[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd commented on pull request #132: cloud-init and UserData service documentation cleanup

[GitBox]

rhtyd commented on pull request #132:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/132#issuecomment-752448828


   Ping @onitake 



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd commented on pull request #157: Virtual Router Service Offering

[GitBox]

rhtyd commented on pull request #157:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/157#issuecomment-752449521


   ping @ustcweizhou are we expecting the content?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd commented on pull request #172: Update user-data.rst

[GitBox]

rhtyd commented on pull request #172:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/172#issuecomment-752452302


   LGTM, we need one more review, can you check @weizhouapache @onitake thnx



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd opened a new pull request #173: releasenotes: add note about CentOS 8 EOL in Dec 2021

[GitBox]

rhtyd opened a new pull request #173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173


   This adds notes in release notes's compatibilty matrix page and about page.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd commented on pull request #173: releasenotes: add note about CentOS 8 EOL in Dec 2021

[GitBox]

rhtyd commented on pull request #173:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#issuecomment-752472654


   requesting docbuild



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] ACSGitBot commented on pull request #173: releasenotes: add note about CentOS 8 EOL in Dec 2021

[GitBox]

ACSGitBot commented on pull request #173:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#issuecomment-752472759


   Your request had been received, i'll go and build the documentation and 
check the output log for errors.
   
   This shouldn't take long.
   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] ACSGitBot commented on pull request #173: releasenotes: add note about CentOS 8 EOL in Dec 2021

[GitBox]

ACSGitBot commented on pull request #173:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#issuecomment-752475972


   Build finished.  You can review it at:   
https://acs-www.shapeblue.com/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr173//
   
   Build Log Output:
   
   
   No log errors found to report.//



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [discuss] CentOS announcement

[Rohit Yadav]

We've added support for CentOS 8 in 4.15 (milestone, both as a management 
server and KVM host). I think it's sensible to wait and see what replaces 
CentOS and CentOS7 users can continue to use it until 2024 (unless Redhat 
decides otherwise). I've proposed a PR to add the EOL note in our release notes 
4.15:



Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander 
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 01:07
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [discuss] CentOS announcement

My opinion at the moment: Wait until the dust settles.

CloudStack should mainly release RPM based packages which work with systemd.

In the end many distros nowadays boil down to:

- DEB or RPM
- systemd

Yes, dependencies might differ in names and versions, but these are the
main differences between Linux distributions.

I could well be that CloudStacks works on CentOS Stream, Rocky, SL and
many other RPM based distributions.

But since this is all very fresh I would wait for now and see how this
turns out.

Wido

On 12/24/20 1:01 PM, Giles Sirett wrote:
> You may have seen this news recently announced by Redhat and the CentOS 
> project.  [1] [2]
>
>
>
>
>
> At this early stage, it looks like   CentOS Stream will not provide the 
> stability that we probably expect
>
>
>
> So, what Linux distro should we be targeting for MS and  KVM agents going 
> forward  ?  I guess this is a decision that we have to make as a project.
>
>
>
> CentOS 7 will receive full updates only until the year end (Q4 2020) and 
> maintenance updates will continue until 30 June 2024, so I don't think we 
> need to rush this decision. Also, I think that there will be a lot of 
> emerging competitors to fill the void, like the recent announcement of Rocky. 
> [3] gives a good summary of current choices
>
>
>
>  I guess, actually, the question is: *when* should we aim to make this 
> decision ?  - the advantage of leaving it is we are able to see what others 
> settle on.
>
>
>
>
> [1] Red Hat makes drastic changes to CentOS, leaves users fuming | 
> TechRadar
>
> [2] CentOS Project shifts focus to CentOS Stream - 
> Blog.CentOS.org
> [3] About/Product - CentOS Wiki
> [4] Where CentOS Linux users can go from here | 
> ZDNet
>
> Kind regards
> Giles
>
>
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [discuss] CentOS announcement

[Rohit Yadav]

(looks like pressing enter sent the email)

Here's the doc PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 17:27
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [discuss] CentOS announcement

We've added support for CentOS 8 in 4.15 (milestone, both as a management 
server and KVM host). I think it's sensible to wait and see what replaces 
CentOS and CentOS7 users can continue to use it until 2024 (unless Redhat 
decides otherwise). I've proposed a PR to add the EOL note in our release notes 
4.15:



Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander 
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 01:07
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [discuss] CentOS announcement

My opinion at the moment: Wait until the dust settles.

CloudStack should mainly release RPM based packages which work with systemd.

In the end many distros nowadays boil down to:

- DEB or RPM
- systemd

Yes, dependencies might differ in names and versions, but these are the
main differences between Linux distributions.

I could well be that CloudStacks works on CentOS Stream, Rocky, SL and
many other RPM based distributions.

But since this is all very fresh I would wait for now and see how this
turns out.

