date:20150114

David,

Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
votes going on as well.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
> vpc, and several storage types.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav  
> wrote:
>> (+ users)
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test 
>> this candidate.
>> In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository 
>> built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
>>
>> DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
>> RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
>> SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0
>>
>>> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>>> up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
>>> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>
>>
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software 
>> Engineering
>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>> Support
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>> Courses
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a 
>> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



-- 
Daan

Re: xenserver 6.5

Adrian, I think your questions/considerations are right and I have
been wondering about the same things.
On one side it should be "allowed unless" instead of "only allowed
if". On the other hand therre are sure to be some features extra or
some that might have a slightly different semantics that might hinder
or impair cloudstack.
Not sure what the right answer is. Hope that someone with a view on
the architectural decisions behind it can shed some light.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Adrian Lewis
 wrote:
> With XS 6.5 released, is anyone able to comment on:
>
> 1. Does the 4.5 branch need updating to support it?
> 2. If the changes are so minor, will we see support in 4.3.x or 4.4.x as
> well?
>
> Do we consider this to be a feature or bug? If the code for the resource
> class stays exactly the same and the only thing blocking the use of XS 6.5
> is the checks that CS does when adding a new host, would this not be
> considered as a bug? Technically the validation is broken as its intent is
> to determine whether or not the current resource class can handle the
> hypervisor. If the current resource class can in fact handle XS6.5 but the
> validation code says it can't, isn’t this is a bug?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adrian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 October 2014 20:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5
>
> Correct on both counts
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
>> thanks Tim, from this I take that hypervisor versions are hardcoded
>> still, and xenserver 6.5 is supported since 4.5. correct?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Tim Mackey  wrote:
>>
>> > Daan,
>> >
>> > Here are the relevant commits:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2b
>> e02d1f515d8d089b6596127614fe6b8030d723
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=b7
>> f5e95c8f17cf42d35705872b4210db8c2def72
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=67
>> 4af6e47313fa18c18536a2daed90d13b9a9a59
>> >
>> > Mike,
>> >
>> > Here's an example of the type of DB changes:
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f=
>> setup/db/db/schema-441to450.sql;h=e6aae8e3d624744af9f19b132fa8f53b5a4c
>> ddb5;hp=34d5f8842005f8a2da4df8a9a838d919cc648831;hb=2be02d1f515d8d089b
>> 6596127614fe6b8030d723;hpb=f212aa57c32eb05d6a69730e37ac50bdb1f0a268
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yeah, Tim, I'm a little unclear of what you mean by requiring a DB
>> > update.
>> > >
>> > > Can you clarify that?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Tim, these changes are needed? so 4.4.1 will not work with db
>> > changes...
>> > > Do
>> > > > you have a commit id?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tim Mackey 
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I know that master had a bunch of cleanup work to make things
>> > > > > work
>> > > better
>> > > > > (commits were a month ago), but baring any significant issues,
>> being
>> > > able
>> > > > > to support a newer XenServer should be as simple as a database
>> > update.
>> > > > So
>> > > > > net of this master *today* should work fine with 6.5 (and the
>> various
>> > > > > pre-release builds since beta.2).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong but, if a previous XenServer
>> > resource
>> > > > > class
>> > > > > > can handle the newer version of XenServer, then I don't
>> > > > > > think you
>> > > need
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > make any changes to CloudStack files to use that newer version.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > If you do see some incompatibility with that version of
>> XenServer,
>> > > then
>> > > > > > someone would need to create a new resource class to handle
>> > > > > > the discrepancies.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Monday, October 20, 2014, Adrian Lewis <
>> > > adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Out of interest, on the assumption that there are no
>> > > > > > > issues
>> with
>> > > > using
>> > > > > > 6.5
>> > > > > > > when it's released and there are no
>> > > > > > > backwards-compatibility
>> > > problems,
>> > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > it then work with 4.4.1 or does CS need to be *explicitly*
>> > > > > > > told
>> > > that
>> > > > > > newer,
>> > > > > > > effectively unknown versions are 'acceptable' as a valid
>> > > hypervisor?
>> > > > > > > Basically, If we deploy CS 4.4.1 and we like the look of
>> > > > > > > XS 6.5
>> > > when
>> > > > it
>> > > > > > > comes out, will we need to make any changes to CS to start
>> using
>> > > it?
>> > > > If
>> > > >

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

Stephen, I already considdered myself out, and the Californians are
asleep at the moment. I'm alright with early start but cannot host a
GTM.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Turner
 wrote:
> As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is that 
> we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out this 
> week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't do 
> 16:00).
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2015 12:50
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>
> It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference?
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
>
> Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks.
>
>> On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner  wrote:
>>
>> You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number 
>> of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to 
>> come along if they care about these process-type issues.
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Turner
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>>
>> Not dominated, majority presence
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>>>
>>> 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's
>>> getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto.
>>>
>>> Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet
>>> and
>>> Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it
>>> pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays?
>>>
>>> [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's
>>> nice to have a diversity of perspectives.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stephen Turner
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
>>> Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
>>>
>>> Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ?
>>>
>>> -abhi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
 On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland 
>>> wrote:

 People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at
 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording
 for me?

 regards,
 --
 Daan
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>>> services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design &
>>> Build
>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
>>> framework
>>> CloudStack Consulting
>>> CloudStack Software
>>> Engineering>> engineering/>
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support>> infrastructure-support/>
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses>> training/>
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>>> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
>>> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
>>> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
>>> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or
>>> show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
>>> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in 
>>> England & Wales.
>>> ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and
>>> is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
>>> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated
>>> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
>>> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering<

Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?

2015-01-14 Thread Steve Wilson

I¹m not sure what bearing Redhat has on this discussion, but you are
correct in noting the Citrix did release CloudPlatform 4.5 today ‹ and it
is largely based on ACS 4.5 code.  Collectively, Citrix engineers continue
to contribute the lion¹s share of ACS code and we carefully follow all
rules established by the community.

That being said, today was the start of our Citrix Summit event.  It is
the Sales Kick Off and and Partner gathering for Citrix to start 2015.  It
was a great opportunity to publicize what we¹re doing with CloudPlatform
(and thus ACS by extension) and we chose today as our launch date.  The
reception by our sales personnel and channel partners at the show has been
very positive so far.  We expect good reaction from customers as well as
we believe this is our highest quality release to date.

Thanks for your interest.

