RE: VM snapshots
Hi Mice: I was informed to inquire with you as you are Developer of VMsnapshot: According to vmsnapshot FS https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots VM Snapshot revert * Revert VM from running/stopped to a disk+memory snapshot, result in running state * Revert VM from running/stopped to a disk snapshot, result in stopped state Is above result state correct regardless of the VM state (running or stopped) before the Revert ? Thanks From: Angeline Shen Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 1:42 PM To: Anthony Xu; Kelven Yang; Chandan Purushothama Subject: VM snapshots Hi: According to vmsnapshot FS https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots VM Snapshot revert * Revert VM from running/stopped to a disk+memory snapshot, result in running state * Revert VM from running/stopped to a disk snapshot, result in stopped state Is above result state correct regardless of the VM state (running or stopped) before the Revert ?
RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
Hi Edison, Anthony, Developers who are interested: I tested Swift integration with Cloudstack 3.x . Please let me know if we need to first round testing of how broken Swift is in terms of integration with campo 4.2. In the process of allocating hosts for Swift integration. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is that, we only have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the community, do we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will take some efforts to support Swift, are there any volunteers can help the integration?
RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
Animesh, Sudha: Swift integration was done for Acton 3.0.0 release. Anthony Xu was developer & I was QA . I will be very happy to work on test plan & testing for 4.2. Thanks -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:15 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers' Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? It was tested pre-4.0 release. As mentioned earlier, there were no changes or reported issues in this area. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers'; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Sudha was Swift working for 4.0 or 4.1? Edison couldn't we use S3 API for Swift? The support is probably not comprehensive [1][2] [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison [2] http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-object-storage/admin/content/configuring-openstack-object-storage-with-s3_api.html > -Original Message- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:31 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers' > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported > in 4.2? > > Swift was tested for older version of Citrix release. There were no > code changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized. > > Thanks > /Sudha > > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:15 AM > To: 'Chip Childers'; > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported > in 4.2? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:46 AM > > To: ; Edison Su > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be > > supported > in 4.2? > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su > wrote: > > >> Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is > > >> that, we only > > have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. > > >> Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the > > >> community, do > > we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will > > take some efforts to support Swift, are there any volunteers can > > help > the integration? > > > > > > > > > Whats the bug ID for this? > > > Unplanned/Unannounced deprecation of a feature is a blocker IMO. > > > It engenders a bad relationship with our users, and strands them > > > on previous versions with no good migration/upgrade path. > > > > > > --David > > > > > > > Edison, How broken is it? Is it shorter to fix or revert the object > > store changes? > It's not working at all. Not sure, revert object store will change it > or not, as this feature is not tested by QA for a long time.
RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
Animesh, Sudha: 1. For Cloudstack Acton 3.0.0 release, Swift 1.4.4 was integrated and tested . 2. Thanks to Sudha located my old documents on http://wiki-ccp.citrix.com/display/DesignDocs/Object+Storage+%28Swift%29+test+plan 3. It seems Swift 1.9.1 is one latest version that can be integrated with Campo. 4. I'll work on updating cwiki with Swift 4.2 integration. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Angeline Shen Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:51 PM To: Sudha Ponnaganti Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan; Chandan Purushothama Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Sudha: I wrote this document for Acton. I was searching for swift docs at http://wiki-ccp.citrix.com/display earlier and the site did not return. -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:48 PM To: Angeline Shen Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan; Chandan Purushothama Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Who wrote this one?? http://wiki-ccp.citrix.com/display/DesignDocs/Object+Storage+%28Swift%29+test+plan -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:33 PM To: Angeline Shen Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan; Chandan Purushothama Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Angie, Do you know where the PRD or test plan for this exist?? I have a line item in Bonita to cover and I remember that we discussed this when I started and covered it in Bonita by you. Thanks /sudha -Original Message- From: Angeline Shen Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi; 'Chip Childers'; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Animesh, Sudha: Swift integration was done for Acton 3.0.0 release. Anthony Xu was developer & I was QA . I will be very happy to work on test plan & testing for 4.2. Thanks -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:15 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers' Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? It was tested pre-4.0 release. As mentioned earlier, there were no changes or reported issues in this area. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers'; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Sudha was Swift working for 4.0 or 4.1? Edison couldn't we use S3 API for Swift? The support is probably not comprehensive [1][2] [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison [2] http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-object-storage/admin/content/configuring-openstack-object-storage-with-s3_api.html > -Original Message- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:31 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers' > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported > in 4.2? > > Swift was tested for older version of Citrix release. There were no > code changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized. > > Thanks > /Sudha > > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:15 AM > To: 'Chip Childers'; > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported > in 4.2? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:46 AM > > To: ; Edison Su > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be > > supported > in 4.2? > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su > wrote: > > >> Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is > > >> that, we only > > have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. > > >> Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the > > >> community, do > > we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will > > take some efforts to support Swift, are there any volunteers can > > help > the integration? > > > > > > > > > Whats the bug ID for this? > > > Unplanned/Unannounced deprecation of a feature is a blocker IMO. > > > It engenders a bad relationship with our users, and strands them > > > on previous versions with no good migration/upgrade path. > > > > > > --David > > > > > > > Edison, How broken is it? Is it shorter to fix or revert the object > > store changes? > It's not working at all. Not sure, revert object store will change it > or not, as this feature is not tested by QA for a long time.
