[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 @borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system VMs isn’t working properly. On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once they are fixed. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org) wrote: We currently have the below list of blockers: BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi, Sure, I can pull that code and test. I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done, I can move on to your PR. Thanks! Mike On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and created this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been testing it and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please repeat your tests on it? Thanks, Nicolas 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike : > Here’s the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can > you take a look? > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it doesn’t pick up any > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag). > > > > This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details > table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags? > > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine it > a bit more before doing so. > > > > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > > > > No VM snapshot. > > > > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I > also tried in the Stopped state. Same results. > > > >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > >> > >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > >> > >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > >> > >> I seem to have found another blocker: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822 > >> > >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > >> > >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and test > >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few more > >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> > >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi ( > raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-604 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 @borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for...
Github user cloudsadhu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r108862410 --- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py --- @@ -114,36 +134,46 @@ def test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize(self): # 2. root disk has new size per listVolumes # 3. Rejects non-supported hypervisor types """ -if(self.hypervisor.lower() == 'kvm'): -newrootsize = (self.template.size >> 30) + 2 -self.virtual_machine = VirtualMachine.create( -self.apiclient, -self.testdata["virtual_machine"], -accountid=self.account.name, -zoneid=self.zone.id, -domainid=self.account.domainid, -serviceofferingid=self.service_offering.id, -templateid=self.template.id, -rootdisksize=newrootsize + + +newrootsize = (self.template.size >> 30) + 2 +if(self.hypervisor.lower() == 'kvm' or self.hypervisor.lower() == +'xenserver'or self.hypervisor.lower() == 'vmware' ): + +if self.hypervisor=="vmware": +self.virtual_machine = VirtualMachine.create( +self.apiclient, self.services["virtual_machine"], +zoneid=self.zone.id, +accountid=self.account.name, +domainid=self.domain.id, +serviceofferingid=self.services_offering_vmware.id, +templateid=self.template.id +) + --- End diff -- sorry thats my bad will add the missing parameter and will post results. if condition is added to address vm deployment in right storage pool. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system VMs isn’t working properly. On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once they are fixed. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org) wrote: We currently have the below list of blockers: BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi, Sure, I can pull that code and test. I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done, I can move on to your PR. Thanks! Mike On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and created this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been testing it and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please repeat your tests on it? Thanks, Nicolas 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike : > Here’s the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can > you take a look? > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it doesn’t pick up any > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag). > > > > This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details > table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags? > > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine it > a bit more before doing so. > > > > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > > > > No VM snapshot. > > > > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I > also tried in the Stopped state. Same results. > > > >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > >> > >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > >> > >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > >> > >> I seem to have found another blocker: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822 > >> > >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > >> > >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and test > >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few more > >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> > >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi ( > raj...@apache.org) > >> wrote: > >> > >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my > >> previous mail. > >> > >> ~ Rajani > >> > >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > >> > >> On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav > >> (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote: > >> > >> Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this > already. > >> Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2. > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >> > >> From: Koushik Das > >>
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not ...
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include network details This removes nic/network specific details while exporting the systemvmtemplate for vmware (ova file). Having this causes the ssvms to not deploy in dvswitch-based vmware environments that have no vswitch portgroups (dummy etc). Tested this on a local Trillian env. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack 4.9-systemvm-fix-vmware-portgroups Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #2022 commit 49a132fdf9a8e97922a4f2e6435c8fb07fea6076 Author: Rohit Yadav Date: 2017-03-30T06:09:43Z appliance: remove nic related rules while exporting ssvm ova Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2019: CLOUDSTACK-9851 travis CI build failure after merge ...
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019 merging now --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2019: CLOUDSTACK-9851 travis CI build failure after...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 @nvazquez PR #2019 is merged. Can you force push and kick travis again? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @NuxRo hi Lucian, I tested your Macchinina template as well: http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/macchinina-vmware.ova It too has network/nics defined so it fails to deploy on dvswitch-based vmware environments (with no vswitches). Can you please regenerate the ova without the defined nics/networks? @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-605 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #899: BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-8921 snapshot_store_ref table shoul...