-Steve

Steve Wilson
VP & Product Unit Manager
Cloud Software
Citrix
@virtualsteve

On 1/13/15, 3:14 PM, "Nux!"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' "Fedora", not
>the other way around.
>Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5
>ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC
>period.
>
>Lucian
>
>--
>Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
>Nux!
>www.nux.ro

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

2015-01-14 Thread Stephen Turner

Well, I sent it yesterday so the Californians would have been awake and may now 
be expecting a meeting at 8 AM their time. Let's do it at 16:00 GMT. Hopefully 
David will be able to start the GTM he's already sent out: he indicated that he 
could do the earlier time if he knew the day before.

-- 
Stephen Turner


-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 14 January 2015 08:19
To: dev
Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process

Stephen, I already considdered myself out, and the Californians are asleep at 
the moment. I'm alright with early start but cannot host a GTM.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Turner  
wrote:
> As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is that 
> we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out this 
> week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't do 
> 16:00).
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2015 12:50
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>
> It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference?
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
>
> Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks.
>
>> On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner  wrote:
>>
>> You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number 
>> of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to 
>> come along if they care about these process-type issues.
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Turner
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>>
>> Not dominated, majority presence
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>>>
>>> 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's 
>>> getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto.
>>>
>>> Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet 
>>> and
>>> Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it 
>>> pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays?
>>>
>>> [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's 
>>> nice to have a diversity of perspectives.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stephen Turner
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
>>> Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
>>>
>>> Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ?
>>>
>>> -abhi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
 On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland 
>>> wrote:

 People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at
 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording 
 for me?

 regards,
 --
 Daan
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
>>> services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design &
>>> Build
>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
>>> framework
>>> CloudStack Consulting
>>> CloudStack Software
>>> Engineering>> engineering/>
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support>> infrastructure-support/>
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>>> Courses>> training/>
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
>>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>>> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and 
>>> do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related 
>>> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you 
>>> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or 
>>> show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
>>> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in 
>>> England & Wales.
>>> ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and 
>>> is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil 
>>> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated 
>>> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
>>> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

Re: what's the status of Bare Metal component?

2015-01-14 Thread Nux!

Frank,

Interesting. Care to detail a bit? How would hosting the kickstarts on the 
public network help?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Frank Zhang" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 20:02:14
> Subject: RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component?

> Yeah that's kind of annoying.
> If users don't mind to put the HTTP/NFS server storing kickstart file and ISOs
> on the public network, it's possible to use other hypervisors' system VM
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 11:39 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: what's the status of Bare Metal component?
>> 
>> Thanks Frank, that sounds promising.
>> The VMware requirement kind of sucks, though. No way around it, perhaps via
>> some helping sys VM?
>> 
>> Lucian
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Frank Zhang" 
>> > To: "" 
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 19:29:56
>> > Subject: RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component?
>> 
>> > CloudStack offers baremetal for basic zone (see
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickS
>> > tart) and advanced zone (see
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+Advance
>> d+Networking+Support).
>> > Basic zone support has been there for years, advanced zone is new
>> > feature in 4.5; development work has been done, though there may be
>> > some small enhancements and bug fixes.
>> >
>> > BTW: competitorstack,  funny!
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:22 AM
>> >> To: 
>> >> Subject: what's the status of Bare Metal component?
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> What is the status of the Bare Metal deployment component? I'm just
>> >> being asked to install the competitorstack because of this feature
>> >> and was wondering where Cloudstack is at the moment?
>> >> Any docs about it and how can we help with it?
>> >>
>> >> Lucian
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> >>
>> >> Nux!
> > > > www.nux.ro

Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2

2015-01-14 Thread Rajani Karuturi

+1 (binding) based on the minimalistic testing to install,
start/stop/destroy a VM

~Rajani

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150112T2202
> Commit: 2d9a42e833b576aba016f0d73660da0c5b7b7174
>
> List of changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8070?filter=12330007
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?

2015-01-14 Thread sebgoa


On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Marcus  wrote:

> Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could
> release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster
> 11.0' If I wanted.

I did not even know it was coming. But I agree with Marcus, citrix clouplatform 
could be at 11.0 right now, it would not mean anything in terms of semantic 
versioning vs cloudstack releases.


> I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some
> extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something.
> It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low
> amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it
> would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that
> though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4
> more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet
> and can't let their own releases be slowed by us.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger  
> wrote:
>> Don't take it back.  I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has 
>> today's date on it.
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>> 
>> 
>>  Original message 
>> From: Nux! 
>> Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00)
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
>> 
>> Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say "release highlights", not 
>> that it was released:
>> https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/
>> 
>> I take it back! :)
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>> 
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Ian Duffy" 
>>> To: "CloudStack Dev" 
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24
>>> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
>> 
>>> That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes
>>> on there site?
>>> On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, "Nux!"  wrote:
>>> 
 Hi,
 
 I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' "Fedora", not the
 other way around.
 Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5
 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC
 period.
 
 Lucian
 
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
>>

Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2

Tested basic zone deployment with KVM and basic VM lifecycle operations.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150112T2202
Commit: 2d9a42e833b576aba016f0d73660da0c5b7b7174

List of changes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8070?filter=12330007

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3/

PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

--
Daan

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?

2015-01-14 Thread Nux!

Yes, mea culpa for making a big deal out of it.
For some reason it suck in my head that ACS is for CP what Fedora is for RHEL 
so it seemed odd.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "sebgoa" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 January, 2015 09:07:36
> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?

> On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Marcus  wrote:
> 
>> Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could
>> release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster
>> 11.0' If I wanted.
> 
> I did not even know it was coming. But I agree with Marcus, citrix 
> clouplatform
> could be at 11.0 right now, it would not mean anything in terms of semantic
> versioning vs cloudstack releases.
> 
> 
>> I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some
>> extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something.
>> It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low
>> amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it
>> would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that
>> though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4
>> more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet
>> and can't let their own releases be slowed by us.
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger  
>> wrote:
>>> Don't take it back.  I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has
>>> today's date on it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Original message 
>>> From: Nux! 
>>> Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
>>> 
>>> Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say "release highlights", not 
>>> that
>>> it was released:
>>> https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/
>>> 
>>> I take it back! :)
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>> 
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>> 
>>> - Original Message -
 From: "Ian Duffy" 
 To: "CloudStack Dev" 
 Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24
 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
>>> 
 That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes
 on there site?
 On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, "Nux!"  wrote:
 
> Hi,
> 
> I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' "Fedora", not the
> other way around.
> Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5
> ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC
> period.
> 
> Lucian
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro

Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?

2015-01-14 Thread sebgoa


On Jan 14, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Nux!  wrote:

> Yes, mea culpa for making a big deal out of it.
> For some reason it suck in my head that ACS is for CP what Fedora is for RHEL 
> so it seemed odd.
> 

Nux no need for a mea culpa, that's also in my head.

