Re: Code executed twice while deploying VM

[Rakesh Venkatesh]

Is there a way second computation can be avoided if "startvm" or some other
flag to indicate starting the vm flag is passed?

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 8:15 AM David Jumani 
wrote:

> Hi Rakesh,
>
> If I'm right, that's because a VM can be deployed without starting it. It
> initially checks whether the VM can be deployed, and once again before
> starting as things might change (if started some time after deployment)
> I'm all for optimizing the code but this is the reason I see the
> duplication of code / computation
>
> 
> From: Rakesh Venkatesh 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 2:34 PM
> To: users ; dev 
> Subject: Code executed twice while deploying VM
>
> Hello Users/Devs
>
>
> Today I observed that while deploying a VM, the same code is executed
> twice: the first time, while trying to find a suitable deployment
> destination and the second time, while trying to start a VM. I think this
> is a redundant process and also time-consuming since the same calculations
> are done twice. These are the one of the duplicate logs
>
> Asyn job is created
> 2021-07-28 09:01:27,964 (logid:10ac9f28) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to
> find storage pool
>
> Now it finds a suitable destination
> Returning Deployment Destination:
>
> Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id))]
> : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(1)-Host(1)-Storage(Volume(23|ROOT-->Pool(3))]
>
> VM start attempt #1
>
> 2021-07-28 09:01:36,039 job-174/job-175 ctx-b815930d) (logid:10ac9f28)
> ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to find storage pool
>
>
> From the above two logs, I can see that starting at 9:01:27 and 09:01:36,
> its doing the same calculations.
> if I see the logs before and after the above-mentioned logs, they are all
> same. They try to find a suitable host, a suitable storage pool, and so on.
> In the production platform, the calculation is done twice and this takes a
> lot of time to deploy a VM.
>
> Do you guys also think this is an issue or redundant process and needs to
> be improved? Or any other suggestions to avoid double calculation?
>
> --
> Thanks and regards
> Rakesh
>
>
>
>

-- 
Thanks and regards
Rakesh venkatesh

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0

[David Jumani]

Thanks for your support.
As an RM, I'll need access to the cloudstack / cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 
dockerhub repo.
I'll also need my GPG key added to the KEYS file in the apache repo. Could a 
PMC help me out with that ?



pub   rsa4096 2021-07-29 [SC] [expires: 2023-07-29]
  C7E3B47728631AA39FB026FC92D88ECF4D63C923
uid   [ultimate] David Jumani 
sig 392D88ECF4D63C923 2021-07-29  David Jumani 


-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
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=CBlM
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-


Thanks

From: Suresh Anaparti 
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 8:45 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0

+1

Good luck David!

Regards,
Suresh

On 15/07/21, 12:02 PM, "David Jumani"  wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to put myself forward as the release manager for CloudStack 
Kubernetes Provider 
v1.0.

This will be the first release of CloudStack Kubernetes Provider which 
facilitates Kubernetes deployments on Cloudstack.
It allows Kubernetes to dynamically allocate IP addresses and the 
respective networking rules on CloudStack to ensure seamless TCP, UDP and 
TCP-Proxy LoadBalancer deployments on Kubernetes.

It was initially the Cloudstack provider in Kubernetes which was later 
extracted to allow for pluggable providers.
A lot of work and effort has gone into developing it, and we are looking 
forward to its grand debut.

The list of open issues triaged for the v1.0 milestone can be found at 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/milestone/1
If you encounter any issues, please do report them at 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues

Looking forward to your support

Thanks,
David








 

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi David,

+1 and thanks for volunteering as the RM.

On behalf of the ACS PMC I'll acknowledge your ticket 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22151 so you've access to the 
dockerhub repo to publish RC/releases.

For the GPG public key, you need to commit your GPG public key to 
https://downloads.apache.org/cloudstack/KEYS - see if you've svn checkout 
persmission as a committer, otherwise, I can add your GPG public key to the 
KEYS file.


Regards.


From: David Jumani 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 13:23
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0

Thanks for your support.
As an RM, I'll need access to the cloudstack / cloudstack-kubernetes-provider 
dockerhub repo.
I'll also need my GPG key added to the KEYS file in the apache repo. Could a 
PMC help me out with that ?



pub   rsa4096 2021-07-29 [SC] [expires: 2023-07-29]
  C7E3B47728631AA39FB026FC92D88ECF4D63C923
uid   [ultimate] David Jumani 
sig 392D88ECF4D63C923 2021-07-29  David Jumani 


-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
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=CBlM
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-


Thanks

From: Suresh Anaparti 
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 8:45 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0

+1

Good luck David!

Regards,
Suresh

On 15/07/21, 12:02 PM, "David Jumani"  wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to put myself forward as the release manager for CloudStack 
Kubernetes Provider 
v1.0.

This will be the first release of CloudStack Kubernetes Provider which 
facilitates Kubernetes deployments on Cloudstack.
It allows Kubernetes to dynamically allocate IP addresses and the 
respective networking rules on CloudStack to ensure seamless TCP, UDP and 
TCP-Proxy LoadBalancer deployments on Kubernetes.

