Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
Hi John & Rohit; If we have time could we add PR 1710 to the upcoming RC for 4.9.1.0. Its a small fix but its waiting for log time... Thanks again, Özhan On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:23 AM, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > I apologize for being relatively radio silent. We have mage good progress > towards getting RCs out for 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0. On 31 October > 2016, we 17 outstanding PRs to be merged. As of today (17 Nov 2016), we > have 9 PRs to merge with pending one potential blocker/critical defect fix: > > * 4.10.0.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 and 4.9.1.0 PRs) > * 1542 (regression tests running) > * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending) > * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending) > * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending) > * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending) > * 4.9.1.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 PRs) > * 1681 (test failures to resolve) > * 1684 (working out the proper fix to an upgrade issue) > * 4.8.2.0 > * 1745 (test failures to resolve) > * 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests > pending) > > Once all PRs are merged, we will re-execute the tests on each of the > release branches. Rohit has opened tracking PRs for 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2], and > master [3] to understand the state of the release branches as we continue > to merge PRs. > > Thank you to everyone who has reviewed, tested, and merged PRs. I am > hopeful that we are very close to cutting these RCs. > > Thanks again, > -John > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752 > [2]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753 > [3]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754 > > john.burw...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710 Hi @rhtyd @jburwell, With the comments of @ustcweizhou, could we start required tests and if its all ok, could we merge this pr to upcoming 4.9.1.0 release please? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1761: CLOUDSTACK-9592 Empty responses from site to ...
Github user yvsubhash commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1761#discussion_r88429916
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/CheckS2SVpnConnectionsAnswer.java ---
@@ -76,4 +76,14 @@ public String getDetail(String ip) {
}
return null;
}
+
+public boolean isIPPresent(String ip) {
+if (this.getResult()) {
+Boolean status = ipToConnected.get(ip);
+if (status != null) {
--- End diff --
Yes The check to see whether ip is there in the response. So it should be
true even when status is false
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1761: CLOUDSTACK-9592 Empty responses from site to ...
Github user yvsubhash commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1761#discussion_r88431269
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/CheckS2SVpnConnectionsAnswer.java ---
@@ -76,4 +76,14 @@ public String getDetail(String ip) {
}
return null;
}
+
+public boolean isIPPresent(String ip) {
+if (this.getResult()) {
+Boolean status = ipToConnected.get(ip);
+if (status != null) {
--- End diff --
@jburwell changed the base branch to 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1761: CLOUDSTACK-9592 Empty responses from site to ...
Github user yvsubhash commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1761#discussion_r88432900
--- Diff: core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/CheckS2SVpnConnectionsAnswer.java ---
@@ -76,4 +76,14 @@ public String getDetail(String ip) {
}
return null;
}
+
+public boolean isIPPresent(String ip) {
+if (this.getResult()) {
+Boolean status = ipToConnected.get(ip);
+if (status != null) {
--- End diff --
@jburwell VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImplTest.java has all tests
commented out. are there any other place having tests covering this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1759: CLOUDSTACK-9589 vmName entries from host_details tab...
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1759 @jburwell Change is moved to schema-481to4820.sql and base branch is changed to 4.8 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1586: CLOUDSTACK-9410 Data Disk shown as detached in XS
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1586 @syed @koushik-das can one of you please merge this --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1760: CLOUDSTACK-9593: userdata: enforce data is a multipl...
