Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 (RC2)
Hi All, For users convenience, the packages for this release candidate (RC2) and 4.20.1.0 systemvm templates are available here: http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.20.1.0-RC20250527T2349/ https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.20/ Regards, Pearl Dsilva On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:57 PM Pearl Dsilva wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.20.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.20.1.0-RC20250527T2349 > Commit: ff492442005bf06eeb2c9cecea1d95bff2235cc5 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.20.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using D15B44FBE333DC47E770D263670EAB13EF443EC7): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards, > Pearl Dsilva -- Pearl Dsilva
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
Hi Rene, Thanks for sharing. I wonder if the mgmt server is started completely between the two steps * restart cloudstack-management * install rc packages Kind regards, Wei On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:29 AM Rene Peinthor wrote: > Kinda, from an empty database. > These are my install steps: > > * create VM's > * install latest stable release of that branch 4.19.2 > * run cloudstack-setup-databases script > * install systemvm template > * restart cloudstack-management > * install rc packages > * restart cloudstack-management > * BOOM > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > Rene, > > > > You are saying this is an upgrade from 4.19.2? > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:13 AM Rene Peinthor > > > wrote: > > > > > > VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or lets > > say > > > started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty). > > > > > > I can recreate them if you want? > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Wei ZHOU > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Rene, > > > > > > > > The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh > > > > installation or upgrade an existing environment? > > > > Can you check if there are exceptions in the management-server.log ? > > > > > > > > > > > > -Wei > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor < > > rene.peint...@linbit.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > -1 > > > > > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I > > wasn't > > > > able > > > > > to start the management server. > > > > > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same > except > > for > > > > > the version number bump. > > > > > But also that build failed with the same error: > > > > > > > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN > > [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > > > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: > [Error > > > > > creating bean with name > > > > > > > > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while > > setting > > > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No > > bean > > > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. > > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG > > [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > > > (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was > > due to: > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error > > creating > > > > > bean with name > > > > > > > > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while > > setting > > > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No > > bean > > > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) > > > > > at > > > > > > &
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or lets say started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty). I can recreate them if you want? On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi Rene, > > The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh > installation or upgrade an existing environment? > Can you check if there are exceptions in the management-server.log ? > > > -Wei > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor > wrote: > > > -1 > > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I wasn't > able > > to start the management server. > > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same except for > > the version number bump. > > But also that build failed with the same error: > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: [Error > > creating bean with name > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > defined in URL > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was due to: > > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating > > bean with name > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > defined in URL > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyPropertyValues(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1707) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1452) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:619) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:542) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.lambda$doGetBean$0(AbstractBeanFactory.java:335) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:234) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:333) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:213) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.context.support.PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.java:171) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(AbstractApplicationContext.java:748) > > at > > > > > org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:564) > > at > > > > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:173) > > at > > > > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.mod
Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello everyone, Thank you, Nicolas, for the summary! There are many ideas for big changes under a single "Versioning" discussion. It will be clearer if all points are separated into different discussions. I think it will be better to have the option to deliver fast fixes than advising users to downgrade. I agree with the suggestion on the version naming. With the rest of the points, I share Sven's and Rohit's opinions that there is no need for such broad restrictions if we want the project to go forward. Best regards, Slavka On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 6:28 PM Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the delay, took time to digest all that has been discussed on > the thread. I’ll try to summarize the discussion points raised by Joao for > simplicity, please correct me if there are some misunderstandings from my > side: > > > * On breaking changes: > * Allow bigger refactoring and introduction of breaking changes; > after being properly discussed, agreed, and communicated to the public. > * Make "small" breaking changes clear to the community; after all, > any breaking change should be properly discussed and announced, so users > are aware and ready for it. > * On database changes: > * Regarding DB **schema** changes, these should be done only in > MAJOR and SECURITY PATCH versions (only when/if needed). > * Regarding DB **data** changes, these may be done in any version. > * On feature removal: > * Specify, in the feature removal process, that a feature must be > removed in a MAJOR version. After having been announced in a previous MAJOR > or MINOR version, following the rest of the protocol already defined. > * On version naming: > * 1. Change our version naming pattern from > ... to > ... > * 2. Patch version MUST be incremented if **only bug fixes or > security fixes** are introduced. A bug fix is defined as an internal change > that fixes incorrect behavior. A security fix is defined as an internal > change that fixes a CVE. > * 3. Minor version MUST be incremented if any functionality is > marked as deprecated. It SHOULD be incremented if improvements are > introduced within the code. It MAY include patch-level changes, as well as > new DB data inserted by the system, or a new feature is introduced. Patch > version MUST be reset to 0 when minor version is incremented. > * 4. Major version MUST be incremented if any backward-incompatible > changes are introduced. It MAY also include minor and patch-level changes. > Patch and