Re: [PR] service and disk offerings [cloudstack-terraform-provider]
CodeBleu commented on PR #77: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/77#issuecomment-2289085537 @fabiomatavelli @rohityadavcloud @poddm Can we come to an agreement on service_offerings between this PR and what @fabiomatavelli had worked on here #113 and move forward with one of these solutions? This is starting to become an issue for me to be able to manage service offerings for our customers and this would be a huge help to be able to create less offerings because of being able to have offerings that are more dynamic to use. P.S. @rohityadavcloud I would like to see a new release this quarter (end of Aug would be nice :smile: ) What can we do to help move the release of a version? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] service and disk offerings [cloudstack-terraform-provider]
poddm commented on PR #77: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/77#issuecomment-2289153210 I can remove `cloudstack_disk_offering` to not conflict with the other changes. I'd like to keep the separate types to align the GUI presentation and make it easier to understand what fields are required. - cloudstack_service_offering_constrained - cloudstack_service_offering_unconstrained - cloudstack_service_offering_fixed -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Integration of console access fails for 4.18.2.1
Hello Everyone, I am using "getCommandQuery" API passing "cmd=access", "vm" and "apiKey" parameters to integrate console access to our own client panel. We have two ACS installations, v4.15.0.0 and 4.18.2.1. If I call the API against v4.15 management server it returns a query string for console access and by appending it to the management server URL I'm able to view the VM's console in the browser. However, If I run the same command against v4.18 and append the returned query string to the management server URL, I just get "failed" string displayed in the browser. The query string returned from vf4.18 has all the parameters. Below is the example of URL I'm building using the returned query string: http:// :8080/console?apiKey=w19-cW1y9pPW8epJTCXZznnW0oz4fbifGWlTfoy_rrVpfhZLUqz_pQ5rysSm442KPL4jEcBNsWMdlTE4V32txQ&cmd=access&vm=3257f9bd-ae5f-448d-a052-6eded88f1d44&signature=UniJRaHso9nV8TW1%2BTkYXmJDvsY%3D Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Re: Integration of console access fails for 4.18.2.1
Try this https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.18/apis/createConsoleEndpoint.html On Wednesday, August 14, 2024, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am using "getCommandQuery" API passing "cmd=access", "vm" and "apiKey" > parameters to integrate console access to our own client panel. We have two > ACS installations, v4.15.0.0 and 4.18.2.1. If I call the API against v4.15 > management server it returns a query string for console access and by > appending it to the management server URL I'm able to view the VM's console > in the browser. However, If I run the same command against v4.18 and append > the returned query string to the management server URL, I just get "failed" > string displayed in the browser. The query string returned from vf4.18 has > all the parameters. Below is the example of URL I'm building using the > returned query string: > > http:// > :8080/console?apiKey=w19-cW1y9pPW8epJTCXZznnW0oz4fbifGW > lTfoy_rrVpfhZLUqz_pQ5rysSm442KPL4jEcBNsWMdlTE4V3 > 2txQ&cmd=access&vm=3257f9bd-ae5f-448d-a052-6eded88f1d44& > signature=UniJRaHso9nV8TW1%2BTkYXmJDvsY%3D > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks. >
