Re: Review Request 29246: CLOUDSTACK-8099: Fixed missing import in test_dynamic_compute_offering.py

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29246/#review65733
---


doesn't apply cleanly on master:


git am -3s 
/Users/talluri/Downloads/0001-CLOUDSTACK-8099-Fixed-missing-import-in-test_dynamic.patch
Applying: CLOUDSTACK-8099: Fixed missing import in 
test_dynamic_compute_offering.py
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M   test/integration/component/test_dynamic_compute_offering.py
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging test/integration/component/test_dynamic_compute_offering.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in 
test/integration/component/test_dynamic_compute_offering.py
Failed to merge in the changes.
Patch failed at 0001 CLOUDSTACK-8099: Fixed missing import in 
test_dynamic_compute_offering.py
The copy of the patch that failed is found in:
   /Users/talluri/asf/cloudstack/.git/rebase-apply/patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 19, 2014, 12:56 p.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29246/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 12:56 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8099
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8099
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Fixed the missing unittest import and pep8 issues.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/component/test_dynamic_compute_offering.py d96fd84 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29246/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Tested with python command and pylint.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashutosh Kelkar
> 
>

Re: Review Request 29245: CLOUDSTACK-8098: Fixed VM snapshot issue in smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29245/#review65734
---


git am -3s 
/Users/talluri/Downloads/0002-CLOUDSTACK-8098-Fixed-VM-snapshot-issue-in-smoke-tes.patch
Applying: CLOUDSTACK-8098: Fixed VM snapshot issue in smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M   test/integration/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging test/integration/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in 
test/integration/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py
Failed to merge in the changes.
Patch failed at 0001 CLOUDSTACK-8098: Fixed VM snapshot issue in 
smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py
The copy of the patch that failed is found in:
   /Users/talluri/asf/cloudstack/.git/rebase-apply/patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 19, 2014, 12:12 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29245/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 12:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8098
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8098
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> The test case fails while reverting the VM snapshot because the snapshot does 
> not contain the memory and VM is not in stopped state.
> 
> Solution:
> Stop the VM before reverting the snapshot
> 
> Also fixed pep8 issues and imports.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py 131da99 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29245/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Log:
> Test to create VM snapshots ... === TestName: test_01_create_vm_snapshots | 
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test to revert VM snapshots ... === TestName: test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | 
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test to delete vm snapshots ... === TestName: test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | 
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> 
> --
> Ran 3 tests in 759.977s
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Question about the userdata availability

[Nux!]

Hello,

I notice that when a VM is deployed with userdata, this userdata is then 
available at http://VR/latest/user-data indefinitely, subsequent reboots of the 
VM will get the userdata again and again.

When the userdata is retrieved is there a way to let the VR know it has been 
retrieved and can be deleted/deactivated?
Like there is the case with the root password script which send a 
"DomU_Request: saved_password" header to confirm it.

Lucian



--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

[ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

[Daan Hoogland]

H,

given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?

greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
-- 
Daan

Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

[Nux!]

+1 for backporting some fixes to 4.4, thank you Santa.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Daan Hoogland" 
> To: "dev" 
> Sent: Saturday, 20 December, 2014 11:09:06
> Subject: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

> H,
> 
> given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
> ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
> work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
> 
> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
> --
> Daan

Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

[sebgoa]

On Dec 20, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> H,
> 
> given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
> ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
> work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
> 

Hi Daan,

To keep it short: +1

Increasing our release cadence will force us to solve our development processes 
and infra issues.

> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
> -- 
> Daan

Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

[Daan Hoogland]

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:52 PM, sebgoa  wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>
...
> Increasing our release cadence will force us to solve our development 
> processes and infra issues.
exactly, I did't feel like it at all but this is kind of my reasoning as well.

>> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,

-- 
Daan

Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

[Tomasz Zięba]

+1
H,

given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?

greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
--
Daan

Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 I'm sure a lot of users may be comfortable in upgrading to a minor
release than a major release.

I've already backported most of the fixes that I did for 4.3 to 4.4
branch and have updated the CHANGES file here;

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.4

Last time I checked using git "ours" merge strategy, 4.3 cleanly merges
into 4.4 branch but probably not a right way to do merges.

On Saturday 20 December 2014 05:23 PM, Nux! wrote:

+1 for backporting some fixes to 4.4, thank you Santa.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Daan Hoogland" 
To: "dev" 
Sent: Saturday, 20 December, 2014 11:09:06
Subject: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3



H,

given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?

greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
--
Daan


--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3

[Marcus]

Until we have 4.5 out, I think it's fair to keep up with bugfix releases
for the current and previously released versions. I know we discussed the
support cycle at one point, but I don't have it handy right now.

Besides, there seems to be a lot of interest in 4.3 at the moment, and
investment in its stability.

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> +1 I'm sure a lot of users may be comfortable in upgrading to a minor
> release than a major release.
>
> I've already backported most of the fixes that I did for 4.3 to 4.4
> branch and have updated the CHANGES file here;
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
> blob;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.4
>
> Last time I checked using git "ours" merge strategy, 4.3 cleanly merges
> into 4.4 branch but probably not a right way to do merges.
>
>
> On Saturday 20 December 2014 05:23 PM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> +1 for backporting some fixes to 4.4, thank you Santa.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>
>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" 
>>> To: "dev" 
>>> Sent: Saturday, 20 December, 2014 11:09:06
>>> Subject: [ACS44] query: do we need/want a 4.4.3
>>>
>>
>>  H,
>>>
>>> given the vote for 4.3.2 that is out and the fact that it contains
>>> ixes that are not in 4.4.2 but will be in 4.5, Do we feel we should
>>> work on a 4.4.3 fix-release?
>>>
>>> greatfuly awaiting all and any comments and thoughts,
>>> --
>>> Daan
>>>
>>
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>