Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC2)

2021-06-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
All,

We've not got any confirmation for a blocker on RC2 yet, kindly raise and 
report any blockers if you've found in RC2.

And please also continue testing and voting. Thanks.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 17:00
To: Andrija Panic ; dev ; 
Corey, Mike 
Cc: users 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC2)

Since there are two thread on this, I request Mike to test ACS 4.15/older 
versions UI/API and 4.15.1.0 RC2 legacy and new UI. Thanks.


Regards.


From: Andrija Panic 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 04:15
To: dev ; Rohit Yadav ; 
Corey, Mike 
Cc: users 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC2)

@Rohit Yadav we might have a UI blocker, I'm 
waiting for Mike to report the issue - it seems (per his separate email to this 
ML) that the Traffic Labels are not persisted after the Zone deployment (UI 
doesn't show traffic labels) - I do recall an issue in 4.15.0 where similar was 
happening and one could not update the Traffic label in new UI (old UI had to 
be used)

@Corey, Mike please report here with the problem - 
thx.





 

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 18:28, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:ro...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi All,

I've created a 4.15.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.15.1.0-RC20210616T2128
Commit SHA:
3afd37022b9dac52cd146dccada6012e47a80232

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.1.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for the next week until 22 June 2021.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate and 4.15.1
systemvmtemplates are available here:
https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.15.1.0-RC2/
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.15/

Documentation is not published yet, but the following may be referenced for
upgrade related tests: (there's a new 4.15.1 systemvmtemplate to be
registered prior to upgrade)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.15/source/upgrading/upgrade

Regards.


--

Andrija Panić


Re: Issues Found Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC2)

2021-06-21 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Mike,

as for the first issue, I have deployed a Zone manually with RC2 - and my
label (for KVM is there). I've also deployed a zone with VMware - and again
everything is OK - traffic label is there (I had 2 physical networks, with
different traffic labels - and all good)

If you can please advise on how different your setup might be - let's try
to reproduce the issue - otherwise, I don't see an issue with RC2.
(screenshot below)

Best,

[image: image.png]


On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 23:01, Corey, Mike 
wrote:

> Well - I found a "workaround", but it really can't be explained.  I
> reverted to a snapshot THREE times and retraced my steps just to validate
> what I'm seeing.
>
> Short summary - When the zone is enabled and the systemvms are created a
> folder is created at /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/.  This folder has
> the nobody:nobody attribute and the error Unable to copy systemvm ISO on
> secondary storage.  Next, I removed the Secondary Storage entry, restarted
> services, re-added Secondary Storage, restarted services, AND systemvms
> deploy.
>
> Attributes of UID Folder at initial systemvm build:
> drwxr-xr-x. 3 cloud  cloud34 Jun 18 16:27 .
> drwxrwx---. 3 root   cloud16 Jun 18 16:27 ..
> drwxrwxrwt. 6 nobody nobody 4096 Jun 18 15:51 345050034639.51841a7
>
> *** ACS tries to set perms on this folder but fails ***
> 2021-06-18 16:27:25,862 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (DirectAgent-3:ctx-a90e1ecb usphlmvesxt01.phl.global.corp.sap,
> job-9/job-51, cmd: CopyCommand) (logid:3d148cdf) chmod: changing
> permissions of ‘/var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050034639.51841a7’: Operation not
> permitted
> 2021-06-18 16:27:25,865 WARN  [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (DirectAgent-3:ctx-a90e1ecb usphlmvesxt01.phl.global.corp.sap,
> job-9/job-51, cmd: CopyCommand) (logid:3d148cdf) Unable to set permissions
> for /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050034639.51841a7 due to chmod: changing
> permissions of ‘/var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050034639.51841a7’: Operation not
> permitted
>
> ***When you remove the SS in UI and restart the services, ACS will clear
> this folder***
> 2021-06-18 16:31:07,962 INFO  [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (SpringContextShutdownHook:null) (logid:) shutting down scheduled tasks
> 2021-06-18 16:31:07,962 INFO  [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (SpringContextShutdownHook:null) (logid:) Cleanup mounted NFS mount points
> used in current session
> 2021-06-18 16:31:07,962 INFO  [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (SpringContextShutdownHook:null) (logid:) umount NFS mount:
> /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050034639.51841a7
> 2021-06-18 16:31:07,962 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (SpringContextShutdownHook:null) (logid:) Executing: sudo umount
> /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050034639.51841a7
>
> ***Re-adding the SS in the UI and restarting services ACS CAN set the
> perms for the new folder ***
> 2021-06-18 16:38:56,254 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (DirectAgent-15:ctx-f9c800cf usphlmvesxt02.phl.global.corp.sap,
> job-9/job-58, cmd: StartCommand) (logid:3d148cdf) Executing: sudo chmod
> 1777 /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050034639.50b47f15
> 2021-06-18 16:38:56,269 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (DirectAgent-15:ctx-f9c800cf usphlmvesxt02.phl.global.corp.sap,
> job-9/job-58, cmd: StartCommand) (logid:3d148cdf) Executing while with
> timeout : 144
> 2021-06-18 16:38:56,293 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (DirectAgent-15:ctx-f9c800cf usphlmvesxt02.phl.global.corp.sap,
> job-9/job-58, cmd: StartCommand) (logid:3d148cdf) Execution is successful.
>
>
> Attributes after SS removed, services restarted, SS added, services
> restarted:
> drwxr-xr-x. 3 cloud cloud   35 Jun 18 16:38 .
> drwxrwx---. 3 root  cloud   16 Jun 18 16:27 ..
> drwxrwxrwt. 6 root  root  4096 Jun 18 15:51 345050034639.50b47f15
>
> So you can see that root:root is applied AFTER the original SS is removed
> and readded into the zone.  I don't why the original attempt by ACS to
> build this directory fails.  Look forward to your thoughts!
>
> Have a great weekend!
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Corey, Mike 
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 11:47 AM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: Issues Found Apache CloudStack 4.15.1.0 (RC2)
>
> Honestly, I can live with having to go in after the wizard completes and
> modify the traffic labels.  What I'm hitting regarding permissions on the
> Secondary Storage is more of a priority.  The systemVM builds are just
> looping because they can't copy/mount the systemvm.iso to the proper
> directory.
>
> What I did in previous builds, both 4.14 and 4.15.0, was to manually
> create the systemvm folder and set ownership (chown -R) to cloud:cloud.
> This allowed for the copying of template and systemvm.iso files to work.
>
> However, now with 4.15.1, I'm getting permissions error when copying the
> systemvm.iso to the /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/
> 021-06-18 11:30:32,062 ERROR [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
> (DirectAgent-2:ctx-8e03b79a , jo

