Re: POM version in 4.11 branch

[Rohit Yadav]

Rafael, can you pull --rebase 4.11 branch. This has been fixed now.



- Rohit






From: Rafael Weingärtner 
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 7:21:10 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: POM version in 4.11 branch

So, this means that we have to fix the version to 4.11.1.0, right?

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Khosrow Moossavi 
wrote:

> I see, thanks Rohit.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for sharing Khosrow, yes that's an error. There was an issue
> around
> > db failure for 4.10.0.0 users upgrade to 4.11.0.0 -- which was sorted in
> > release notes instead of doing a new 4.11.0.1 release.
> >
> >
> > Let me fix that.
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Khosrow Moossavi 
> > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:46:36 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: POM version in 4.11 branch
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > While working on a PR, Rafael and myself noticed that the POM version of
> > 4.11 branch
> > is 4.11.0.1-SNAPSHOT and not 4.11.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > Was this planned? Shouldn't we be on micro version rather than patch
> > version?
> >
> > Khosrow Moossavi
> >
> > CloudOps
> >
> > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



--
Rafael Weingärtner

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: POM version in 4.11 branch

[Rafael Weingärtner]

Sure I can. Was there a PR created for this one?

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Rafael, can you pull --rebase 4.11 branch. This has been fixed now.
>
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
>
>
>
> 
> From: Rafael Weingärtner 
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 7:21:10 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: POM version in 4.11 branch
>
> So, this means that we have to fix the version to 4.11.1.0, right?
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Khosrow Moossavi 
> wrote:
>
> > I see, thanks Rohit.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Rohit Yadav  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for sharing Khosrow, yes that's an error. There was an issue
> > around
> > > db failure for 4.10.0.0 users upgrade to 4.11.0.0 -- which was sorted
> in
> > > release notes instead of doing a new 4.11.0.1 release.
> > >
> > >
> > > Let me fix that.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Rohit
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Khosrow Moossavi 
> > > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:46:36 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: POM version in 4.11 branch
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > While working on a PR, Rafael and myself noticed that the POM version
> of
> > > 4.11 branch
> > > is 4.11.0.1-SNAPSHOT and not 4.11.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > > Was this planned? Shouldn't we be on micro version rather than patch
> > > version?
> > >
> > > Khosrow Moossavi
> > >
> > > CloudOps
> > >
> > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Re: POM version in 4.11 branch

[Rohit Yadav]

Rafael - No. After a release is processed, the next version is set and 
carefully forward merged to not change versions in target branches (i.e. use 
git merge -X our).


See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+Procedure 
and on how to use

setnextversion.sh.


(Test pass: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/346350688)


- Rohit






From: Rafael Weingärtner 
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:09:26 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: POM version in 4.11 branch

Sure I can. Was there a PR created for this one?

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Rafael, can you pull --rebase 4.11 branch. This has been fixed now.
>
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
>
>
>
> 
> From: Rafael Weingärtner 
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 7:21:10 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: POM version in 4.11 branch
>
> So, this means that we have to fix the version to 4.11.1.0, right?
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Khosrow Moossavi 
> wrote:
>
> > I see, thanks Rohit.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Rohit Yadav  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for sharing Khosrow, yes that's an error. There was an issue
> > around
> > > db failure for 4.10.0.0 users upgrade to 4.11.0.0 -- which was sorted
> in
> > > release notes instead of doing a new 4.11.0.1 release.
> > >
> > >
> > > Let me fix that.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Rohit
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Khosrow Moossavi 
> > > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:46:36 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: POM version in 4.11 branch
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > While working on a PR, Rafael and myself noticed that the POM version
> of
> > > 4.11 branch
> > > is 4.11.0.1-SNAPSHOT and not 4.11.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > > Was this planned? Shouldn't we be on micro version rather than patch
> > > version?
> > >
> > > Khosrow Moossavi
> > >
> > > CloudOps
> > >
> > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>


--
Rafael Weingärtner

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Question: Domain filed on the SSL upload form

[Andrija Panic]

Hi all,

I got confused about the domain fields/API parameter that is used when
uploading new SSL, to be used on CPVM and SSVM copy process (this is
domain_suffix in cloud.keystore table)

Due to some automation, I came across the following scenarios, which WORKS
FINE, but I'm confused as how and why it works.

New SSL that was issued for " *.domain1.com " was uploaded via API (CA,
intermediate, server cert, and the key in pkcs8) - but doman specified
during this SSL upload process was " domain2.com " (so NOT matching domain
of the certificate)

This causes the cloud.keystore table/rows to have this domain2.com in the
last column next to CA/intermediate/server/key... (this is domain_suffix
column)

But in global config we define " *.domain1.com " as the CERT to be used for
CPVM and for securing/encrypting secondary storage copy process between
zones
Same SSL is also used to i.e. download templates etc...

