[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: added -f and a note about en...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: added -f and a note about en...

[terbolous]

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19#issuecomment-66961199
  
I did, lets hope I did it right :-) 
@runseb or @pdion891 (or anyone else): do you think this should be applied 
to 4.4/4.3 branches as well?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-simulator #1417

[jenkins]

See 

--
[...truncated 1088 lines...]
Running com.cloud.agent.dao.impl.PropertiesStorageTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.205 sec

Results :

Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[INFO] Compiling 28 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-framework-cluster ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[INFO] Compiling 5 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Erik Weber (terbolous)

[Erik Weber]

Thanks everyone :-)

-- 
Erik

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Congrats Erik!
>
> -Jayapal
>
> On 15-Dec-2014, at 11:15 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri <
> srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Erik!
> >
> > ~Talluri
> >
> > On 15/12/14 10:59 am, "Punith S"  wrote:
> >
> >> congrats Erik :)
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Congratulations, Erik!
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Rajani Karuturi 
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Congratulations Eric :)
> 
> 
>  On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Todd Pigram 
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Congrats!
> 
>  On Saturday, December 13, 2014, ilya musayev <
> >>> ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
>  >
>  wrote:
> 
> > Congrats and welcome!
> > On 12/13/14, 12:27 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> >
> >> Congrats Erik!
> >>
> >> On 14-Dec-2014, at 1:27 am, Nux! >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Gratulerer :-)
> >>>
> >>> Lucian
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>>
> >>> Nux!
> >>> www.nux.ro
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>>
>  From: "Pierre-Luc Dion" >
>  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
>  Sent: Saturday, 13 December, 2014 17:03:32
>  Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Erik Weber (terbolous)
>  The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>  has asked Erik Weber to become a committer and we are pleased to
>  announce that they have accepted.
> 
>  Erik is doing a great job on helping the community thru the
> >>> mailing
>  list.
>  He helped a lot on testing and troubleshooting new releases of
>  CloudStack
>  as well as contributing to the documentation. Thanks Erik and
> >>> Congrat!
> 
> 
>  Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
>  autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit
> >>> changes
> >>> and
>  eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch
>  submission process. Whether contributions are
> >>> development-related or
>  otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation
> >>> in
> >>> the
>  project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
> 
>  Please join me in congratulating Erik
> 
>  Pierre-Luc
>  on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
> 
> >>> Regards,
> >> Rohit Yadav
> >> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> >> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> >> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>  services
> >>
> >> IaaS Cloud Design & Build >> iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> >> CSForge ­ rapid IaaS deployment framework<
> >>> http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
> >
> >> CloudStack Consulting
> >> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>  http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-
> >> engineering/>
> >> CloudStack Infrastructure Support >> cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses >> cloudstack-training/>
> >>
> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>  intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> >>> views
>  or
> >> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> >>> necessarily
> >> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are
> >>> not
>  the
> >> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> >>> based
> >> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact
> >>> the
>  sender
> >> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue
> >>> Ltd
> >>> is
>  a
> >> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India
> >>> LLP
> >>> is
>  a
> >> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from
> >>> Shape
>  Blue
> >> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated
> >>> in
>  Brasil
> >> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty
> >>> Ltd
>  is
> >> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded
> >>> under
> >> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
>  --
> 
> 
>  Todd Pigram
>  http://about.me/ToddPigram
>  www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
>  @pigram86 on twitter
>  https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigra

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: added -f and a note about en...

[runseb]

Github user runseb commented on the pull request:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19#issuecomment-66966195
  
looks good on the 
docs.http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/qig.html
It's valid for 4.3 and 4.3 so go for it.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: Update virtual_machines.rst

[runseb]

Github user runseb commented on the pull request:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/21#issuecomment-66966586
  
Hi Radhika, this is a pr to master, but your pr# 22 for updating the 
service offering is for 4.4. Where should this go in ? 4.4, 4.5 and master 
…or just master ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.3.2

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi All,

I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up
for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SHA:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.3

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.2/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

For release testing procedure, please refer:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure

Building from source is encouraged but for those people who are not able to
build from source, a deb/rpm repository built out of this artifact is
available for your test participation:
http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/