> Lucian
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "sebgoa" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 14 January, 2015 09:07:36
>> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
> 
>> On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>> 
>>> Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could
>>> release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster
>>> 11.0' If I wanted.
>> 
>> I did not even know it was coming. But I agree with Marcus, citrix 
>> clouplatform
>> could be at 11.0 right now, it would not mean anything in terms of semantic
>> versioning vs cloudstack releases.
>> 
>> 
>>> I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some
>>> extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something.
>>> It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low
>>> amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it
>>> would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that
>>> though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4
>>> more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet
>>> and can't let their own releases be slowed by us.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger  
>>> wrote:
 Don't take it back.  I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has
 today's date on it.
 
 
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
 
 
  Original message 
 From: Nux! 
 Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00)
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
 
 Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say "release highlights", 
 not that
 it was released:
 https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/
 
 I take it back! :)
 
 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
 Nux!
 www.nux.ro
 
 - Original Message -
> From: "Ian Duffy" 
> To: "CloudStack Dev" 
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24
> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
 
> That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes
> on there site?
> On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, "Nux!"  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' "Fedora", not 
>> the
>> other way around.
>> Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5
>> ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC
>> period.
>> 
>> Lucian
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro

Re: [MERGE] Support Granular SCSI disk controllers in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor


Hi Sateesh,

Can can send a Github PR for review (if you want to get a code review)
and share code coverage wrt unit (and integration) tests. I think if the
code coverage is well above 80% I think everyone should be okay with the
merge.

Let me know if you need any help.

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 09:06 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:

Hi,

I would like merge the branch 'vmware-disk-controllers' into master branch. 
This branch contains implementation to support Granular SCSI disk controllers 
in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor.

This is specific to VMware hypervisor only. The code changes are in area of 
vmware resource.

All changes are being tracked using JIRA ticket [3] with code in ACS branch 
'vmware-disk-controllers'.
Please see [2[ for Functional specification which was discussed in proposal 
thread [1] below and talk [4] held at CCC EU 2014, Budapest.

Currently CloudStack supports following combinations only.
 * DATA volumes - SCSI controller (LSI Logic Parallel) - Hard coded in 
source code, no option for user to edit/choose the controller type
 * ROOT volumes - IDE or SCSI (LSI Logic Parallel) - Baed on value of global 
configuration parameter "vmware.root.disk.controller"

For some guest operating systems like Windows 2012 R2, deploying instances with 
LSI Parallel controller might result in failure to boot as guest OS vendor is 
not shipping the OS with LSI Logic parallel drivers.
OS Vendor is supporting/shipping LSI SAS controller as preferred.

CloudStack should provide administrator the means to choose the type of disk 
controller (including sub types listed in introduction section above) for an
instance. The controller to be used by VM to access virtual disk (volume) can 
decided for various reasons. Some of them are listed here,
*   Some controllers are optimized for best performance over specific backend 
infrastructure like SAN. Ex: VMware Paravirtual SCSI
*Compatibility of some controllers with VM's virtual hardware version or 
guest operating system.
*Operating system vendor recommendation and default set of drivers 
distributed as part of operating system image. Ex: Windows 8.1 ISO doesn't have 
Lsi Logic Parallel SCSI drivers by default. Hence a virtual disk attached to 
this controller won't accessible during installation of OS using the ISO.

Now CloudStack provides administrator options to specify disk controllers to 
use for user instances at various ways.
1) Global configuration settings
2) Template settings (during registration of template)
3) Option to enable auto detection of the recommended disk controller for the 
instance's guest operating system by vendor and applicable virtual hardware 
version.

Please let me know your comments.

Regards,
Sateesh

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/en4skoqu4mbitacs
[2] Functional specification document - 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/vI5cAg
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787
[4] http://ccceu2014.sched.org/event/5d24aad67443542c72b5fc51c25c090b



From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 12:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Server 2012 R2 Bug on CS 4.4.0 with vmware hypervisor


-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: 15 November 2014 14:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Michael Phillips
Subject: RE: Server 2012 R2 Bug on CS 4.4.0 with vmware hypervisor

Hi Michael,


further clarification; CS adds the data disk to the VM but since it's listed as 
SCSI device 0:0, the vm is unable to find it when you

do a disk rescan.
Yes, due to absence of LSI Logic Parallel driver in the guest, the virtual disk 
goes undetected.

Currently for all data volumes, of user instance deployed by CloudStack, are 
attached to  LSI Logic Parallel controller. And this is not
configurable, which is be a blocker for most recent versions of Windows OS like 
Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 8.1 which does not
ship/pack LSI Logic Parallel driver by default, which means all virtual disks 
attached to this controller would not detected.

Support for choice of controllers is in progress and expected to be available 
in CloudStack 4.6 release.
I am going to talk about proposal to address this and implementation details in 
CloudStack Collaboration Conference scheduled
next week at Budapest, Hungary.

Link to the entry in conference schedule is [1] and JIRA ticket for this 
feature is [2]

[1] 
http://ccceu2014.sched.org/event/5d24aad67443542c72b5fc51c25c090b?iframe=yes&w=&sidebar=yes&bg=no
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787


Hi,

I am working on implementation of this feature based on functional 
specification [2] and followed by proposal thread [1] below.
All changes are being tracked using JIRA ticket [3] using ACS branch 
'vmware-disk-controllers'

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/en4skoqu4mbitacs
[2] Short link for functional specification document - 
https://cwiki.a

Re: API response change command=deleteIso


Hi,

I think we have had such fixes before and it won't break anyone's
client's unless they rely on hardcoded response keys. Most clients such
as CloudMonkey or Marvin would look for returned response under a key
that has a "response" substring so this change should not break them.
I'm not sure about the UI though. Brian, Jessica may comment on that.

On Tuesday 13 January 2015 09:22 PM, Rene Moser wrote:

Hi dev

I found an inconsistency, call it a typo, in the API response and would
like to make an API change [1]. I saw there has been a similar change in
the past [2].

Thanks for your response.