So it all works fine, but...how ?, when "domain1.com" (instead of "*.
domain2.com") was defined in uploadCertificate GUI/API - i.e. what is the
use of this domain_suffix field at all ?

Thx,

-- 

Andrija Panić

Ceph and CloudStack day, London, April 19

[Steve Roles]

Hi all!

We have now published an agenda for the day and have lots of great talks, on 
Ceph, CloudStack, and 'Ceph & CloudStack'!


  *   Morning: Mix of Ceph & CloudStack with talks applying to both projects
  *   Afternoon: Split into separate tracks: Ceph and CloudStack



Registration is open, and you can also check out the agenda here: 
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-group-ceph-day-tickets-42670526694


Hopefully see some of you on the day!

Best regards,


steve.ro...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[IMPENDING SHUTDOWN] Re: Replacing download.cloud.com by download.cloudstack.org

[Chiradeep Vittal]

I would like to propose a shutdown window of 60 days starting March 1.
Every few days (3?) we can announce the impending shutdown on users@
and dev@.
At day 30 we can temporarily disable (using S3 permissions)
download.cloud.com for 72 hours to see if this any impact.

Thoughts?

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
>
>
> On 02/25/2018 12:11 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>
>> Which releases still refer to them in the setup SQL?
>>
>
> I think it was 4.9? Does anybody know this exactly?
>
> Wido
>
>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Feb 24, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
 On 02/24/2018 12:14 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
 Citrix is wondering if they can shut down download.cloud.com at this
 point.
>>>
>>>
>>> Grepping through the source I see no references to download.cloud.com
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> I *think* it can be shut down. Any other opinions on this?
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
 Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Wido den Hollander 
> wrote:
>
>> Op 10 maart 2017 om 11:36 schreef Wido den Hollander :
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Will Stevens and I have been working on a replacement for
>> download.cloud.com.
>>
>> This resulted in download.cloudstack.org which is also available over
>> SSL!
>>
>> download.cloudstack.org is a CNAME to cloudstack.apt-get.eu and is
>> hosted by me in Amsterdam (on CloudStack and Ceph).
>>
>> In the future I'd like to scale this out to more systems on different
>> providers by using RR-DNS, but for now let's not make it very difficult.
>>
>> There is a PR open [0] to start to do this, but we also have
>> documentation which might need to be fixed.
>>
>> RPM and DEB packages are also available on download.cloudstack.org:
>>
>> - RPM: https://download.cloudstack.org/centos
>> - DEB: https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu
>>
>> SystemVMs are also available:
>> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/
>>
>> In total there is 126GB of data on the server:
>>
>> 0 centos7
>> 4.0K  README
>> 4.0K  release.asc
>> 4.0K  RPM-GPG-KEY
>> 12K   foss
>> 316K  tools
>> 629M  tmp
>> 2.9G  archive
>> 3.7G  rhel
>> 5.3G  releases
>> 8.3G  centos
>> 19G   ubuntu
>> 24G   systemvm
>> 64G   templates
>>
>> If you want to be able to add files to the system, send me your SSH
>> key and we can fix this. A few PMC members already have access and can 
>> add
>> files.
>>
>> Any things which we need to fix in addition?
>>
>
> Forgot to add, the system already has rsync available, so you can sync
> it if you want:
>
> $ rsync -avr --stats --progress download.cloudstack.org::cloudstack .
>
> Might want to do that already so that we can quickly move to a
> different server should the one in Amsterdam be down for a long time.
>
>> Wido
>>
>> [0]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582

Re: [IMPENDING SHUTDOWN] Re: Replacing download.cloud.com by download.cloudstack.org

[Rohit Yadav]

Sounds good to me.


- Rohit


From: Chiradeep Vittal 
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 18:33
To: dev
Subject: [IMPENDING SHUTDOWN] Re: Replacing download.cloud.com by 
download.cloudstack.org

I would like to propose a shutdown window of 60 days starting March 1.
Every few days (3?) we can announce the impending shutdown on users@
and dev@.
At day 30 we can temporarily disable (using S3 permissions)
download.cloud.com for 72 hours to see if this any impact.

Thoughts?