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899 @yvsubhash your template related changes are not relevant to the issue fixed. Please remove the changes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2012: CLOUDSTACK-9842: Unable to map root volume usage to ...
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2012 LGTM for the code changes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813 Hi @borisstoyanov, >Here are some recommendations that would make user experience better. What I'm suggesting is to implement 2 standalone checks. Check if vmware.create.full.clone is true. Check if vmware.root.disk.controller is true. >These checks should be performed >When adding instance This could be done, soon UI will be updated. >when resizing a running instance I think for this we should rely on Hypervisor. Because currently, we do not have API for extracting certain details (like root disk controller of running VM's Disk). What is your opinion ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now? On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system VMs isn’t working properly. On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once they are fixed. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org) wrote: We currently have the below list of blockers: BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi, Sure, I can pull that code and test. I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done, I can move on to your PR. Thanks! Mike On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and created this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been testing it and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please repeat your tests on it? Thanks, Nicolas 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike : > Here’s the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can > you take a look? > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it doesn’t pick up any > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag). > > > > This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details > table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags? > > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine it > a bit more before doing so. > > > > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > > > > No VM snapshot. > > > > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I > also tried in the Stopped state. Same results. > > > >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > >> > >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > >> > >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > >> > >> I seem to have found another blocker: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822 > >> > >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > >> > >> PRs are ready for the blockers.
Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
Mike, can you confirm that this is not also an issue in 4.9? On 30/03/17 08:21, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: This one may be a blocker (it’s currently marked as such): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849 It would be nice if one of our VMware gurus could take a look at it and see what’s going on there. The gist is you can’t live migrate a VM from one cluster to another in the same datacenter (using either NFS or iSCSI as shared storage) (which I think you should be able to do with VMware in CloudStack). On 3/30/17, 12:06 AM, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once they are fixed. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org) wrote: We currently have the below list of blockers: BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi, Sure, I can pull that code and test. I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done, I can move on to your PR. Thanks! Mike On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and created this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been testing it and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please repeat your tests on it? Thanks, Nicolas 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike : > Here’s the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can > you take a look? > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it doesn’t pick up any > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag). > > > > This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details > table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags? > > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine it > a bit more before doing so. > > > > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > > > > No VM snapshot. > > > > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I > also tried in the Stopped sta
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813 >I'm happy that you agree with my comments, as far as resizing root disk for runnign VM, I think checking both full.clone and root.disk.controller global settings puts us in a good position to make the option available or not. By any chance if the user has made a change and changed the RootDiskController, he would be notified with exception and that would ring a bell to him. I think Cloudstack brings an abstraction when using hypervisors and it's generally good for the product when users use more CloudStack features instead of relying on the Hypervisor to get work done. @serg38, @pdube and @sateesh-chodapuneedi. Should i write additional API for extracting all these details in case of running VM or is there any alternative to achieve this functionality ? What is your opinion ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...
Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002 @serg38 Added changes for failure case. If migration fails the old pod id will be restored. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002 LGTM on the code changes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #883: CLOUDSTACK-8906: /var/log/cloud/ doesn't get logrotat...
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883 Test results; when I executed the setupxenserver.sh file , following is the output iptables: Bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?). mv: invalid option -- n Try `mv --help' for more information. success mv -n option is provided in line 52 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgra...
