[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.2.0

[Pearl Dsilva]

Hi All,

I've created a v6.2.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and commit SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commits/8aae61e20c6789133c1d97d49e58f354ba7428c3

Commit:
8aae61e20c6789133c1d97d49e58f354ba7428c3

GitHub pre-release (for RC1 testing, contains changelog,
artifacts/binaries to test, checksums/usage details):
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/releases/tag/6.2.0

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-6.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 986611B4A5B7090D0145B230E7DB9FC18F16C6AE)
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open until October 1st, 2021.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why)

Regards,
Pearl Dsilva

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.2.0

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (binding)

  *   Verified source tarball signature and manually checked SHA512 checksum
> gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-cloudmonkey-6.2.0-src.tar.bz2.asc 
> apache-cloudstack-cloudmonkey-6.2.0-src.tar.bz2
gpg: Signature made Thu 23 Sep 2021 11:29:59 AM IST
gpg:using RSA key 986611B4A5B7090D0145B230E7DB9FC18F16C6AE
gpg: Good signature from "Pearl Dsilva (GPG Key) " 
[unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 9866 11B4 A5B7 090D 0145  B230 E7DB 9FC1 8F16 C6AE
  *   Verified binary version:
> cmk -v
Apache CloudStack 🐵 CloudMonkey 6.2.0 (build: 8aae61e, 2021-09-22T16:26:51+0530)
  *   Tested output formats (column, csv, json, text, table) with filter options
  *   Tested new autocomplete option, set to false wasn't able to autocomplete 
API param options; set to true was able to autocomplete API param options
  *   Tested all older "set" options
  *   Tested zone creation with json output in a test script that uses 
awk/sed/jq
  *   Test sync and async API response against two server profiles
  *   All above tests on Ubuntu Linux x86_64
  *   Other platforms where basic tests (download binary, set server profile, 
make API calls, output formats) pass: arm64/raspberrypi, Windows 10 x86-64

Regards.


From: Pearl Dsilva 
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 13:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.2.0

Hi All,

I've created a v6.2.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and commit SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commits/8aae61e20c6789133c1d97d49e58f354ba7428c3

Commit:
8aae61e20c6789133c1d97d49e58f354ba7428c3

GitHub pre-release (for RC1 testing, contains changelog,
artifacts/binaries to test, checksums/usage details):
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/releases/tag/6.2.0

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-6.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 986611B4A5B7090D0145B230E7DB9FC18F16C6AE)
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open until October 1st, 2021.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why)

Regards,
Pearl Dsilva

 

Zones and regions in CloudStack

[Jonas Porsche]

Hi Rohit,

just a short question to my mail I send a few days ago. What is the difference 
between zones and regions?

Kind regards
Jonas


__

Jonas Porsche
BA-Student der Informatik

EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Br?hl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P
F +49 341 42649 - 98
j.pors...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Gesch?ftsf?hrer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Tassilo M?schke
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 9065

Support:
+49 341 42649 555

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2018

ISAE 3402 Typ II Assessed

EWERK-Blog | 
LinkedIn | 
Xing | 
Twitter | 
Facebook


Ausk?nfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) ist 
vertraulich und nur f?r den Empf?nger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
bestimmungsgem??e Empf?nger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
Vervielf?ltigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverz?glich den Absender und l?schen Sie die 
E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.

RE: Zones and regions in CloudStack

[Alex Mattioli]

Hi Jonas,

A Region is one instance of the ACS database and a set of management servers, 
inside a Region you have Zones.

There are many ways to carve that but one example would be:
Regions: Europe, North America, Asia.  
Then say, inside the Europe region you can have the zones: London, Paris, 
Frankfurt, etc..etc..

Does that answer your question?

Cheers
Alex

 


-Original Message-
From: Jonas Porsche  
Sent: 24 September 2021 14:07
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Zones and regions in CloudStack

Hi Rohit,

just a short question to my mail I send a few days ago. What is the difference 
between zones and regions?

Kind regards
Jonas


__

Jonas Porsche
BA-Student der Informatik

EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Br?hl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P
F +49 341 42649 - 98
j.pors...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Gesch?ftsf?hrer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Tassilo M?schke
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 9065

Support:
+49 341 42649 555

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2018

ISAE 3402 Typ II Assessed

EWERK-Blog | 
LinkedIn | 
Xing | 
Twitter | 
Facebook


Ausk?nfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) ist 
vertraulich und nur f?r den Empf?nger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
bestimmungsgem??e Empf?nger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
Vervielf?ltigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverz?glich den Absender und l?schen Sie die 
E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.