Re: Meet the CloudStack Community: Who is NEXT?

2021-06-21 Thread Gabriel Bräscher
Hi Ivet & all

I would suggest Pierre-Luc and/or Simon :-)
They are PMCs that have been involved in the project for some time. It
would be great if one of them (or both) could share a bit of their
long-term experience with CloudStack.

Cheers,
Gabriel.

Em sex., 18 de jun. de 2021 às 12:05, Ivet Petrova <
ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com> escreveu:

> Hey,
>
> Hope all of you are ready for the weekend :) I am rising again the topic
> for nominations for video participation. It is not scary, it is easy and
> nice :)
>
> Whom would you like to nominate? Be brave!
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
>
> On 13 Jun 2021, at 0:11, Daan Hoogland  daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> grumble
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:45 PM Slavka Peleva  >
> wrote:
>
> Great to hear that, Rohit, even if you don't complete the book ;) And
> Andrija will survive the interview 😇
>
> I can't wait to watch the interviews with you :)
>
> Kind regards,
> Slavka
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
>


Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New life to Terraform Provider CloudStack with Apache CloudStack project

2021-06-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
Update - the process has been slow due to getting major contributors to agree 
on code base relicensing and getting Hashicorp to transfer the repo to its 
original/major author Sander who now has relicensed the repositories under 
APLv2:
https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack
https://github.com/xanzy/go-cloudstack

We're in the final process of IP clearance post which the code base will be 
accepted and available in the following repositories by either a ASF member 
(Paul has volunteered) or an officer of PMC with suitable permissions:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go

As some may realise there is a new dependency repo (the Go SDK repo) which I'm 
advised by Sander should go along with the donation as it's used by the 
Terraform repo and Sander has notified submission of software grants 
(https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#grants) for both 
the repos. I'll keep the thread open if anyone has any concerns or objections 
for the additional dependency repo.

Regards.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 1:16:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New life to Terraform Provider CloudStack with 
Apache CloudStack project

Update - I've created the new repository on Github: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider

... and logged request with ASF infra:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21772


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 13:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] New life to Terraform Provider CloudStack with Apache 
CloudStack project

Hi all,

After 120 hours, the vote [1] for accepting codebase of Terraform Provider for 
CloudStack by the Apache CloudStack project has passed with the following votes:

+1 (PMC / binding)
4 persons (Wido, Daan, Boris, Rohit)

+1 (non-binding)
5 persons (Nathan, Abhishek, Hari, Suresh, Nicolas)

0
none

-1 (non-binding)
1 person (Rene)

Thanks to everyone participating. Following this I'll request ASF infra with a 
new repository: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider have 
access enabled for all committers/PMC with issues, pull request and wiki 
features.

[1] https://markmail.org/message/26yjsewj4tgq


Regards.

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




 



[DISCUSS] Usage server improvements

2021-06-21 Thread Nicolas Vazquez
Hi all,

I would like to propose a refactor and improvements on the usage server; and 
have created the following design document: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Usage+server+improvements.

Please review and provide your thoughts and suggestions.


Regards,

Nicolas Vazquez

 



[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] davidjumani commented on pull request #32: Update Kubernetes version to 1.20.6

2021-06-21 Thread GitBox


davidjumani commented on pull request #32:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-865517226


   @rhtyd @joschi36 Can this be merged after 1.0 is released? Since there only 
exist isos for 1.16. Post release isos for 1.18, 1.20 can be created and tested


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org