Re: [VOTE] Cyrille Le Clerc for committer....
+1, -- Ulhas Bhole Daniel Kulp wrote: Cyrille has submitted several patches to various management and logging related things for CXF starting way back in February. I think he's up to 7 or 8 submitted patches.He's also been hanging around the user list for almost a year answering some questions.Thus, I think he's a bit over due to become a committer. Here is my +1. Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Re: Migrating CXF-DOSGi to be complaint with the new OSGi Remote Service Admin spec
> Hope everyone is ok with this. Go for it! And welcome to the project, Marc. Cheers, Eoghan
Re: [VOTE] Cyrille Le Clerc for committer....
+1 On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Ulhas Bhole wrote: > +1, > > -- Ulhas Bhole > > Daniel Kulp wrote: >> Cyrille has submitted several patches to various management and logging >> related things for CXF starting way back in February. I think he's up to 7 >> or 8 submitted patches.He's also been hanging around the user list for >> almost a year answering some questions.Thus, I think he's a bit over due >> to become a committer. >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >>
Re: move up to springframework 2.5.6?
Actually, it looks like the stack trace thing is fixed with ActiveMQ 5.3. Basically, at shutdown time, ActiveMQ was SOMETIMES throwing some sort of exception that spring was catching and calling printStackTrace on.With updating to 5.3, it looks like things are shutting down cleanly and not stack trace. Thus, I've updated the poms for 2.3 and 2.2.6 to grab Spring 2.5.6. Dan On Sat December 5 2009 5:52:03 am Alexandros Karypidis wrote: > Sorry to bring this up again, but apparently "camel-cxf" version 2.1.0 > has started pulling in spring 2.5.6 modules (including spring-jms). A > lot of people are using Camel + CXF so I was wondering whether: > > 1) They should stick to older Camel versions > 2) They can use Camel 2.1.0 as long as they override spring dependencies > in their POMs to use 2.5.5 > 3) The "bug" can be fixed / worked around? > > By the way, regarding (3), can someone provide more information on what > the issue is? I wouldn't mind having a look at it to investigate. > > Daniel Kulp wrote: > > On Wed November 4 2009 10:43:38 am Eamonn Dwyer wrote: > >> Hi > >> is there a reason we are using version 2.5.5 of spring framework? I > >> think servicemix and camel have already moved on up to 2.5.6, so would > >> it be a good idea to upgrade to both stay in synch with them and also to > >> avail of any bug fixes. > > > > Spring 2.5.6 has a "bug" in the JMS stuff that is resulting in stack > > traces being printed out in several places when running out test suite. > > We've more or less stayed on 2.5.5 so that those stack traces aren't > > confused with real errors. > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
[RESULT] [VOTE] Cyrille Le Clerc for committer....
With 13 +1 votes and no other votes, this vote passes. Welcome aboard Cyrille! Dan On Thu December 3 2009 10:48:29 am Daniel Kulp wrote: > Cyrille has submitted several patches to various management and logging > related things for CXF starting way back in February. I think he's up to > 7 or 8 submitted patches.He's also been hanging around the user list > for almost a year answering some questions.Thus, I think he's a bit > over due to become a committer. > > Here is my +1. > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
org.apache.cxf.systest.jaxrs.JAXRSLoggingAtomPushTest stack traces and stuff
The org.apache.cxf.systest.jaxrs.JAXRSLoggingAtomPushTest is spitting all kinds of stuff out to stdout/stderr. Can that be fixed? -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Status of Atom logging stuff....
Quick question about the Atom logging stuff... Is this intended for 2.2.6 or just for 2.3? Just wondering if I need to merge it back or not. Thanks! -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Cyrille Le Clerc for committer....
Dear community, It's a great honor for me to be welcomed in the Apache CXF community. It's a great honor to contribute to a foundation that changed the face of Open Source and I am specially touched to join a team that provides one of the most widely used web services technologies. I will do my best to deserve your confidence, I must admit that I am very impressed :-) . Cyrille. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > With 13 +1 votes and no other votes, this vote passes. > > Welcome aboard Cyrille! > > Dan > > > On Thu December 3 2009 10:48:29 am Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Cyrille has submitted several patches to various management and logging > > related things for CXF starting way back in February. I think he's up > to > > 7 or 8 submitted patches.He's also been hanging around the user list > > for almost a year answering some questions.Thus, I think he's a bit > > over due to become a committer. > > > > Here is my +1. > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