RE: Zones and regions in CloudStack

[Jonas Porsche]

Hi Aley,

thank You for the answer.
Yeah that's helping me.

My original question to this was in relation to the old and the new UI. It 
seems to me that the regions feature isn't supported in the new UI. Is this 
intended or is the feature missing?

Kind regards
Jonas


__

Jonas Porsche
BA-Student der Informatik

EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Br?hl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P
F +49 341 42649 - 98
j.pors...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Gesch?ftsf?hrer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Tassilo M?schke
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 9065

Support:
+49 341 42649 555

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2018

ISAE 3402 Typ II Assessed

EWERK-Blog | 
LinkedIn | 
Xing | 
Twitter | 
Facebook


Ausk?nfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) ist 
vertraulich und nur f?r den Empf?nger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
bestimmungsgem??e Empf?nger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
Vervielf?ltigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverz?glich den Absender und l?schen Sie die 
E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.

RE: Zones and regions in CloudStack

[Jonas Porsche]

Hi Alex,



Sorry for the misspelling in the last mail.



My original question to this was in relation to the old and the new UI. It 
seems to me that the regions feature isn't supported in the new UI. Is this 
intended or is the feature missing?



Kind regards

Jonas


__

Jonas Porsche
BA-Student der Informatik

EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Br?hl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P
F +49 341 42649 - 98
j.pors...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Gesch?ftsf?hrer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Tassilo M?schke
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 9065

Support:
+49 341 42649 555

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2018

ISAE 3402 Typ II Assessed

EWERK-Blog | 
LinkedIn | 
Xing | 
Twitter | 
Facebook


Ausk?nfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) ist 
vertraulich und nur f?r den Empf?nger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
bestimmungsgem??e Empf?nger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
Vervielf?ltigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverz?glich den Absender und l?schen Sie die 
E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.2.0

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

+1

I've got it build and tested but found some minor issue with our
dependencies, look like they are outdated:
content in vendor/ folder would be older than 3years ?

go mod vendor
go get -u
go mod tidy



cloudstack-cloudmonkey git:(heads/6.2.0) ✗ go get -u
go get: upgraded github.com/briandowns/spinner
v0.0.0-20181029155426-195c31b675a7 => v1.16.0
go get: upgraded github.com/fatih/color v1.7.0 => v1.13.0
go get: upgraded github.com/gofrs/flock v0.7.0 => v0.8.1
go get: upgraded github.com/google/shlex v0.0.0-20150127133951-6f45313302b9
=> v0.0.0-20191202100458-e7afc7fbc510
go get: upgraded github.com/mattn/go-colorable v0.0.9 => v0.1.9
go get: upgraded github.com/mattn/go-isatty v0.0.4 => v0.0.14
go get: upgraded github.com/mattn/go-runewidth v0.0.3 => v0.0.13
go get: upgraded github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir v1.0.0 => v1.1.0
go get: upgraded github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter v0.0.1 => v0.0.5
go get: added github.com/rivo/uniseg v0.2.0
go get: upgraded golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20181019160139-8e24a49d80f8 =>
v0.0.0-20210923061019-b8560ed6a9b7
go get: upgraded gopkg.in/ini.v1 v1.39.0 => v1.63.2

cloudstack-cloudmonkey git:(heads/6.2.0) ✗ go mod tidy
go: downloading github.com/smartystreets/goconvey
v0.0.0-20180222194500-ef6db91d284a
go: downloading github.com/smartystreets/assertions
v0.0.0-20180927180507-b2de0cb4f26d
go: downloading github.com/jtolds/gls v4.2.1+incompatible
go: downloading github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs
v0.0.0-20181017120253-077cb4d1

cloudstack-cloudmonkey git:(heads/6.2.0) go mod vendor
cloudstack-cloudmonkey git:(heads/6.2.0) ✗ git status
On branch 6.2.0
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add/rm ..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore ..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified:   go.mod
modified:   vendor/github.com/chzyer/readline/complete.go
modified:   vendor/github.com/chzyer/readline/runes.go
deleted:vendor/github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir/go.mod
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/mkpost.go
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/types_aix.go
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/types_darwin.go
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/types_dragonfly.go
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/types_freebsd.go
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/types_netbsd.go
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/types_openbsd.go
deleted:vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix/types_solaris.go
modified:   vendor/modules.txt