GitHub user kishankavala opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023 BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path for LXC and OVM `mysql> select id,unique_name,name,type,url,updated,created from vm_template where type='SYSTEM'; ++-+---++---+-+-+ | id | unique_name | name | type | url | updated | created | ++-+---++---+-+-+ | 1 | routing-1 | SystemVM Template (XenServer) | SYSTEM | https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-xen.vhd.bz2 | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 | | 3 | routing-3 | SystemVM Template (KVM) | SYSTEM | https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 | | 8 | routing-8 | SystemVM Template (vSphere) | SYSTEM | https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-vmware.ova | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 | | 9 | routing-9 | SystemVM Template (HyperV)| SYSTEM | https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-hyperv.vhd.zip | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:53:00 | | 10 | routing-10 | SystemVM Template (LXC) | SYSTEM | https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2 | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:54:13 | | 12 | routing-12 | SystemVM Template (Ovm3) | SYSTEM | https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/systemvm64template-master-4.10.0-ovm.raw.bz2 | NULL| 2017-03-30 15:55:58 | ++-+---++---+-+-+ 6 rows in set (0.00 sec) ` You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9808 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #2023 commit 4795cba0ec86c2e4ffd2da959414deeb15a2c532 Author: Kishan Kavala Date: 2017-03-30T11:45:46Z BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path for LXC and OVM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path...
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023 LGTM @kishankavala did you check what went wrong with the kvm template. @karuturi reported that and it was probably some auto-conflict-resolution. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 Hi, I'll remove the NICs. Thanks for the notification. I assume I'll have to do the same for all my templates as I am using the same script to generate the ova. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #883: CLOUDSTACK-8906: /var/log/cloud/ doesn't get logrotat...
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883 @jayakarteek Thanks for testing. I have made the respective code changes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to master and it's working fine on master. This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be checked why they cannot co exist. ~Rajani Sent from phone. On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" wrote: Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now? On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system VMs isn’t working properly. On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once they are fixed. ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org) wrote: We currently have the below list of blockers: BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: Hi, Sure, I can pull that code and test. I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done, I can move on to your PR. Thanks! Mike On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and created this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been testing it and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please repeat your tests on it? Thanks, Nicolas 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike : > Here’s the ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can > you take a look? > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it doesn’t pick up any > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag). > > > > This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details > table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags? > > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine it > a bit more before doing so. > > > > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > > > > No VM snapshot. > > > > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I > also tried in the Stopped state. Same results. > > > >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > >> > >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state? > >> > >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > >> > >> I seem to have found another blocker: > >> > >> https://
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-606 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 This may be seen as a blocker for vmware dv-switch based environments where at the moment we cannot use the systemvmtemplates. Pinging for review - @DaanHoogland @abhinandanprateek @borisstoyanov @PaulAngus @karuturi @koushik-das and others --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 I requested @sateesh-chodapuneedi for a review --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path...
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023 code LGTM. Need to check why xenserver and KVM still have wrong urls on PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582#issuecomment-288310796 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not ...
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022#discussion_r108918688
--- Diff:
vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HypervisorHostHelper.java ---
@@ -1477,6 +1493,40 @@ public static String
resolveHostNameInUrl(DatacenterMO dcMo, String url) {
return url;
}
+public static String removeOVFNetwork(final String ovfString) {
+if (ovfString == null || ovfString.isEmpty()) {
+return ovfString;
+}
+try {
+final DocumentBuilderFactory factory =
DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
+final Document doc = factory.newDocumentBuilder().parse(new
ByteArrayInputStream(ovfString.getBytes()));
+final DocumentTraversal traversal = (DocumentTraversal) doc;
+final NodeIterator iterator =
traversal.createNodeIterator(doc.getDocumentElement(), NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
null, true);
+for (Node n = iterator.nextNode(); n != null; n =
iterator.nextNode()) {
+final Element e = (Element) n;
+if ("NetworkSection".equals(e.getTagName())) {
+if (e.getParentNode() != null) {
+e.getParentNode().removeChild(e);
+}
+} else if ("rasd:Connection".equals(e.getTagName())) {
+if (e.getParentNode() != null &&
e.getParentNode().getParentNode() != null) {
+
e.getParentNode().getParentNode().removeChild(e.getParentNode());
+}
+}
+}
+final DOMSource domSource = new DOMSource(doc);
+final StringWriter writer = new StringWriter();
+final StreamResult result = new StreamResult(writer);
+final TransformerFactory tf = TransformerFactory.newInstance();
+final Transformer transformer = tf.newTransformer();
+transformer.transform(domSource, result);
+return writer.toString();
+} catch (SAXException | IOException | ParserConfigurationException
| TransformerException e) {
+s_logger.warn("Unexpected exception caught while removing
network elements from OVF:", e);
--- End diff --
thanks for this.
I'd log a warn without, and a debug with the stacktrace.That way an admin
had better control on what is seen in the logs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2023: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path...
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023 @karuturi I think it is easiest to just reapply and not search for the cause of an 8 month old PR resulting in conflicts. (if the original code has the right URLS in it) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
Hello, Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late? We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ? Thanks, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to > master and it's working fine on master. > This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be > checked why they cannot co exist. > > ~Rajani > > Sent from phone. > > > On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" > wrote: > > Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now? > > On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > > Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great > if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) > > If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: > > To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been > removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system > VMs isn’t working properly. > > On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: > > Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: > > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once > they are fixed. > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi > (raj...@apache.org) > wrote: > > We currently have the below list of blockers: > > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator > > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready > > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > Sure, I can pull that code and test. > > I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the > middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is > done, > I can move on to your PR. > > Thanks! > Mike > > On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and > created this > PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been > testing it > and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please > repeat your > tests on it? > > Thanks, > Nicolas > > 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike > : > > > Here’s the ticket: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ > nvazquez can > > you take a look? > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > wrote: > > > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, > the tag > > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places > them > > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > wrote: > > > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should > either > > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it > doesn’t pick up any > > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag). > > > > > > This data used to be stored in the > cloud.storage_pool_details > > table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our > upgrade process > > move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to > storage_pool_tags? > > > > > > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine > it > > a bit more before doing so. > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" < > > m
Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread. Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It would give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new things' a chance to help test widely and then backport important bug fixs, even features back to 4.9.x (LTS branch) . Similar approach we see on Ubuntu roadmap, 16.04 (LTS) and 17.04 (non-LTS). 在2017年03月30 21时20分, "Pierre-Luc Dion"写道: Hello, Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late? We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ? Thanks, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to > master and it's working fine on master. > This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be > checked why they cannot co exist. > > ~Rajani > > Sent from phone. > > > On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" > wrote: > > Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now? > > On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > > Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great > if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) > > If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: > > To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been > removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system > VMs isn’t working properly. > > On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: > > Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: > > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once > they are fixed. > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi > (raj...@apache.org) > wrote: > > We currently have the below list of blockers: > > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator > > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready > > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > Sure, I can pull that code and test. > > I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the > middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is > done, > I can move on to your PR. > > Thanks! > Mike > > On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and > created this > PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been > testing it > and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please > repeat your > tests on it? > > Thanks, > Nicolas > > 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike > : > > > Here’s the ticket: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ > nvazquez can > > you take a look? > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > wrote: > > > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, > the tag > > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places > them > > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > wrote: > > > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should > either > > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it >
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813 @priyankparihar Fortunately those API are already written. As per PR1767 you can get VM details including rootdiskcontroller using listVirtualMachines API and listTemplates. So if we are talking about resizing a root disk on existing VM we can obtain all the details upfront for 1. vmware.root.disk.controller global setting 2. vmware.root.disk.controller if it is set on VM level 3.vmware.create.full.clone global setting 4. vmware.create.full.clone if ti s set on the storage pool where root disk resides After that UI can make a determination if resizing should be allowed or not For the case of new VM deployment with variable root disk size all options above can be obtaine except #4 since storage pool will be determine only during volume allocation. I think for that case we just use items #1-3 to determine if we allow variable root disk size in UI or not (for #3 we obtain rootdiskcontroller setting if it is set on Template level) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