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
>
>
> On 02/25/2018 12:11 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>
>> Which releases still refer to them in the setup SQL?
>>
>
> I think it was 4.9? Does anybody know this exactly?
>
> Wido
>
>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Feb 24, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
 On 02/24/2018 12:14 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
 Citrix is wondering if they can shut down download.cloud.com at this
 point.
>>>
>>>
>>> Grepping through the source I see no references to download.cloud.com
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> I *think* it can be shut down. Any other opinions on this?
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
 Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Wido den Hollander 
> wrote:
>
>> Op 10 maart 2017 om 11:36 schreef Wido den Hollander :
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Will Stevens and I have been working on a replacement for
>> download.cloud.com.
>>
>> This resulted in download.cloudstack.org which is also available over
>> SSL!
>>
>> download.cloudstack.org is a CNAME to cloudstack.apt-get.eu and is
>> hosted by me in Amsterdam (on CloudStack and Ceph).
>>
>> In the future I'd like to scale this out to more systems on different
>> providers by using RR-DNS, but for now let's not make it very difficult.
>>
>> There is a PR open [0] to start to do this, but we also have
>> documentation which might need to be fixed.
>>
>> RPM and DEB packages are also available on download.cloudstack.org:
>>
>> - RPM: https://download.cloudstack.org/centos
>> - DEB: https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu
>>
>> SystemVMs are also available:
>> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/
>>
>> In total there is 126GB of data on the server:
>>
>> 0 centos7
>> 4.0K  README
>> 4.0K  release.asc
>> 4.0K  RPM-GPG-KEY
>> 12K   foss
>> 316K  tools
>> 629M  tmp
>> 2.9G  archive
>> 3.7G  rhel
>> 5.3G  releases
>> 8.3G  centos
>> 19G   ubuntu
>> 24G   systemvm
>> 64G   templates
>>
>> If you want to be able to add files to the system, send me your SSH
>> key and we can fix this. A few PMC members already have access and can 
>> add
>> files.
>>
>> Any things which we need to fix in addition?
>>
>
> Forgot to add, the system already has rsync available, so you can sync
> it if you want:
>
> $ rsync -avr --stats --progress download.cloudstack.org::cloudstack .
>
> Might want to do that already so that we can quickly move to a
> different server should the one in Amsterdam be down for a long time.
>
>> Wido
>>
>> [0]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582

Re: [IMPENDING SHUTDOWN] Re: Replacing download.cloud.com by download.cloudstack.org

[Wido den Hollander]

Yes! Sounds good to me

> Op 27 feb. 2018 om 20:02 heeft Rohit Yadav  het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> 
> - Rohit
> 
> 
> From: Chiradeep Vittal 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 18:33
> To: dev
> Subject: [IMPENDING SHUTDOWN] Re: Replacing download.cloud.com by 
> download.cloudstack.org
> 
> I would like to propose a shutdown window of 60 days starting March 1.
> Every few days (3?) we can announce the impending shutdown on users@
> and dev@.
> At day 30 we can temporarily disable (using S3 permissions)
> download.cloud.com for 72 hours to see if this any impact.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 02/25/2018 12:11 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>> 
>>> Which releases still refer to them in the setup SQL?
>>> 
>> 
>> I think it was 4.9? Does anybody know this exactly?
>> 
>> Wido
>> 
>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
 On Feb 24, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
 
 
 
> On 02/24/2018 12:14 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> Citrix is wondering if they can shut down download.cloud.com at this
> point.
 
 
 Grepping through the source I see no references to download.cloud.com
 anymore.
 
 I *think* it can be shut down. Any other opinions on this?
 
 Wido
 
> Thanks!
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Wido den Hollander 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Op 10 maart 2017 om 11:36 schreef Wido den Hollander :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Will Stevens and I have been working on a replacement for
>>> download.cloud.com.
>>> 
>>> This resulted in download.cloudstack.org which is also available over
>>> SSL!
>>> 
>>> download.cloudstack.org is a CNAME to cloudstack.apt-get.eu and is
>>> hosted by me in Amsterdam (on CloudStack and Ceph).
>>> 
>>> In the future I'd like to scale this out to more systems on different
>>> providers by using RR-DNS, but for now let's not make it very difficult.
>>> 
>>> There is a PR open [0] to start to do this, but we also have
>>> documentation which might need to be fixed.
>>> 
>>> RPM and DEB packages are also available on download.cloudstack.org:
>>> 
>>> - RPM: https://download.cloudstack.org/centos
>>> - DEB: https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu
>>> 
>>> SystemVMs are also available:
>>> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/
>>> 
>>> In total there is 126GB of data on the server:
>>> 
>>> 0 centos7
>>> 4.0K  README
>>> 4.0K  release.asc
>>> 4.0K  RPM-GPG-KEY
>>> 12K   foss
>>> 316K  tools
>>> 629M  tmp
>>> 2.9G  archive
>>> 3.7G  rhel
>>> 5.3G  releases
>>> 8.3G  centos
>>> 19G   ubuntu
>>> 24G   systemvm
>>> 64G   templates
>>> 
>>> If you want to be able to add files to the system, send me your SSH
>>> key and we can fix this. A few PMC members already have access and can 
>>> add
>>> files.
>>> 
>>> Any things which we need to fix in addition?
>>> 
>> 
>> Forgot to add, the system already has rsync available, so you can sync
>> it if you want:
>> 
>> $ rsync -avr --stats --progress download.cloudstack.org::cloudstack .
>> 
>> Might want to do that already so that we can quickly move to a
>> different server should the one in Amsterdam be down for a long time.
>> 
>>> Wido
>>> 
>>> [0]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582