Regards
René

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63
[2]
https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack/commit/e7134b82f90cfa9482cd08c3cf4633c64d621117



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

so that's an appointment, everybody! ;)

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Stephen Turner
 wrote:
> Well, I sent it yesterday so the Californians would have been awake and may 
> now be expecting a meeting at 8 AM their time. Let's do it at 16:00 GMT. 
> Hopefully David will be able to start the GTM he's already sent out: he 
> indicated that he could do the earlier time if he knew the day before.
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2015 08:19
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
>
> Stephen, I already considdered myself out, and the Californians are asleep at 
> the moment. I'm alright with early start but cannot host a GTM.
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Stephen Turner  
> wrote:
>> As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is 
>> that we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out 
>> this week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't 
>> do 16:00).
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Turner
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 13 January 2015 12:50
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>>
>> It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference?
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Turner
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
>>
>> Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks.
>>
>>> On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number 
>>> of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to 
>>> come along if they care about these process-type issues.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stephen Turner
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
>>>
>>> Not dominated, majority presence
>>>
 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process

 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's
 getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto.

 Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet
 and
 Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it
 pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays?

 [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's
 nice to have a diversity of perspectives.

 --
 Stephen Turner


 -Original Message-
 From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
 Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process

 Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ?

 -abhi




> On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland 
 wrote:
>
> People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at
> 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording
> for me?
>
> regards,
> --
> Daan

 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
 services

 IaaS Cloud Design &
 Build
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
 framework
 CloudStack Consulting
 CloudStack Software
 Engineering
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training
 Courses

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
 intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
 Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
 do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
 companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
 must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or
 show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
 received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in 
 England & Wales.
 ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and
 is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
 Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporate

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6900: Fixed if we download a v...

2015-01-14 Thread anshul1886

Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images

2015-01-14 Thread Star Guo

Are there anyone help me ? Thanks a lot :).

Best Regards,
Star Guo

-邮件原件-
发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me] 
发送时间: 2015年1月13日 15:28
收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images

Dear All,

I find some images in ui/images about CloudStack UI. Could I get the PSD
(Photoshop) format or XCF (GIMP) format?

I want to change the UI color for different Regions, then easy for
acknowledge . Thanks a lot :)

Best Regards,
Star Guo

Re: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images


Hi Star,

Our major UI contributors Jessica or Brian may have some idea. I think
you can also use existing images for dimensions etc and create your own?

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 03:13 PM, Star Guo wrote:

Are there anyone help me ? Thanks a lot :).

Best Regards,
Star Guo

-邮件原件-
发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me]
发送时间: 2015年1月13日 15:28
收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images

Dear All,

I find some images in ui/images about CloudStack UI. Could I get the PSD
(Photoshop) format or XCF (GIMP) format?

I want to change the UI color for different Regions, then easy for
acknowledge . Thanks a lot :)

Best Regards,
Star Guo




--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Adding Dockerfile and instructions

2015-01-14 Thread runseb

Github user runseb closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/61


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

2015-01-14 Thread pyr

GitHub user pyr opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65

Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures

This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API.
See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the
full rationale.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack feature/constant-time

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #65


commit 9b4e39e837af498599859c4a6687eb8bf9f8ad89
Author: Pierre-Yves Ritschard 
Date:   2015-01-14T10:27:35Z

Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures

This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API.
See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the
full rationale.

Conflicts:
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServer.java
server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

2015-01-14 Thread Pierre-Yves Ritschard

I'll note here that this can be applied to 4.4 and 4.3 as well, modulo some
simple changes.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:32 AM, pyr  wrote:

> GitHub user pyr opened a pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65
>
> Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures
>
> This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API.
> See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the
> full rationale.
>
> You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
>
> $ git pull https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack
> feature/constant-time
>
> Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65.patch
>
> To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
> with (at least) the following in the commit message:
>
> This closes #65
>
> 
> commit 9b4e39e837af498599859c4a6687eb8bf9f8ad89
> Author: Pierre-Yves Ritschard 
> Date:   2015-01-14T10:27:35Z
>
> Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures
>
> This limits the likeliness of timing attacks against the API.
> See http://codahale.com/a-lesson-in-timing-attacks/ for the
> full rationale.
>
> Conflicts:
> server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServer.java
> server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java
>
> 
>
>
> ---
> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
> contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
> with INFRA.
> ---
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#discussion_r22929307
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ConstantTimeComparator.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+package com.cloud.api;
+
+public class ConstantTimeComparator {
+
+public static boolean compareBytes(byte[] b1, byte[] b2) {
+if (b1.length != b2.length) {
+return false;
+}
+
+int result = 0;
+for (int i = 0; i < b1.length; i++) {
+result |= b1[i] ^ b2[i];
--- End diff --

Neat. +1

I would suggest moving this to utils instead of api. The api directory or 
artifact should hold only contracts, commands and interfaces, if this is in 
utils it could be re-usable (or maybe not) in future.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#issuecomment-69899701
  
LGTM, let me test it. I can help backport it to 4.3/4.4, it's a good fix.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69900395
  
Tested with CloudMonkey/Marvin, most sane clients should not break who 
search for objects in a "xyzresponse" key. This also fixes the UI so we're good.

Google search resulted 8 places where "deleteisosresponse" was used. Such 
fixes have been done in the past. The impact is low, also because it's an async 
api.

Response before;
{ "deleteisosresponse" : {"jobid":"aef086a9-ceb6-4af1-9b01-44a130dc6a16"} }

Response after the fix;
{ "deleteisoresponse" : {"jobid":"0fd02b7f-0a14-4ef2-8dc5-932a9ee30004"} }


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...

2015-01-14 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

2015-01-14 Thread pyr

Github user pyr commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#discussion_r22930247
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ConstantTimeComparator.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+package com.cloud.api;
+
+public class ConstantTimeComparator {
+
+public static boolean compareBytes(byte[] b1, byte[] b2) {
+if (b1.length != b2.length) {
+return false;
+}
+
+int result = 0;
+for (int i = 0; i < b1.length; i++) {
+result |= b1[i] ^ b2[i];
--- End diff --

Agreed, updated accordingly


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #277

See 

Changes:

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response name string: there is an 
extra 's'

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8154: fix UI for API change

--
[...truncated 1276 lines...]
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-framework-security ---
[INFO] Compiling 7 source files to 

[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-engine-api ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-engine-api ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-engine-api ---
[INFO] Compiling 107 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-framework-security ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-framework-security ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-framework-security ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-engine-api ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-api ---
[INFO] Compiling 2 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-api ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.ScopeTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.28 sec
Running 
org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.type.VolumeTypeHelperTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.05 sec

Results :

Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Core 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema 
---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-core ---
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting  
(includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting  
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] Deleting  
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-core ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-core

Re: weird db setup issue

2015-01-14 Thread Erik Weber

This happens on a new installation of Citrix CloudPlatform 4.5.0 as well.