To encourage participation instead of the usual 72 hours window the vote
will be open for 120 hours (5 days) and includes users MLs.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #789

[jenkins]

See 

Review Request 29046: CLOUDSTACK-8071: Fixed api key issue in test_snapshots_improvement.py

[Ashutosh Kelkar]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29046/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8071
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8071


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

The test case failed with "Api key does not map with valid account".
That is because the apiclient object was assigned previous account's value in 
another test case.
It is important that all test cases use different account and their respective 
api clients.
Made appropriate changes.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_snapshots_improvement.py 6638ddd 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29046/diff/


Testing
---

Test perform concurrent snapshots and migrate the vm from one host ... === 
TestName: test_01_concurrent_snapshots_live_migrate | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test stop running VM while performing concurrent snapshot on volume ... === 
TestName: test_02_stop_vm_concurrent_snapshots | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test while parent concurrent snapshot job in progress,create ... === TestName: 
test_03_concurrent_snapshots_create_template | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test while parent concurrent snapshot job in progress,create volume ... === 
TestName: test_04_concurrent_snapshots_create_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 4 tests in 1132.201s

OK


Thanks,

Ashutosh Kelkar

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-simulator #1418

[jenkins]

See 

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: added -f and a note about en...

[terbolous]

Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19#issuecomment-66980759
  
@hannibal20 Thank you for your contribution, your patch has been merged to 
all branches


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5-simulator #121

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-8072: Fixed NPE in deleting default ACL items in default 
ACL

--
[...truncated 1484 lines...]
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[INFO] Compiling 10 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[INFO] Compiling 2 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-secondary-storage ---
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-storage 
---
[INFO] Deleting 

 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-engine-storage ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-engine-storage ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-engine-storage ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-engine-storage ---
[INFO] Compiling 60 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-engine-storage ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-storage ---
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-engine-storage ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.StrategyPriorityTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.457 sec

Results :

Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] -

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

[runseb]

Github user runseb commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66985696
  
I will need to look into it. If we don't want to do a force push, then 
maybe we can wait to do this new -2 branch…because we would need to do it 
again and again…until we merge in master.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

DNS amplification attack to CloudStack VR running dnsmasq

[Indra Pramana]

Dear all,

We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.

Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by DNS
amplification attack? It seems that the DNS services on dnsmasq running on
the VRs are by default recursive, causing it to easily be targeted for DNS
amplification attack.

Any advice on how to overcome this?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #790

[jenkins]

See 

Re: DNS amplification attack to CloudStack VR running dnsmasq

[Andrija Panic]

Indra, did you observe this on Shared Network - I had same issue with
Shared Network (public IPs) in Advanced Zone.

I think VR for VPC is NOT a problem...

On 15 December 2014 at 13:13, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
>
> Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by DNS
> amplification attack? It seems that the DNS services on dnsmasq running on
> the VRs are by default recursive, causing it to easily be targeted for DNS
> amplification attack.
>
> Any advice on how to overcome this?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>


-- 

Andrija Panić

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

[scan-admin]

Hi,

Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found 
with Coverity Scan.

5 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
2 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent 
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.

New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 5 of 5 defect(s)


** CID 1258460:  RC: Questionable use of reference equality rather than calling 
equals  (FB.RC_REF_COMPARISON)
/server/src/com/cloud/network/rules/RulesManagerImpl.java: 1530 in 
com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.updatePortForwardingRule(long, 
java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Long, com.cloud.utils.net.Ip, java.lang.String, 
java.lang.Boolean)()

** CID 1258459:  UPM: Private method is never called  
(FB.UPM_UNCALLED_PRIVATE_METHOD)
/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2672 in 
com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(com.cloud.vm.VmWorkExtractVolume)()

** CID 1258458:  UrF: Unread field  (FB.URF_UNREAD_FIELD)
/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 70 in ()
/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 78 in ()
/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 74 in ()

** CID 1258457:  Dereference after null check  (FORWARD_NULL)
/server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java: 3614 in 
com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.registerSSHKeyPair(org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.ssh.RegisterSSHKeyPairCmd)()

** CID 1258456:  Dereference null return value  (NULL_RETURNS)
/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2127 in 
com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(long, long)()
/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2102 in 
com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(long, long)()



