Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

[Rajani K]

These are the pending PRs for RC3:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/2

Blockers are tagged as such.

Thanks,

~ Rajani

On May 18, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:

All,

Other than Mike's blocker fix #2098, do we have any other
outstanding issues blocking the 4.10.0.0 release?

Regards.


From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 12 May 2017 01:53:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi Rajani,

I opened the following PR (against master) to fix the blocker
CLOUDSTACK-9917:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098

Thanks!
Mike

On 5/10/17, 10:40 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
wrote:

Thanks for testing Mike.

RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR

Any other additions?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

I've been running regression tests against the release
candidate.

So far, all tests but one have passed.

The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It
looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this
thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for
managed storage in a particular situation.

As a result of this, I was going to vote -1.

I'm guessing the fix will not be complicated, but is important.

I don't yet have the fix, however. Once I do, I can reply to
this thread.

On May 10, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
wrote:

I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before
creating
RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.

If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections,
we
can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens
:

Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only
with basic
networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes
noticeable when
you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?

Well, the provisioning is the same between Basic and Advanced.
The VR is utterly slow in doing that.

It happens when you have a lot of VMs in those networks.

In our case we have a couple of thousands VMs.

What I'd like to prevent is that this is merged into 4.9.3, but
is not in 4.10.

However, I don't want to delay 4.10 any longer.

Wido

On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" 
wrote:

+0

I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us
4.10 would
be a problem due to the VR performance.

A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any
longer:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utterly
slow.

Wido

Op 9 mei 2017 om 7:31 schreef Rajani Karuturi
:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up
for a

vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=

fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204

Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to

indicate

"(binding)" with their vote

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.3

[Rajani K]

+1 (binding)
tested some basic operations like create vm, list, create
template etc. all worked fine.

~ Rajani

On November 9, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Rohit Yadav
(rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
+1 (binding)

Tested on Fedora/CentOS/Ubuntu Linux and using master on several
Linux machines since past few months.

Regards.


From: Pierre-Luc Dion 
Sent: 08 November 2016 18:57:58
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.3

+1 (binding)

Got it to work on osX-sierra.

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Sigert GOEMINNE <
sigert.goemi...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
+1

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Rohit Yadav

wrote:
Hi All,

I've created a 5.3.3 release-candidate of CloudMonkey, with the
following
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-
cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
Commit: 319c2dc097fcf7607d352d9fb26f13e8051074ff

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-
cloudmonkey.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=master

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.3/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Regards.

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com )
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

Re: Edit page permission in cwiki.

[Rajani K]

you are in

~ Rajani

On December 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Nitin Kumar Maharana
(nitinkumar.mahar...@accelerite.com) wrote:

Hi,

I don’t have permission to edit a page in cwiki.
Even I don’t have permission to assign issues to myself in JIRA.

Can you please give me these accesses.
Username : nitin.maharana

Thanks,
Nitin

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information
which is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems
business. It is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print,
distribute or use this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all
copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business
does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.