We do that until rc1 is created. After that it's mostly blockers. If there is less gap between RC and release, that would solve it. But unfortunately, we have very few people who test/vote on a release and taking more and more fixes after RC delays it even more if the merged fixes uncover more blockers. Also, we don't backport. We forward merge(there can be exceptions). ~Rajani Sent from phone. On 30 Mar 2017 7:18 p.m., "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread. Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It would give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new things' a chance to help test widely and then backport important bug fixs, even features back to 4.9.x (LTS branch) . Similar approach we see on Ubuntu roadmap, 16.04 (LTS) and 17.04 (non-LTS). 在2017年03月30 21时20分, "Pierre-Luc Dion"写道: Hello, Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late? We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ? Thanks, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to > master and it's working fine on master. > This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be > checked why they cannot co exist. > > ~Rajani > > Sent from phone. > > > On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" > wrote: > > Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now? > > On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > > Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great > if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) > > If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: > > To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been > removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system > VMs isn’t working properly. > > On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: > > Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: > > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once > they are fixed. > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi > (raj...@apache.org) > wrote: > > We currently have the below list of blockers: > > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator > > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready > > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > Sure, I can pull that code and test. > > I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the > middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is > done, > I can move on to your PR. > > Thanks! > Mike > > On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and > created this > PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been > testing it > and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please > repeat your > tests on it? > > Thanks, > Nicolas > > 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike > : > > > Here’s the ticket: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ > nvazquez can > > you take a look? > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > wrote: > > > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, > the tag > > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places > them > > in
Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
We can wait. When do you expect the pr to be out? ~Rajani Sent from phone. On 30 Mar 2017 6:50 p.m., "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote: > Hello, > > Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late? > We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ? > > Thanks, > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi > wrote: > > > Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to > > master and it's working fine on master. > > This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be > > checked why they cannot co exist. > > > > ~Rajani > > > > Sent from phone. > > > > > > On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" > > wrote: > > > > Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now? > > > > On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > > > > Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great > > if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) > > > > If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. > > > > Thanks, > > > > ~ Rajani > > > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > > > On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland > > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: > > > > To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been > > removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system > > VMs isn’t working properly. > > > > On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: > > > > Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? > > > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > > > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: > > > > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once > > they are fixed. > > > > ~ Rajani > > > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > > > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi > > (raj...@apache.org) > > wrote: > > > > We currently have the below list of blockers: > > > > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator > > > > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - > > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready > > > > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 > > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical > > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov > > > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > > > Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? > > > > ~ Rajani > > > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > > > On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Sure, I can pull that code and test. > > > > I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the > > middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is > > done, > > I can move on to your PR. > > > > Thanks! > > Mike > > > > On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" > > wrote: > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and > > created this > > PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been > > testing it > > and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please > > repeat your > > tests on it? > > > > Thanks, > > Nicolas > > > > 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike > > : > > > > > Here’s the ticket: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > > > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ > > nvazquez can > > > you take a look? > > > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, > > the tag > > > ends up in storage_pool_details. > > > > > > > > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places > > them > > > in storage_pool_tags. > > > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should > > either > > > fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10). > > > > > > > > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > > > > > > > > The addition of this table seems to have broken the > > > listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it > > doesn’t pick up any > > > storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
Re:Re:Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
Thanks for you reply, Rajani, you are doging good job ! 在2017年03月30 22时15分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: We do that until rc1 is created. After that it's mostly blockers. If there is less gap between RC and release, that would solve it. But unfortunately, we have very few people who test/vote on a release and taking more and more fixes after RC delays it even more if the merged fixes uncover more blockers. Also, we don't backport. We forward merge(there can be exceptions). ~Rajani Sent from phone. On 30 Mar 2017 7:18 p.m., "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread. Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It would give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new things' a chance to help test widely and then backport important bug fixs, even features back to 4.9.x (LTS branch) . Similar approach we see on Ubuntu roadmap, 16.04 (LTS) and 17.04 (non-LTS). 在2017年03月30 21时20分, "Pierre-Luc Dion"写道: Hello, Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late? We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ? Thanks, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to > master and it's working fine on master. > This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be > checked why they cannot co exist. > > ~Rajani > > Sent from phone. > > > On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland" > wrote: > > Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now? > > On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: > > Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great > if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR) > > If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday. > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: > > To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been > removed. What is blocking us now is that the update to new system > VMs isn’t working properly. > > On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote: > > Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ? > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > 在2017年03月14 00时34分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道: > > We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once > they are fixed. > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi > (raj...@apache.org) > wrote: > > We currently have the below list of blockers: > > BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator > > CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places - > Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready > > CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3 > while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical > host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov > > CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to > http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland > > Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811? > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > Sure, I can pull that code and test. > > I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the > middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is > done, > I can move on to your PR. > > Thanks! > Mike > > On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and > created this > PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been > testing it > and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please > repeat your > tests on it? > > Thanks, > Nicolas > > 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike > : > > > Here’s the ticket: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827 > > > > On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > wrote: > > > > Yes, I can open a ticket. > > > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy < > > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ > nvazquez can > > you take a look? > > > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" > > > wrote: > > > > > > This does seem messed up. > > > > > > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, > the tag > > ends up in storage_pool_details
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 @karuturi sure, done! I rebased master and pushed, now Travis passes! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002 LGTM on the code review. @borisstoyanov @rhtyd Can you kick off tests for this PR? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002 @borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 Trillian test result (tid-968) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 32527 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2021-t968-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py Test completed. 48 look ok, 1 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 366.18 | test_privategw_acl.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 165.52 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.09 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 256.22 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 268.95 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 498.20 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 513.11 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1428.00 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 548.32 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 760.45 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1286.45 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 151.48 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.41 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 161.54 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.31 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.72 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.21 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.29 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 89.19 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 621.23 | test_volumes.py test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.22 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 95.94 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 163.73 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 257.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.73 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 30.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.82 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 70.63 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.17 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 40.41 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.37 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.65 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.35 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.25 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.92 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 138.50 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.98 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.04 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | Success | 87.45 | test_snapshots.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.29 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 209.63 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.22 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.35 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 30.30 | test_rout
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2002: CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in th...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-607 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
Hi All, I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. I got the CentOS7 template from http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-vanilla-vmware.ova Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for Cloudstack? Thanks, -Syed
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. > > I got the CentOS7 template from > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-vanilla-vmware.ova > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for > Cloudstack? > > Thanks, > -Syed
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
Attachments are not forwarded with emails. On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. > > > > I got the CentOS7 template from > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- > vanilla-vmware.ova > > > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for > > Cloudstack? > > > > Thanks, > > -Syed > -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu. On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote: > Attachments are not forwarded with emails. > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > > > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but > > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The > > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. > > > > > > I got the CentOS7 template from > > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/ > x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- > > vanilla-vmware.ova > > > > > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there > > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for > > > Cloudstack? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Syed > > > > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner >
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report! On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build > cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu. > > > On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" > wrote: > >> Attachments are not forwarded with emails. >> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: >> >> > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but >> > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The >> > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. >> > > >> > > I got the CentOS7 template from >> > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/ >> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- >> > vanilla-vmware.ova >> > > >> > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there >> > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for >> > > Cloudstack? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > -Syed >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Rafael Weingärtner >>