*** CID 1258460:  RC: Questionable use of reference equality rather than 
calling equals  (FB.RC_REF_COMPARISON)
/server/src/com/cloud/network/rules/RulesManagerImpl.java: 1530 in 
com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.updatePortForwardingRule(long, 
java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Long, com.cloud.utils.net.Ip, java.lang.String, 
java.lang.Boolean)()
1524 }
1525 
1526 if (forDisplay != null) {
1527 rule.setDisplay(forDisplay);
1528 }
1529 
>>> CID 1258460:  RC: Questionable use of reference equality rather than 
>>> calling equals  (FB.RC_REF_COMPARISON)
>>> Suspicious comparison of Integer references
1530 if (rule.getSourcePortStart() != rule.getSourcePortEnd() && 
privatePort != null) {
1531 throw new InvalidParameterValueException("Unable to update 
the private port of port forwarding rule as  the rule has port range : " + 
rule.getSourcePortStart() + " to " + rule.getSourcePortEnd());
1532 }
1533 if (virtualMachineId == null && vmGuestIp != null) {
1534 throw new InvalidParameterValueException("vmguestip should 
be set along with virtualmachineid");
1535 }


*** CID 1258459:  UPM: Private method is never called  
(FB.UPM_UNCALLED_PRIVATE_METHOD)
/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2672 in 
com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(com.cloud.vm.VmWorkExtractVolume)()
2666 
AsyncJobExecutionContext.getCurrentExecutionContext().joinJob(workJob.getId());
2667 
2668 return new VmJobSnapshotOutcome(workJob,snapshotId);
2669 }
2670 
2671 @ReflectionUse
>>> CID 1258459:  UPM: Private method is never called  
>>> (FB.UPM_UNCALLED_PRIVATE_METHOD)
>>> Private method 
>>> com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(VmWorkExtractVolume)
>>>  is never called
2672 private Pair 
orchestrateExtractVolume(VmWorkExtractVolume work) throws Exception {
2673 String volUrl = orchestrateExtractVolume(work.getVolumeId(), 
work.getZoneId());
2674 return new Pair(JobInfo.Status.SUCCEEDED, _jobMgr.marshallResultObject(volUrl));
2675 }
2676 
2677 @ReflectionUse


*** CID 1258458:  UrF: Unread field  (FB.URF_UNREAD_FIELD)
/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 70 in ()
64 
65 public void setFingerprint(String fingerprint) {
66 this.fingerprint = fingerprint;
67 }
68 
69 public void setAccountName(String accountName) {
>>> CID 1258458:  UrF: Unread field  (FB.URF_UNREAD_FIELD)
>>> Unread field: 
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.SSHKeyPairResponse.accountName
70 this.accountName = accountN

Re: DNS amplification attack to CloudStack VR running dnsmasq

[Jayapal Reddy Uradi]

Please refer the following ticket, It will help 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5494


Thanks,
jayapal
On 15-Dec-2014, at 5:52 PM, Andrija Panic  wrote:

> Indra, did you observe this on Shared Network - I had same issue with
> Shared Network (public IPs) in Advanced Zone.
> 
> I think VR for VPC is NOT a problem...
> 
> On 15 December 2014 at 13:13, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
>> 
>> Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by DNS
>> amplification attack? It seems that the DNS services on dnsmasq running on
>> the VRs are by default recursive, causing it to easily be targeted for DNS
>> amplification attack.
>> 
>> Any advice on how to overcome this?
>> 
>> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>> 
>> Cheers.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Andrija Panić

Re: DNS amplification attack to CloudStack VR running dnsmasq

[Wei ZHOU]

Please look at the comments for CLOUDSTACK-5494 and CLOUDSTACK-6432 on JIRA.
Maybe it helps.

-Wei

2014-12-15 13:13 GMT+01:00 Indra Pramana :

> Dear all,
>
> We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
>
> Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by DNS
> amplification attack? It seems that the DNS services on dnsmasq running on
> the VRs are by default recursive, causing it to easily be targeted for DNS
> amplification attack.
>
> Any advice on how to overcome this?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>

Re: DNS amplification attack to CloudStack VR running dnsmasq

[Indra Pramana]

Hi Andrija,

Yes, it's on a shared network with public IP in advanced zone. So far I
don't see similar issues on my VPC's VRs, but it could be because the IP is
not known, unlike the VR on a shared network which will automatically use
the second IP on the subnet after the gateway (e.g. x.x.x.2).

