[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1616: Added missing rules on router config, fixed ordering...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1616
  
@swill missing required LGTMs.. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (binding)


I built the 4.9.0-rc2 packages 
(http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/custom/490rc2/) and tested:


- Upgraded an existing KVM (basic zone/shared network) deployment from a 
4.7.1.1 environment

- Fresh adv zone and adv networking

- VR firewall, pf, acls, egress/ingress rules and iptables rules/chains

- Deployed a guest VM with/without data disks, tested normal VM lifecycles, 
disk/volume lifecycles and template life cycles

- Performed VM migration with/without storage


Regards.


From: Will Stevens 
Sent: 26 July 2016 02:35:23
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Hi All,

I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
*https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
*
Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9

I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,

Will

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Wido den Hollander]

> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens :
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> *
> Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
> 
> I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
> RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> 

Anybody else seeing this build failure?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on 
project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer 
artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to 
apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer 
file: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
 Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project 
net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
[ERROR] 

Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from 
testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.

Wido

> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will

Re: Working Site-to-Site VPN gets disconnected and VPC seems to forgets ACL’s

[Jonas Schlichtenbrede]

Hi Simon,

thanks for your reply.Currently we don't use private gateways - this
deployment never made it that far ;-)

It's always a very simple setup because we are testing several scenarios
(especially regarding the network setup) to find a solution for this issue.

@ Jayapal

You'll find the output of ipsec status via the following Google Drive
folder including some new logs:

   -
   
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BzK2SWUHninKaGpSS0twQlR0NUE&usp=sharing

For a new try the connection was established at 25.07.2016 arround 16:38:00
and broke at 25.07.2016 arround 19:54:00. Logs from the VR are 2 hours
behind.

We'll so far we do not have any other ideas how to get this issue isolated.
Maybe it's related to the hardware of the XenServer hosts: Intel i350
Gigabit Network NICs are used. However we use these cards at working setup
too.

Is it possible to take a look at the setup together?

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Simon Weller  wrote:

> Do you use private gateways as well in your VPC environment? If so, does
> the same ACL problem occur there as well?
>
>
> 
> From: Jonas Schlichtenbrede 
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:18 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Working Site-to-Site VPN gets disconnected and VPC seems to
> forgets ACL’s
>
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> thanks for you feedback!
>
> We already tested the VPN with and without dead period detection - always
> the same behaviour. I'll try 'ipsec auto --status' to see the output.
>
> Browsing is just browsing to a website from within the VM (Windows Server
> VM + IE). This works even if the VPN switches to disconnected...
>
> At the moment we use NIC Bonding with the XenServers, but of course we
> disabled one switch just to be sure that there is no general network or
> switch issue. At the beginning we tested this setup without NIC Bonding,
> too (again the same issues).
>
> The strange thing is that everything is working for a few hours and then
> just stops and a simple restart of the VPC Tier fixes it.
>
> Is there a way to debug/analyse why the VR cuts/drops the connections or at
> which stage (Xen, Switch, Top of the Rack Switch,...)?
>
> Thanks
> Jonas
>
> PS: At guest networks we encountered that for example an active RDP session
> (port forwardings in general) stopp working at the same time. Again
> browsing to a website from a VM inside such a guest network is still
> working...
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Jayapal Uradi <
> jayapal.ur...@accelerite.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > It seems the connection is going down because the dead period detection.
> >
> > In router run the command 'ipsec auto —status’  to vpn connection
> status.
> > When the connection is down initiate traffic from the guest vm to other
> > end of vpn and go to router check the ipsec vpn status (ipsec auto
> —status).
> > This gives wether the connection is up or not in the VR.  It takes router
> > status get interval to update the VPN status.
> >
> > The browsing you mentioned is about browsing the other end of vpn
> servers ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jayapal
> >
> > > On Jul 21, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Jonas Schlichtenbrede <
> > jonas.schlichtenbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi CloudStack Users and Developers,
> > >
> > > we’re currently implementing a new CloudStack environment based on
> > 4.8.0.1
> > > (System VM Template is 4.6) with XenServer 6.5 SP1 and all the latest
> > > updates.
> > >
> > > So far everything works as expected we only have an issue regarding the
> > > stability of Site-to-Site VPNs within VPCs and we think ACL’s.
> > >
> > > I’ll try to describe the problem and behaviour:
> > >
> > > A connected and working S2S VPN switches to disconnected after some
> time
> > > (usually a few hours). In relation to that the VPC seems to “forget”
> it’s
> > > ACLs. Restarting only the Network Tier (a VM lives within) solves the
> > > issues for a short period of time (1-3 hours). The state of the VPN
> > > switches to connected and the S2S VPN is working again. Also pinging
> from
> > > the VM to any public address is working again. Strange is, that for
> > example
> > > browsing to a website is working all the time. Isolated networks
> however
> > > work like a charm.
> > >
> > > We tried to solve this issue through several tests. We changing the
> > network
> > > setup and reducing the complexity just to get this behaviour isolated.
> > But
> > > it’s always the same. We also tried several different connections to
> > > different customer gateways (firewalls) and a VPC-VPN to VPC-VPN
> > connection
> > > to another CloudStack deployment (based on Version 4.5.2) without any
> > > success.
> > >
> > > In addition, we tested several setups like CentOS 6 and CentOS 7, but
> > again
> > > always the same. We updated one installation to the master from
> yesterday
> > > 4.9.0.0-snapshot – again no success. We do not have any issues with
> > version
> > > 4.5.2 – but this installation is in a differ