minor versions MUST be reset to 0 when major version is > incremented. > > In my opinion, the first point on database changes must also allow schema > changes for minor versions. I don’t think we should restrict that only for > major versions and security patches only. About breaking changes, I’m not > sure about allowing big refactoring as it may impact negatively on the > product stability. With the rest of the points I’m largely ok, also > dropping the 4. and keeping the same process. > > I see Rene has also raised more proposals about the development process, > should they be discussed on a separate thread? > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > > > From: Sven Vogel > Date: Friday, 23 May 2025 at 08:37 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: users > Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning > i agree with Rohit. like he wrote already users can use snapshots > / backups and normally you need to test before you make a final > upgrade ;) Normally everyone should have an staging. > > the important point always is the information that changes on the db > was done and which changes. with this information normally an > operation should handle the upgrade like each otherwise software. i am > not generally against restrictions but i think its like what Rohit > suggest a better way to find out the problems and fix the upgrade > challanges or or problems than to move them. > > > > Cheers, > > Sven Vogel > Apache CloudStack PMC member > > Am Mittwoch, den 05/21/2025 um 18:57 schrieb Rohit Yadav: > > > It seems we're going in circles at this point. > I can't support the proposal to limit DB updates in releases, as it > feels overly restrictive. Users can follow best practices such as > taking DB backups (or snapshots of their mgmt/db instances when > virtualised) before upgrading, which allows for safe downgrades. > Testing upgrades in staging environments has also been the common and > recommended approach. I don't believe these practices need to change > even with the proposed database-upgrade restrictions. > I was under the impression that idempotent upgrade paths and MySQL > routines had addressed most upgrade challenges. If issues remain, we > should explore technical solutions rather than introduce broad > restrictions. > To my knowledge, we haven't seen any major upgrade blockers > recently—most upgrades are already tested between releases via > automation (BO/Trillian
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
stallation or upgrade an existing environment? > > > > > Can you check if there are exceptions in the management-server.log > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Wei > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor < > > > rene.peint...@linbit.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > -1 > > > > > > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I > > > wasn't > > > > > able > > > > > > to start the management server. > > > > > > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same > > except > > > for > > > > > > the version number bump. > > > > > > But also that build failed with the same error: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN > > > [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > > > > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: > > [Error > > > > > > creating bean with name > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while > > > setting > > > > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: > No > > > bean > > > > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. > > > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG > > > [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > > > > (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was > > > due to: > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error > > > creating > > > > > > bean with name > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while > > > setting > > > > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: > No > > > bean > > > > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyPropertyValues(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1707) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1452) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:619) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
Hi All, For users convenience, the packages for this release candidate (RC1) is available here: http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.3.0-RC20250527T1642/ Regards, Pearl Dsilva On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:46 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.19.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.3.0-RC20250527T1642 > Commit: b00400d5fa8ad2b08a85139ae32f443adfb793a1 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.3.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -- > Daan -- Pearl Dsilva
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
thanks for the report Rene, I see several GHA runs successful, but I'll try to deploy in a lab env to see if I can reproduce your issue. On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor wrote: > > -1 > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I wasn't able > to start the management server. > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same except for > the version number bump. > But also that build failed with the same error: > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: [Error > creating bean with name > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > defined in URL > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was due to: > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating > bean with name > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > defined in URL > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyPropertyValues(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1707) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1452) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:619) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:542) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.lambda$doGetBean$0(AbstractBeanFactory.java:335) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:234) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:333) > at > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:213) > at > org.springframework.context.support.PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.java:171) > at > org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(AbstractApplicationContext.java:748) > at > org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:564) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:173) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:142) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:273) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:261) > at > org.apache.cloudstac
Re: [PR] CKS Enhancements docs [cloudstack-documentation]
kiranchavala commented on PR #458: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/458#issuecomment-2915357879 @nvazquez also can we update one test iso which has external etcd https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/custom_templates/ubuntu/22.04/ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
