Re: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage backups for snapshots" Feature

[Rohit Yadav]

Simon,


I'm not sure, we can ask the PR author - Harika Punna, and reviewers - Koushik, 
Mike, Suresh -- please advise?


- Rohit






From: Simon Weller 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:55:37 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Nathan Johnson
Subject: Re: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to 
secondary storage backups for snapshots" Feature

I'm not sure why this was removed from public.  We haven't tested the feature 
set since the below PR was merged.


Nathan,


Thoughts on this?





From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:20 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to 
secondary storage backups for snapshots" Feature

Hi Ozhan,


The global setting was removed in following PR, however you can get the 
feature/ability via the API:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2081


Also see:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Separate+creation+and+backup+operations+for+a+volume+snapshot
Separate creation and backup operations for a volume 
...
cwiki.apache.org
DB Changes. NA UI Flow. A checkbox will be added to the "Create Volume 
Snapshot" dialog box, which when checked, snapshot and copy operations will be 
separated and if ...





Please test and share if the changes introduce by above are acceptable, or you 
think is blocker(ish)?


- Rohit


[https://cloudstack.apache.org/images/monkey-144.png]

Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing
cloudstack.apache.org
CloudStack is open source cloud computing software for creating, managing, and 
deploying infrastructure cloud services







From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman 
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 4:50:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to secondary 
storage backups for snapshots" Feature

Hi;
I plan to test "Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
backups for snapshots" feature on 4.11 rc1 release. For this test i think i
need to update "snapshot.backup.rightafter" parameter from global settings
but i could not find the parameter on global configuration there.

Is this normal?

Thanks
Özhan

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
[http://www.shapeblue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png]

Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company
www.shapeblue.com
Rapid deployment framework for Apache CloudStack IaaS Clouds. CSForge is a 
framework developed by ShapeBlue to deliver the rapid deployment of a 
standardised ...



53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Thanks all for your participation towards 4.11.0.0 RC1.


We've managed to discover and fix about 10 blocker fixes, I'll close RC1 voting 
now and cut RC2 shortly.


- Rohit






From: Frank Maximus 
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 2:08:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

I found and fixed an issue in cloudstack-agent logrotate.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10255
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2429

IMHO it's feasible to include it in RC2.
As only the maven build is impacted by the change,
I see little risk.

Regards,
Frank


On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:31 PM Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> All,
>
>
> We don't have any outstanding blocker PRs now.
>
>
> I could n't reproduce any regression wrt only VM-HA in RC1. By killing a
> HV host (and keep it that way, i.e. not rebooting it), HA enabled VMs did
> migrate to other hosts in a test I did.
>
>
> The only potential (blocker) issue seems to be a ldap related regression
> reported on users@ that Daan is looking into, which may or may not be a
> blocker but a configuration issue.
>
>
> Given, we're approaching the end of the week, it's likely we cut RC2 on
> Monday. Please continue testing RC1 in the meanwhile.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rohit Yadav
>
>
> 
> From: Nux! 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:29:21 AM
> To: users
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)
>
> Paul,
>
> Ok, let me play some more with those tunings params, see if I can find a
> satisfactory combination and I'll withhold a -1 on this on the basis that
> I've just misunderstood the whole thing. :)
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

