***Cloudstack EUUG - CFP***

[Giles Sirett]

All
The next Cloudstack European User Group will be in 17 August in London
I'm just putting the agenda together at the moment. If anybodys got a 
cloudstack-related talk they'd like to present then ping me.

For those that don't fancy speaking, it would be great to see as many of you 
there as possible

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-group-tickets-35565783215?aff=es2


Kind regards
Giles


giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: ***Cloudstack EUUG - CFP***

[Ivan Kudryavtsev]

Hello, Giles.

If the community is interested in our development and integration
experience on https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/ we would like to join
and have a technical talk. Let me know if the preconditions fit and we
prepare agenda which can help to decide go/no go.

2017-06-22 16:42 GMT+07:00 Giles Sirett :

> All
> The next Cloudstack European User Group will be in 17 August in London
> I'm just putting the agenda together at the moment. If anybodys got a
> cloudstack-related talk they'd like to present then ping me.
>
> For those that don't fancy speaking, it would be great to see as many of
> you there as possible
>
> https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-
> group-tickets-35565783215?aff=es2
>
>
> Kind regards
> Giles
>
>
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>


-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

RE: ***Cloudstack EUUG - CFP***

[Giles Sirett]

Hi Ivan - great, thanks - I think the gorpu would love to hear about your work

Contanct me offline and we'll work out logisitics

Kind regards
Giles

giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev [mailto:kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com] 
Sent: 22 June 2017 10:51
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: ***Cloudstack EUUG - CFP***

Hello, Giles.

If the community is interested in our development and integration experience on 
https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/ we would like to join and have a 
technical talk. Let me know if the preconditions fit and we prepare agenda 
which can help to decide go/no go.

2017-06-22 16:42 GMT+07:00 Giles Sirett :

> All
> The next Cloudstack European User Group will be in 17 August in London 
> I'm just putting the agenda together at the moment. If anybodys got a 
> cloudstack-related talk they'd like to present then ping me.
>
> For those that don't fancy speaking, it would be great to see as many 
> of you there as possible
>
> https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-
> group-tickets-35565783215?aff=es2
>
>
> Kind regards
> Giles
>
>
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>


-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

Re: ***Cloudstack EUUG - CFP***

[Wido den Hollander]

Hi,

Registered and arranged travel!

I can give a short IPv6 talk (again?). Aug 17th we should be running the 4.10 
code in production so I can share some details en demos?

Wido

> Op 22 juni 2017 om 11:42 schreef Giles Sirett :
> 
> 
> All
> The next Cloudstack European User Group will be in 17 August in London
> I'm just putting the agenda together at the moment. If anybodys got a 
> cloudstack-related talk they'd like to present then ping me.
> 
> For those that don't fancy speaking, it would be great to see as many of you 
> there as possible
> 
> https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-group-tickets-35565783215?aff=es2
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> Giles
> 
> 
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

[Kris Sterckx]

Hi all


Thanks to Daan for driving the work at PR/2155
 , but i believe it needs
more soak time.

We found today this PR is breaking VR-provided Guest DNS for SDN providers
also.

As Daan also suggested, i would recommend taking it out 4.10 and give it
some more cycles in 4.11.

We will support qualifying it.

thanks,

Kris

- Nuage Networks

On 21 June 2017 at 16:45, Kris Sterckx 
wrote:

> Hi  Wido, Daan, all
>
>
> We have just pushed a workaround
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2155
>
> This works for us.
>
> The CsPassword class seems like not needed at all ?  The important part
> for us is that  iptables_change = True  is set also in case of password
> handling.  That was missing.
>
> Daan, we left a TODO for you to look into deeper though. We worked at
> getting the databag handling fixed inside the class but as we don't have
> full background, we kept hitting issues. Until we then saw that commenting
> out the lines which we did actually works as well.
>
> I suggest the /2155 is reviewed by the involved stakeholders and based on
> that we decide ?
>
>
> thanks and toi-toi :-)
>
>
> Kris
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC5

[Kris Sterckx]

Sorry , i meant  PR/2084 

On 22 June 2017 at 21:25, Kris Sterckx 
wrote:

> Hi all
>
>
> Thanks to Daan for driving the work at PR/2155
>  , but i believe it needs
> more soak time.
>
> We found today this PR is breaking VR-provided Guest DNS for SDN providers
> also.
>
> As Daan also suggested, i would recommend taking it out 4.10 and give it
> some more cycles in 4.11.
>
> We will support qualifying it.
>
> thanks,
>
> Kris
>
> - Nuage Networks
>
> On 21 June 2017 at 16:45, Kris Sterckx 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi  Wido, Daan, all
>>
>>
>> We have just pushed a workaround
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2155
>>
>> This works for us.
>>
>> The CsPassword class seems like not needed at all ?  The important part
>> for us is that  iptables_change = True  is set also in case of password
>> handling.  That was missing.
>>
>> Daan, we left a TODO for you to look into deeper though. We worked at
>> getting the databag handling fixed inside the class but as we don't have
>> full background, we kept hitting issues. Until we then saw that commenting
>> out the lines which we did actually works as well.
>>
>> I suggest the /2155 is reviewed by the involved stakeholders and based on
>> that we decide ?
>>
>>
>> thanks and toi-toi :-)
>>
>>
>> Kris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>