Wido

On 12/24/20 1:01 PM, Giles Sirett wrote:
> You may have seen this news recently announced by Redhat and the CentOS 
> project.  [1] [2]
>
>
>
>
>
> At this early stage, it looks like   CentOS Stream will not provide the 
> stability that we probably expect
>
>
>
> So, what Linux distro should we be targeting for MS and  KVM agents going 
> forward  ?  I guess this is a decision that we have to make as a project.
>
>
>
> CentOS 7 will receive full updates only until the year end (Q4 2020) and 
> maintenance updates will continue until 30 June 2024, so I don't think we 
> need to rush this decision. Also, I think that there will be a lot of 
> emerging competitors to fill the void, like the recent announcement of Rocky. 
> [3] gives a good summary of current choices
>
>
>
>  I guess, actually, the question is: *when* should we aim to make this 
> decision ?  - the advantage of leaving it is we are able to see what others 
> settle on.
>
>
>
>
> [1] Red Hat makes drastic changes to CentOS, leaves users fuming | 
> TechRadar
>
> [2] CentOS Project shifts focus to CentOS Stream - 
> Blog.CentOS.org
> [3] About/Product - CentOS Wiki
> [4] Where CentOS Linux users can go from here | 
> ZDNet
>
> Kind regards
> Giles
>
>
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] GabrielBrascher commented on a change in pull request #173: releasenotes: add note about CentOS 8 EOL in Dec 2021

[GitBox]

GabrielBrascher commented on a change in pull request #173:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#discussion_r550205055



##
File path: source/releasenotes/compat.rst
##
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ Supported OS Versions for Management Server
 This section lists the operating systems that are supported for running
 CloudStack Management Server.
 
--  Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04, 20.04 LTS
--  CentOS versions 7.x, 8.x
+-  Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS

Review comment:
   Ubuntu 16.04 also has an EOL coming soon, in April 2021. Should add such 
a disclaimer for it as well?





This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] GabrielBrascher commented on issue #906: [BUG] Migration of a VM (local storage) stuck on UI

[GitBox]

GabrielBrascher commented on issue #906:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/906#issuecomment-752634881


   Thanks for the hint, @shwstppr.
   
   I am not sure if #789 tackles this issue; from what I understood that PR 
deals only with stopped VMs being migrated on VMware clusters? Please correct 
me if I am wrong.
   
   Adding a bit of information here, this issue was created due to tests on 
live migration of VMs running in KVM with local storage volumes; the migration 
itself worked fine, except by the fact of UI not dealing with the command 
response. The problem seems to be related to the UI not dealing with the 
expected response.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] GabrielBrascher opened a new issue #907: [BUG] UI Does not allow to add a zone without primary shared storage

[GitBox]

GabrielBrascher opened a new issue #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/907


    Description:
   
   Via the "legacy UI, it is possible to deploy a Zone that does not contain 
shared primary storage by enabling local storage for user and system VMs; 
however, it is mandatory to at least deploy one shared network via the new UI.
   
    Expected behavior
   
   Allow continuing with the Zone deployment wizard without shared primary 
storage if the user has selected to enable local storage for user and system VMs
   
    Screenshots
   
   Enabling local storage:
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5025148/103384114-f9891e80-4ad3-11eb-9442-57fdfff49fe9.png)
   
   Shared primary storage:
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5025148/103384067-c9418000-4ad3-11eb-9389-aa0d2b13d5f1.png)
   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] utchoang opened a new pull request #908: FIX - Skip add primary storage if user selected to enable local storage for user and system VMs

[GitBox]

utchoang opened a new pull request #908:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/908


   Fixes #907 
   @rhtyd cc @svenvogel Please review it. Thanks.
   
![Screenshot_2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13766648/103392186-30e8e100-4b4f-11eb-96f1-1919be266471.png)
   
![Screenshot_3](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13766648/103392190-32b2a480-4b4f-11eb-81ce-be54ccff85e0.png)
   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] utchoang commented on pull request #908: FIX - Skip add primary storage if user selected to enable local storage for user and system VMs

[GitBox]

utchoang commented on pull request #908:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/908#issuecomment-752826943


   @blueorangutan package



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #908: FIX - Skip add primary storage if user selected to enable local storage for user and system VMs

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #908:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/908#issuecomment-752827020


   @utchoang a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #908: FIX - Skip add primary storage if user selected to enable local storage for user and system VMs

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #908:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/908#issuecomment-752828525


   Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian 
:heavy_check_mark:archive.
   QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/908 (JID-3785)



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd commented on a change in pull request #173: releasenotes: add note about CentOS 8 EOL in Dec 2021

[GitBox]

rhtyd commented on a change in pull request #173:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#discussion_r550419777



##
File path: source/releasenotes/compat.rst
##
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ Supported OS Versions for Management Server
 This section lists the operating systems that are supported for running
 CloudStack Management Server.
 
--  Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04, 20.04 LTS
--  CentOS versions 7.x, 8.x
+-  Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS

Review comment:
   @GabrielBrascher it's a normal case where the EOL date hasn't changed 
and I suppose most users would be aware that 16.04 is old enough by now.

##
File path: source/releasenotes/compat.rst
##
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ Supported OS Versions for Management Server
 This section lists the operating systems that are supported for running
 CloudStack Management Server.
 
--  Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04, 20.04 LTS
--  CentOS versions 7.x, 8.x
+-  Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS

Review comment:
   @GabrielBrascher it's a normal case where the EOL date hasn't changed 
and I suppose most users would be aware that 16.04 is old enough by now. But 
feel free to raise a separate PR.





This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd merged pull request #173: releasenotes: add note about CentOS 8 EOL in Dec 2021

[GitBox]

rhtyd merged pull request #173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org