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1760 I changed the code to make it resilient to incorrect data that are already in the database. Moreover, instead of throwing an error when the padding is not present, it appends it. I think it's a better solution. I'll squash it when it's an accepted. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542 Trillian test result (tid-343) Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 36589 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1542-t343-vmware-55u3.zip Test completed. 42 look ok, 7 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 117.54 | test_privategw_acl.py test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 375.38 | test_privategw_acl.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 557.58 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 753.40 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | `Error` | 622.29 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Error` | 322.22 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | `Error` | 60.47 | test_templates.py ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 351.48 | test_templates.py test_reboot_router | `Error` | 560.78 | test_network.py test_nested_virtualization_vmware | `Error` | 353.13 | test_nested_virtualization.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 166.92 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 365.60 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 944.50 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 744.25 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1560.08 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 684.86 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1378.05 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 25.85 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 60.58 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.27 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.20 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.39 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 58.79 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 514.80 | test_volumes.py test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.24 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 235.41 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.75 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 288.70 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 142.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 81.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_create_template | Success | 141.09 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 241.92 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 238.88 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.60 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.72 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 206.97 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 208.84 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.51 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 66.50 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 92.32 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.16 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 151.01 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 140.95 | test_routers.py test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.24 | test_routers.py test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.65 | test_routers.py test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 181.54 | test_routers.py test_02_router_internal_adv | Succ
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710 @ustcweizhou @ozhanrk this feels like a relatively narrow case (RBD on KVM), and we are extremely late for 4.9.1.0. We have numerous "small" fixes that could be included that would further delay significant fixes that affect nearly users. I am sorry, but this fix will have to wait until 4.9.2.0/4.10.1.0/4.11.0.0. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
Ozhan, As I said on the PR, #1710 addresses a fairly narrow case (RBD on KVM), and 4.9.1.0 is extremely late. There are a lot “small” fixes that could be included. However, it would further delay delivery of significant dies that nearly all users. At some point, we must draw a line, and this fix will have to wait until 4.9.2.0/4.10.1.0/4.11.0.0. Thanks, -John john.burw...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On Nov 17, 2016, at 5:22 AM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman > wrote: > > Hi John & Rohit; > If we have time could we add PR 1710 to the upcoming RC for 4.9.1.0. Its a > small fix but its waiting for log time... > > Thanks again, > Özhan > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:23 AM, John Burwell > wrote: > >> All, >> >> I apologize for being relatively radio silent. We have mage good progress >> towards getting RCs out for 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0. On 31 October >> 2016, we 17 outstanding PRs to be merged. As of today (17 Nov 2016), we >> have 9 PRs to merge with pending one potential blocker/critical defect fix: >> >> * 4.10.0.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 and 4.9.1.0 PRs) >> * 1542 (regression tests running) >> * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending) >> * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending) >> * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending) >> * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending) >> * 4.9.1.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 PRs) >> * 1681 (test failures to resolve) >> * 1684 (working out the proper fix to an upgrade issue) >> * 4.8.2.0 >>* 1745 (test failures to resolve) >>* 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests >> pending) >> >> Once all PRs are merged, we will re-execute the tests on each of the >> release branches. Rohit has opened tracking PRs for 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2], and >> master [3] to understand the state of the release branches as we continue >> to merge PRs. >> >> Thank you to everyone who has reviewed, tested, and merged PRs. I am >> hopeful that we are very close to cutting these RCs. >> >> Thanks again, >> -John >> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752 >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753 >> [3]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754 >> >> john.burw...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >>
Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Status
Ok John, i will ping you and Rohit again when we start to work for 4.9.2 release. Thanks for your time. Özhan On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:32 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Ozhan, > > As I said on the PR, #1710 addresses a fairly narrow case (RBD on KVM), > and 4.9.1.0 is extremely late. There are a lot “small” fixes that could be > included. However, it would further delay delivery of significant dies > that nearly all users. At some point, we must draw a line, and this fix > will have to wait until 4.9.2.0/4.10.1.0/4.11.0.0. > > Thanks, > -John > > > john.burw...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On Nov 17, 2016, at 5:22 AM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman < > oruzgarkara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi John & Rohit; > > If we have time could we add PR 1710 to the upcoming RC for 4.9.1.0. Its > a > > small fix but its waiting for log time... > > > > Thanks again, > > Özhan > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:23 AM, John Burwell < > john.burw...@shapeblue.com> > > wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> I apologize for being relatively radio silent. We have mage good > progress > >> towards getting RCs out for 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0. On 31 > October > >> 2016, we 17 outstanding PRs to be merged. As of today (17 Nov 2016), we > >> have 9 PRs to merge with pending one potential blocker/critical defect > fix: > >> > >> * 4.10.0.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 and 4.9.1.0 PRs) > >> * 1542 (regression tests running) > >> * 1545 (code review comments; regression tests pending) > >> * 1577 (Jenkins failures; regression tests pending) > >> * 1579 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending) > >> * 1580 (needs rebase + commit squash; regression tests pending) > >> * 4.9.1.0 (+ all 4.8.2.0 PRs) > >> * 1681 (test failures to resolve) > >> * 1684 (working out the proper fix to an upgrade issue) > >> * 4.8.2.0 > >>* 1745 (test failures to resolve) > >>* 1765 (squash commits; code review feedback; regression tests > >> pending) > >> > >> Once all PRs are merged, we will re-execute the tests on each of the > >> release branches. Rohit has opened tracking PRs for 4.8 [1], 4.9 [2], > and > >> master [3] to understand the state of the release branches as we > continue > >> to merge PRs. > >> > >> Thank you to everyone who has reviewed, tested, and merged PRs. I am > >> hopeful that we are very close to cutting these RCs. > >> > >> Thanks again, > >> -John > >> > >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752 > >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753 > >> [3]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754 > >> > >> john.burw...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com > >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710 @ozhanrk @ustcweizhou I asked a [functionality question](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710#issuecomment-257697031) regarding this functionality to which I cannot find an answer. Namely, that this patch is deleting snapshots in a circumstance where not all users want them deleted. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1710: CLOUDSTACK-9538: FIX failure in Deleting Snapshot Fr...
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710 hi @jburwell this pr does not delete any kind of snapshots, this patch only prevents, solves a kind of timeout issue on code thats all, nothing more. This is a 4 lines of small fix where delete snapshot code could not find already deleted snapshots ids so it waits till timeout reached, with this patch it understands they are already deleted so it did not wait and continue the process. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nua...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579 @jburwell @rhtyd We want to get this PR merged in after merging in PR #1580 as there are some feature interactions and dependencies. Thus, we will rebase this PR on top of the PR #1580 (2 dev + 2 test commits) and let you know. Let me know, if this is fine with you. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577 @jburwell @rhtyd The previous Jenkins failure was due to missing solidfire plugin dependency. I have re-based this PR with latest master, and we now only have two commits (1 dev + 1 test). Jenkins and Travis are green now, you can now kick off regression tests on this PR via blueorangutan. Meanwhile, we are re-running our regression tests on the latest build. Let me know, if you need anything from our side. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell @rhtyd I have re-based this PR with latest master, and we now only have two commits (1 dev + 1 test). Jenkins and Travis are green now, you can now kick off regression tests on this PR via blueorangutan. Meanwhile, we are re-running our local regression tests on the latest build. Let me know, if you need anything from our side. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the...
GitHub user murali-reddy opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in non-default network when guest VM has nic's in more than one guest network set the tag for each host in /etc/dhcphosts.txt, and use the tag to add exception in /etc/dhcpopts.txt to prevent sending default route, dns server in case if the nic is in non-default network this was the behaviour with edithosts.sh prior to 4.6 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/murali-reddy/cloudstack vr-default-network-gateway Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1766 commit 17be6d806378cbacb21e8256e02e6d92188ed183 Author: Murali Reddy Date: 2016-11-17T18:00:25Z CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in non-default network when guest VM has nic's in more than one guest network set the tag for each host in /etc/dhcphosts.txt, and use the tag to add exception in /etc/dhcpopts.txt to prevent sending default route, dns server in case if the nic is in non-default network --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in...
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 @murali-reddy a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support
Github user syed commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711 Sounds good @jburwell --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-161 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in...
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 @murali-reddy a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542 @jburwell @rhtyd Looks like blueorangutain vmware side has issues on hypervisor. Can you take a look and then re-kick the tests? Some errors were due to that. 530, errortext : u'Unable to add NIC to VM[User|i-39-54-VM]: com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:1] is unreachable: Host 1: Unable to start instance due to Unable to start VM:f22d93f6-e197-46e4-8e0c-0a926fece518 due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying'}, --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in...
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 I suggest to use default_entry in the script. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9017?focusedCommentId=15653794&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15653794 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1766: CLOUDSTACK-9598: wrong defaut gateway for the nic in...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1766 Trillian test result (tid-344) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 23535 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1766-t344-kvm-centos7.zip Test completed. 41 look ok, 2 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 858.96 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 358.43 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 88.74 | test_router_dhcphosts.py ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 134.10 | test_router_dhcphosts.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 140.86 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 55.78 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 235.72 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 279.36 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 482.65 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 502.48 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1455.91 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 538.26 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.33 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.34 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.49 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.33 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.21 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.20 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.22 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 43.60 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.21 | test_volumes.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 268.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.52 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.66 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.75 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.77 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 61.48 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.09 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.13 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 55.50 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.54 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 133.15 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.41 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 102.94 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.65 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.10 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.22 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.90 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.04 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 209.38 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.09 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.41 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 30.29 | test_routers.py test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.21 | test_routers.py test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.65 | test_routers.py test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.47 | test_routers.py test_02_router_internal_adv | Success
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1767: CLOUDSTACK-9457: Allow retrieval and modifica...
GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1767 CLOUDSTACK-9457: Allow retrieval and modification of VM and template details via API and UI JIRA TICKET: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9457 ### Goal This PR proposes list/add/update/delete user vm and vm template details via API and UI. ### New API methods | Method name| Desc | Params| | - |:-:|:-:| | `listTemplateDetails` / `listVirtualMachineDetails` | List all details | `templateid` / `virtualmachineid` (required) | | | | detailid (optional) | | Method name| Desc | Params| | - |:-:|:-:| | `addTemplateDetail` / `addVirtualMachineDetail` | Add detail | `templateid` / `virtualmachineid` (required) | | | | `detailname` (required) | | | | `detailvalue` (required) | | Method name| Desc | Params| | - |:-:|:-:| | `updateTemplateDetail` / `updateVirtualMachineDetail` | Update detail | `templateid` / `virtualmachineid` (required) | | | | `detailid` (required) | | | | `detailname` (required) | | | | `detailvalue` (required) | | Method name| Desc | Params| | - |:-:|:-:| | `deleteTemplateDetail` / `deleteVirtualMachineDetail` | Delete detail | `templateid` / `virtualmachineid` (required) | | | | detailid (required) | You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/nvazquez/cloudstack userVmAndTemplatesDetails Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1767.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1767 commit 04bd4a49cd71da4096f9fe05d2cb17b903cb72cb Author: nvazquez Date: 2016-11-18T02:18:16Z CLOUDSTACK-9457: Allow retrieval and modification of VM and template details via API and UI --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577 @jburwell a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542 @serg38 these errors look similar to those we have seen on other PRs. We are currently investigating them with the assumption that they are most likely environmental. Once we have them resolved, we will re-kick the tests. /cc @PaulAngus @murali-reddy @rhtyd --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-162 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-163 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577 @jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @prashanthvarma please squash all commits down into one logical commit for the enhancement. Multiple commits for the same feature muddy the long term history. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nua...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579 @prashanthvarma please squash all commits down into one logical commit for the enhancement. Multiple commits for the same feature muddy the long term history. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1580: CLOUDSTACK-9402 : Support for underlay features (Sou...
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580 @jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1577: CLOUDSTACK-9321 : Multiple Internal LB rules (more t...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577 @prashanthvarma please squash all commits down into one logical commit for the enhancement. Multiple commits for the same feature muddy the long term history. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nua...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1579: CLOUDSTACK-9403 : Support for shared networks in Nua...
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579 @blueorganutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
