Re: Older Ceph packages for Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise Pangolin) to recompile libvirt with RBD support

2016-06-05 Thread Cloud List
Hi,

Anyone can assist on this?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.


On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Cloud List  wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to setup older version of CloudStack 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 12.04 to
> use Ceph RBD as primary storage for our upgrade testing purposes. Two of
> the steps involved were to add below repository to manually compile libvirt
> to have RBD support, since the default libvirt on Ubuntu 12.04 doesn't have
> RBD support by default, unlike on Ubuntu 14.04:
>
> 
> # wget -q -O- '
> https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc' | sudo
> apt-key add -
> OK
>
> # echo deb http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/ $(lsb_release -sc) main
> | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list
> deb http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/ precise main
> 
>
> But when I ran sudo apt-get update, I am receiving this error (excerpts):
>
> 
> Err http://eu.ceph.com precise/main amd64 Packages
>   404  Not Found
> Err http://eu.ceph.com precise/main i386 Packages
>   404  Not Found
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages
> 404  Not Found
>
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages
> 404  Not Found
>
> E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old
> ones used instead.
> 
>
> It seems that the repository for the particular required packages has been
> removed, anyone can advise if I can get the required packages, may be from
> a different location?
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
> -ip-
>


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1531: systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to de...

2016-06-05 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531#discussion_r65813255
  
--- Diff: tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb ---
@@ -27,15 +27,15 @@
 architectures = {
 :i386 => {
 :os_type_id => 'Debian',
-:iso_file => 'debian-7.9.0-i386-netinst.iso',
-:iso_src => 
'http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.9.0-i386-netinst.iso',
-:iso_md5 => 'e101a11ddb31f85acef542df1a49bf57',
+:iso_file => 'debian-7.10.0-i386-netinst.iso',
+:iso_src => 
'http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/7.10.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.10.0-i386-netinst.iso',
+:iso_md5 => '7fa97966e31afc705b3e115906cbcaa5',
--- End diff --

You can bump it to 7.11 now ;-)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1531: systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to de...

2016-06-05 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531#discussion_r65813268
  
--- Diff: 
tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/configure_systemvm_services.sh ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 set -e
 set -x
 
-CLOUDSTACK_RELEASE=4.6.0
+CLOUDSTACK_RELEASE=4.9.0
--- End diff --

Browsed merged PRs but nothing is merged that requires this. Or do I miss 
something?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1531: systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to de...

2016-06-05 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531#discussion_r65813321
  
--- Diff: tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/definition.rb ---
@@ -27,15 +27,15 @@
 architectures = {
 :i386 => {
 :os_type_id => 'Debian',
-:iso_file => 'debian-7.9.0-i386-netinst.iso',
-:iso_src => 
'http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/7.9.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.9.0-i386-netinst.iso',
-:iso_md5 => 'e101a11ddb31f85acef542df1a49bf57',
+:iso_file => 'debian-7.10.0-i386-netinst.iso',
+:iso_src => 
'http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/7.10.0/i386/iso-cd/debian-7.10.0-i386-netinst.iso',
+:iso_md5 => '7fa97966e31afc705b3e115906cbcaa5',
--- End diff --

Is i386 still being used?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1531: systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to debian 7....

2016-06-05 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531
  
@rhtyd Maybe we can replace all this with a Packer build? I already did 
that for Cosmic and I think it's at least 90% the same so it should be fairly 
easy. As a matter of fact, we use Cosmic systemvm templates with older 
CloudStack versions as well and that works fine. Along that way, a separate 
project with the systemvm would be best, as you could then iterate separately 
from CloudStack itself. A new version would just require a certain version of 
the systemvm template.
https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/systemvm-packer



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-05 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 135
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=71
 Failed=2
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_vpc_vpn.py

 * test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn Failed

 * test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #562: Cloudstack 8612

2016-06-05 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/562
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 136
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #556: CLOUDSTACK-8609. [VMware] VM is not accessible after ...

2016-06-05 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/556
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 137
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack issue #544: CLOUDSTACK-8599. CS reports failure for a successful ...