Kinda, from an empty database. These are my install steps: * create VM's * install latest stable release of that branch 4.19.2 * run cloudstack-setup-databases script * install systemvm template * restart cloudstack-management * install rc packages * restart cloudstack-management * BOOM On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > Rene, > > You are saying this is an upgrade from 4.19.2? > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:13 AM Rene Peinthor > wrote: > > > > VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or lets > say > > started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty). > > > > I can recreate them if you want? > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > > > Hi Rene, > > > > > > The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh > > > installation or upgrade an existing environment? > > > Can you check if there are exceptions in the management-server.log ? > > > > > > > > > -Wei > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor < > rene.peint...@linbit.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > -1 > > > > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I > wasn't > > > able > > > > to start the management server. > > > > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same except > for > > > > the version number bump. > > > > But also that build failed with the same error: > > > > > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN > [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: [Error > > > > creating bean with name > > > > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while > setting > > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No > bean > > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG > [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > > (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was > due to: > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error > creating > > > > bean with name > > > > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while > setting > > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No > bean > > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyPropertyValues(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1707) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1452) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:619) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.Abst
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
-1 As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I wasn't able to start the management server. I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same except for the version number bump. But also that build failed with the same error: 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: [Error creating bean with name 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' defined in URL [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting bean property 'locations'; nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was due to: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' defined in URL [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting bean property 'locations'; nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean named 'DefaultConfigResources' available at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyPropertyValues(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1707) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1452) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:619) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:542) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.lambda$doGetBean$0(AbstractBeanFactory.java:335) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:234) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:333) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:213) at org.springframework.context.support.PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.java:171) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(AbstractApplicationContext.java:748) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:564) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:173) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:142) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:273) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:261) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContexts(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:130) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.load(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:78) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.ModuleBasedContextFactory.loadModules(ModuleBasedContextFactory.java:37) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.init(CloudStackSpringContext.java:70) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.(CloudStackSpringContext.java:57) at org.apache.clo
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 (RC2)
+1 Linstor tests ran successfully Cheers, Rene On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:27 PM Pearl Dsilva wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.20.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for > a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.20.1.0-RC20250527T2349 > Commit: ff492442005bf06eeb2c9cecea1d95bff2235cc5 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.20.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using D15B44FBE333DC47E770D263670EAB13EF443EC7): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards, > Pearl Dsilva >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
Hi Rene, The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh installation or upgrade an existing environment? Can you check if there are exceptions in the management-server.log ? -Wei On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor wrote: > -1 > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I wasn't able > to start the management server. > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same except for > the version number bump. > But also that build failed with the same error: > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: [Error > creating bean with name > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > defined in URL > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was due to: > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating > bean with name > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > defined in URL > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyPropertyValues(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1707) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1452) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:619) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:542) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.lambda$doGetBean$0(AbstractBeanFactory.java:335) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:234) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:333) > at > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:213) > at > > org.springframework.context.support.PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.java:171) > at > > org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(AbstractApplicationContext.java:748) > at > > org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:564) > at > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:173) > at > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:142) > at > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:273) > at > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > > org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:278) > at > > org.apache.clo
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
Rene, You are saying this is an upgrade from 4.19.2? On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:13 AM Rene Peinthor wrote: > > VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or lets say > started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty). > > I can recreate them if you want? > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > Hi Rene, > > > > The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh > > installation or upgrade an existing environment? > > Can you check if there are exceptions in the management-server.log ? > > > > > > -Wei > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor > > wrote: > > > > > -1 > > > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I wasn't > > able > > > to start the management server. > > > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same except for > > > the version number bump. > > > But also that build failed with the same error: > > > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: [Error > > > creating bean with name > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available]. > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,779 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] > > > (main:null) (logid:) module start failure of module [redfish] was due to: > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating > > > bean with name > > > > > 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' > > > defined in URL > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-snapshot.20250528.