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Wido,


I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I fixed it 
by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root pom.xml:

https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/commit/0ede472334114341e68eea5e3da37599b71f52e4#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036R47



I've already shared a PR to fix the recurring juniper-repo issue and it also 
improves testing using marvin and integration-tests packages:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612



Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander 
Sent: 26 July 2016 14:31:46
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2


> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens :
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> *
> Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
>
> I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
> RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>

Anybody else seeing this build failure?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on 
project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer 
artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to 
apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer 
file: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
 Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project 
net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]

Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from 
testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.

Wido

> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Will Stevens]

I have seen this periodically over the past couple months.

On Jul 26, 2016 5:01 AM, "Wido den Hollander"  wrote:

>
> > Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens  >:
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > *
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> >*
> > Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
> >
> > I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when
> the
> > RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
>
> Anybody else seeing this build failure?
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process
> (default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact:
> Could not transfer artifact
> net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to
> apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to
> transfer file:
> http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
> Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project
> net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
>
> Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from
> testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.
>
> Wido
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Simon Weller]

Yes, I've experienced this as well going back probably 4 months or so. I 
eventually just took the plugin out of our build (as we don't use it).


- Si





From: Will Stevens 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:44 AM
To: Wido den Hollander
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

I have seen this periodically over the past couple months.

On Jul 26, 2016 5:01 AM, "Wido den Hollander"  wrote:

>
> > Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens  >:
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > *
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> >*
> > Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
> >
> > I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when
> the
> > RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
>
> Anybody else seeing this build failure?
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process
> (default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact:
> Could not transfer artifact
> net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to
> apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to
> transfer file:
> http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
> Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project
> net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
>
> Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from
> testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.
>
> Wido
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1616: Added missing rules on router config, fixed ordering...

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1616
  
@karuturi yes, but it is a blocking issue for RC2 and I need to get RC2 
out.  Do you have problems with anything?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Will Stevens]

Juniper changes are unrelated to the Marvin packaging.  Why is it in that
PR?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Hi Wido,
>
>
> I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I
> fixed it by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root
> pom.xml:
>
>
> https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/commit/0ede472334114341e68eea5e3da37599b71f52e4#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036R47
>
>
>
> I've already shared a PR to fix the recurring juniper-repo issue and it
> also improves testing using marvin and integration-tests packages:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
>
>
> Regards.
> --
> *From:* Wido den Hollander 
> *Sent:* 26 July 2016 14:31:46
> *To:* Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2
>
>
> > Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens  >:
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > *
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> >*
> > Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
> >
> > I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when
> the
> > RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >
>
> Anybody else seeing this build failure?
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process
> (default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact:
> Could not transfer artifact
> net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to
> apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to
> transfer file:
> http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
> Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project
> net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
>
> Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from
> testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.
>
> Wido
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Rohit Yadav]

Will please re-read the PR summary, thanks. I added the juniper api mvn 
repository fix to fix for failing el7 rpms packages.

