Re: [DISCUSS] Adding License to the jquery file.

[Sudharma Jain]

Hi,

As jquery.flot.navigate.js doesn't belong to ASF, I don't think it make
sense to add ASF licence header to it. As suggested we can exclude this
through Pom.xml.

Thanks,
Sudharma

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Vedula Santosh <
vedula.sant...@accelerite.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I added the jquery.flot.navigate.js file in systemvm/js/ directory for
> mouse scroll functionality in ajaxviewer.js. I took this
> jquery.flot.navigate.js file from ui/lib/flot/ directory.
>
> While raising PR, checks were failed because ASF license is not there at
> the top of the file. But the file is dual licensed with MIT and GPL
> licenses. For other jquery files which are there in the project, there is
> no ASF license but an exclude tag is added in pom.xml to those files.
>
> Pom.xml:
>
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.js 
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.navigate.js
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.pie.js
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.resize.js
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.selection.js
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.stack.js
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.symbol.js
> ui/lib/flot/jquery.flot.threshold.js
> ui/lib/jquery-ui/css/jquery-ui.css
> ui/lib/jquery-ui/index.html
> ui/lib/jquery-ui/js/jquery-ui.js
> ui/lib/jquery.cookies.js 
> ui/lib/jquery.easing.js
> ui/lib/jquery.js
>
> Need Suggestion.
>
> * Whether I have to add ASF license on top of those licenses.
> * or I have to add exclude tag to jquery.flot.navigate.js file in pom.xml.
>
> PR number is #2240.
>
> Thanks,
> Santosh.
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain,
> copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any
> liability for virus infected mails.
>

Building Cloudstack failing on windows

[Sudharma Jain]

While building Cloudstack on windows, it fails with following exceptions.

Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.052 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.TestProfiler
testProfilerInNano(com.cloud.utils.TestProfiler)  Time elapsed: 1.004 sec
 <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: null
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:52)
at
com.cloud.utils.TestProfiler.testProfilerInNano(TestProfiler.java:71)


Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.001 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtUtilitiesHelperTest
testSSHKeyPaths(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtUtilitiesHelperTest)
 Time elapsed: 0.001 sec  <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:
but was:
at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:100)
at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:107)
at junit.framework.TestCase.assertEquals(TestCase.java:269)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtUtilitiesHelperTest.testSSHKeyPaths(LibvirtUtilitiesHelperTest.java:40)

Thanks,
Sudharma

Building cloudstack failing on windows

[Sudharma Jain]

Hi,

While building cloudstack on windows, LocalTemplateDownloaderTest fails.

java.lang.AssertionError: Failed download
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at
com.cloud.storage.template.LocalTemplateDownloaderTest.localTemplateDownloaderTest(LocalTemplateDownloaderTest.java:37)


Thanks,
Sudharma

Re: Fault percentage value of CPU usage in Cloud Platform

[Sudharma Jain]

Hi Anil,

There could be a bug with the dashboard, but it has nothing to do with the
deployment failure. Check your management server logs.

Thanks,
Sudharma

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:25 PM, anil lakineni <
anilkumar459.lakin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good Morning,
>
> @Will- but we don't have support contract.
>
> @Bharat- True, but the allocated CPU percentage value is showing wrong in
> the Dashboard where as in Zone's Resources *(Path is: 'Infrastructure' ->
> 'Zones' -> 'click on desired zone name' -> 'Resources') *the percentage
> value is showing correct.
>
> Total CPU allocated is 800 GHz out of 2000 GHz. So that means the
> percentage value should be in 40% range but in my case it is showing 91% in
> the Dashboard which leads in failing new deployments. But, the same value
> in Zone's Resources is showing accurate 40% value.
>
>
> But, for new VPS or VM deployments the cloud is preferring dashboard
> percentage value not the one which is there at Zone's Resources. So would
> you help me to fix this issue?
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Anil.
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Bharat Kumar  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There may be a difference in what you have allocated and what is being
> > actually used. The dashboard shows what is allocated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bharat.
> >
> > On 11/21/16, 9:44 PM, "williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf of Will
> > Stevens" 
> > wrote:
> >
> > >You will have to contact Accelerite for support with ACP (previously
> CCP).
> > >We have no visibility into the ACP code or how to support you.
> > >
> > >https://support.accelerite.com/hc/en-us
> > >
> > >Best of luck...
> > >
> > >*Will STEVENS*
> > >Lead Developer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:44 AM, anil lakineni <
> > >anilkumar459.lakin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear All,
> > >>
> > >> On CloudPlatform dashboard our CPU usage is showing wrong (high -91%)
> > value
> > >> which in-turn not allowing us to provision new VMs. But, the fact is
> > only
> > >> 40% of the available CPU is utilized and Even in the Dashboard only
> > >> percentage calculation is showing false metric value, But Cpu usage
> > value
> > >> is showing accurate(800/2000 GHZ).
> > >>
> > >> In addition to that when we go to check the CPU status at Zones level
> we
> > >> are seeing the accurate CPU usage percentage in all Zones, Only we are
> > >> getting false usage percentage at dashboard level(which leads to fail
> > the
> > >> new deployments).
> > >>
> > >> - Our CCP version is 4.5.0
> > >> - Hypervisors are Xen 6.2 & 6.5
> > >>
> > >> Please help me to sort out this issue and also let me know if any
> > >> additional information needed.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Anil.
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DISCLAIMER
> > ==
> > This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> > the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
> > only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read,
> retain,
> > copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
> > this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept
> any
> > liability for virus infected mails.
> >
>