Re: Marvin Package?

2014-09-21 Thread Ian Duffy
Uploaded a binary for this to pypi yesterday based of the 4.4 branch.

https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin/4.4.1

pip install cloudstack-marvin now works.

I tested on centos hit some issues around running on python 2.6 with
pycrypto Needed to install gmp-devel before python-setuptools,
python-pip and marvin then things were OK.

I believe its due to a conflict with yums pycrypto and pips pycrypto.

On 30 July 2014 10:40, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

>
> Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
>
>> please add me as well. username "santhoshe"
>>
>
> Done.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>> Santhosh
>> 
>> From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 5:28 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Marvin Package?
>>
>> Ian Duffy wrote:
>>
>>> Ian and other committers who may be interested, let me know your pypi

>>> username I'll add you on the admin list as well.
>>>
>>> Sure, imduffy15 is my pypi username.
>>>
>>
>> Done, feel free to help release marvin in future.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>> On 29 July 2014 22:08, Rohit Yadav   wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Ian,

 Thanks for the find, I think since sharing things on pypi does not need
 to be officially voted I think we can go ahead and release marvin for
 past CloudStack releases for at least 4.4.0

 Hugo, PMC and other can comment on the releasing part?

 I went ahead and added cloudmonkey pypi module owners to this:
 https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin

 Ian and other committers who may be interested, let me know your pypi
 username I'll add you on the admin list as well.

 Regards.


 Ian Duffy wrote:

  I see the pypi entry now goes to 404:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin/
>
> Came we go ahead and set the version of marvin to 4.4 and do a release?
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>
> On 28 July 2014 18:50, Ian Duffywrote:
>
>+1 on same version, makes sense to me.
>
>> On 28 July 2014 13:55, Hugo Trippaerswrote:
>>
>>Sounds good to me.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Hugo
>>>
>>> On 28 jul. 2014, at 14:33, Rohit Yadav
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi Hugo,
>>>
 Does it make sense to simply use the same version as CloudStack from
 next Marvin releases? This is because with each CloudStack release
 and
 possible API changes, the Marvin cloudstackAPI python module will
 change. Other than that there are couple of API
 marshaling/unmarshaling,
 signature logic and HTTP stuff but that too changes with CloudStack.

 Regards.

 Hugo Trippaers wrote:

  Before we start with Marvin releases we should discuss versioning i
>
>  think.
 At the moment all marvin packages are shipped with version 1.0, if
 we
 want to take marvin releases serious we need to start with versions

>>> whenever the something in marvin changes.
>>>
>>>  Cheers.
>
> Hugo
>
>
> On 28 jul. 2014, at 14:20, Rohit Yadav
>
>  wrote:
 Hi,

> I think since the Marvin package tightly depends on CloudStack,
>> it's
>> release can happen along with CloudStack release.
>>
>> @Prasanna -- Can you add couple of people as owner/admins to the
>> cloudstack-marvin pypi package?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>  I wonder if we need to move this to its own release as we did
>>> with
>>>
>>>  cloudmonkey?
>>
> --David

> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Ian Duffy
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>  I believe no, atleast the latest changes under master or
 4.4-forward.

>>> Alright, Thanks. I believe all changes for it within 4.4-forward

> should now
>>>
>> be in 4.4?

> @Prasanna since you hold the account on pypi holding the name
 "cloudstack-marvin" can you make the upload?
 Tar at:

  http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.
>>> 4-marvin/
>>>
>> Thanks,

> Ian


 On 28 July 2014 01:52, Santhosh Edukulla<

  santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com>
>>>
>> wrote:

>I believe no, atleast the latest changes under master or
 4.4-forward.

>>> Santhosh

> 
> From: Ian Duffy [i...@ianduffy.ie]
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:47 PM
> To: CloudStack Dev; Santhosh Edukulla; Prasan

[ACS441] merge request (CLOUDSTACK-401)

2014-09-21 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Hi Daan,

I've made a minor hotfix: origin/hotfix/4.4-401  (ui help popup texts)
is it possible to merge it in 4.4.1 if it's not too late?

Thanks,


*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683

*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_


[ACS441] merge request: origin/hotfix/4.4-generateapi

2014-09-21 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Hi Daan,

Could you merge this branch (1 commit)  updating generation of API docs to
4.4.1?
version is hardcoded into files :-(
branch = origin/hotfix/4.4-generateapi

Thanks

*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683

*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_


[ACS441] merge request (CLOUDSTACK-1632)

2014-09-21 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Hi Daan,

I've correct API description typos: origin/hotfix/4.4-1632.
Is is possible to merge this into 4.4.1?

Thank you!

*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683

*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_


How to start a guest VM on different host?

2014-09-21 Thread Indra Pramana
Dear all,

When I stop and then start back a guest VM, CloudStack will try to start it
back on the same hypervisor host where the VM was hosted previously.

Is it possible for me to start a guest VM on a specific other hypervisor
host?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.


Re: Marvin Package?

