[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1612: packaging: Marvin and integration-tests packages

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
  
@swill @wido @PaulAngus @jburwell review and lgtm please, thanks :)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Wido den Hollander]

+1 (binding)

Reran my previous tests as I did with the first 4.9.0 and they worked out good 
for me.

Wido

> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens :
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> *
> Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
> 
> I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
> RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Milamber]

Hello,

My vote +1 (binding)

Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS) 
(1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :


1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC2 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK
Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create 
networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, 
create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip 
release, static nat, firewall rule)
Some tests with ansible and cloudstack module with success too (create 
network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)


2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC2 : OK
(after migration, I made the same tests that the fresh install)

3/ Localization tests of the Web UI: All localization works.


Thanks to the RM.

Milamber



On 25/07/2016 22:05, Will Stevens wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
*https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
*
Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9

I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

Re:Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Haijiao]

Hi, Gents


Anyone tested RC2 with redudant VR configuration ?  I think there are some 
issues not fixed yet, e.g. password server.  
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385


We will test these days and come back.

Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Will Stevens]

Check the details here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1568#issuecomment-222315777

Let us know if you have additional details about what is expected.  If you
have more details, I would suggest you contribute to the #1568 PR.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hi, Gents
>
>
> Anyone tested RC2 with redudant VR configuration ?  I think there are some
> issues not fixed yet, e.g. password server.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385
>
>
> We will test these days and come back.
>
>
>
>

Usage data reported by listvirtualmachines incomplete in setup with multiple management servers

[Stefan Engstrom]

Hello all - we are standing up a cloud service using CloudStack 4.8 with some 
select PRs included.

We base usage rate reporting on differentials of the data (rates) served by GET 
listvirtualmachines. While validating our production build which has three 
management servers we noticed that this approach is under-reporting network r/w 
and disk r/w volumes (and most likely iops as well).


The test case and diagnostics we looked at today are the following:

1. curl a decent (11.7 GB) payload to disk in a centos 7 VM

2. Check the network transfer on the VM's nic with "ip -s link"

3. Verify the transfer on the ACS host with virsh.

4. Check reporting from the individual management hosts - the *sum* of what 
they report via GET listvirtualmachines matches the volume in steps 1-3 above.


The load balanced IP for the management cluster picks a host at random (and 
have you stick to it) - thus you get a usage number anywhere between 0 and the 
correct value, probably depending on how the start of the individual management 
hosts were staggered on startup.


>From a cursory look at the code we think the agent on the host collects 
>differentials every time it is queried by a management host, reports the diff 
>and the management hosts proceeds to accumulate that. A little backwards 
>perhaps but it explains the behavior outlined above.


So, I wonder how other people deal with this, or even if there is awareness of 
the issue when you have multiple management servers.


My planned work-around for now is to pull the management servers individually 
and simply add up the results, but curious to hear other ideas. Anybody using 
the ACS  usage server or the graphite integration for this kind of reporting?


Thanks for your thoughts,


Stefan Engström

Lead Research & Development Engineer
Education Networks of America

618 Grassmere Park Drive

Suite 12

Nashville, TN 37211

Phone: 615-312-6136
CTAC: 888-612-2880
Video @ https://ena.zoom.us/my/sengstrom
Mobile: 615-500-3223 <= Best option