Regards.




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:52 PM +0530, "Will Stevens" 
mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Juniper changes are unrelated to the Marvin packaging.  Why is it in that PR?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Wido,


I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I fixed it 
by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root pom.xml:

https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/commit/0ede472334114341e68eea5e3da37599b71f52e4#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036R47



I've already shared a PR to fix the recurring juniper-repo issue and it also 
improves testing using marvin and integration-tests packages:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612



Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>>
Sent: 26 July 2016 14:31:46
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2


> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens 
> mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>>:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> *
> Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
>
> I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
> RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>

Anybody else seeing this build failure?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on 
project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer 
artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to 
apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer 
file: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
 Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project 
net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]

Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from 
testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.

Wido

> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I'm having trouble building the code on Ubuntu 14.04:

Tests run: 146, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.661 sec <<< 
FAILURE! - in com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest)
  Time elapsed: 0.014 sec  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't obtain updateLastError method for class 
com.sun.jna.Native
at com.sun.jna.Native.initIDs(Native Method)
at com.sun.jna.Native.(Native.java:139)
at com.sun.jna.Pointer.(Pointer.java:42)
at com.sun.jna.Structure.(Structure.java:1933)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest.createMemoryStatisticFreeMemory100(LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java:5063)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest.testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics(LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java:5045)

Thoughts on this?

From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Will Stevens
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Will please re-read the PR summary, thanks. I added the juniper api mvn 
repository fix to fix for failing el7 rpms packages.

Regards.




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue



On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:52 PM +0530, "Will Stevens" 
mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Juniper changes are unrelated to the Marvin packaging.  Why is it in that PR?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Wido,


I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I fixed it 
by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root pom.xml:

https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/commit/0ede472334114341e68eea5e3da37599b71f52e4#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036R47



I've already shared a PR to fix the recurring juniper-repo issue and it also 
improves testing using marvin and integration-tests packages:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612



Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>>
Sent: 26 July 2016 14:31:46
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2


> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens 
> mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>>:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> *
> Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
>
> I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
> RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>

Anybody else seeing this build failure?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on 
project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer 
artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to 
apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer 
file: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
 Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project 
net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]

Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from 
testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.

Wido

> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue

VMware Primary Storage Question

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Hi,


Does anyone know why you have to explicitly note the IP address of vCenter 
Server and the datacenter when adding cluster-wide primary storage based on 
VMFS?


http://imgur.com/a/BVJuq


It seems like we already provided this info when we added the datacenter to the 
zone that your VMware cluster is in, so I would have expected these fields to 
default to those settings.


By the way, the image was taken from the second RC for 4.9.


Thoughts?


Thanks,

Mike

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Rohit Yadav]

Mike, your system has a old jna version can you upgrade your 1.7 jdk and jna 
and/or try building with mvn  -Djna.nosys=true?


Regards.


From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 27 July 2016 09:07:32
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

I'm having trouble building the code on Ubuntu 14.04:

Tests run: 146, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.661 sec <<< 
FAILURE! - in com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest)
  Time elapsed: 0.014 sec  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't obtain updateLastError method for class 
com.sun.jna.Native
at com.sun.jna.Native.initIDs(Native Method)
at com.sun.jna.Native.(Native.java:139)
at com.sun.jna.Pointer.(Pointer.java:42)
at com.sun.jna.Structure.(Structure.java:1933)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest.createMemoryStatisticFreeMemory100(LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java:5063)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest.testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics(LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java:5045)

Thoughts on this?

From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Will Stevens
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Will please re-read the PR summary, thanks. I added the juniper api mvn 
repository fix to fix for failing el7 rpms packages.

Regards.




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:52 PM +0530, "Will Stevens" 
mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Juniper changes are unrelated to the Marvin packaging.  Why is it in that PR?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Wido,


I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I fixed it 
by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root pom.xml:

https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/commit/0ede472334114341e68eea5e3da37599b71f52e4#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036R47



I've already shared a PR to fix the recurring juniper-repo issue and it also 
improves testing using marvin and integration-tests packages:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612



Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>>
Sent: 26 July 2016 14:31:46
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2


> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens 
> mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>>:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> *
> Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
>
> I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
> RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>

Anybody else seeing this build failure?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on 
project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer 
artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to 
apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer 
file: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
 Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project 
net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]

Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from 
testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.

Wido

> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Thanks, Rohit

From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:41 PM
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Mike, your system has a old jna version can you upgrade your 1.7 jdk and jna 
and/or try building with mvn  -Djna.nosys=true?


Regards.


From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 27 July 2016 09:07:32
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

I'm having trouble building the code on Ubuntu 14.04:

Tests run: 146, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.661 sec <<< 
FAILURE! - in com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest)
  Time elapsed: 0.014 sec  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't obtain updateLastError method for class 
com.sun.jna.Native
at com.sun.jna.Native.initIDs(Native Method)
at com.sun.jna.Native.(Native.java:139)
at com.sun.jna.Pointer.(Pointer.java:42)
at com.sun.jna.Structure.(Structure.java:1933)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest.createMemoryStatisticFreeMemory100(LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java:5063)
at 
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest.testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics(LibvirtComputingResourceTest.java:5045)

Thoughts on this?

From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Will Stevens
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Will please re-read the PR summary, thanks. I added the juniper api mvn 
repository fix to fix for failing el7 rpms packages.

Regards.




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue



On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:52 PM +0530, "Will Stevens" 
mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Juniper changes are unrelated to the Marvin packaging.  Why is it in that PR?

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Wido,


I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I fixed it 
by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root pom.xml:

https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/commit/0ede472334114341e68eea5e3da37599b71f52e4#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036R47



I've already shared a PR to fix the recurring juniper-repo issue and it also 
improves testing using marvin and integration-tests packages:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612



Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>>
Sent: 26 July 2016 14:31:46
To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2


> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens 
> mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com>>:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656
> *
> Commit: 227ff3884dd0b9c2804f20a2cc53964b01256ad9
>
> I will continue working on the Release Notes and will release them when the
> RC is accepted so I don't have to redo them too many times.
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>

Anybody else seeing this build failure?

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on 
project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer 
artifact net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:pom:1.0-SNAPSHOT from/to 
apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots): Failed to transfer 
file: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom.
 Return code is: 502, ReasonPhrase: Proxy Error. for project 
net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]

Trying with cURL gives me a 502 as well. This currently prohibits me from 
testing, so I can't cast my vote yet.

Wido

> PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wil

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

[Tutkowski, Mike]

+1 (binding)

I ran the following automated tests (details below):

TestVolumes.py (with and without its XenServer resigning option)
TestSnapshots.py
TestVMSnapshots.py
TestAddRemoveHosts.py

I built a cloud from scratch (using a script) with this RC. I ran the automated 
tests that I listed above on it. I also performed a bunch of manual testing 
with XenServer, VMware, and KVM.

I did not observe any failures.

TestVolumes.py (with XenServer resigning):

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === TestName: 
test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a VM 
in another account ... === TestName: test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 2679.896s

OK

TestVolumes.py (without XenServer resigning):

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === TestName: 
test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === TestName: 
test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a VM 
in another account ... === TestName: test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 1994.853s

OK

TestSnapshots:

test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot (TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) 
... === TestName: test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume (TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) 
... === TestName: test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 3 tests in 8791.432s

OK

TestVMSnapshots.py:

test_01_take_VM_snapshot (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_01_take_VM_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_take_VM_snapshot_with_data_disk (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... 
=== TestName: test_02_take_VM_snapshot_with_data_disk | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 2 tests in 529.451s

OK

TestAddRemoveHosts.py:

test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1 
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName: 
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plug