If anyone has time, we should check if this happens on ACS 4.5 and fix it

-- 
Erik

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:

>
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> > Hi Sebastien,
> >
> > Which build/version of CloudStack are you using?
>
> this is 4.3.1 from packages, ubuntu 14.04
>
> but I think it's an issue with my setup. that schema file has not changed
> in more than a year and is the same in all branches.
>
> I will keep investigating.
>
> adding use cloud (like Erik mentioned) solved the issue.
>
> >
> >> On 05-Dec-2014, at 7:22 pm, Erik Weber  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process.
> >>>
> >>> When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue:
> >>>
> >>> Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster
> management
> >>> server node IP[ OK ]
> >>> Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties
> >>> [ OK ]
> >>> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql
> >>>[ OK ]
> >>> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql
> >>>[ OK ]
> >>> Applying
> >>> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql
>  [ OK
> >>> ]
> >>> Applying
> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
> >>>
> >>> We apologize for below error:
> >>> ***
> >>> Encountering an error when executing mysql script
> >>> --
> >>> table:
> >>> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
> >>>
> >>> Error:
> >>> ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created
> >>> successfully and not create-schema-premium ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> - the create-database* scripts doesn't need a selected database
> >> - the create-schema.sql script starts by selecting the database (use
> cloud;)
> >>
> >> create-schema-premium.sql doesn't have the same selection at start, and
> I'm
> >> no sql guru but it could be a foreign key or something else without an
> >> explicit schema that fails.
> >> you should probably be able to workaround it by adding a "use cloud;"
> early
> >> in the create-schema-premium.sql file
> >>
> >> that's my two cent.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Erik
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohit Yadav
> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> > M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> >
> >
> >
> > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
> >
> > IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> > CloudStack Consulting
> > CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> > CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any
> action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a
> company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of
> South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> a registered trademark.
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...

GitHub user cloudtrends opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66

under windows environment  the publicKeyPath and privateKeyPath should 
replace from \...

Under windows environment the publicKeyPath and privateKeyPath should 
replace from \  to / when send them into injectkeys.py

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/cloudtrends/cloudstack master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #66


commit 13d65691358946feebd80c9e905a4f374459a39d
Author: cloudtrends <2306434...@qq.com>
Date:   2015-01-14T11:51:18Z

under windows the publicKeyPath and privateKeyPath should replace from \ to 
/ when send them into injectkeys.py




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...

2015-01-14 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#discussion_r22932649
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java ---
@@ -894,6 +894,13 @@ protected void 
injectSshKeysIntoSystemVmIsoPatch(String publicKeyPath, String pr
 } else {
 command = new Script("/bin/bash", s_logger);
 }
+String osname = System.getProperty("os.name");
--- End diff --

There is an isOnWindows() function in this class which can be reused


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #891

See

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...

2015-01-14 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#discussion_r22932788
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java ---
@@ -894,6 +894,13 @@ protected void 
injectSshKeysIntoSystemVmIsoPatch(String publicKeyPath, String pr
 } else {
 command = new Script("/bin/bash", s_logger);
 }
+String osname = System.getProperty("os.name");
+if (osname.startsWith("Windows")) {
+scriptPath = scriptPath.replaceAll("" ,"/" );
--- End diff --

 testWindowsScript#ConfigurationServerImplTest TestCase might break with 
this change. 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...

2015-01-14 Thread karuturi

Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#issuecomment-69908275
  
In case of windows, python scripts are executed and I think it runs fine 
from cygwin. Is this change targeted to make it work from cmd?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images

2015-01-14 Thread Star Guo

Hi, Rohit

Thanks. I try to change the color style of UI on png.

Best Regards,
Star Guo

-邮件原件-
发件人: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
发送时间: 2015年1月14日 17:59
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images

Hi Star,

Our major UI contributors Jessica or Brian may have some idea. I think you can 
also use existing images for dimensions etc and create your own?

On Wednesday 14 January 2015 03:13 PM, Star Guo wrote:
> Are there anyone help me ? Thanks a lot :).
>
> Best Regards,
> Star Guo
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me]
> 发送时间: 2015年1月13日 15:28
> 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: [CloudStack 4.4] About UI Images
>
> Dear All,
>
> I find some images in ui/images about CloudStack UI. Could I get the 
> PSD
> (Photoshop) format or XCF (GIMP) format?
>
> I want to change the UI color for different Regions, then easy for 
> acknowledge . Thanks a lot :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Star Guo
>
>

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did 
not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #892

See

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...

2015-01-14 Thread terbolous

GitHub user terbolous opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67

CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better

This should fix the problem some people are seeing with 
cloudstack-setup-databases complaining about 'No database selected'

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/terbolous/cloudstack mysql56-schema-fix

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #67


commit 396936ea5e84d079394664fd1d0596a94e159855
Author: Erik Weber 
Date:   2015-01-14T13:52:47Z

Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: weird db setup issue

2015-01-14 Thread Erik Weber

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process.
>
> When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue:
>
> Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management
> server node IP[ OK ]
> Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties
>   [ OK ]
> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql
>  [ OK ]
> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql
>  [ OK ]
> Applying
> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql [ OK
> ]
> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
>
> We apologize for below error:
> ***
> Encountering an error when executing mysql script
> --
> table:
> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
>
> Error:
> ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected
>
>
> Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created
> successfully and not create-schema-premium ?
>
>
I solved the issue and it seems related to MySQL

What mysql version are/were you running?

I just confirmed that the SQL query is accepted on MySQL 5.1, but not on
MySQL 5.6.
I guess they became a bit more strict somewhere in between.

Adding absolute references solves it.

See PR #67 for a fix

-- 
Erik

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

2015-01-14 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#issuecomment-69926558
  
Tested locally on master, works for me. Thanks for your contribution @pyr 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

4.3 build issue

2015-01-14 Thread sebgoa

is there a temporary build issue with 4.3:

[INFO] Scanning for projects...
Downloading: 
http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.3.2/cloudstack-4.3.2.pom
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]   
[ERROR]   The project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:4.3.2 
(/opt/cloudstack/pom.xml) has 1 error
[ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not find artifact 
org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack:pom:4.3.2 in central 
(http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2) and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong 
local POM @ line 24, column 11 -> [Help 2]
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e 
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please 
read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
[ERROR] [Help 2] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/UnresolvableModelException
INFO[0019] The command [/bin/sh -c cd /opt/cloudstack; mvn -Pdeveloper 
-Dsimulator -DskipTests clean install] returned a non-zero code: 1

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69926942
  
LGTM. Maybe we could be to put "USE cloud;" (or cloud_usage as applicable) 
in this file at the beginning, will that help?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use constant-time comparison functions wh...