Re: [IMPENDING SHUTDOWN] Re: Replacing download.cloud.com by download.cloudstack.org

[Chiradeep Vittal]

For the last 6 days, here are the stats (first column is downloads)

   2381 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2

 89 templates/4.5.1/systemvm64template-2015-05-14-4.5.1-xen.vhd.bz2

 77 releases/2.2.0/eec2209b-9875-3c8d-92be-c001bd8a0faf.qcow2.bz2

 51 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-04-10-master-xen.vhd.bz2

 50 templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz2

 50 templates/4.2/64bit/systemvmtemplate64-2013-07-15-master-xen.vhd.bz2

 34 templates/4.5/systemvm64template-2015-02-03-4.5.0-xen.vhd.bz2

 25 templates/4.5.1/systemvm64template-2015-08-20-4.5.1-xen.vhd.bz2

 24 templates/4.7/systemvm64template-2016-03-24-4.7.0-xen.vhd.bz2

 24 templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2

 22 templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2

 20 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-09-30-4.3-xen.vhd.bz2

 20 templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2

 16 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2

 15 templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2

 15 templates/4.5/systemvm64template-2014-12-18-4.5.0.0-xen.vhd.bz2

 13 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2015-02-04-4.3-xen.vhd.bz2

  5 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-06-23-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2

  4 templates/4.5.1/systemvm64template-2016-04-15-4.5.1-xen.vhd.bz2

  3 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-06-23-master-xen.vhd.bz2

  2 templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2015-02-04-4.3-kvm.qcow2.bz2

  1 templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2

  1 releases/4.3/centos6_4_64bit.vhd.bz2


Here's a list of the top IPs downloading. If you recognize yourself here
(the top one is from one location in Montreal), please fix:

   2370 216.113.73.34

220 175.107.195.22

 60 66.165.176.60

 42 180.222.191.150

 38 82.192.93.187

 16 60.27.95.237

 16 200.124.137.20

 10 216.55.171.4

 10 130.185.128.25

  9 81.142.101.129

  9 211.125.79.4

  8 193.144.82.46

  7 217.192.89.130

  7 199.115.112.53

  6 5.152.164.8

  6 121.15.182.138

  5 91.223.182.11

  5 69.26.35.120

  5 219.163.55.73

  5 194.19.236.162

  5 178.16.163.70

  5 14.139.116.2

  4 84.33.37.2

  4 74.84.196.150

  4 185.53.31.146

  4 12.129.245.254

  4 119.31.171.20

  2 61.50.103.158

  2 58.210.242.134

  2 58.140.89.62

  2 41.77.158.254

  2 222.80.81.132

  2 218.104.96.139

  2 178.170.92.5

  2 177.47.20.58

  2 118.70.146.225

  2 115.249.104.17

  2 112.217.184.196

  2 112.217.184.195

  2 111.198.74.125

  2 103.4.132.9

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:

> Yes! Sounds good to me
>
> > Op 27 feb. 2018 om 20:02 heeft Rohit Yadav 
> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Sounds good to me.
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > 
> > From: Chiradeep Vittal 
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 18:33
> > To: dev
> > Subject: [IMPENDING SHUTDOWN] Re: Replacing download.cloud.com by
> download.cloudstack.org
> >
> > I would like to propose a shutdown window of 60 days starting March 1.
> > Every few days (3?) we can announce the impending shutdown on users@
> > and dev@.
> > At day 30 we can temporarily disable (using S3 permissions)
> > download.cloud.com for 72 hours to see if this any impact.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Wido den Hollander 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 02/25/2018 12:11 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Which releases still refer to them in the setup SQL?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think it was 4.9? Does anybody know this exactly?
> >>
> >> Wido
> >>
> >>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
>  On Feb 24, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Wido den Hollander 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > On 02/24/2018 12:14 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> > Citrix is wondering if they can shut down download.cloud.com at this
> > point.
> 
> 
>  Grepping through the source I see no references to download.cloud.com
>  anymore.
> 
>  I *think* it can be shut down. Any other opinions on this?
> 
>  Wido
> 
> > Thanks!
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Wido den Hollander  >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Op 10 maart 2017 om 11:36 schreef Wido den Hollander <
> w...@widodh.nl>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Will Stevens and I have been working on a replacement for
> >>> download.cloud.com.
> >>>
> >>> This resulted in download.cloudstack.org which is also available
> over
> >>> SSL!
> >>>
> >>> download.cloudstack.org is a CNAME to cloudstack.apt-get.eu and is
> >>> hosted by me in Amsterdam (on CloudStack and Ceph).
> >>>
> >>> In the future