Is there a way to configure dnsmasq not to response to recursive queries?

Thank you.



On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Andrija Panic 
wrote:
>
> Indra, did you observe this on Shared Network - I had same issue with
> Shared Network (public IPs) in Advanced Zone.
>
> I think VR for VPC is NOT a problem...
>
> On 15 December 2014 at 13:13, Indra Pramana  wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
> >
> > Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by DNS
> > amplification attack? It seems that the DNS services on dnsmasq running
> on
> > the VRs are by default recursive, causing it to easily be targeted for
> DNS
> > amplification attack.
> >
> > Any advice on how to overcome this?
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>

Re: DNS amplification attack to CloudStack VR running dnsmasq

[Andrija Panic]

you got response with BUGs on jira and temp fix is there...
so, yes

On 15 December 2014 at 13:49, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>
> Hi Andrija,
>
> Yes, it's on a shared network with public IP in advanced zone. So far I
> don't see similar issues on my VPC's VRs, but it could be because the IP is
> not known, unlike the VR on a shared network which will automatically use
> the second IP on the subnet after the gateway (e.g. x.x.x.2).
>
> Is there a way to configure dnsmasq not to response to recursive queries?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Andrija Panic 
> wrote:
> >
> > Indra, did you observe this on Shared Network - I had same issue with
> > Shared Network (public IPs) in Advanced Zone.
> >
> > I think VR for VPC is NOT a problem...
> >
> > On 15 December 2014 at 13:13, Indra Pramana  wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
> > >
> > > Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by
> DNS
> > > amplification attack? It seems that the DNS services on dnsmasq running
> > on
> > > the VRs are by default recursive, causing it to easily be targeted for
> > DNS
> > > amplification attack.
> > >
> > > Any advice on how to overcome this?
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>


-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

[Daan Hoogland]

H fellow devs,
We got a bad report here: 5 new, 2 fixed.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:08 PM,   wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found 
> with Coverity Scan.
>
> 5 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
> 2 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the 
> recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
>
> New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
> Showing 5 of 5 defect(s)
>
>
> ** CID 1258460:  RC: Questionable use of reference equality rather than 
> calling equals  (FB.RC_REF_COMPARISON)
> /server/src/com/cloud/network/rules/RulesManagerImpl.java: 1530 in 
> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.updatePortForwardingRule(long, 
> java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Long, com.cloud.utils.net.Ip, java.lang.String, 
> java.lang.Boolean)()
>
> ** CID 1258459:  UPM: Private method is never called  
> (FB.UPM_UNCALLED_PRIVATE_METHOD)
> /server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2672 in 
> com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(com.cloud.vm.VmWorkExtractVolume)()
>
> ** CID 1258458:  UrF: Unread field  (FB.URF_UNREAD_FIELD)
> /api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 70 in ()
> /api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 78 in ()
> /api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 74 in ()
>
> ** CID 1258457:  Dereference after null check  (FORWARD_NULL)
> /server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java: 3614 in 
> com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.registerSSHKeyPair(org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.ssh.RegisterSSHKeyPairCmd)()
>
> ** CID 1258456:  Dereference null return value  (NULL_RETURNS)
> /server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2127 in 
> com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(long, long)()
> /server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2102 in 
> com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(long, long)()
>
>
> 
> *** CID 1258460:  RC: Questionable use of reference equality rather than 
> calling equals  (FB.RC_REF_COMPARISON)
> /server/src/com/cloud/network/rules/RulesManagerImpl.java: 1530 in 
> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.updatePortForwardingRule(long, 
> java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Long, com.cloud.utils.net.Ip, java.lang.String, 
> java.lang.Boolean)()
> 1524 }
> 1525
> 1526 if (forDisplay != null) {
> 1527 rule.setDisplay(forDisplay);
> 1528 }
> 1529
 CID 1258460:  RC: Questionable use of reference equality rather than 
 calling equals  (FB.RC_REF_COMPARISON)
 Suspicious comparison of Integer references
> 1530 if (rule.getSourcePortStart() != rule.getSourcePortEnd() && 
> privatePort != null) {
> 1531 throw new InvalidParameterValueException("Unable to 
> update the private port of port forwarding rule as  the rule has port range : 
> " + rule.getSourcePortStart() + " to " + rule.getSourcePortEnd());
> 1532 }
> 1533 if (virtualMachineId == null && vmGuestIp != null) {
> 1534 throw new InvalidParameterValueException("vmguestip 
> should be set along with virtualmachineid");
> 1535 }
>
> 
> *** CID 1258459:  UPM: Private method is never called  
> (FB.UPM_UNCALLED_PRIVATE_METHOD)
> /server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java: 2672 in 
> com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(com.cloud.vm.VmWorkExtractVolume)()
> 2666 
> AsyncJobExecutionContext.getCurrentExecutionContext().joinJob(workJob.getId());
> 2667
> 2668 return new VmJobSnapshotOutcome(workJob,snapshotId);
> 2669 }
> 2670
> 2671 @ReflectionUse
 CID 1258459:  UPM: Private method is never called  
 (FB.UPM_UNCALLED_PRIVATE_METHOD)
 Private method 
 com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateExtractVolume(VmWorkExtractVolume)
  is never called
> 2672 private Pair 
> orchestrateExtractVolume(VmWorkExtractVolume work) throws Exception {
> 2673 String volUrl = orchestrateExtractVolume(work.getVolumeId(), 
> work.getZoneId());
> 2674 return new Pair String>(JobInfo.Status.SUCCEEDED, _jobMgr.marshallResultObject(volUrl));
> 2675 }
> 2676
> 2677 @ReflectionUse
>
> 
> *** CID 1258458:  UrF: Unread field  (FB.URF_UNREAD_FIELD)
> /api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java: 70 in ()
> 64
> 65 public void setFingerprint(String fingerprint) {
> 66 this.fingerprint = fingerprint;
> 67 }
> 68
>