2015-01-14 Thread pyr

Github user pyr commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/65#issuecomment-69926943
  
thanks @bhaisaab 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...

2015-01-14 Thread terbolous

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69927499
  
Yes, that would also work. I considered it, but since the file works with 
both cloud and cloud_usage I wasn


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69927724
  
Fair point, merging it.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.3 build issue

I think this is only on jenkins.b.o, I’m able to build it locally.

> On 14-Jan-2015, at 8:20 pm, sebgoa  wrote:
>
> is there a temporary build issue with 4.3:
>
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> Downloading: 
> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.3.2/cloudstack-4.3.2.pom
> [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR]   The project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:4.3.2 
> (/opt/cloudstack/pom.xml) has 1 error
> [ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not find artifact 
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack:pom:4.3.2 in central 
> (http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2) and 'parent.relativePath' points at 
> wrong local POM @ line 24, column 11 -> [Help 2]
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e 
> switch.
> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please 
> read the following articles:
> [ERROR] [Help 1] 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
> [ERROR] [Help 2] 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/UnresolvableModelException
> INFO[0019] The command [/bin/sh -c cd /opt/cloudstack; mvn -Pdeveloper 
> -Dsimulator -DskipTests clean install] returned a non-zero code: 1
>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67#issuecomment-69928504
  
Thanks for fixing this Erik @terbolous !


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8157: Add absolute schema refe...

2015-01-14 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/67


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: weird db setup issue

Sebastien,

Can you try again with latest 4.3/4.4/4.5/master and see if it works after 
Erik’s fix?
Keep us posted.

> On 14-Jan-2015, at 7:29 pm, Erik Weber  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process.
>>
>> When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue:
>>
>> Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management
>> server node IP[ OK ]
>> Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties
>>  [ OK ]
>> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql
>> [ OK ]
>> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql
>> [ OK ]
>> Applying
>> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql [ OK
>> ]
>> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
>>
>> We apologize for below error:
>> ***
>> Encountering an error when executing mysql script
>> --
>> table:
>> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
>>
>> Error:
>> ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected
>>
>>
>> Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be created
>> successfully and not create-schema-premium ?
>>
>>
> I solved the issue and it seems related to MySQL
>
> What mysql version are/were you running?
>
> I just confirmed that the SQL query is accepted on MySQL 5.1, but not on
> MySQL 5.6.
> I guess they became a bit more strict somewhere in between.
>
> Adding absolute references solves it.
>
> See PR #67 for a fix
>
> --
> Erik

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: weird db setup issue

2015-01-14 Thread Raja Pullela

Sebastien,

Can you check your MySQL version ?  Is it 5.6.22 or above ?
There was an issue with MySQL 5.6.22 - where in the SQL file mentioned returns 
an error, runs fine on MySQL 5.6.21 and below.
You can downgrade/install the MySQL that is packaged with 4.5.0 OR update the 
SQL to include the "use cloud" before the SQL command.

Raja
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:53 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: weird db setup issue

This happens on a new installation of Citrix CloudPlatform 4.5.0 as well.

If anyone has time, we should check if this happens on ACS 4.5 and fix it

--
Erik

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:

>
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> > Hi Sebastien,
> >
> > Which build/version of CloudStack are you using?
>
> this is 4.3.1 from packages, ubuntu 14.04
>
> but I think it's an issue with my setup. that schema file has not 
> changed in more than a year and is the same in all branches.
>
> I will keep investigating.
>
> adding use cloud (like Erik mentioned) solved the issue.
>
> >
> >> On 05-Dec-2014, at 7:22 pm, Erik Weber  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen 
> >> 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process.
> >>>
> >>> When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue:
> >>>
> >>> Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster
> management
> >>> server node IP[ OK ]
> >>> Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties
> >>> [ OK ]
> >>> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database.sql
> >>>[ OK ]
> >>> Applying /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema.sql
> >>>[ OK ]
> >>> Applying
> >>> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-database-premium.sql
>  [ OK
> >>> ]
> >>> Applying
> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
> >>>
> >>> We apologize for below error:
> >>> ***
> >>> Encountering an error when executing mysql script
> >>> --
> >>> 
> >>> table:
> >>> /usr/share/cloudstack-management/setup/create-schema-premium.sql
> >>>
> >>> Error:
> >>> ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 285: No database selected
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Does this ring a bell to anyone ? why would the first schema be 
> >>> created successfully and not create-schema-premium ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> - the create-database* scripts doesn't need a selected database
> >> - the create-schema.sql script starts by selecting the database 
> >> (use
> cloud;)
> >>
> >> create-schema-premium.sql doesn't have the same selection at start, 
> >> and
> I'm
> >> no sql guru but it could be a foreign key or something else without 
> >> an explicit schema that fails.
> >> you should probably be able to workaround it by adding a "use cloud;"
> early
> >> in the create-schema-premium.sql file
> >>
> >> that's my two cent.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Erik
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohit Yadav
> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> > M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> >
> >
> >
> > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
> >
> > IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment 
> > framework
> > CloudStack Consulting
> > CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> > CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related 
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you 
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this 
> email in error.
> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue 
> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda 
> is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The 
> Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue 
> Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #548

See 

Changes:

[Rohit Yadav] Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better

--
[...truncated 1207 lines...]
 T E S T S
---
Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DatabaseAccessObjectTest
Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.862 sec
Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DbUpgradeUtilsTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.425 sec

Results :

Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs 4.4.3-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-jobs 
---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Compiling 33 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 4 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Compiling 4 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API 
4.4.3-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] Compiling 31 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #549

See

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist #437

See 


Changes:

[Daan Hoogland] logging in clustering code, to find faulty vif plug on 
xenserver from clustered ms on nic orchestration for start command

[Daan Hoogland] serialization issue in json/gson

[Daan Hoogland] upgrade path

[Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-6652 CLONE - [Automation] Vmware-  System's 
StartCommand failed with "NumberFormatException" while using VMware DVS

[Rohit Yadav] Add absolute schema references to support MySQL 5.6 better

[Rohit Yadav] Use constant-time comparison functions when checking signatures

[Rohit Yadav] move ConstantTimeComparator to utils

--
[...truncated 2542 lines...]
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-jar-plugin:2.4:jar (default-jar) @ cloud-engine-components-api 
---
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ 
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/home/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-engine-components-api/4.4.3-SNAPSHOT/cloud-engine-components-api-4.4.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/home/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-engine-components-api/4.4.3-SNAPSHOT/cloud-engine-components-api-4.4.3-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Server 4.4.3-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-server ---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-server ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-server 
---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (generate-resource) @ cloud-server ---
[INFO] Executing tasks

main:
 [copy] Copying 3 files to 

 [copy] Copying 1 file to 

[INFO] Executed tasks
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-server ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 30 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-server 
---
[INFO] Compiling 360 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-server ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 33 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-server ---
[INFO] Compiling 83 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-server ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory:

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #893

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #894

See

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-14 Thread Adrian Lewis

Rohit,

I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?

Adrian

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

(+ users)

Hi everyone,

David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test
this candidate.
In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository
built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:

DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0

> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs
> /heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a
company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[CROSSPOST] [ovsdb-dev] CloudStack & OVSDB?

2015-01-14 Thread Chiradeep Vittal



-Original Message-
From: 
ovsdb-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org
 [mailto:ovsdb-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:03 PM
To: mailto:ovsdb-...@lists.opendaylight.org>>
Subject: [ovsdb-dev] CloudStack & OVSDB?

Hi all,

I saw Hugo Trippaers' presentation from last year's FOSDEM about using OVSDB 
and CloudStack.

As some of you may have noticed, I was looking for someone to document using 
OpenDaylight with CloudStack for the new "Using OpenDaylight"
section of the wiki:
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CloudStack_and_OpenDaylight

Is there anyone here who's familiar with this who can help document Helium with 
CloudStack 4.4, please?

Thanks,
Dave.

--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - 
http://secure-web.cisco.com/1dDDhuQflPzd19tLV5kjckvanMMnd62cqqA-4LBPmf4LYnM7d72a73uz4zzIjskvgu9VA1tB69c0BNKJoGwVu-P8RS6kuLNJA048jvJNq7u1ryaYXO8zdDm56fj92K91KFxKw5zU-76QMYZhT7su0OXf35sS1wJeey0hn2iR4bDE/http%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 
___
ovsdb-dev mailing list
ovsdb-...@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/ovsdb-dev

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-14 Thread David Nalley

Daan:

I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the
vote period will be longer.

--David

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> David,
>
> Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
> think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
> votes going on as well.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>> +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
>> vpc, and several storage types.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav  
>> wrote:
>>> (+ users)
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test 
>>> this candidate.
>>> In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following 
>>> repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:
>>>
>>> DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
>>> RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
>>> SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0
>>>
 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:

 Hi folks,

 I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
 up for a vote:

 Git Branch and Commit SH:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
 location):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/

 PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

 Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

 For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
 indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohit Yadav
>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design & 
>>> Build
>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>>> CloudStack Consulting
>>> CloudStack Software 
>>> Engineering
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>>> Support
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>>> Courses
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is 
>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan

[SOLUTION] CloudStack 4.3.1 some VMs would get stopped continuously

2015-01-14 Thread ilya musayev

I've seen an issue where cloudstack would stop some VMs after they have 
been started. Posting the solution for whoever comes across this problem.


I've noticed following pattern:

VM was trying to be migrated to another host while another thread would 
stop the VM within 10 minutes of the start time.


The solution was to look for a message in the log that has 
"(981,VmWorkJobQueue, 2371) is reaching concurrency limit 1" continuously.


Delete the reference id of "2371" from cloud.sync_queue_item
Delete the reference id of "981" from cloud.sync_queue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-14 Thread Ian Duffy

+1 (binding)

Brought up a basic zone using devcloud4(Centos 6and XenServer
6.2.0-70446c), everything worked without issue system vms came up and
their agent connected.

Added Nux's macchinina distribution as a template.
Added Ubuntu as a template. (Loved the HVM checkbox addition to the UI).

Successfully brought up a VM both based on both the templates.
Password retrieval worked, root resize worked.

Brought up a web server on one of the VMs and opened a security group
rule. The rule applied successfully.

Brought up an advanced zone again using devcloud4 so centos 6 and
XenServer 6.2.0-70446c. Just like with the 4.4 release marvin fails to
set the traffic tags for the public/management/storage/guest networks.
I skipped over this small detail and set them manually.

After this everything was fine, added a machine based on Nux's
macchinina template, password retrieval worked. Brought up a web
server on it, did nat forwarding. All worked without issue.

Great work on this release folks!

On 14 January 2015 at 18:40, David Nalley  wrote:
> Daan:
>
> I am running it for at least 72 hours, though practice tells me the
> vote period will be longer.
>
> --David
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daan Hoogland  
> wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> Can you be lenient with the 72 hour schedule on this one? I don't
>> think I personally can get to test this soon and we have two other
>> votes going on as well.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marcus  wrote:
>>> +1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
>>> vpc, and several storage types.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav  
>>> wrote:
 (+ users)

 Hi everyone,

 David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test 
 this candidate.
 In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following 
 repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740:

 DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/
 RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/
 SystemVM Templates: 
 http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0

> On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256
> Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

 Regards,
 Rohit Yadav
 Software Architect, ShapeBlue
 M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design & 
 Build
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
 CloudStack Consulting
 CloudStack Software 
 Engineering
 CloudStack Infrastructure 
 Support
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
 Courses

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the 
 sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue 
 Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India 
 LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from 
 Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
 incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
 ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South 
 Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
 registered trademark.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan

Re: [SOLUTION] CloudStack 4.3.1 some VMs would get stopped continuously

2015-01-14 Thread David Nalley

This is a great workaround, but can we make sure a bug gets filed for
this issue? It'd be nice if we could get it fixed.

--David

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:14 PM, ilya musayev
 wrote:
> I've seen an issue where cloudstack would stop some VMs after they have been
> started. Posting the solution for whoever comes across this problem.
>
> I've noticed following pattern:
>
> VM was trying to be migrated to another host while another thread would stop
> the VM within 10 minutes of the start time.
>
> The solution was to look for a message in the log that has
> "(981,VmWorkJobQueue, 2371) is reaching concurrency limit 1" continuously.
>
> Delete the reference id of "2371" from cloud.sync_queue_item
> Delete the reference id of "981" from cloud.sync_queue
>
>

CloudStack Quality Process meeting 14 jan 2014

H,

A little report on this afternoons meeting:

We mainly spoke on the minimal functionality that should not be
touched by new commits. A list was made at [1]. Next we agreed to
finalize this list next week by working through maven projects (and
possibly documetation chapters) and to start grinding down on the gate
specification and ipossibly implementation.[2]. It was a small
committee. Hopefully this is indicative of people doing real work and
not of the spin this initiative has ;)

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+basic+functionalities
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Gate+requirements

