump to next version. Thank you.
> 
>  [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
>  [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
>  [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
> 
>  Best Regards,
> Andriy Redko
> 
>  COh> Hi Andriy,
> 
>  COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today
> or
>  COh> else bumped to the next release?
> 
>  COh> Colm.
> 
>  COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them
> >> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations
>  fixes work.
> >> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate
> >> the
> >> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks!
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796
> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>Andriy Redko
> >>
> >>> I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next
> >>> releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned?
> >>
> >>> Colm.
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >>>  wrote:
>  It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko  on
> >> two
>  fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to
> >> go.
>  Colm.
>  On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma 
>  wrote:
> > Thanks Andriy and Dan !
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko 
>  wrote:
> >> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan!
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>Andriy Redko
> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp 
>  wrote:
>  I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward!
>  @Colm @Dan
> >>
> >>> do
>  we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as
>  well? With
>  4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully),
>  the 3.4.x
> >>> is
>  approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release.
> >>> I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime
>  before the
> >>> end of the year.  Thus, we could do a full set of releases.   I
>  have a
> >>> bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work
>  for
> >>> everyone?  That would give a week to get any final updates in.
> >>> Dan
>  Thank you guys!
>  Best Regards,
>    Andriy Redko
>  On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma 
>  wrote:
> > Hi Andriy,
> > Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing
>  left we
> >>> need
> > to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ?
> >>
> > @Daniel Kulp  Can you please help do the
>  relea

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

[Andriy Redko]

Hi Dan,

Yes, as Jim mentioned, most of our tests need JDK-17 to run (because of Spring 
6), 
we also need JDK-17 to compile (same reason), but when Spring is not involved 
(it is 
optional by and large), JDK-11 is sufficient. We do have a number of samples 
(bundled
with distribution) that run on JDK-11 with no issues. Please let me know your 
conclusions
and if you need any help or pointers here. Thank you.

Best Regards,
Andriy Redko

DK> On Dec 11, 2022, at 9:36 PM, Jim Ma  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Andriy,
>> Thanks for the quick update. Good to see this is running with the jenkins
>> pipeline and all tests are green.
>> Did it include all things for the CXF 4.0.0 release ?

DK> I didn’t do the 4.0.0 release as I kind of ran out of time.   My basic 
tests don’t work with java11, but I didn’t really get time to figure out why 
yet.   I’m trying to figure out if it’s still actually compatible with java11 
or not.   If not, we should bump the jdk.version up.   


DK> Dan


>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:06 AM Andriy Redko  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> I disabled this build (and
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK19/ as well)
>>> because we run pipeline matrix [1] against both JDKs. These builds were
>>> quite useful when
>>> the main branch was unstable,  but the pipeline should be sufficient now.
>>> Please let me
>>> know if you have any concerns, thank you.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/main/
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>>Andriy Redko
>>> 
>>> JM> Did we already start the 4.0 release work ?
>>> JM> I saw the CI build for CXF 4.0.0 is disabled now :
>>> JM> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/ and last build
>>> result
>>> JM> was 7 days ago.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> JM> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:46 PM Andriy Redko  wrote:
>>> 
> Hi Colm,
> 
> I still wait for review on [1], if you or/and Dan could take a look,
> would be great. The [2] could go in today but no user response on [3],
> may need a bump to next version. Thank you.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
> 
> Best Regards,
>Andriy Redko
> 
> COh> Hi Andriy,
> 
> COh> What's the status of these open issues? Can they be merged today or
> COh> else bumped to the next release?
> 
> COh> Colm.
> 
> COh> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andriy Redko 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey guys,
>>> 
>>> I have only these 3 issues to wrap up [1], [2], [3], for all of them
>>> pull requests are opened, waiting for minor changes / confirmations
> fixes work.
>>> @Dan @Colm appreciate your input on [4] please, this is to eliminate
>>> the
>>> leak of the REMOVED_MARKER. Thanks!
>>> 
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8798
>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8799
>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8796
>>> [4] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1033
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>>Andriy Redko
>>> 
 I'm done now in terms of any remaining fixes for the next
 releases...not sure if @Andriy Redko has anything else planned?
>>> 
 Colm.
>>> 
 On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
  wrote:
> It works for me as well. I'm coordinating with @Andriy Redko  on
>>> two
> fixes that remain for 3.5.x/3.4.x and then we should be good to
>>> go.
> Colm.
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:10 AM Jim Ma 
> wrote:
>> Thanks Andriy and Dan !
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM Andrey Redko 
> wrote:
>>> Works for me, thanks a lot Dan!
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>>Andriy Redko
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp 
> wrote:
> I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward!
> @Colm @Dan
>>> 
 do
> we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as
> well? With
> 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully),
> the 3.4.x
 is
> approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release.
 I was definitely planning on doing 3.4/3.5 releases sometime
> before the
 end of the year.  Thus, we could do a full set of releases.   I
> have a
 bunch of things happening this week, but would next Monday work
> for
 everyone?  That would give a week to get any final updates in.
 Dan
> Thank you guys!
> Best Regards,
>   Andriy Redko
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 10:27 PM Jim Ma 
> wrote:
>> Hi Andriy,
>> Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing
> left we
>