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/bootstrap/spring-bootstrap-context-inheritable.xml]: > > > Cannot resolve reference to bean 'DefaultConfigResources' while setting > > > bean property 'locations'; nested exception is > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No bean > > > named 'DefaultConfigResources' available > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveReference(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:342) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValueResolver.resolveValueIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionValueResolver.java:113) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyPropertyValues(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1707) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.populateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1452) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:619) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:542) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.lambda$doGetBean$0(AbstractBeanFactory.java:335) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:234) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:333) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:213) > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.context.support.PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.invokeBeanFactoryPostProcessors(PostProcessorRegistrationDelegate.java:171) > > > at &
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
nt,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain) > throws java.lang.ClassFormatError accessible: module java.base does not > "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @4802796d > at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.defineClass(ReflectUtils.java:464) > at > net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.generate(AbstractClassGenerator.java:339) > at > net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator$ClassLoaderData$3.apply(AbstractClassGenerator.java:96) > ... 99 more > Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make > protected final java.lang.Class > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain) > throws java.lang.ClassFormatError accessible: module java.base does not > "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @4802796d > at > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:354) > at > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:297) > at > java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:200) > ... 107 more > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:34 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> Hi Rene, >> >> Thanks for sharing. >> >> I wonder if the mgmt server is started completely between the two steps >> >> * restart cloudstack-management >> * install rc packages >> >> >> Kind regards, >> Wei >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:29 AM Rene Peinthor >> wrote: >> >> > Kinda, from an empty database. >> > These are my install steps: >> > >> > * create VM's >> > * install latest stable release of that branch 4.19.2 >> > * run cloudstack-setup-databases script >> > * install systemvm template >> > * restart cloudstack-management >> > * install rc packages >> > * restart cloudstack-management >> > * BOOM >> > >> > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM Daan Hoogland > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Rene, >> > > >> > > You are saying this is an upgrade from 4.19.2? >> > > >> > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:13 AM Rene Peinthor < >> rene.peint...@linbit.com >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or >> lets >> > > say >> > > > started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty). >> > > > >> > > > I can recreate them if you want? >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Wei ZHOU >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Rene, >> > > > > >> > > > > The issue might be caused by some SQLException. Do you use a fresh >> > > > > installation or upgrade an existing environment? >> > > > > Can you check if there are exceptions in the >> management-server.log ? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -Wei >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM Rene Peinthor < >> > > rene.peint...@linbit.com> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > -1 >> > > > > > As I couldn't test, I tried building the mentioned branch and I >> > > wasn't >> > > > > able >> > > > > > to start the management server. >> > > > > > I then tried the latest nightly build as I saw it is the same >> > except >> > > for >> > > > > > the version number bump. >> > > > > > But also that build failed with the same error: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 2025-05-28 06:36:34,778 WARN >> > > [o.a.c.s.m.m.i.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet] >> > > > > > (main:null) (logid:) Failed to start module [redfish] due to: >> > [Error >> > > > > > creating bean with name >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> 'org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer#0' >> > > > > > defined in URL >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0-sn
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
zerError > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$AutowiredFieldElement.resolveFieldValue(AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:660) > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$AutowiredFieldElement.inject(AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:640) > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.InjectionMetadata.inject(InjectionMetadata.java:119) > > ... 65 more > > Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error > > creating bean with name 'configurationDaoImpl' defined in URL > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/system/spring-framework-config-system-context.xml]: > > Instantiation of bean failed; nested exception is > > org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException: Failed to > instantiate > > [org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl]: > > Constructor threw exception; nested exception is > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.instantiateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1334) > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBeanInstance(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1232) > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:582) > > ... 76 more > > Caused by: org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException: Failed > to > > instantiate > > [org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl]: > > Constructor threw exception; nested exception is > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > at > org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:224) > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.SimpleInstantiationStrategy.instantiate(SimpleInstantiationStrategy.java:87) > > at > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.instantiateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1326) > > ... 78 more > > Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.(GenericDaoBase.java:259) > > at > > > org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl.(ConfigurationDaoImpl.java:51) > > at > > > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native > > Method) > > ... 85 more > > Caused by: net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: > > java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException-->Unable to make protected > > final java.lang.Class > > > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain) > > throws java.lang.ClassFormatError accessible: module java.base does not > > "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @4802796d > > at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.defineClass(ReflectUtils.java:464) > > at > > > net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.generate(AbstractClassGenerator.java:339) > > at > > > net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator$ClassLoaderData$3.apply(AbstractClassGenerator.java:96) > > ... 99 more > > Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make > > protected final java.lang.Class > > > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain) > > throws java.lang.ClassFormatError accessible: module java.base does not > > "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @4802796d > > at > > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:354) > > at > > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:297) > > at > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:200) > > ... 107 more > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:34 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > >> Hi Rene, > >> > >> Thanks for sharing. > >> > >> I wonder if the mgmt server is started completely between the two steps > >> > >> * restart cloudstack-management > >> * install rc packages > >> > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Wei > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:29 AM Rene Peinthor < > rene.peint...@linbit.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >&