-- 
Daan

Re: CloudStack Quality Process meeting 14 jan 2014

2015-01-14 Thread David Nalley

Recording of the meeting is here:

https://citrix.sharefile.com/d/s0b016d158bb41c3b

--David

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> H,
>
> A little report on this afternoons meeting:
>
> We mainly spoke on the minimal functionality that should not be
> touched by new commits. A list was made at [1]. Next we agreed to
> finalize this list next week by working through maven projects (and
> possibly documetation chapters) and to start grinding down on the gate
> specification and ipossibly implementation.[2]. It was a small
> committee. Hopefully this is indicative of people doing real work and
> not of the spin this initiative has ;)
>
> [1] 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+basic+functionalities
> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Gate+requirements
>
> --
> Daan

StaticNat does not get disassociated from tier when plugin fails to enable the static NAT

2015-01-14 Thread Suresh Ramamurthy

Hi Jayapal,

In NuageVsp integration, we found that when NuageVsp plugin fails to enable
a StaticNat in
VPC, StaticNat does not get disassociated from tier. When I looked in to
the code, I found that there is a field performedIpAssoc in
enableStaticNat() method.

This field is initialized to false and not set to true after calling
ipAddress = _ipAddrMgr.associateIPToGuestNetwork(ipId, networkId, false);

So, this is value always false and when plugin fails
_vpcMgr.unassignIPFromVpcNetwork(ip.getId(), networkId); is never called.

But, in case of createPortForwardingRule(), similar variable is initialized
but
it is set to true after calling _ipAddrMgr.associateIPToGuestNetwork().

So, I tried the fix to set the flag to true after calling
associateIPTOGuestNetwork() for staticNat and things are working as
expected. When plugin fails, StaticNat gets disassociated from tier.

Please let me know if I am missing something.

Thanks,
Suresh

pnfs support?

2015-01-14 Thread John Kinsella

Somebody in the silicon valley meetup just asked about pNFS [1] - I’d never 
heard of it, but sounds interesting and in theory would negate a lot of the 
ugliness of NFS.

Curious if anybody else is familiar with it, or if there’s a general interest 
in having support in ACS?

John
1: http://www.pnfs.com/

Secondary Storage Behavior

2015-01-14 Thread Kevin McGill

Hi All,

I'm working on a plugin to list all the data saved on a given secondary
storage. I've experienced some unexpected behavior in the process.

*Setup:*
 CS - 4.4.0
 Hypervisor - KVM
 Storage - 2 secondary storage NFS mount points (/mnt/secondary, and
/mnt/secondary2)

All installed on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS, on their own node in the same zone.

*Expected Behavior:*
 *System VM Templates* - When additional secondary storage's are added,
System Templates are copied to the new secondary storages in the same zone.
 *Iso's and Templates* - If public, loaded on ALL secondary storages in the
zone. If private, a secondary storage is chosen at random.
*Snapshots* - A secondary storage is chosen at random and all subsequent
snapshots will be on the secondary storage originally selected.

*Actual Behavior:*
 *System VM Templates* - When additional secondary storage's are added,
System Templates are reflected in the data base as being on both mount
points however when exploring the directories the system templates are NOT
on the newly added secondary storage. Investigating the
'template_store_ref' tables in the DB there are, in fact, two
template_store_ref entries for each secondary storage both of which
reference the same 'vm_template'. I've given CS overnight to maybe complete
the copy  or kick off any tasks to perform the copy but nothing came of it.
(causing my plugin to return UUID's of system templates that don't actually
reside on the given secondary storage)

 *Iso's*  (*Working as expected*)- If public, loaded on ALL secondary
storages in the zone. If private, a secondary storage is chosen at random.

*Templates* - Regardless of being Featured, Public, and/or Private a
secondary storage is chosen at random.

*Snapshots* - It appears a secondary storage is chosen at random.


Maybe I have a misunderstanding how secondary storage should work or maybe
I found a bug?

Any thoughts, suggestions or direction would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Kevin McGill

Re: pnfs support?

2015-01-14 Thread Marcus

Isn't that just a version of NFS 4.x? I believe it would "just work", at
least as a shared mount point with KVM.
On Jan 14, 2015 7:39 PM, "John Kinsella"  wrote:

> Somebody in the silicon valley meetup just asked about pNFS [1] - I’d
> never heard of it, but sounds interesting and in theory would negate a lot
> of the ugliness of NFS.
>
> Curious if anybody else is familiar with it, or if there’s a general
> interest in having support in ACS?
>
> John
> 1: http://www.pnfs.com/

Re: pnfs support?

2015-01-14 Thread Marcus

I remember it being similar to ceph (or gluster) in a lot of ways, and
there's already good support there as well. I haven't honestly looked at
nfs 4.x in about 4 years, other than keeping up on Linux kernel notes about
patches to it.
On Jan 14, 2015 9:10 PM, "Marcus"  wrote:

> Isn't that just a version of NFS 4.x? I believe it would "just work", at
> least as a shared mount point with KVM.
> On Jan 14, 2015 7:39 PM, "John Kinsella"  wrote:
>
>> Somebody in the silicon valley meetup just asked about pNFS [1] - I’d
>> never heard of it, but sounds interesting and in theory would negate a lot
>> of the ugliness of NFS.
>>
>> Curious if anybody else is familiar with it, or if there’s a general
>> interest in having support in ACS?
>>
>> John
>> 1: http://www.pnfs.com/
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...

Github user cloudtrends commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#discussion_r22991914
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java ---
@@ -894,6 +894,13 @@ protected void 
injectSshKeysIntoSystemVmIsoPatch(String publicKeyPath, String pr
 } else {
 command = new Script("/bin/bash", s_logger);
 }
+String osname = System.getProperty("os.name");
--- End diff --

Hi  karuturi ,

thanks for your kindly help , yes , I should use the isOnWindows function .

ChunFeng 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...

Github user cloudtrends commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/66#issuecomment-70043494
  
My test environment is on Windows 2008 & cygwin 64 bits version .

I can reoccur the error's by below python scripts:

---  cygwin_python_test.py ---
import os.path
import sys
file_name = sys.argv[1]
if os.path.exists(file_name):
print file_name
else:
print "can not find"
 end  --

test it by , touch a file : F:/sourcecode/python/a-exist.txt

First test with Backslash :  
$ python cygwin_python_test.py  F:\sourcecode\python\a-exist.txt
can not find

Then with slash : 

$ python cygwin_python_test.py  F:/sourcecode/python/a-exist.txt
F:/sourcecode/python/a-exist.txt



So , I thinks we should change the backslash to slash in windows 
environment .



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: under windows environment the publicKeyPa...