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:05 AM Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
>   *   Verified source tarball signature and manually checked SHA512
> checksum
> > gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-cloudmonkey-6.2.0-src.tar.bz2.asc
> apache-cloudstack-cloudmonkey-6.2.0-src.tar.bz2
> gpg: Signature made Thu 23 Sep 2021 11:29:59 AM IST
> gpg:using RSA key 986611B4A5B7090D0145B230E7DB9FC18F16C6AE
> gpg: Good signature from "Pearl Dsilva (GPG Key) "
> [unknown]
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 9866 11B4 A5B7 090D 0145  B230 E7DB 9FC1 8F16 C6AE
>   *   Verified binary version:
> > cmk -v
> Apache CloudStack 🐵 CloudMonkey 6.2.0 (build: 8aae61e,
> 2021-09-22T16:26:51+0530)
>   *   Tested output formats (column, csv, json, text, table) with filter
> options
>   *   Tested new autocomplete option, set to false wasn't able to
> autocomplete API param options; set to true was able to autocomplete API
> param options
>   *   Tested all older "set" options
>   *   Tested zone creation with json output in a test script that uses
> awk/sed/jq
>   *   Test sync and async API response against two server profiles
>   *   All above tests on Ubuntu Linux x86_64
>   *   Other platforms where basic tests (download binary, set server
> profile, make API calls, output formats) pass: arm64/raspberrypi, Windows
> 10 x86-64
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: Pearl Dsilva 
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 13:14
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.2.0
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a v6.2.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following
> artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and commit SHA:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commits/8aae61e20c6789133c1d97d49e58f354ba7428c3
>
> Commit:
> 8aae61e20c6789133c1d97d49e58f354ba7428c3
>
> GitHub pre-release (for RC1 testing, contains changelog,
> artifacts/binaries to test, checksums/usage details):
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/releases/tag/6.2.0
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-6.2.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 986611B4A5B7090D0145B230E7DB9FC18F16C6AE)
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open until October 1st, 2021.
>
> For sanity in tallying the

Re: [DISCUSS] Way to fix a problem with KVM snapshots for non-managed storages

[Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador]

Hi Slavka,

In my POV, volume/VM deletion behavior when "snapshot.backup.to.secondary" is 
"false" should be the same as when it's "true", regarding to disk snapshots. 
What changes to snapshots is the location of they, therefore, operators should 
be able to do any operation with them on primary, as when they are on 
secondary. 

With that said, I see two ways to achieve this:

1. Backup the snapshot to secondary;
2. As operators choose to not backup snapshots at first, their features should 
be adapted to work with primary storage;

Best regards,
Daniel.

On 2021/09/14 07:20:12, Slavka Peleva  wrote: 
> Hi all,
> 
> There is a problem with snapshots kept only on primary storage for
> non-managed drivers, and I've opened an issue request #5433
> 
> The problem is when we delete a volume with more than one snapshot kept
> only on primary with the option snapshot.backup.to.secondary to false. And
> the behaviour is different for most of the non-managed drivers.
> My question is which is the best way to handle this?
> For me the better option is each driver to handle this (if there is need to
> delete the snapshots from DB/storage or they could live without the volume)
> 
> Thanks for the help!
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Slavka
> 

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] nvazquez commented on a change in pull request #244: Adding a note for fixing pvlan issues

[GitBox]

nvazquez commented on a change in pull request #244:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/244#discussion_r715627020



##
File path: source/adminguide/networking/isolation_in_advanced_zone_with_vlan.rst
##
@@ -80,6 +80,11 @@ Prerequisites
 Creating a PVLAN-Enabled Network
 
 
+   .. note::
+  If you are facing issues with connectivity in PVLANS, especially 
community and promiscuous PVLANS
+  in a multi hypervisor environment, this could be caused by the way 
PVLANs were implemented

Review comment:
   Could be easier to mention `community and promiscuous PVLANs were 
introduced after 4.14.0 and were not supported on previous versions` rather 
than `this could be caused by the way PVLANs were implemented in 4.14.0, which 
was later fixed in 4.15.0`?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

New storage integration in CloudStack

[Ivet Petrova]

Hello all,

Hope I catch you in good mood and shape :) on Friday!

I am writing to share that from the next CloudStack LTS Release we will have a 
support for new storage - LINBIT. Probably you have seen on GitHub.
With the guys from LINBIT we organise a joint event next week, which will 
basically promote the new integration and show to the world how is it working.

I am sharing a link to the event, will be cool if more people from our 
community can join: 
https://linbit.com/storage-days-apache-cloudstack-cloud-computing/


Kind regards,