2016-06-05 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/544
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 139
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=73
 Failed=0
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**

**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Re: long waiting times on routervm for savepassword and DhcpEntryCommand's

2016-06-05 Thread Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
Hi Remi;
Does this fix approved for upcoming 4.9 release?

Thanks
Özhan

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Remi Bergsma 
wrote:

> Hi Wido,
>
> I've fixed that recently, just need to find the time to backport it :-s
>
> https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/cosmic-core/pull/138
>
> Regards, Remi
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 03 Jun 2016, at 12:10, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Op 1 juni 2016 om 11:10 schreef Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <
> oruzgarkara...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Developers;
> >> I could find any answer from Cloudstack User Mailing list, i am
> forwarding
> >> my mail to the development list, thanks for all answers who has
> experience
> >> on high capacity virtual router usage.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Özhan
> >>
> >> Today i noticed that my vm creation commands takes a little bit long
> then
> >> before. When i check the logs i noticed that router vm takes too much
> time
> >> like 4 seconds for each savepassword and DhcpEntryCommands.
> >
> > I checked this quickly on a VR in Basic Networking and I see the same.
> It's that it is executing Python code for every Instance which has to be
> provisioned on that VR.
> >
> > I don't know of a quick way to work around this however, this probably
> requires parts of that code to be rewritten.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> >> We are using advanced networking with security groups enabled for ACS
> 4.8 .
> >> It looks like when ip address usage increases(100 ip addresess for one C
> >> Class network) for each guest network block, router vm responds slower
> than
> >> the old days.
> >>
> >> We are using default compute offering for virtual router, my plan is to
> >> change to default offering for virtual router vm to 512 mb ram & 2 core
> cpu
> >> and increase cpu shares and restart virtual router.
> >>
> >> Are there any other cleanup procedures or other ways to speed up
> >> savepassword and DhcpEntryCommands like disable logging or any other
> clues
> >> would be helpful. Because of this long waiting times on 2 commands
> total vm
> >> creation time takes longer then expected.
>


Re: long waiting times on routervm for savepassword and DhcpEntryCommand's

2016-06-05 Thread Will Stevens
Master is frozen for 4.9, so probably no if it is not already in.
On Jun 5, 2016 5:29 PM, "Özhan Rüzgar Karaman" 
wrote:

> Hi Remi;
> Does this fix approved for upcoming 4.9 release?
>
> Thanks
> Özhan
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Remi Bergsma  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Wido,
> >
> > I've fixed that recently, just need to find the time to backport it :-s
> >
> > https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/cosmic-core/pull/138
> >
> > Regards, Remi
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On 03 Jun 2016, at 12:10, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> Op 1 juni 2016 om 11:10 schreef Özhan Rüzgar Karaman <
> > oruzgarkara...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi Developers;
> > >> I could find any answer from Cloudstack User Mailing list, i am
> > forwarding
> > >> my mail to the development list, thanks for all answers who has
> > experience
> > >> on high capacity virtual router usage.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Özhan
> > >>
> > >> Today i noticed that my vm creation commands takes a little bit long
> > then
> > >> before. When i check the logs i noticed that router vm takes too much
> > time
> > >> like 4 seconds for each savepassword and DhcpEntryCommands.
> > >
> > > I checked this quickly on a VR in Basic Networking and I see the same.
> > It's that it is executing Python code for every Instance which has to be
> > provisioned on that VR.
> > >
> > > I don't know of a quick way to work around this however, this probably
> > requires parts of that code to be rewritten.
> > >
> > > Wido
> > >
> > >> We are using advanced networking with security groups enabled for ACS
> > 4.8 .
> > >> It looks like when ip address usage increases(100 ip addresess for
> one C
> > >> Class network) for each guest network block, router vm responds slower
> > than
> > >> the old days.
> > >>
> > >> We are using default compute offering for virtual router, my plan is
> to
> > >> change to default offering for virtual router vm to 512 mb ram & 2
> core
> > cpu
> > >> and increase cpu shares and restart virtual router.
> > >>
> > >> Are there any other cleanup procedures or other ways to speed up
> > >> savepassword and DhcpEntryCommands like disable logging or any other
> > clues
> > >> would be helpful. Because of this long waiting times on 2 commands
> > total vm
> > >> creation time takes longer then expected.
> >
>


Documentation Hackathon

2016-06-05 Thread Ron Wheeler
While discussing the documentation, issues were raised about the 
diagrams in the documentation.