- Original Message -
> > From: "Paul Angus" 
> > To: "users" 
> > Cc: "dev" 
> > Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 19:55:01
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)
>
> > Hey Nux,
> >
> > There is quite a bit of tuning you can do, to speed or slow CloudStack's
> > decision making, but we need to be sure that when we lose contact with a
> host
> > agent, that the VMs themselves really are dead.  By default host-ha is
> set to
> > be super sure.
> >
> > There are various timeouts which can be configured to decide how long to
> wait
> > for a host to restart before deciding that it is not going to start as
> well as
> > how many times we should check for disk activity from the resident VMs
> of a
> > suspect host.
> >
> > The parameters are detailed here.
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Host+HA
> >
> > Honestly, the aim of Host HA was to fix the particular issue that you are
> > describing as we can't remember a time when it did work reliably.
> >
> >
> >
> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> > Sent: 23 January 2018 19:08
> > To: users 
> > Cc: dev 
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > To be honest I do not remember when I last saw this, as I have not been
> testing
> > ACS in 2017.
> > You'd kill a HV, the VMs would pop up on another after a few minutes.
> >
> > Even with Host HA, the VMs remain down until the hypervisor is back up,
> > restarted by OOBM - however if that HV has suffered a HW fault and needs
> to be
> > removed, then those VM will be down for a long time ...
> >
> > Unless I got things quite wrong, (VM) HA - one of the big selling points
> of ACS
> > - is essentially broken?
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Paul Angus" 
> >> To: "users" , "dev"
> >> 
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 23 January, 2018 16:02:54
> >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)
> >
> >> Hi Nux,
> >>
> >> When have you seen the VMs on KVM behaving in the manner which you are
> >> expecting?  I recall it didn’t work that way in the mid 4.5 versions
> >> (we found out the hard way in front of a customer) and it doesn't
> >> behave the way you are expecting 4.9 - I've just tested it.
> >>
> >> You need host-ha enabled to get reliable HA in the event of a host
> >> crash, that is why we developed the host ha feature.
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Paul Angus
> >>
> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
testing and a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180126T1313
Commit: 5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open till end of next week, 2nd Feb 2018.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from
5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf and published RC2 repository here:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.11-rc2
(the packages are being built and will be available shortly)

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate
upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for
systemvmtemplate upgrade testing:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/index.html

4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here:
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/

Regards,
Rohit Yadav

Re: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage backups for snapshots" Feature

[Özhan Rüzgar Karaman]

Hi Rohit;
We have tested the feature and it works great.

Thanks
Özhan

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Simon,
>
>
> I'm not sure, we can ask the PR author - Harika Punna, and reviewers -
> Koushik, Mike, Suresh -- please advise?
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
>
>
>
> 
> From: Simon Weller 
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:55:37 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Nathan Johnson
> Subject: Re: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to
> secondary storage backups for snapshots" Feature
>
> I'm not sure why this was removed from public.  We haven't tested the
> feature set since the below PR was merged.
>
>
> Nathan,
>
>
> Thoughts on this?
>
>
>
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:20 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to
> secondary storage backups for snapshots" Feature
>
> Hi Ozhan,
>
>
> The global setting was removed in following PR, however you can get the
> feature/ability via the API:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2081
>
>
> Also see:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
> Separate+creation+and+backup+operations+for+a+volume+snapshot
> Separate creation and backup operations for a volume ...<
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
> Separate+creation+and+backup+operations+for+a+volume+snapshot>
> cwiki.apache.org
> DB Changes. NA UI Flow. A checkbox will be added to the "Create Volume
> Snapshot" dialog box, which when checked, snapshot and copy operations will
> be separated and if ...
>
>
>
>
>
> Please test and share if the changes introduce by above are acceptable, or
> you think is blocker(ish)?
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
> [https://cloudstack.apache.org/images/monkey-144.png] ps://cloudstack.apache.org/>
>
> Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing apache.org/>
> cloudstack.apache.org
> CloudStack is open source cloud computing software for creating, managing,
> and deploying infrastructure cloud services
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 4:50:41 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [4.11] Testing New "Ability to disable primary storage to
> secondary storage backups for snapshots" Feature
>
> Hi;
> I plan to test "Ability to disable primary storage to secondary storage
> backups for snapshots" feature on 4.11 rc1 release. For this test i think i
> need to update "snapshot.backup.rightafter" parameter from global settings
> but i could not find the parameter on global configuration there.
>
> Is this normal?
>
> Thanks
> Özhan
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> [http://www.shapeblue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png]<
> http://www.shapeblue.com/>
>
> Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company
> www.shapeblue.com
> Rapid deployment framework for Apache CloudStack IaaS Clouds. CSForge is a
> framework developed by ShapeBlue to deliver the rapid deployment of a
> standardised ...
>
>
>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