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately. I found something on osboxes. I am trying that. http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the > cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report! > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: >> Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build >> cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu. >> >> >> On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" >> wrote: >> >>> Attachments are not forwarded with emails. >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: >>> >>> > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: >>> > > Hi All, >>> > > >>> > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but >>> > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The >>> > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. >>> > > >>> > > I got the CentOS7 template from >>> > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/ >>> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- >>> > vanilla-vmware.ova >>> > > >>> > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there >>> > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for >>> > > Cloudstack? >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > -Syed >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rafael Weingärtner >>>
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only supports OVA for VMWare On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately. > I found something on osboxes. I am trying that. > > http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: >> I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the >> cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report! >> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: >>> Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build >>> cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu. >>> >>> >>> On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" >>> wrote: >>> Attachments are not forwarded with emails. On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. > > > > I got the CentOS7 template from > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/ x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- > vanilla-vmware.ova > > > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for > > Cloudstack? > > > > Thanks, > > -Syed > -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
Hi, I am working on a new set of templates, you can try this one: http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/x86_64/centos-7-vmware.ova If still no luck, happy to debug if you can provide me an account. The only templates I (can) test are the KVM ones. The official templates from various distros will not work properly as they are openstack/aws focused. On 30 March 2017 22:41:05 BST, Syed Ahmed wrote: >osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only >supports OVA for VMWare > >On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed >wrote: >> The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately. >> I found something on osboxes. I am trying that. >> >> http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw >> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed >wrote: >>> I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the >>> cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report! >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion > wrote: Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think >centos build cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu. On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" > wrote: > Attachments are not forwarded with emails. > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed >wrote: > > > FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 >but > > > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. >The > > > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. > > > > > > I got the CentOS7 template from > > > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/ > x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- > > vanilla-vmware.ova > > > > > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are >there > > > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for > > > Cloudstack? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Syed > > > > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
I tried the one you provided however, it still has the same problem ... DHCP doesn't seem to pick up. I also see that the interface is not named eth0 .. could this be the problem? I can try changing the network driver and see if that helps. Will report back. On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, I am working on a new set of templates, you can try this one: > http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/x86_64/centos-7-vmware.ova > > If still no luck, happy to debug if you can provide me an account. The only > templates I (can) test are the KVM ones. > > The official templates from various distros will not work properly as they > are openstack/aws focused. > > > > > On 30 March 2017 22:41:05 BST, Syed Ahmed wrote: >> >> osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only >> supports OVA for VMWare >> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: >>> >>> The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately. >>> I found something on osboxes. I am trying that. >>> >>> http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report! On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos > build > cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu. > > > On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" > > wrote: > >> Attachments are not forwarded with emails. >> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed >> wrote: >> >>> FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed >>> wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. I got the CentOS7 template from http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/ >> >> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- >>> >>> vanilla-vmware.ova Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are there any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for Cloudstack? Thanks, -Syed >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Rafael Weingärtner > > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
Yes. Centos 7 changed the name of the interface. There were ways to change it prior to 7.3: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/205010/centos-7-rename-network-interface-without-rebooting As of 7.3, the details in that thread do not work (unless you see my comment). This is because of this: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2592561 You will need to modify this file '/etc/udev/rules.d/90-eno-fix.rules' in order to make the override actually work after 7.3. Hope that helps. On Mar 30, 2017 6:54 PM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: > I tried the one you provided however, it still has the same problem > ... DHCP doesn't seem to pick up. I also see that the interface is not > named eth0 .. could this be the problem? I can try changing the > network driver and see if that helps. Will report back. > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Nux! wrote: > > Hi, I am working on a new set of templates, you can try this one: > > http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/x86_64/centos-7-vmware.ova > > > > If still no luck, happy to debug if you can provide me an account. The > only > > templates I (can) test are the KVM ones. > > > > The official templates from various distros will not work properly as > they > > are openstack/aws focused. > > > > > > > > > > On 30 March 2017 22:41:05 BST, Syed Ahmed wrote: > >> > >> osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only > >> supports OVA for VMWare > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed > wrote: > >>> > >>> The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately. > >>> I found something on osboxes. I am trying that. > >>> > >>> http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed > wrote: > > I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the > cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report! > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion > > wrote: > > > > Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos > > build > > cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu. > > > > > > On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" > > > > wrote: > > > >> Attachments are not forwarded with emails. > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed > >> wrote: > >> > >>> FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed > >>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but > somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. > The > default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works. > > I got the CentOS7 template from > http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/ > >> > >> x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64- > >>> > >>> vanilla-vmware.ova > > > Is there any setting that I need to do for this template? Are > there > any other places I can get a working template for CentOS7 for > Cloudstack? > > Thanks, > -Syed > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Rafael Weingärtner > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument biosdevname=0 will make all network device names reverted back to ethX We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting RHEL/CentOS 7 and had no issues so far. Thanks, Sergey