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #791

[jenkins]

See 

Re: Redundant VPC routers

[Ian Southam]

Hi Karl,

On 12 Dec 2014, at 15:51, Karl Harris 
mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote:

We have looked at the Java refactoring work. I seems most of that work was a 
true refactoring in that it didn't change the interface used to manipulate the 
systemvm's.

We could not find any posted changes to the systemvm's, unless we are looking 
in the wrong place. ;-)


Daan asked me to drop you a mail and explain a little bit where we have been 
concentrating our efforts.

Most of the Java refactor is indeed what you saw, a refactor to make the code 
more logical, eliminate duplication get the methods better aligned with the 
classes and so on but that is not all.

We have also introduced a new way of sending the configuration to the systemvm 
itself.  Instead of calling scripts, a json file is passed to the server and 
processed.

The processing is done by some python code (to be found in /opt/cloud/bin)

The idea is that it is a self healing convergence based system.  We had planned 
to use chef solo to do this but, it was just too slow.

If you spin up our branch and make your self a network and an instance, log on 
to the VR and take a look in /etc/cloudstack and /var/cache/cloud/processed

It would be really interesting to use to maybe share ideas and work.  It would 
be such a shame if we are duplicating each other’s efforts!

--
Regards
Ian

Re: remove a not existing VM

[Alireza Eskandari]

Thanks MatthewI set vm state in vm_instance table to Expunging and run expunge 
command from UI successfully.
I notice that I changed state of active snapshots of this instace from 
"vm_snapshots" table to "Expunging" and fill "removed" field.


  From: Matthew Midgett 
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
 Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 8:07 PM
 Subject: RE: remove a not existing VM
   
If the vm is not on the hypervisor then set vm_instance to Expunged for that vm 
in MySql. Please next time tell us what version of ACS and hypervisor and 
version. Also logs will help us find your problem. 
/var/log/cloudstack/management/ and the management log and cataylina log are 
important. 


Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III

 Original message From: Alireza Eskandari 
 Date:12/14/2014  2:00 AM  
(GMT-05:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: remove 
a not existing VM 
HiI can't remove an instance from CS that doesn't exist in hypervisor and 
deleted already.Do you have any idea?Thanks

  

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.3.2

[Mike Tutkowski]

Just an FYI that I'll have to abstain from voting on this one as I'm still
in the process of testing the current 4.5.0 RC.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up
> for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SHA:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
> Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4
>
> List of changes:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.3
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.2/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> For release testing procedure, please refer:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Building from source is encouraged but for those people who are not able to
> build from source, a deb/rpm repository built out of this artifact is
> available for your test participation:
> http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/
>
> To encourage participation instead of the usual 72 hours window the vote
> will be open for 120 hours (5 days) and includes users MLs.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: use directIO flags when dd'ing template

[remibergsma]

GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/58

use directIO flags when dd'ing template

This makes sure dom0 in xenserver doesn't get hammered
when copying templates. It doesn't make sense to use
the cache of dom0 as the template does not fit in
memory. The directIO flags prevents it from trying.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/58.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #58


commit 4e1527e8787d14d3c7d3a6782b80cbf36a8c
Author: Remi Bergsma 
Date:   2014-12-15T15:36:35Z

use directIO flags when dd'ing template

This makes sure dom0 in xenserver doesn't get hammered
when copying templates. It doesn't make sense to use
the cache of dom0 as the template does not fit in
memory. The directIO flags prevent it from trying.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Erik Weber (terbolous)

[Giles Sirett]

Great news - congratulations Erik

Kind Regards
Giles

D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com




-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pdion...@apache.org]
Sent: 13 December 2014 17:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Erik Weber (terbolous)

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Erik 
Weber to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have 
accepted.

Erik is doing a great job on helping the community thru the mailing list.
He helped a lot on testing and troubleshooting new releases of CloudStack as 
well as contributing to the documentation. Thanks Erik and Congrat!


Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For 
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to 
have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether 
contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a 
contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and 
the Apache Way.

Please join me in congratulating Erik

Pierre-Luc
on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: Update virtual_machines.rst

[radhikapc]

Github user radhikapc commented on the pull request:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/21#issuecomment-67034172
  
This document should go into Master and 4.5.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Potential feature: Firewall comments

[Logan Barfield]

Currently in the UI and API it can be difficult to tell what exactly a
particular firewall rule is being used for.  I know that it is currently
possible to add "tags" to firewall rules, but that seems suboptimal from an
ease-of-use standpoint.

Would it be feasible to add a "comment" or "description" field for firewall
rules in advanced zones?  It could be added as an extra DB column, and
appear in the UI and listFirewallRules API call (unless it's left blank).
In theory the description/comment could also be added to the IPtables rule
on the VR.

This could probably also be applied to security groups.


Thoughts, comments?

[OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

Happy holidays everyone. I will be offline from 12/18 - 12/28.

Thanks
Animesh

Re: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28

[Nux!]

Dec 2018 to Dec 2028? :-D

Happy xmas & new year

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 15 December, 2014 23:07:38
> Subject: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28

> Happy holidays everyone. I will be offline from 12/18 - 12/28.
> 
> Thanks
> Animesh

Re: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28

[Daan Hoogland]

HaHa, make fun of the American, and this when he tries to give us
useful date formats (high significance first).

Have a good time of Animesh,

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Nux!  wrote:
> Dec 2018 to Dec 2028? :-D
>
> Happy xmas & new year
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 15 December, 2014 23:07:38
>> Subject: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28
>
>> Happy holidays everyone. I will be offline from 12/18 - 12/28.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Animesh



-- 
Daan

Re: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

LOL!

Enjoy, all !

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:
>
> HaHa, make fun of the American, and this when he tries to give us
> useful date formats (high significance first).
>
> Have a good time of Animesh,
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Nux!  wrote:
> > Dec 2018 to Dec 2028? :-D
> >
> > Happy xmas & new year
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Sent: Monday, 15 December, 2014 23:07:38
> >> Subject: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28
> >
> >> Happy holidays everyone. I will be offline from 12/18 - 12/28.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Animesh
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.3.2

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Kudos Rohit for the package repo in RC!
I'll test the upgrade path to 4.5 from it and perform some tests against
4.3.2rc

 PL


On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> Just an FYI that I'll have to abstain from voting on this one as I'm still
> in the process of testing the current 4.5.0 RC.
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up
> > for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SHA:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
> > Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4
> >
> > List of changes:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.3
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.2/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > For release testing procedure, please refer:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
> >
> > Building from source is encouraged but for those people who are not able
> to
> > build from source, a deb/rpm repository built out of this artifact is
> > available for your test participation:
> > http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/
> >
> > To encourage participation instead of the usual 72 hours window the vote
> > will be open for 120 hours (5 days) and includes users MLs.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohit Yadav
> >
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> *™*
>

RE: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

I wish I could take that much time off.


> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 4:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28
> 
> Dec 2018 to Dec 2028? :-D
> 
> Happy xmas & new year
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Animesh Chaturvedi" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, 15 December, 2014 23:07:38
> > Subject: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28
> 
> > Happy holidays everyone. I will be offline from 12/18 - 12/28.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Animesh

Re: Potential feature: Firewall comments

[Jayapal Reddy Uradi]

+1

When there are large set of rules, It will be useful. 

Thanks,
Jayapal
On 16-Dec-2014, at 4:17 AM, Logan Barfield  wrote:

> Currently in the UI and API it can be difficult to tell what exactly a
> particular firewall rule is being used for.  I know that it is currently
> possible to add "tags" to firewall rules, but that seems suboptimal from an
> ease-of-use standpoint.
> 
> Would it be feasible to add a "comment" or "description" field for firewall
> rules in advanced zones?  It could be added as an extra DB column, and
> appear in the UI and listFirewallRules API call (unless it's left blank).
> In theory the description/comment could also be added to the IPtables rule
> on the VR.
> 
> This could probably also be applied to security groups.
> 
> 
> Thoughts, comments?

Review Request 29087: Add Feature Root Disk Resize for XenServer 6.2.0

[Yitao Jiang]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29087/
---

Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski and Min Chen.


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

Currently, only KVM support root disk resize feature in ACS 4.4.1.
As we are now using Xenserver 6.2.0, and it's so convient feature,
So we do some hack.


Diffs
-

  
plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/XenServerStorageProcessor.java
 e326770 
  server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 4fdacd5 
  ui/scripts/instanceWizard.js 9df6ecc 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29087/diff/


Testing
---

Mgmt Server : CentOS release 6.4 (Final)
ACS: 4.4.1
Primary & Secondary : NFS


Thanks,

Yitao Jiang

Re: Status of Root Disk Resize for XenServer

[Yitao Jiang]

Hi,
I just upload a patch which implements the root -resize feature within
xenserver 6.2.0.

Hopes can help.


---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Matthew Midgett <
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Root disk resize during deployment is a huge advantage when you don't have
> 10GB networking. Who should we contact to see if some sponsorship could be
> put together to make the code happen for XenServer and ACS 4.4. The XAPI
> can
> resize the root disk so we only need code to tell it that it can. Once the
> disk is resized then it's up to cloud-init or the administrator to take
> care
> of resizing the partitions.
>
>
>
> I've been watching
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181?jql=text%20~%20%22root
> %20disk%20resize%22 and it says resolved but it not for all hypervisors.
>
>
>
> Will someone direct me on to the correct path?
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Midgett
>
> Trick Solutions
>
> 143 Jenny Marie Rd
>
> Mooresville NC,28115
>
> 336-618-7425 Office
>
> 704-728-5644 Cell
>
> www.trick-solutions.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Review Request 28748: CLOUDSTACK-8021: Change test cases to use host information from configurableData section in test_data.py

[Gaurav Aradhye]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28748/
---

(Updated Dec. 16, 2014, 11:41 a.m.)


Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8021
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8021


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

Changing few test cases to use the host username, password from the 
configurableData section in test_data.py. Earlier they were reading the hard 
coded value. Removed old host_password value from test_data.py

Also fixed few pep8 issues.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_deploy_vgpu_vm.py 0284eab 
  test/integration/component/test_persistent_networks.py 4b1bc7a 
  test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm.py f13ac92 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28748/diff/


Testing
---

Tested test_persistent_networks.py
Other test cases not testable right now. Change is only in reading the config 
value.


File Attachments (updated)


Patch for 4.5
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/12/16/3251644a-f44e-49b1-af90-78a10492cd71__0001-CLOUDSTACK-8021-Change-test-cases-to-use-host-inform.patch


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye