[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-413


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1827: CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while creating t...

2016-12-22 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1827
  
@rhtyd Thanks. Re-based against 4.9 branch, and changed base branch to 4.9


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1826: CLOUDSTACK-9675: Cloudstack Metrics Miscellaneous bu...

2016-12-22 Thread rashmidixit
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1826
  
@rhtyd - There have been four things fixed here. I have explained each 
commit below. Your review/comments is most appreciated.

1. Goto Zone metrics or Hosts metrics. NUmerical values are not listed 
under Mem Usage and Mem Allocation columns. Instead 'NaN' is displayed 
- Mainly happening due to missing checks for undefined.

2. Create a Windows instance on a Xen cluster. No IOPS data is generated or 
shown in the Disk Usage Tab for that Instance: In some cases the diskiops from 
API comes back as 0. In this case, calculated it based on disk read and write 
values.

3. Changing storage.overprovisioning factor should cause changed values in 
storage metrics. This doesnt happen currently:  The disk overprovisioning 
factor was not considered when calculating metrics 'disk total' and 'disk 
allocated'. Added this in.

4. Allocated memory is not correctly calculated on Hosts Metrics page for a 
xen server with multiple instances: The value being returned from API was % 
value. The Host metric page shows this in GB. Converted it correctly.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1828: CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting...

2016-12-22 Thread sateesh-chodapuneedi
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
  
@rhtyd Thanks. Done with rebase against `4.9` branch, also changed the PR's 
base branch to `4.9`.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1853: CLOUDSTACK-9696: Fixed Virtual Router deploym...

2016-12-22 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1853: CLOUDSTACK-9696: Fixed Virtual Router deploym...

2016-12-22 Thread anshul1886
GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853

CLOUDSTACK-9696: Fixed Virtual Router deployment failing if there are…

… no shared resources available

and has access to resources through parent domain heirarachy

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-9696

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1853


commit 5f6f4ef3c634bbf60f157253253b5720a7177c0d
Author: Anshul Gangwar 
Date:   2016-12-22T06:17:03Z

CLOUDSTACK-9696: Fixed Virtual Router deployment failing if there are no 
shared resources available
and has access to resources through parent domain heirarachy




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1855: CLOUDSTACK-9697: Better error message if user...

2016-12-22 Thread rashmidixit
GitHub user rashmidixit opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1855

CLOUDSTACK-9697: Better error message if user tries to shrink VM ROOT 
Volume size

Skip the API call altogether if the UI detects this case and throw a more 
user friendly message

Conflicts:
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja_JP.properties
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties
ui/dictionary2.jsp

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9697

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1855.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1855


commit 4b54fa3438fc88a2465b22a344c601e61d40c4af
Author: sanket_thite 
Date:   2016-09-13T06:47:09Z

CLOUDSTACK-9697: Added better error message user if tries to shrink the VM 
ROOT volume size
Skip the API call altogether if the UI detects this and throw a more user 
friendly message

Conflicts:
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja_JP.properties
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties
ui/dictionary2.jsp




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configurati...

2016-12-22 Thread ustcweizhou
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856

CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration 
router.aggregation.command.each.timeout to KVM agent

The router.aggregation.command.each.timeout in global configuration is only 
applied on new created KVM host.
For existing KVM host, changing the value will not be effective.
We need to propagate the configuration to existing host when 
cloudstack-agent is connected.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/ustcweizhou/cloudstack set-kvm-host-params

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1856


commit ec5ab8dc196227bc728d5667090aa98fe8baf651
Author: Wei Zhou 
Date:   2016-12-22T09:14:36Z

CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration 
router.aggregation.command.each.timeout to KVM agent




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1826: CLOUDSTACK-9675: Cloudstack Metrics Miscellaneous bu...

2016-12-22 Thread rashmidixit
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1826
  
Added one more fix to this: 
1. List of Virtual Machines will be incorrect if the number is greater than 
the pagesize. Added -1 to the call of the API.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
Fixes most of the failures from test_volumes, which turns out to be env 
related.

Test Volume creation for all Disk Offerings (incl. custom) ... === 
TestName: test_01_create_volume | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL
Attach a created Volume to a Running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Download a Volume attached to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_03_download_attached_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete a Volume attached to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach a Volume attached to a VM ... === TestName: test_05_detach_volume | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Download a Volume unattached to an VM ... === TestName: 
test_06_download_detached_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test resize (negative) non-existent volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_resize_fail | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test resize a volume ... === TestName: test_08_resize_volume | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete a Volume unattached to an VM ... === TestName: 
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-414


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
CentOS6 pkg re-kicked.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configurati...

2016-12-22 Thread murali-reddy
Github user murali-reddy commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856#discussion_r93599467
  
--- Diff: 
core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingResource.java ---
@@ -259,8 +260,18 @@ private Answer execute(GetDomRVersionCmd cmd) {
 return new GetDomRVersionAnswer(cmd, result.getDetails(), 
lines[0], lines[1]);
 }
 
+public boolean configureHostParams(final Map params) {
+if (_params.get("router.aggregation.command.each.timeout") == 
null) {
--- End diff --

Why do we need this check?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration rout...

2016-12-22 Thread murali-reddy
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856
  
@ustcweizhou this will be useful for 4.9 as well, would you mind rebasing 
the patch to 4.9?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configurati...

2016-12-22 Thread koushik-das
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856#discussion_r93603576
  
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/SetHostParamsCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+//
+
+package com.cloud.agent.api;
+
+import java.util.Map;
+
+public class SetHostParamsCommand extends Command {
+
+Map params;
--- End diff --

Map is not serializable, also HashMap that is actually used may have issues 
with serialization. Please check.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configurati...

2016-12-22 Thread ustcweizhou
Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856#discussion_r93604300
  
--- Diff: 
core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingResource.java ---
@@ -259,8 +260,18 @@ private Answer execute(GetDomRVersionCmd cmd) {
 return new GetDomRVersionAnswer(cmd, result.getDetails(), 
lines[0], lines[1]);
 }
 
+public boolean configureHostParams(final Map params) {
+if (_params.get("router.aggregation.command.each.timeout") == 
null) {
--- End diff --

the idea is: if router.aggregation.command.each.timeout is already set in 
agent.properties, then ignore the propagation.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration rout...

2016-12-22 Thread ustcweizhou
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856
  
rebase with apache/4.9


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration rout...

2016-12-22 Thread borisstoyanov
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856
  
@blueorangutan package



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration rout...

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1857: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8284

2016-12-22 Thread adwaitpatankar
GitHub user adwaitpatankar opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1857

BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8284

On expunge VM, initiate resource count update at domain
level. Setting accountId as null ensures resource count is done at domain 
level and any hierarchies below.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-8284

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1857.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1857


commit 468ec40963189f1e68be46c4c0f2955eb3a520ab
Author: Adwait Patankar 
Date:   2016-07-27T20:41:11Z

BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8284
On expunge VM, initiate resource count update at domain
level. Setting accountId as null ensures resource count is done
 at domain level and any hierarchies below.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configurati...

2016-12-22 Thread ustcweizhou
Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856#discussion_r93606574
  
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/SetHostParamsCommand.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+//
+
+package com.cloud.agent.api;
+
+import java.util.Map;
+
+public class SetHostParamsCommand extends Command {
+
+Map params;
--- End diff --

@koushik-das luckily there is no issue on our platforms. We have some 
similar definitions in other Command in cloudstack actually.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1856: CLOUDSTACK-9569: propagate global configuration rout...

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-415


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-416


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Re: Error on Master

2016-12-22 Thread Will Stevens
No problem. I think it is because I have been upgrading this env from
master to master periodically and the schema changes were only recently
added in the upgrade sql. We should be good. Thanks for checking. I got my
env working with the details in this thread, so hopefully it will help
others if they have a similar nontraditional upgrade of master to master.

Thanks for the hard work rohit and happy holidays. :)

On Dec 22, 2016 1:55 AM, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:

> Will,
>
>
> I tried to run some upgrade tests and could not reproduce your issue.
>
> If this happens again, let me know.
>
>
> Regards.
> --
> *From:* Rohit Yadav 
> *Sent:* 22 December 2016 12:03:41
> *To:* Will Stevens
> *Cc:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Error on Master
>
> Hi Will,
>
> I tried a fresh installation of latest master and I was able to deploy
> database. I'll run upgrade tests soon to verify if there are any issues.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone seen this.
> >
> > I upgraded a system which was running master to a later version of master
> > and I get the following when I start the service after upgrading.
> >
> > 2016-12-21 18:55:13,388 WARN  [o.a.c.s.m.c.ResourceApplicationContext]
> > (main:null) (logid:) Exception encountered during context initialization
> -
> > cancelling refresh attempt: org.springframework.context.
> ApplicationContextException:
> > Failed to start bean 'cloudStackLifeCycle'; nested exception is
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on:
> > com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@69cd2214: SELECT
> > network_offerings.id, network_offerings.name,
> > network_offerings.unique_name, network_offerings.display_text,
> > network_offerings.nw_rate, network_offerings.mc_rate,
> > network_offerings.traffic_type, network_offerings.specify_vlan,
> > network_offerings.system_only, network_offerings.service_offering_id,
> > network_offerings.tags, network_offerings.default, network_offerings.
> availability,
> > network_offerings.state, network_offerings.removed,
> > network_offerings.created, network_offerings.guest_type,
> > network_offerings.dedicated_lb_service, network_offerings.shared_
> source_nat_service,
> > network_offerings.specify_ip_ranges, network_offerings.sort_key,
> > network_offerings.uuid, network_offerings.redundant_router_service,
> > network_offerings.conserve_mode, network_offerings.elastic_ip_service,
> > network_offerings.eip_associate_public_ip, network_offerings.elastic_lb_
> service,
> > network_offerings.inline, network_offerings.is_persistent,
> > network_offerings.egress_default_policy, network_offerings.concurrent_
> connections,
> > network_offerings.keep_alive_enabled, network_offerings.supports_
> streched_l2,
> > network_offerings.supports_public_access, network_offerings.internal_lb,
> > network_offerings.public_lb FROM network_offerings WHERE
> > network_offerings.unique_name = _binary'System-Public-Network'  AND
> > network_offerings.removed IS NULL  ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1
> >
> >
> > I tried running the SQL directly to see what I get and I get the
> following:
> >
> > mysql> SELECT network_offerings.id, network_offerings.name,
> > network_offerings.unique_name, network_offerings.display_text,
> > network_offerings.nw_rate, network_offerings.mc_rate,
> > network_offerings.traffic_type, network_offerings.specify_vlan,
> > network_offerings.system_only, network_offerings.service_offering_id,
> > network_offerings.tags, network_offerings.default, network_offerings.
> availability,
> > network_offerings.state, network_offerings.removed,
> > network_offerings.created, network_offerings.guest_type,
> > network_offerings.dedicated_lb_service, network_offerings.shared_
> source_nat_service,
> > network_offerings.specify_ip_ranges, network_offerings.sort_key,
> > network_offerings.uuid, network_offerings.redundant_router_service,
> > network_offerings.conserve_mode, network_offerings.elastic_ip_service,
> > network_offerings.eip_associate_public_ip, network_offerings.elastic_lb_
> service,
> > network_offerings.inline, network_offerings.is_persistent,
> > network_offerings.egress_default_policy, network_offerings.concurrent_
> connections,
> > network_offerings.keep_alive_enabled, network_offerings.supports_
> streched_l2,
> > network_offerings.supports_public_access, network_offerings.internal_lb,
> > network_offerings.public_lb FROM network_offerings WHERE
> > network_offerings.unique_name = _binary'System-Public-Network'  AND
> > network_offerings.removed IS NULL  ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1;
> >
> > ERROR 1054 (42S22): Unknown column 'network_offerings.supports_
> public_access'
> > in 'field list'
> >
> > Did I miss a step or something in my upgrade from master to the latest
> > master?  I have done this upgrade a few times in the past without issues,
> > but maybe something has changed?
> >
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837
  
Trillian test result (tid-708)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36003 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1837-t708-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 944.85 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 182.10 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 506.71 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 824.09 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | `Error` | 5.14 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | `Error` | 5.13 | test_templates.py
ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 243.78 | 
test_templates.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 201.87 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 379.57 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 786.41 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 734.09 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1604.97 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 864.93 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 730.71 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1405.13 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 30.85 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 65.69 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 110.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.62 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.31 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 58.83 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 526.23 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 295.27 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 230.05 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 176.42 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.73 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 307.91 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 107.81 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 86.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 237.00 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 233.76 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 246.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.67 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 212.01 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 203.67 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.37 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 71.56 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 97.51 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.15 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.17 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 186.12 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 156.00 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.23 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.62 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 191.33 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 0.99 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.56 | test_routers.py
test_router_dns_guestipquery | Success | 76.8

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858

README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

Here's a screenshot to confirm the UI change:
![screenshot from 2016-12-22 
23-42-31](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/95203/21435538/64d5fdda-c8a0-11e6-9346-bceaa1eca4ab.png)

Pinging for review -- @abhinandanprateek @chipchilders @chiradeep 
@DaanHoogland  @imduffy15 @K0zka @PaulAngus @nvazquez @terbolous @murali-reddy 
@NuxRo @wido @mike-tutkowski @swill @resmo @sebgoa @wilderrodrigues @kiwiflyer  
@pyr @pdion891 @koushik-das @JayapalUradi  @karuturi @kishankavala 
@milamberspace @mlsorensen @serverchief @jlk @pdube @syed and many others!