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
This does not work anymore after 7.3 because it gets overridden by this 'fix'. I tried all of the previously working techniques before finally having to modify the hard coded naming in the file I mentioned previously. On Mar 30, 2017 8:42 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" wrote: > There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument > biosdevname=0 > > will make all network device names reverted back to ethX > We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting > RHEL/CentOS 7 and had no issues so far. > > Thanks, > Sergey > > >
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
It still works in our environment with 7.3 and biosdevname=0. [root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Maipo) [root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# ifconfig |grep eth eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 ether 1e:00:34:00:07:ce txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) ether 52:54:00:15:5c:a7 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) On 3/30/17, 5:48 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote: This does not work anymore after 7.3 because it gets overridden by this 'fix'. I tried all of the previously working techniques before finally having to modify the hard coded naming in the file I mentioned previously. On Mar 30, 2017 8:42 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" wrote: > There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument > biosdevname=0 > > will make all network device names reverted back to ethX > We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting > RHEL/CentOS 7 and had no issues so far. > > Thanks, > Sergey > > >
Re: Need help in getting CentOS 7 templates to run on Cloudstack 4.9 and VMWare
OK. Will have to test again. Maybe there was another change since I last tested. On Mar 30, 2017 8:59 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" wrote: > It still works in our environment with 7.3 and biosdevname=0. > > [root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Maipo) > > [root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# ifconfig |grep eth > eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 > ether 1e:00:34:00:07:ce txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > ether 52:54:00:15:5c:a7 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > > > > > On 3/30/17, 5:48 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote: > > This does not work anymore after 7.3 because it gets overridden by this > 'fix'. I tried all of the previously working techniques before finally > having to modify the hard coded naming in the file I mentioned > previously. > > > > On Mar 30, 2017 8:42 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" < > sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> > wrote: > > > There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument > > biosdevname=0 > > > > will make all network device names reverted back to ethX > > We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting > > RHEL/CentOS 7 and had no issues so far. > > > > Thanks, > > Sergey > > > > > > > > >
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2022: CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022 Trillian test result (tid-970) Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 49701 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2022-t970-vmware-55u3.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_internal_lb.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Failure` | 317.34 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 884.39 | test_privategw_acl.py test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 253.25 | test_privategw_acl.py test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 121.15 | test_snapshots.py test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 126.25 | test_snapshots.py test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Error` | 263.46 | test_privategw_acl.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 361.57 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 156.72 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 572.99 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 372.78 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 769.88 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 712.56 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1508.33 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 770.08 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 695.97 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1366.74 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 30.86 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 50.52 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.55 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 53.76 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 520.78 | test_volumes.py test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.18 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 199.11 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 128.83 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 237.78 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 76.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 216.47 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.21 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.10 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 110.84 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 272.11 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 238.83 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.60 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.38 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 387.09 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 203.79 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.17 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.27 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py test_01_li
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1756: CLOUDSTACK-9585 UI doesn't give an option to select ...
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1756 Tested the scenario, xen tools version is visible  --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 LGTM for the code changes --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage test failu...
Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 Wonderful. Seeing green travis after a long time :) ð Thanks @nvazquez and @SudharmaJain merging now --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #2021: CLOUDSTACK-9854: Fix test_primary_storage tes...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #883: CLOUDSTACK-8906: /var/log/cloud/ doesn't get logrotat...
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883 Tested the PUll Request. Logs are rotated as expected in /var/log/cloud folder --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #921: CLOUDSTACK-8944 Template download possible from new n...
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/921 unable to reproduce in ACS environment --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #899: BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-8921 snapshot_store_ref table shoul...
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899 @SudharmaJain its taken care --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