It was initially the Cloudstack provider in Kubernetes which was later 
extracted to allow for pluggable providers.
A lot of work and effort has gone into developing it, and we are looking 
forward to its grand debut.

The list of open issues triaged for the v1.0 milestone can be found at 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/milestone/1
If you encounter any issues, please do report them at 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues

Looking forward to your support

Thanks,
David











 

Re: Code executed twice while deploying VM

[David Jumani]

The way the deployVM command works is that it first runs the create() where it 
checks the requirements, returns the jobid and then the execute() where it 
starts the VM if specified.
Perhaps the VM can be started in create() itself if startvm is true and return 
a future which is then checked in execute()


From: Rakesh Venkatesh 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 12:47 PM
To: dev 
Subject: Re: Code executed twice while deploying VM

Is there a way second computation can be avoided if "startvm" or some other
flag to indicate starting the vm flag is passed?

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 8:15 AM David Jumani 
wrote:

> Hi Rakesh,
>
> If I'm right, that's because a VM can be deployed without starting it. It
> initially checks whether the VM can be deployed, and once again before
> starting as things might change (if started some time after deployment)
> I'm all for optimizing the code but this is the reason I see the
> duplication of code / computation
>
> 
> From: Rakesh Venkatesh 
> http://www.rakeshv@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 2:34 PM
> To: users ; dev 
> Subject: Code executed twice while deploying VM
>
> Hello Users/Devs
>
>
> Today I observed that while deploying a VM, the same code is executed
> twice: the first time, while trying to find a suitable deployment
> destination and the second time, while trying to start a VM. I think this
> is a redundant process and also time-consuming since the same calculations
> are done twice. These are the one of the duplicate logs
>
> Asyn job is created
> 2021-07-28 09:01:27,964 (logid:10ac9f28) ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to
> find storage pool
>
> Now it finds a suitable destination
> Returning Deployment Destination:
>
> Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id))]
> : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(1)-Host(1)-Storage(Volume(23|ROOT-->Pool(3))]
>
> VM start attempt #1
>
> 2021-07-28 09:01:36,039 job-174/job-175 ctx-b815930d) (logid:10ac9f28)
> ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator to find storage pool
>
>
> From the above two logs, I can see that starting at 9:01:27 and 09:01:36,
> its doing the same calculations.
> if I see the logs before and after the above-mentioned logs, they are all
> same. They try to find a suitable host, a suitable storage pool, and so on.
> In the production platform, the calculation is done twice and this takes a
> lot of time to deploy a VM.
>
> Do you guys also think this is an issue or redundant process and needs to
> be improved? Or any other suggestions to avoid double calculation?
>
> --
> Thanks and regards
> Rakesh
>
>
>
>

--
Thanks and regards
Rakesh venkatesh

 

Error custom disk size 200 GB disk

[technologyrss.mail]

*Hi,*

I try to create Instance custom disk size. So I try to create first

1. compute offering

2. Disk offering

3. Then I try to create Instance but not create instance properly.

Error log from


But If I create default offering 100GB disk then it is ok.

How can I solve this issue?

Please help me.

--

*Thanks & Regards.*

*Support Admin*

Facebook  | Twitter 
 | YouTube 
 | LinkedIn 



116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
*Mob :* +88 01716915504*
Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com*
Web :* www.technologyrss.com

Re: Error custom disk size 200 GB disk

[Darrin Hüsselmann]

Hi,

Have a look at the global setting custom.diskoffering.size.max

Cheers,
Darrin

From: technologyrss.mail 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 5:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Error custom disk size 200 GB disk


Hi,

I try to create Instance custom disk size. So I try to create first

1. compute offering

2. Disk offering

3. Then I try to create Instance but not create instance properly.

[cid:part1.27A5EF1E.BE01AB9C@gmail.com]

Error log from

[cid:part2.07A6FCA3.F124001F@gmail.com]


But If I create default offering 100GB disk then it is ok.

How can I solve this issue?

Please help me.

--

Thanks & Regards.

Support Admin

Facebook | Twitter | 
YouTube | 
LinkedIn

116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
Mob : +88 01716915504
Email : support.ad...@technologyrss.com
Web : www.technologyrss.com

 

Re: Error custom disk size 200 GB disk

[Wei ZHOU]

yes.

please also check
1. storage.overprovisioning.factor in global setting and cluster setting.
2. pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold and
pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold in global setting

-Wei


On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 17:12, Darrin Hüsselmann <
darrin.husselm...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Have a look at the global setting custom.diskoffering.size.max
>
> Cheers,
> Darrin
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* technologyrss.mail 
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2021 5:06 PM
> *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> *Subject:* Error custom disk size 200 GB disk
>
>
> *Hi,*
>
> I try to create Instance custom disk size. So I try to create first
>
> 1. compute offering
>
> 2. Disk offering
>
> 3. Then I try to create Instance but not create instance properly.
>
> Error log from
>
>
> But If I create default offering 100GB disk then it is ok.
>
> How can I solve this issue?
>
> Please help me.
>
> --
>
> *Thanks & Regards.*
>
> *Support Admin*
>
> Facebook | Twitter  | YouTube
>  | LinkedIn
> 
>
> 116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
> Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
> *Mob :* +88 01716915504
> * Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com
> * Web :* www.technologyrss.com
>