[Boris Stoyanov]

Hi all,

I’ve done upgrade testing on the following platform matrix:


OS and Hypervisor \ ACS Version 4.5 → 4.11  4.6 → 4.11  4.9 → 4.11
M: CentOS6 H: CentOS 6  ✔
M: CentOS6 H: XS65sp1   ✔
M: CentOS6 H: VMware 5.5u3  ✔
M: CentOS7 H: CentOS 7  ✔
M: CentOS7 H: XS7   ✔
M: CentOS7 H: VMware 5.5u3  ✔
M: CentOS7 H: VMware 6.5✔

All the upgrades were successful as well as VR/SSVM upgrade.

I’m +1 on RC2, didn’t had any issues with it.

Boris Stoyanov


boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On 26 Jan 2018, at 14:19, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:ro...@apache.org>> wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
testing and a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180126T1313
Commit: 5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open till end of next week, 2nd Feb 2018.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from
5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf and published RC2 repository here:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.11-rc2
(the packages are being built and will be available shortly)

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate
upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for
systemvmtemplate upgrade testing:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/index.html

4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here:
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/

Regards,
Rohit Yadav

Enhance package.sh script

[Khosrow Moossavi]

Hi community

I fixed and enhanced package.sh script in PR #2433 [1]. It's based on 4.11
branch
and since it's only touches packaging script, it should be safe to be
included in
4.11.0.0 and/or 4.11.1.0.

The idea was to be able to "brand" the final package name to distinguish
the custom
built packages from community build ones just by looking at the file name.

If POM version contains branding string (x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]) it will
generate
packages like: cloudstack-package-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433

Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

[Nux!]

I won't be able to test sooner than Monday guys.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Boris Stoyanov" 
> To: "dev" 
> Cc: "users" 
> Sent: Friday, 26 January, 2018 17:48:24
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

> Hi all,
> 
> I’ve done upgrade testing on the following platform matrix:
> 
> 
> OS and Hypervisor \ ACS Version 4.5 → 4.11  4.6 → 4.11  4.9 → 4.11
> M: CentOS6 H: CentOS 6  ✔
> M: CentOS6 H: XS65sp1   ✔
> M: CentOS6 H: VMware 5.5u3  ✔
> M: CentOS7 H: CentOS 7  ✔
> M: CentOS7 H: XS7   ✔
> M: CentOS7 H: VMware 5.5u3  ✔
> M: CentOS7 H: VMware 6.5✔
> 
> All the upgrades were successful as well as VR/SSVM upgrade.
> 
> I’m +1 on RC2, didn’t had any issues with it.
> 
> Boris Stoyanov
> 
> 
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>  
> 
> 
> On 26 Jan 2018, at 14:19, Rohit Yadav
> mailto:ro...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.11.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
> testing and a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180126T1313
> Commit: 5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.0.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open till end of next week, 2nd Feb 2018.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Additional information:
> 
> For users' convenience, I've built packages from
> 5dada1f7ed5fb6a8ee261c763f744583e586f8bf and published RC2 repository here:
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.11-rc2
> (the packages are being built and will be available shortly)
> 
> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate
> upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for
> systemvmtemplate upgrade testing:
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/index.html
> 
> 4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here:
> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/
> 
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav

master merges

[Daan Hoogland]

I am unclear of our present state. have we opened master for merging again?

-- 
Daan

Re: master merges

[Wido den Hollander]

On 01/26/2018 10:36 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

I am unclear of our present state. have we opened master for merging again?



Afaik yes, 4.11 has been cut and master has been updated to 4.12-SNAPSHOT

So master is open again after enough LGTM.

Wido