1) It was felt that some of the diagrams looked a bit old fashioned

2) The sources for images seemed to be lost or held outside the SCM.

This encouraged me to look at ways to improve the production of images 
for the documentation.


I had the following as goals:

a) The tools used should be open source so everyone can use the same 
sources.


b) The tools should not require specialized expertise to use.

c) It must be possible to produce images that can be used in other tools 
(Confluence Wiki includes drawing tools but there is no way to use the 
images outside confluence).


d) There should be a library of relevant images.

At the meeting Visio and Apache OpenOffice Draw were mentioned as 
possible drawing tools. Visio is an excellent product but is proprietary.


Apache OpenOffice Draw is an Apache product and very well supported.

After a bit of research I found a library of OpenOffice symbols from VRT 
(http://www.vrt.com.au/downloads/vrt-network-equipment) that seems to 
include many of the symbols that we need.


I tested the addition of the library into OpenOffice using the normal 
add-on process and it works well.


Requires a restart of Open Office after the update but that is to be 
expected.


I used it to create an equivalent diagram for one of the drawings from 
the current doc set.


You can see the results and a short discussion at 
http://blog.artifact-software.com/tech/?p=305


The OpenOffice Draw source can be downloaded from the article to see how 
the png files where created.


It is possible to produce many output formats beside png from OpenOffice.


Ron


--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102



[GitHub] cloudstack issue #351: This branch implements the CSV and native HA support ...

2016-06-05 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 142
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=70
 Failed=3
 Skipped=3

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_vpc_vpn.py

 * test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn Failed

* test_volumes.py

 * test_06_download_detached_volume Failed

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


LXC container template for CloudStack

2016-06-05 Thread Cloud List
Dear all,

I am trying to add an LXC cluster in addition to the existing running KVM
cluster in my CloudStack 4.8.0 test environment.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LXC+Support+in+Cloudstack

I understand that the LXC container template for CloudStack is not provided
/ bundled by default, so we need to create one or download. May I know:

(1) How do we create one? I follow the instruction on how to create LXC
template for Ubuntu here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LXC+Template+creation#LXCTemplatecreation-CreatingtemplateonUbuntu

It requires us to install lxc (apt-get install lxc) but doing so will
remove cloudstack-agent package hosted on the same host.

(2) Where can we download ready-to-use LXC container template for
CloudStack?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

-ip-


Re: Older Ceph packages for Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise Pangolin) to recompile libvirt with RBD support

2016-06-05 Thread Wido den Hollander
I think you will have to compile Ceph from source or use Ceph Dumpling.

Cuttlefish is no longer supported.

Wido

> Op 5 juni 2016 om 10:04 schreef Cloud List :
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Anyone can assist on this?
> 
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Cloud List  wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am trying to setup older version of CloudStack 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 12.04 to
> > use Ceph RBD as primary storage for our upgrade testing purposes. Two of
> > the steps involved were to add below repository to manually compile libvirt
> > to have RBD support, since the default libvirt on Ubuntu 12.04 doesn't have
> > RBD support by default, unlike on Ubuntu 14.04:
> >
> > 
> > # wget -q -O- '
> > https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc' | sudo
> > apt-key add -
> > OK
> >
> > # echo deb http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/ $(lsb_release -sc) main
> > | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list
> > deb http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/ precise main
> > 
> >
> > But when I ran sudo apt-get update, I am receiving this error (excerpts):
> >
> > 
> > Err http://eu.ceph.com precise/main amd64 Packages
> >   404  Not Found
> > Err http://eu.ceph.com precise/main i386 Packages
> >   404  Not Found
> >
> > W: Failed to fetch
> > http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages
> > 404  Not Found
> >
> > W: Failed to fetch
> > http://eu.ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages
> > 404  Not Found
> >
> > E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old
> > ones used instead.
> > 
> >
> > It seems that the repository for the particular required packages has been
> > removed, anyone can advise if I can get the required packages, may be from
> > a different location?
> >
> > Any help is greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > -ip-
> >