Re: Error custom disk size 200 GB disk

[technologyrss.mail]

this is



-


On 7/29/2021 9:11 PM, Darrin Hüsselmann wrote:

Hi,

Have a look at the global setting custom.diskoffering.size.max

Cheers,
Darrin



*From:* technologyrss.mail 
*Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2021 5:06 PM
*To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
*Subject:* Error custom disk size 200 GB disk

*Hi,*

I try to create Instance custom disk size. So I try to create first

1. compute offering

2. Disk offering

3. Then I try to create Instance but not create instance properly.

Error log from


But If I create default offering 100GB disk then it is ok.

How can I solve this issue?

Please help me.

--

*Thanks & Regards.*

*Support Admin*

Facebook | Twitter  | YouTube 
 | LinkedIn 



116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
*Mob :* +88 01716915504*
Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com 
*

Web :* www.technologyrss.com 

Re: Error custom disk size 200 GB disk

[technologyrss.mail]

1. option

2. option

3. option

which value I setup for 200GB disk volume.

**
*Alamin*

On 7/29/2021 10:35 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:

yes.

please also check
1. storage.overprovisioning.factor in global setting and cluster setting.
2. pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold and
pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold in global setting

-Wei


On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 17:12, Darrin Hüsselmann <
darrin.husselm...@shapeblue.com> wrote:


Hi,

Have a look at the global setting custom.diskoffering.size.max

Cheers,
Darrin





--
*From:* technologyrss.mail 
*Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2021 5:06 PM
*To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
*Subject:* Error custom disk size 200 GB disk


*Hi,*

I try to create Instance custom disk size. So I try to create first

1. compute offering

2. Disk offering

3. Then I try to create Instance but not create instance properly.

Error log from


But If I create default offering 100GB disk then it is ok.

How can I solve this issue?

Please help me.

--

*Thanks & Regards.*

*Support Admin*

Facebook | Twitter  | YouTube
 | LinkedIn


116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
*Mob :* +88 01716915504
* Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com
* Web :* www.technologyrss.com

[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] davidjumani opened a new pull request #34: Updating for release

[GitBox]

davidjumani opened a new pull request #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/34


   Updating Readme and examples prior to the release


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] vladimirpetrov commented on pull request #224: Adding docs for SUSE / RHEL8 variants support

[GitBox]

vladimirpetrov commented on pull request #224:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/224#issuecomment-889665824


   Docs verified - LGTM


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: Error custom disk size 200 GB disk

[technologyrss.mail]

I find out my problem is compute offering.

Compute offering not support CPU 1600MHz. How can I increase this ?

Please help me.

*---**
**Alamin*

On 7/29/2021 10:35 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:

yes.

please also check
1. storage.overprovisioning.factor in global setting and cluster setting.
2. pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold and
pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold in global setting

-Wei


On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 17:12, Darrin Hüsselmann <
darrin.husselm...@shapeblue.com> wrote:


Hi,

Have a look at the global setting custom.diskoffering.size.max

Cheers,
Darrin





--
*From:* technologyrss.mail 
*Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2021 5:06 PM
*To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
*Subject:* Error custom disk size 200 GB disk


*Hi,*

I try to create Instance custom disk size. So I try to create first

1. compute offering

2. Disk offering

3. Then I try to create Instance but not create instance properly.

Error log from


But If I create default offering 100GB disk then it is ok.

How can I solve this issue?

Please help me.

--

*Thanks & Regards.*

*Support Admin*

Facebook | Twitter  | YouTube
 | LinkedIn


116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
*Mob :* +88 01716915504
* Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com
* Web :* www.technologyrss.com

Re: 1600MHz CPU error when I create Instance

[Wei ZHOU]

The vm cpu speed (in mhz) should not be greater than the physical host
(hypervisor).

you can find the check in cloudstack here.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/server/src/main/java/com/cloud/capacity/CapacityManagerImpl.java#L416

-Wei

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 08:46, technologyrss.mail <
technologyrss.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I try to create compute offering like 4GB RAM , 4 cpu and 1500MHz  then I
> create Instance is ok. But when I set 1500MHz+ like 1600MHz it is not
> working. how can I solve this issue?
>
> My KVM server have 24 CPU
>
>
> How can I solve this issue?
>
> Please help me.
>
> --
>
> *Thanks & Regards.*
>
> *Support Admin*
>
> Facebook | Twitter  | YouTube
>  | LinkedIn
> 
>
> 116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
> Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
> *Mob :* +88 01716915504
> * Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com
> * Web :* www.technologyrss.com
>
>