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
; > to > > > instantiate > > > [org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl]: > > > Constructor threw exception; nested exception is > > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > > at > > org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:224) > > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.SimpleInstantiationStrategy.instantiate(SimpleInstantiationStrategy.java:87) > > > at > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.instantiateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1326) > > > ... 78 more > > > Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > > at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.(GenericDaoBase.java:259) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl.(ConfigurationDaoImpl.java:51) > > > at > > > > > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native > > > Method) > > > ... 85 more > > > Caused by: net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: > > > java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException-->Unable to make protected > > > final java.lang.Class > > > > > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain) > > > throws java.lang.ClassFormatError accessible: module java.base does not > > > "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @4802796d > > > at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.defineClass(ReflectUtils.java:464) > > > at > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.generate(AbstractClassGenerator.java:339) > > > at > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator$ClassLoaderData$3.apply(AbstractClassGenerator.java:96) > > > ... 99 more > > > Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make > > > protected final java.lang.Class > > > > > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain) > > > throws java.lang.ClassFormatError accessible: module java.base does not > > > "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @4802796d > > > at > > > > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:354) > > > at > > > > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:297) > > > at > > > java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:200) > > > ... 107 more > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:34 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Rene, > > >> > > >> Thanks for sharing. > > >> > > >> I wonder if the mgmt server is started completely between the two steps > > >> > > >> * restart cloudstack-management > > >> * install rc packages > > >> > > >> > > >> Kind regards, > > >> Wei > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:29 AM Rene Peinthor < > > rene.peint...@linbit.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Kinda, from an empty database. > > >> > These are my install steps: > > >> > > > >> > * create VM's > > >> > * install latest stable release of that branch 4.19.2 > > >> > * run cloudstack-setup-databases script > > >> > * install systemvm template > > >> > * restart cloudstack-management > > >> > * install rc packages > > >> > * restart cloudstack-management > > >> > * BOOM > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM Daan Hoogland < > > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Rene, > > >> > > > > >> > > You are saying this is an upgrade from 4.19.2? > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:13 AM Rene Peinthor < > > >> rene.peint...@linbit.com > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > VM's already thrown away, but they were completely fresh setups or > > >> lets > > >> > > say > > >> > > > started from the 4.19.2.0 install (empty). > > >> > > > &
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0
> > > > > org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLifeCycle.java:169) > > > > at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:423) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(ContainerLifeCycle.java:110) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHandler.java:97) > > > > at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:387) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:73) > > > > at org.apache.cloudstack.ServerDaemon.start(ServerDaemon.java:203) > > > > at org.apache.cloudstack.ServerDaemon.main(ServerDaemon.java:114) > > > > Caused by: > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.UnsatisfiedDependencyException: > Error > > > > creating bean with name 'configDepot': Unsatisfied dependency > expressed > > > > through field '_configDao'; nested exception is > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error > creating > > > > bean with name 'configurationDaoImpl' defined in URL > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/system/spring-framework-config-system-context.xml]: > > > > Instantiation of bean failed; nested exception is > > > > org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException: Failed to > > > instantiate > > > > [org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl]: > > > > Constructor threw exception; nested exception is > > > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$AutowiredFieldElement.resolveFieldValue(AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:660) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$AutowiredFieldElement.inject(AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:640) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.InjectionMetadata.inject(InjectionMetadata.java:119) > > > > ... 65 more > > > > Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: > Error > > > > creating bean with name 'configurationDaoImpl' defined in URL > > > > > > > > [jar:file:/usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloudstack-4.19.2.0.jar!/META-INF/cloudstack/system/spring-framework-config-system-context.xml]: > > > > Instantiation of bean failed; nested exception is > > > > org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException: Failed to > > > instantiate > > > > [org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl]: > > > > Constructor threw exception; nested exception is > > > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.instantiateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1334) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBeanInstance(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1232) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:582) > > > > ... 76 more > > > > Caused by: org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException: > Failed > > > to > > > > instantiate > > > > [org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.ConfigurationDaoImpl]: > > > > Constructor threw exception; nested exception is > > > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > > > at > > > > org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:224) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.SimpleInstantiationStrategy.instantiate(SimpleInstantiationStrategy.java:87) > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.instantiateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1326) > > > > ... 78 more > > > > Caused by: java.lang.Exception
[I] Improvement: `cloudstack_service_offering` [cloudstack-terraform-provider]
ianc769 opened a new issue, #182: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/182 When developing in our dev environment we noticed we can set `customized = true` but nothing around constraints. - Min/Max CPU - Min/Max Memory - IOPS Outside of those, these new params would be very useful as well: - encryptroot - tags (not hosttags) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