RE: [ACS42] QA Subtasks that need to be resolved
Sudha: CLOUDSTACK-903CLOUDSTACK-40 QA - New Image based provisioning method for Baremetal IS this new baremetal feature or referring to existing baremetal project? How to update these 2 bugs ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS42] QA Subtasks that need to be resolved Hi All, Following QA Tasks are not closed and require your attention. Can you review the list and see if these can be resolved/closed. - For some of these parent story might have been pushed to next release, in such case set fixed version as "Future" Thanks /Sudha CLOUDSTACK-903CLOUDSTACK-40 QA - New Image based provisioning method for Baremetal angeline shen CLOUDSTACK-2800 CLOUDSTACK-1963 QA: New mapping model for CloudStack zone and Vmware datacenter angeline shen CLOUDSTACK-2749 CLOUDSTACK-996 QA: Write test plan and execute Testplan for midonet network integrationDave Cahill CLOUDSTACK-879CLOUDSTACK-509 QA S3-backed Secondary Storage Feature John Burwell CLOUDSTACK-2841 CLOUDSTACK-1191 QA: Test RBD cloning, backup and snapshotting sadhu suresh CLOUDSTACK-954CLOUDSTACK-788 QA - support multiple VLANs for KVM HV sadhu suresh CLOUDSTACK-2267 CLOUDSTACK-2059 QA: Support remove network over VMware deployments with dvSwitchSailaja Mada CLOUDSTACK-943CLOUDSTACK-714 QA - S3 based secondary storage Sanjeev N CLOUDSTACK-886CLOUDSTACK-629 QA new storage subsystem Sanjeev N
RE: Review Request: Temporarily disabling baremetal functionality in CS 4.1
Chip, Vijay: Let me know When the build is ready, I can help test if baremetal feature has been deactivated from UI. -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 5:04 PM To: ; Vijayendra Bhamidipati Cc: Frank Zhang; Kelven Yang; cloudstack Subject: Re: Review Request: Temporarily disabling baremetal functionality in CS 4.1 Can *you* check it first please? Does it apply cleanly? Does it compile? On Mar 22, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/ > --- > > (Updated March 22, 2013, 11:55 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Frank Zhang. > > > Changes > --- > > Hi Chip! > > Reuploading a consolidated patch with the sql changes as well, plus another > change in the plugins/pom.xml file - this is on top of the 4.1 branch - > generated using git format-patch.. can you please check and let me if it > applies? Thanks! > > Regards, > Vijay > > > Description > --- > > Temporarily disabling baremetal functionality in CS 4.1 > > > This addresses bug CS-1773. > > > Diffs (updated) > - > > client/pom.xml 38ba405 > client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in ff7376e > client/tomcatconf/nonossComponentContext.xml.in 35e1b28 > plugins/pom.xml 02459b4 > server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java 17fe62b > setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql 754bfb6 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Baremetal and Cisco UCS related APIs confirmed to not be exposed to clients. > > > Thanks, > > Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati >
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 OVS support in KVM
ASF 4.1 cloudstack with openvswitch support for RHEL 6.3 KVM test configuration setup: After completing http://nullworks.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/kvm-and-openvswitch-on-centos-6-3-minimal/ to setup RHEL 6.3 openvswitch, encountered following problems: 1. In this scenario, after service openvswitch start, host is still up running but completely lost connection to network. [root@Rack3Host16 /]# service openvswitch start Inserting brcompat module [ OK ] Starting ovsdb-server [ OK ] Configuring Open vSwitch system IDs [ OK ] Starting ovs-vswitchd [ OK ] Starting ovs-brcompatd [ OK ] iptables already has a rule for gre, not explicitly enabling. [root@Rack3Host16 /]# 2. content of various files: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ovsbr1 : DEVICE=ovsbr1 ONBOOT=yes DEVICETYPE=ovs TYPE=OVSBridge BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=10.223.58.195 GATEWAY=10.223.58.193 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 HOTPLUG=no QUESTION:Is http://nullworks.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/kvm-and-openvswitch-on-centos-6-3-minimal/ Valid configuration instructions for openvswitch RHEL 6.3or are there other updated correct configuration steps? Thanks
[ACS42] [QA] Test plan Isolation in advance zone using PVLAN
Hello: Issue: http://bugs-ccp.citrix.com/browse/CS-17445 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1456 PRD: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+in+Advanced+Zone+using+PVLANs FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+in+Advanced+Zone+using+PVLANs+-+Functional+Specification+for+VMWare+integration+with+CloudStack test plan: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+Advance+zone+using+PVLAN Please review & forward comments + feedback for test plan. Thanks
RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 OVS support in KVM
ped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:340 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:46264 (45.1 KiB) TX bytes:46264 (45.1 KiB) 8. [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloud0/bridge: No such file or directory .aa81045f5e4a no cloudbr /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory /sys/class/net/cloudbr/bridge: No such file or directory .bc305bd4163c no -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:59 PM To: Hugo Trippaers Cc: Subject: Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 OVS support in KVM Thank you Hugo! --Sheng On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Hugo Trippaers < htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Hey Sheng, > > Sure thing, I'm trying to help Angeline already, but it's quite a > complex setup. > > I'll try to write down some detailed instructions. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 24 apr. 2013, at 19:56, "Sheng Yang" wrote: > > Hi Hugo, > > Could you help with KVM OVS setup? I cannot find much information on > the our wiki about OVS on KVM. > > --Sheng > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Angeline Shen > wrote: > >> ASF 4.1 cloudstack with openvswitch support for RHEL 6.3 KVM test >> configuration setup: >> >> After completing >> http://nullworks.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/kvm-and-openvswitch-on-cent >> os-6-3-minimal/ to setup RHEL 6.3 openvswitch, encountered following >> problems: >> >> 1. In this scenario, after service openvswitch start, host is still >> up running but completely lost connection to network. >> >> [root@Rack3Host16 /]# service openvswitch start Inserting brcompat >> module [ OK ] Starting ovsdb-server [ OK ] Configuring Open vSwitch >> system IDs [ OK ] Starting ovs-vswitchd [ OK ] Starting ovs-brcompatd >> [ OK ] iptables already has a rule for gre, not explicitly enabling. >> [root@Rack3Host16 /]# >> >> >> 2. content of various files: >> >> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ovsbr1 : >> DEVICE=ovsbr1 >> ONBOOT=yes >> DEVICETYPE=ovs >> TYPE=OVSBridge >> BOOTPROTO=static >> IPADDR=10.223.58.195 >> GATEWAY=10.223.58.193 >> NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >> HOTPLUG=no >> >> >> QUESTION:Is >> http://nullworks.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/kvm-and-openvswitch-on-centos-6-3-minimal/ >> Valid configuration instructions for openvswitch RHEL 6.3 >> or are there other updated correct configuration steps? >> >> Thanks >> >> >
RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 OVS support in KVM
Hugo: For your configuration example : # The physical interface: eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=BC:30:5B:D4:16:3C IPV6INIT=no #MTU=1500 NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=OVSPort DEVICETYPE=ovs OVS_BRIDGE=br0 # The bridge interface: br0 DEVICE=br0 ONBOOT=yes DEVICETYPE=ovs TYPE=OVSBridge BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR= 10.223.58.195 GATEWAY = 10.223.58.193 NETMASK=255.255.255.192 HOTPLUG=no QUESTION: will commands to configure openvswitch network interfaces be as follows: ovs-vsctl add-br br0 ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth1 Thanks -Original Message- From: Angeline Shen Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:13 PM To: ; Hugo Trippaers; Sheng Yang; Edison Su Subject: RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 OVS support in KVM Hugo: Please review my updates to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 . The latest experiment I conducted per your instructions is as follows: ovs Host10.223.58.195 gateway 10.223.58.193 other host on same gateway but not in ovs setup 10.223.58.194 On ovs host 10.223.58.195 , After I changed /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-cloudbr to your instructions, service network restart , the ovs host can now ONLY ping its own gateway 10.223.58.193 and any host in same subnet, but CANNOT reach anything beyond the gateway 10.223.58.193. 1. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1: DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=BC:30:5B:D4:16:3C IPV6INIT=no #MTU=1500 NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes #TYPE=Ethernet TYPE=OVSPort DEVICETYPE=ovs OVS_BRIDGE=cloudbr #UUID="0142ba15-de11-499c-a1ba-82837b30f890" #IPADDR=10.223.58.195 #NETMASK=255.255.255.192 #GATEWAY=10.223.58.193 #DNS1=10.223.110.254 #USERCTL=yes #IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes #DEFROUTE=yes #NAME="System eth1" 2. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-cloudbr: DEVICE=cloudbr ONBOOT=yes DEVICETYPE=ovs TYPE=OVSBridge BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=10.223.58.195 GATEWAY=10.23.58.193 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 HOTPLUG=no 3. On host 10.223.58.195, service network restart 4. on host 10.223.58.195: [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# ip route 10.223.58.0/24 dev cloudbr proto kernel scope link src 10.223.58.195 169.254.0.0/16 dev cloud0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.0.1 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link metric 1002 169.254.0.0/16 dev cloudbr scope link metric 1015 5. It can reach its gateway & other hosts on same gateway: [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# ping 10.223.58.193 PING 10.223.58.193 (10.223.58.193) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.223.58.193: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=7.43 ms 64 bytes from 10.223.58.193: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.82 ms 64 bytes from 10.223.58.193: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.06 ms ^C --- 10.223.58.193 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2364ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.061/3.771/7.430/2.685 ms [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# ping 10.223.58.194 PING 10.223.58.194 (10.223.58.194) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.223.58.194: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.399 ms 64 bytes from 10.223.58.194: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.181 ms ^C --- 10.223.58.194 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1446ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.181/0.290/0.399/0.109 ms [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# traceroute 10.223.58.194 traceroute to 10.223.58.194 (10.223.58.194), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.223.58.194 (10.223.58.194) 0.922 ms 0.851 ms 0.830 ms [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# traceroute 10.223.58.193 traceroute to 10.223.58.193 (10.223.58.193), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.223.58.193 (10.223.58.193) 7.017 ms 12.506 ms 7.675 ms 6. host CANNOT reach anything outside of its subnet: [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# ping 10.223.195.114 connect: Network is unreachable [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# ping www.google.com ping: unknown host www.google.com [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# ping 8.8.8.8 connect: Network is unreachable [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# traceroute 8.8.8.8 traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets connect: Network is unreachable 7. [root@Rack3Host16 ~]# ifconfig cloudbr Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr BC:30:5B:D4:16:3C inet addr:10.223.58.195 Bcast:10.223.58.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fc00:2::be30:5bff:fed4:163c/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::68f7:52ff:fe03:a744/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:46945 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:549 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:39235509 (37.4 MiB) TX bytes:102773 (100.3 KiB) cloud0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AA:81:04:5F:5E:4A inet addr:169.254.0.1 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::a881:4ff:fe5f:5e4a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:23 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrie
RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM
Hugo: 1. Your instructions here are for CentOS 6.4 environment. However, ASF 4.2 Cloudstack is currently only supported on CentOS 6.3, ** NOT CentOS 6.4 ** Since ASF 4.2 Cloudstack has product features requiring openvswitch support , That is why we need to have openvswitch (1.7.1 probably) running on CentOS 6.3 for ASF 4.2 Cloudstack. ** NOT CENTOS 6.4 ** Also, ASF 4.2 Cloudstack has not been tested on CentOS 6.4 yet. There are no ASF 4.2 cloudstack builds available on CentOS 6.4 We need ASF 4.2 Cloudstack openvswitch running and tested on CENTOS 6.3. Therefore I have been installing libvirt-0.10.1 and openvswitch-1.7.1 on CentOS 6.3 in CentOS 6.3 Will your configurations work on CentOS 6.3 ? 2. Your instruction in installing cloudstack-agent: # yum install cloudstack-agent What version of cloudstack-agent are you installing? Please show content of your /etc/repos.d/ ? There is no cloudstack-agent on CentOS 6.4 yet. 2. What is the sectionon== centos64-openvswitch.patch ==about? 3. In CentOS 6.3, only libvirt-0.9.10 is available. Cloudstack-agent installation installs libvirt-0.9.10 Therefore I had to installand overlaylibvirt-0.10.1over libvirt-0.9.10 4. Your response to my previous email about your openvswitch example To my question of commands for openswitch configuration : > ovs-vsctl add-br br0 > ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth1 The redhat network configuration should take care of creating all the bridges and linking the ports. But yes the configuration above should have the same effect as these two commands. Do you mean there is NO NEED to execute these two commands at all as long as the files are configured, Because these commands are listed in ACS installation guide for openvswitch configuration, and upon executing the Second command ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth1the host lost network connection ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:19 AM To: Angeline Shen; ''; Sheng Yang; Edison Su Subject: RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 OVS support in KVM Heya, Comments inline. I ran through the entire procedure I use to test the setup and documented it as detailed as possible. Hope this helps: # # CentOS KVM installation # Base installation: CentOS 6.2 Basic Server Upgraded to CentOS 6.4: # yum update Install Virtualization tools # yum groupinstall Virtualization "Virtualization Client" "Virtualization Platform" "Virtualization Tools" Verify Installed: hypervkvpd.x86_64 0:0-0.9.el6libguestfs.x86_64 1:1.16.34-2.el6 libvirt.x86_64 0:0.10.2-18.el6_4.3 libvirt-client.x86_64 0:0.10.2-18.el6_4.3python-virtinst.noarch 0:0.600.0-15.el6qemu-kvm.x86_64 2:0.12.1.2-2.355.0.1.el6.centos.2 virt-manager.x86_64 0:0.9.0-18.el6 virt-top.x86_64 0:1.0.4-3.15.el6 virt-viewer.x86_64 0:0.5.2-18.el6_4.2 Modify libvirt configuration: Edit /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf listen_tls = 0 listen_tcp = 1 tcp_port = 16059 auth_tcp = "none" mdns_adv = 0 Edit /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd LIBVIRTD_ARGS="--listen" Start libvirtd # /etc/init.d/libvirtd start # /etc/init.d/libvirtd status Verify installation: # virsh capabilities - Should list two guest tags with os_type hvm Build and install openvswitch: Install build requirements: # yum install rpmdevtools openssl-devel kernel-devel gcc redhat-rpm-config Build packages: # mkdir -p ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES # curl -O http://openvswitch.org/releases/openvswitch-1.9.0.tar.gz # cp openvswitch-1.9.0.tar.gz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES # cp centos64-openvswitch.patch ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES # tar -xzf openvswitch-1.9.0.tar.gz # cd openvswitch-1.9.0 # patch -p1 < ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/centos64-openvswitch.patch # rpmbuild -bb rhel/openvswitch.spec # rpmbuild -bb -D "kversion `uname -r`" rhel/openvswitch-kmod-rhel6.spec Install openvswitch: # yum install ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/kmod-openvswitch-1.9.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/openvswitch-1.9.0-1.x86_64.rpm # echo 'blacklist bridge' >> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf # reboot Verify installation: # lsmod |grep openvswitch # ovs-vsctl -V Network design: cloudbr0 (Management, Storage) ip: 172.16.10.10/24 gateway: 172.16.10.1 eth0 (physical port, no vlans) cloudbr1 (Guest, Public) eth1 (physical port, vlan trunk) ip: none Configure network interfaces: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/
RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM
Sheng : 1. This implies testing environment for ASC 4.2 isolation PVLAN feature KVM hypervisor will beCentOS 6.4 based instead of CentOS 6.3 based for Xen, vmware . Is this acceptable? 2. Hugo: if we must have CentOS 6.3 test environment for above feature, what parts of this procedure need be changed? Or do you already know that Cent OS 6.3 does NOT support openvswitch ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:50 PM To: Angeline Shen; ''; Sheng Yang; Edison Su Subject: RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM Hey Angeline, > -Original Message- > From: Angeline Shen [mailto:angeline.s...@citrix.com] > Sent: donderdag 25 april 2013 23:07 > To: Hugo Trippaers; ''; Sheng Yang; Edison > Su > Subject: RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent > OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM > > Hugo: > > 1. Your instructions here are for CentOS 6.4 environment. > > However, ASF 4.2 Cloudstack is currently only supported on CentOS 6.3, > ** NOT CentOS 6.4 ** > Since ASF 4.2 Cloudstack has product features requiring openvswitch > support , > That is why we need to have openvswitch (1.7.1 probably) running on > CentOS 6.3 for ASF 4.2 Cloudstack. ** NOT CENTOS 6.4 ** > > Also, ASF 4.2 Cloudstack has not been tested on CentOS 6.4 yet. > There are no ASF 4.2 cloudstack builds available on CentOS 6.4 CloudStack 4.2 is perfectly supported on CentOS 6.4. The RPM packages are all developed on CentOS 6.4, so for that matter CentOS 6.3 is less supported ;-) But this is actually irrelevant. CentOS has dropped the release strategy with minor version numbers to a certain degree. If you read my instructions I actually started with a CentOS 6.2 system, running a yum update like regular users would do will upgrade the entire system to the latest version available. CentOS 6 is the actual release and the minor numbers are only place holders for certain releases. You need to upgrade the system to get the latest security fixes and so you will end up with a CentOS 6.4 system. CloudStack supports CentOS 6 and has been tested on CentOS 6. > > We need ASF 4.2 Cloudstack openvswitch running and tested on CENTOS > 6.3. > > Therefore I have been installing libvirt-0.10.1 and openvswitch-1.7.1 > on > CentOS 6.3 in CentOS 6.3 > > Will your configurations work on CentOS 6.3 ? As explained above there is no actual difference for CentOS 6.3 and 6.4 in setup. So the instructions will work regardless. The only thing you need to be aware of is the kernel version. My instructions regarding compiling openvswitch are specific to the current most recent version of the CentOS 6 kernel. So you need to upgrade at least that to work with these instructions. > > > > 2. Your instruction in installing cloudstack-agent: > > # yum install cloudstack-agent > > What version of cloudstack-agent are you installing? > > Please show content of your /etc/repos.d/ ? > > There is no cloudstack-agent on CentOS 6.4 yet. I'm installing from my own repository with cloudstack packages which is updated on every build. I think I used the 4.1 branch here, because that is default in my repo. But there have been no noticeable changes for OVS support in 4.2 yet. > > > 2. What is the sectionon== centos64- > openvswitch.patch ==about? It's a patch I developed to support openvswitch with the latest kernel version of CentOS. The way redhat does kernel updates regularly conflicts with the compatibility settings in openvswitch. You need to apply this patch on openvswitch 1.9.0 to make it compile on the latest CentOS 6 kernel. > > > 3. In CentOS 6.3, only libvirt-0.9.10 is available. Cloudstack-agent > installation installs libvirt-0.9.10 > Therefore I had to installand overlaylibvirt-0.10.1over > libvirt-0.9.10 I used a fully updated CentOS 6.2 release (effectively 6.4). You should consider these instructions for an updated system. > > > 4. Your response to my previous email about your openvswitch example To > my question of commands for openswitch configuration : > > ovs-vsctl add-br br0 > > ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth1 > > The redhat network configuration should take care of creating all the > bridges and linking the ports. But yes the configuration above should > have the same effect as these two commands. > > Do you mean there is NO NEED to execute these two commands at all > as long as the files are configured, Because these commands are > listed in ACS installation guide for openvswitch configuration, an
RE: Is VM snapshot supported in KVM ?
Rayees: Please ensure in MS Global setting kvm.snapshot.enabled=true It defaults to false currently. Thanks -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:47 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Is VM snapshot supported in KVM ? Hi All, Is VM snapshot supported in KVM, below doc says its supported in KVM, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots But if I try to take vm snapshot from UI, I am getting message "VM snapshot is not enabled for hypervisor type: KVM" Regards, Rayees
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home edit permission
Hello Administrators: Please allow me "edit" permissions in order to add CloudStack test plans to: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home Thank you.
