[GitHub] cloudstack issue #351: This branch implements the CSV and native HA support ...

[anshul1886]

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351
  
Rebased the branch against current master.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@karuturi I understand these words: "help", "hello", "thanks", "package", 
"test"
Test command usage: test [mgmt os] [hypervisor] [additional tests]
Mgmt OS options: ['centos6', 'centos7', 'ubuntu']
Hypervisor options: ['kvm-centos6', 'kvm-centos7', 'kvm-ubuntu', 
'xenserver-65sp1', 'xenserver-62sp1', 'vmware-60u2', 'vmware-55u3', 
'vmware-51u1', 'vmware-50u1']
Additional tests: list of comma separated tests with paths relative to the 
`test/integration` directory, for example: component/test_acl_listvm.py, 
component/test_volumes.py
Note: when additional tests are passed, you need to specify mgmt server os 
and hypervisor or use the `matrix` command.

Blessed contributors for kicking Trillian test jobs: ['rhtyd', 'jburwell', 
'murali-reddy', 'abhinandanprateek', 'PaulAngus', 'borisstoyanov', 'karuturi']


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan help



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[milamberspace]

Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  

Hello @nvazquez 
Could you see this bug CLOUDSTACK-9671 It's related with this PR and 
CLOUDSTACK-9438
Thanks


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@milamberspace Column details is supposed to be added during 4.8 to 4.9 
schema upgrade. Most likely when you upgraded to 4.9 this PR hadn't been merged 
yet. You can simply apply this statement before starting the 4.9 to 4.10 
upgrade:
ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`image_store_details` CHANGE COLUMN `value` `value` 
VARCHAR(255) NULL DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'value of the detail', ADD COLUMN 
`display` tinyint(1) NOT 
NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the detail can be displayed to the end 
user' AFTER `value`;




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[milamberspace]

Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@serg38 My CS 4.9.1.0 installation is a fresh installation not an upgrade 
from 4.8.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@milamberspace Can you check if file 
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/db/schema-481to490.sql  in your 
installation has the SQL alter image_store_details table line ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[milamberspace]

Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@serg38 Root cause of the issue found.
In the 4.9.1.0 branch, the commit 2e77496601ab5420723ce8b955b3960faaba7d5c 
(CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS version changeable in UI) 
hasn't exists, so the schema-481to490.sql file doesn't contains the SQL 
request...
Probably this issue will be a blocker for the 4.9.1.0 RC1...


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@rhtyd @jburwell @karuturi What is the easiest way to resolve this merge 
conflict? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)

[Milamber]

Hello,

I'm not sure, but perhaps we have an 'indirect' blocker for 4.9.1.0 RC1.

Currently the upgrade from 4.9.1.0 RC1 to 4.10.0.0 SNAPSHOT don't works 
because the schema-481to490.sql in the 4.9.1.0 / 4.9 doesn't contains 
the commit of CLOUDSTACK-9438 (2e77496601ab5420723ce8b955b3960faaba7d5c).

(this commit is currently in master)

When you try to make the upgrade you have this error: "Unknown column 
'image_store_details.display' in 'field list'"

see:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9671

Currently there have 2 diff between the schema-481to490.sql in 4.9.1.0 
RC1 (and 4.9 branch) and master branch.


What is your opinion: blocker or not?

Just copy the 2 sql request inside the schema-4910to41000.sql file (but 
the commit 2e77496601ab5420723ce8b955b3960faaba7d5c contains other 
modified files)?


Milamber



$ diff ./setup/db/db/schema-481to490.sql /tmp/MASTER-schema-481to490.sql
547a548,552
>
> ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`image_store_details` CHANGE COLUMN `value` 
`value` VARCHAR(255) NULL DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'value of the detail', 
ADD COLUMN `display` tinyint(1) NOT
> NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the detail can be displayed to the 
end user' AFTER `value`;

>
> ALTER TABLE `snapshots` ADD COLUMN `location_type` VARCHAR(32) 
COMMENT 'Location of snapshot (ex. Primary)';






On 12/12/2016 21:36, Milamber wrote:

Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)

Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS) 
(1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :


1/ Fresh install of 4.9.1.0 RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.5 + KVM + 
NFS : OK
Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create 
networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, 
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip 
release, static nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with success too (create 
network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ Test upgrade from 4.8.1 to 4.9.1.0 RC1 : OK

3/ Test upgrade from 4.8.2 RC1 to 4.9.1.0 RC1 : don't works (expected)

4/ Tests of all localization Web UI for 4.9.1.0 RC1:
Localization works well except Spanish (not a blocker to release): the 
Web UI display partially the localization strings due of one bad 
carriage return in the label 
message.installWizard.copy.whatIsCloudStack string (from Transifex). 
This is the same issue that the 4.8.2 RC1.



Perhaps add in the Release notes this Spanish l10n issue.

Thanks to the RM.

Milamber



On 10/12/2016 03:11, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838 


Commit: af2679959b634d095b93b8265c6da294d360065d

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838 



Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.1.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 120 hours, considering the process started 
during the

weekends, and will end on 14 Dec 2016 end of the day.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate

"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Trillian test result (tid-676)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33149 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1711-t676-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 43 look ok, 5 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 524.58 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1340.49 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 562.24 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 798.12 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 374.94 | 
test_templates.py
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi | `Error` | 38.18 | test_primary_storage.py
ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 295.92 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 151.58 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 583.33 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 314.56 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 663.03 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 874.69 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1037.07 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 20.67 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 110.97 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 111.39 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 25.34 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.38 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.25 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 15.68 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 392.36 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 219.35 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.73 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 277.81 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 36.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.06 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 20.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 110.90 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 65.58 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 259.00 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 146.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 148.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.66 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 168.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.31 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 129.23 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.14 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.22 | test_scale_vm.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 65.47 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 45.36 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.24 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.52 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 115.85 |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[nvazquez]

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
Hi @milamberspace, sorry for my late response, I'm out of work this week 
but please let me know if there's something I can do to help.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.8.2.0 (RC1)

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (binding)


Based on a test deployment against KVM, and Trillian results [1].


[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752


Regards.


From: Milamber 
Sent: 13 December 2016 03:06:26
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.8.2.0 (RC1)

Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)

Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
(1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :

1/ Fresh install of 4.8.2.0 RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.5 + KVM + NFS
: OK
Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create
networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template,
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip
release, static nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with success too (create
network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)

2/ Test upgrade from 4.8.1 to 4.8.2.0 RC1 : OK

3/ Tests of all localization Web UI for 4.8.1 RC1:
Localization works well except Spanish (not a blocker to release): the
Web UI display partially the localization strings due of one bad
carriage return in the label message.installWizard.copy.whatIsCloudStack
string (from Transifex). This is the same issue that the 4.9.1.0RC1.


Perhaps add in the Release notes this Spanish l10n issue.

Thanks to the RM.

Milamber



On 10/12/2016 03:07, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.8.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
> shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.8.2.0-RC20161210T0832
> Commit: 4a1f7ed8bc51d859c5e0e5b9c3ad513752ff8c40
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
> blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.8.2.0-RC20161210T0832
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.8.2.0/
> *
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 120 hours, considering the process started during the
> weekends, and will end on end of the day on 14 Dec 2016.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards.
>


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Haijiao,


Thanks, you're right. We've been using a template, and I just checked to find 
that we've not been updating the `changes` file in the repository but instead 
doing that in the release notes. I'll keep this in mind for next voting threads.


Regards.


From: Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
Sent: 10 December 2016 10:13:21
To: Rohit Yadav
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)

The chang log seems not working


Sent from my mobile



On 2016-12-10 11:11 , Rohit Yadav Wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838
Commit: af2679959b634d095b93b8265c6da294d360065d

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.1.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 120 hours, considering the process started during the
weekends, and will end on 14 Dec 2016 end of the day.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards.

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Bruno,


Thanks for sharing, a failing upgrade looks like a blocker. I'll assess this 
myself and fix this appropriately, if needed we'll have to then kick another RC 
round.


Regards.


From: Milamber 
Sent: 14 December 2016 00:32:19
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)


Hello,

I'm not sure, but perhaps we have an 'indirect' blocker for 4.9.1.0 RC1.

Currently the upgrade from 4.9.1.0 RC1 to 4.10.0.0 SNAPSHOT don't works
because the schema-481to490.sql in the 4.9.1.0 / 4.9 doesn't contains
the commit of CLOUDSTACK-9438 (2e77496601ab5420723ce8b955b3960faaba7d5c).
(this commit is currently in master)

When you try to make the upgrade you have this error: "Unknown column
'image_store_details.display' in 'field list'"
see:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9671

Currently there have 2 diff between the schema-481to490.sql in 4.9.1.0
RC1 (and 4.9 branch) and master branch.

What is your opinion: blocker or not?

Just copy the 2 sql request inside the schema-4910to41000.sql file (but
the commit 2e77496601ab5420723ce8b955b3960faaba7d5c contains other
modified files)?

Milamber



$ diff ./setup/db/db/schema-481to490.sql /tmp/MASTER-schema-481to490.sql
547a548,552
 >
 > ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`image_store_details` CHANGE COLUMN `value`
`value` VARCHAR(255) NULL DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'value of the detail',
ADD COLUMN `display` tinyint(1) NOT
 > NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the detail can be displayed to the
end user' AFTER `value`;
 >
 > ALTER TABLE `snapshots` ADD COLUMN `location_type` VARCHAR(32)
COMMENT 'Location of snapshot (ex. Primary)';





On 12/12/2016 21:36, Milamber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My vote +1 (binding)
>
> Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
> (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :
>
> 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.1.0 RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.5 + KVM +
> NFS : OK
> Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create
> networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template,
> create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip
> release, static nat, firewall rule)
> Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with success too (create
> network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)
>
> 2/ Test upgrade from 4.8.1 to 4.9.1.0 RC1 : OK
>
> 3/ Test upgrade from 4.8.2 RC1 to 4.9.1.0 RC1 : don't works (expected)
>
> 4/ Tests of all localization Web UI for 4.9.1.0 RC1:
> Localization works well except Spanish (not a blocker to release): the
> Web UI display partially the localization strings due of one bad
> carriage return in the label
> message.installWizard.copy.whatIsCloudStack string (from Transifex).
> This is the same issue that the 4.8.2 RC1.
>
>
> Perhaps add in the Release notes this Spanish l10n issue.
>
> Thanks to the RM.
>
> Milamber
>
>
>
> On 10/12/2016 03:11, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 4.9.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838
>>
>> Commit: af2679959b634d095b93b8265c6da294d360065d
>>
>> List of changes:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838
>>
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.1.0/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 120 hours, considering the process started
>> during the
>> weekends, and will end on 14 Dec 2016 end of the day.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate
>> "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>
>


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1826: CLOUDSTACK-9675: Mem Usage and Mem Allocation...

[rashmidixit]

GitHub user rashmidixit opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1826

 CLOUDSTACK-9675:  Mem Usage and Mem Allocation show NaN

More for information refer to 
[CLOUDSTACK-9675](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9675) 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9675

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1826.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1826


commit 1eee2b613e1926d086b02920358afbb30af1abee
Author: Sanket Thite 
Date:   2016-06-16T09:50:22Z

 CLOUDSTACK-9675:  Mem Usage and Mem Allocatio for all views do not list 
values. 'NaN' is displayed instead




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1827: CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while cre...

[sateesh-chodapuneedi]

GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1827

CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while creating the CPVM in VMware setup 
over standard vSwitches

Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while creating the CPVM in VMware setup 
over standard vSwitches

Issue

Exception occured while creating the CPVM in the VmWare Setup using 
standard vswitches.
```
StartCommand failed due to Exception: com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExists
message: [] com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExistsFaultMsg: The specified key, 
name, or identifier already exists
```

Fix
===
Ensure synchronization while attempting to create port group such that 
simultaneous attempts are not made with same port group name on same ESXi host.

Testing
==
Successfully ran manual tests (deploy user instance) on top of latest 
master commit `17653a86fad67447a4f13e455e336694ad5c1735`.This code change is 
involved in virtual network creation over VMware standard vSwitches. Existing 
functional tests covers this functionality.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/sateesh-chodapuneedi/cloudstack 
pr-cloudstack-9673

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1827.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1827


commit 69370e1cd9068fb37a46f15066efaa63cea81741
Author: Sateesh Chodapuneedi 
Date:   2016-12-13T18:40:42Z

CLOUDSTACK-9673 Exception occured while creating the CPVM in the VmWare 
Setup over standard vSwitches

Issue

Exception occured while creating the CPVM in the VmWare Setup using 
standard vswitches.
StartCommand failed due to Exception: com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExists
message: [] com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExistsFaultMsg: The specified key, 
name, or identifier already exists

Fix
===
Ensure synchronization while attempting to create port group such that 
simultaneous attempts are not made with same port group name on same ESXi host.

Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---