Since this a text/UI change, please accept this without explicit 
integration test results, of course as long as Travis is green :)

Happy holidays everyone!


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack xmas2016

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1858


commit 86247ab3a67ca1642a6fcfc57d85d552b5cb0f3d
Author: Rohit Yadav 
Date:   2016-12-22T18:10:40Z

README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread ustcweizhou
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
LGTM :+1: 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread K0zka
Github user K0zka commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
🥇 👍 :)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread kiwiflyer
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
LGTM 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread syed
Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
Lgtm happy holidays
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 13:48 Simon Weller  wrote:

> LGTM
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> ,
> or mute the thread
> 

> .
>



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
👍 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
+1 happy holidays!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
Trillian test result (tid-717)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 31562 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1854-t717-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 864.20 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 381.18 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | `Error` | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | `Error` | 10.27 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | `Error` | 279.82 | test_volumes.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 160.05 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 71.20 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 281.47 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 446.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 782.65 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 519.75 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1409.89 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 548.01 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1302.18 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 78.83 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 368.52 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.66 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.88 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.86 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 125.85 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 105.84 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.17 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 60.83 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 194.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.51 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.69 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 161.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.66 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.58 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.19 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 234.59 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.32 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.33 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.15 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.72 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.54 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.05 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.57 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1849: CLOUDSTACK-9690: Scale CentOS7 VM fails with error

2016-12-22 Thread sudhansu7
Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1849
  
@rhtyd Thanks for the Review. I have amended the code as per your 
suggestion.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
Trillian test result (tid-718)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 31629 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1854-t718-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 40 look ok, 8 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Failure` | 206.53 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Failure` | 115.95 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 849.24 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 101.59 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 136.69 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Error` | 227.37 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | `Error` | 65.96 | test_volumes.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | `Error` | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | `Error` | 5.15 | test_templates.py
ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 279.45 | 
test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | `Error` | 501.01 | test_ssvm.py
ContextSuite context=TestIsolatedNetworksPasswdServer>:setup | `Error` | 
0.00 | test_password_server.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 177.25 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 359.55 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 761.08 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 676.86 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 730.26 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 685.79 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1394.62 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 30.76 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.22 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.30 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 58.89 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 452.28 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.20 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 227.14 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 181.43 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.62 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 232.46 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 62.43 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 71.05 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.28 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 364.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.73 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.68 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 171.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 208.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 4.25 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 66.43 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 96.84 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 145.93 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 110.74 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.23 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.62 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 126.14

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread pdube
Github user pdube commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
Happy holidays!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
Trillian test result (tid-716)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 33496 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1854-t716-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 43 look ok, 5 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 526.40 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1356.28 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 568.21 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 96.67 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_04_extract_template | `Error` | 5.14 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | `Error` | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | `Error` | 70.73 | test_templates.py
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:teardown | `Error` | 62.76 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi | `Error` | 38.78 | test_primary_storage.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 322.75 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 162.35 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 553.37 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 310.64 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 734.60 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 910.40 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1033.63 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.90 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 116.22 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 121.26 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 31.16 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.31 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.26 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.37 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 15.83 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 397.71 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.29 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 186.39 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.79 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 293.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 555.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 71.29 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.30 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.30 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 121.10 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.14 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.82 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 229.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 121.68 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 143.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 141.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 140.44 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.58 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 126.44 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.21 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.27 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 65.58 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 50.48 | test_route

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread milamberspace
Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
LGTM and Happy holidays! 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
If we have to

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Milamber  wrote:

> LGTM and Happy holidays!
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> ,
> or mute the thread
> 

> .
>



-- 
Daan



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1838: CLOUDSTACK-9682: Block VM migration to a stor...

2016-12-22 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1838


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1854: 4.9 multiplex testing

2016-12-22 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-417


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858
  
Alright merging this based on reviews, LGTMs and that Travis is green 
:smile: 
Happy holidays!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1858: README: Happy Christmas, happy holidays!

2016-12-22 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1858


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---