2014-09-21 Thread David Nalley
Sorry for not catching this earlier; I just saw Ian's message and read
the rest of this thread.

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Thanks for the find, I think since sharing things on pypi does not need
> to be officially voted I think we can go ahead and release marvin for
> past CloudStack releases for at least 4.4.0
>

Sharing things on pypi is a distribution channel for end users -  if
it's done by the project, it must be voted on and released. If it's
done by an individual, they can't post anything they want, but we'll
have to insist that they don't use our trademarks (e.g. both Marvin
and CloudStack will need to be removed from the package name)

> Hugo, PMC and other can comment on the releasing part?
>
> I went ahead and added cloudmonkey pypi module owners to this:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin
>
> Ian and other committers who may be interested, let me know your pypi
> username I'll add you on the admin list as well.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> Ian Duffy wrote:
>>
>> I see the pypi entry now goes to 404:
>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin/
>>
>> Came we go ahead and set the version of marvin to 4.4 and do a release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>>
>> On 28 July 2014 18:50, Ian Duffy  wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on same version, makes sense to me.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28 July 2014 13:55, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:
>>>
 Sounds good to me.

 Cheers,

 Hugo

 On 28 jul. 2014, at 14:33, Rohit Yadav
 wrote:

> Hi Hugo,
>
> Does it make sense to simply use the same version as CloudStack from
> next Marvin releases? This is because with each CloudStack release and
> possible API changes, the Marvin cloudstackAPI python module will
> change. Other than that there are couple of API
> marshaling/unmarshaling,
> signature logic and HTTP stuff but that too changes with CloudStack.
>
> Regards.
>
> Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>>
>> Before we start with Marvin releases we should discuss versioning i

 think.
>>
>> At the moment all marvin packages are shipped with version 1.0, if we

 want to take marvin releases serious we need to start with versions
 whenever the something in marvin changes.
>>
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> Hugo
>>
>>
>> On 28 jul. 2014, at 14:20, Rohit Yadav

   wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think since the Marvin package tightly depends on CloudStack, it's
>>> release can happen along with CloudStack release.
>>>
>>> @Prasanna -- Can you add couple of people as owner/admins to the
>>> cloudstack-marvin pypi package?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> David Nalley wrote:

 I wonder if we need to move this to its own release as we did with

 cloudmonkey?

 --David

 On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Ian Duffy
 wrote:
>>
>> I believe no, atleast the latest changes under master or

 4.4-forward.
>
> Alright, Thanks. I believe all changes for it within 4.4-forward

 should now
>
> be in 4.4?
>
> @Prasanna since you hold the account on pypi holding the name
> "cloudstack-marvin" can you make the upload?
> Tar at:

 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-marvin/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
>
>
> On 28 July 2014 01:52, Santhosh Edukulla<

 santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>> I believe no, atleast the latest changes under master or

 4.4-forward.
>>
>> Santhosh
>> 
>> From: Ian Duffy [i...@ianduffy.ie]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:47 PM
>> To: CloudStack Dev; Santhosh Edukulla; Prasanna Santhanam
>> Subject: Marvin Package?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do we have a binary of marvin that users can download independent

 to the
>>
>> management server rpms? Other than grabbing the tar.gz from

 jenkins.
>>
>> I was hoping it would be published on pypi. Prasanna seems to have

 a page
>>
>> for it there but there are no uploads:
>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin/0.1.0
>>
>> Ideally I want pip install cloudstack-marvin or easy_install
>> cloudstack-marvin.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>> --
>>> Rohit Yadav
>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>> M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>>
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related

 services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design&   Build<

 http://shapeblue.com/iaa

Re: Marvin Package?

2014-09-21 Thread David Nalley
Ian, my apologies for not seeing the thread back in July.

Unfortunately this is going to need to be removed. CloudStack hasn't
voted on or released 4.4.1 yet, which would include Marvin. 4.4.0 is
fair game as is 4.3.1, etc.

--David



On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> Uploaded a binary for this to pypi yesterday based of the 4.4 branch.
>
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin/4.4.1
>
> pip install cloudstack-marvin now works.
>
> I tested on centos hit some issues around running on python 2.6 with
> pycrypto Needed to install gmp-devel before python-setuptools,
> python-pip and marvin then things were OK.
>
> I believe its due to a conflict with yums pycrypto and pips pycrypto.
>
> On 30 July 2014 10:40, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
>>
>> Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
>>
>>> please add me as well. username "santhoshe"
>>>
>>
>> Done.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Santhosh
>>> 
>>> From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 5:28 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Marvin Package?
>>>
>>> Ian Duffy wrote:
>>>
 Ian and other committers who may be interested, let me know your pypi
>
 username I'll add you on the admin list as well.

 Sure, imduffy15 is my pypi username.

>>>
>>> Done, feel free to help release marvin in future.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>>
 On 29 July 2014 22:08, Rohit Yadav   wrote:

  Hi Ian,
>
> Thanks for the find, I think since sharing things on pypi does not need
> to be officially voted I think we can go ahead and release marvin for
> past CloudStack releases for at least 4.4.0
>
> Hugo, PMC and other can comment on the releasing part?
>
> I went ahead and added cloudmonkey pypi module owners to this:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin
>
> Ian and other committers who may be interested, let me know your pypi
> username I'll add you on the admin list as well.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> Ian Duffy wrote:
>
>  I see the pypi entry now goes to 404:
>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudstack-marvin/
>>
>> Came we go ahead and set the version of marvin to 4.4 and do a release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>>
>> On 28 July 2014 18:50, Ian Duffywrote:
>>
>>+1 on same version, makes sense to me.
>>
>>> On 28 July 2014 13:55, Hugo Trippaerswrote:
>>>
>>>Sounds good to me.
>>>
 Cheers,

 Hugo

 On 28 jul. 2014, at 14:33, Rohit Yadav
wrote:

Hi Hugo,

> Does it make sense to simply use the same version as CloudStack from
> next Marvin releases? This is because with each CloudStack release
> and
> possible API changes, the Marvin cloudstackAPI python module will
> change. Other than that there are couple of API
> marshaling/unmarshaling,
> signature logic and HTTP stuff but that too changes with CloudStack.
>
> Regards.
>
> Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>
>  Before we start with Marvin releases we should discuss versioning i
>>
>>  think.
> At the moment all marvin packages are shipped with version 1.0, if
> we
> want to take marvin releases serious we need to start with versions
>
 whenever the something in marvin changes.

  Cheers.
>>
>> Hugo
>>
>>
>> On 28 jul. 2014, at 14:20, Rohit Yadav
>>
>>  wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I think since the Marvin package tightly depends on CloudStack,
>>> it's
>>> release can happen along with CloudStack release.
>>>
>>> @Prasanna -- Can you add couple of people as owner/admins to the
>>> cloudstack-marvin pypi package?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> David Nalley wrote:
>>>
>>>  I wonder if we need to move this to its own release as we did
 with

  cloudmonkey?
>>>
>> --David
>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Ian Duffy
wrote:

  I believe no, atleast the latest changes under master or
> 4.4-forward.
>
 Alright, Thanks. I believe all changes for it within 4.4-forward
>
>> should now

>>> be in 4.4?
>
>> @Prasanna since you hold the account on pypi holding the name
> "cloudstack-marvin" can you make the upload?
> Tar at:
>
>  http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.
 4-marvin/

>>> Thanks,
>
>> Ian
>
>
> On 28 July 2014 01:52

RE: How to start a guest VM on different host?

2014-09-21 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Hi,

Try using host tagging feature supported by CloudStack. I am not sure whether 
the tagging will be applicable for already deployed vms. You can give a try.

-Sanjeev

-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] 
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 7:57 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: How to start a guest VM on different host?

Dear all,

When I stop and then start back a guest VM, CloudStack will try to start it 
back on the same hypervisor host where the VM was hosted previously.

Is it possible for me to start a guest VM on a specific other hypervisor host?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.


RE: How to start a guest VM on different host?

2014-09-21 Thread Anshul Gangwar
If you are root admin, you can use startVirtualMachine api call with hostId 
parameter

https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.3/root_admin/startVirtualMachine.html

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 9:44 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to start a guest VM on different host?

Hi,

Try using host tagging feature supported by CloudStack. I am not sure whether 
the tagging will be applicable for already deployed vms. You can give a try.

-Sanjeev

-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] 
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 7:57 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: How to start a guest VM on different host?

Dear all,

When I stop and then start back a guest VM, CloudStack will try to start it 
back on the same hypervisor host where the VM was hosted previously.

Is it possible for me to start a guest VM on a specific other hypervisor host?

Looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.


Re: How to start a guest VM on different host?

2014-09-21 Thread Indra Pramana
Hi Sanjeev and Anshul,

Good day to you, and thank you for your replies.

Sanjeev - yes, host tagging works by creating a new service compute
offering with the host tag, change the guest VM's service compute offering
and start the guest VM. I have just tested earlier. However, this will
remove the HA functionality since if that particular host is down, the
guest VM will not be started on other available hosts because of the host
tag, so this is not the best solution IMHO.

Anshul - thanks for the info, will try this. If this works, then this would
be the best solution.

Thank you.


On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Anshul Gangwar 
wrote:

> If you are root admin, you can use startVirtualMachine api call with
> hostId parameter
>
>
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.3/root_admin/startVirtualMachine.html
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 9:44 AM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: How to start a guest VM on different host?
>
> Hi,
>
> Try using host tagging feature supported by CloudStack. I am not sure
> whether the tagging will be applicable for already deployed vms. You can
> give a try.
>
> -Sanjeev
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 7:57 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: How to start a guest VM on different host?
>
> Dear all,
>
> When I stop and then start back a guest VM, CloudStack will try to start
> it back on the same hypervisor host where the VM was hosted previously.
>
> Is it possible for me to start a guest VM on a specific other hypervisor
> host?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>


Re: [VMWARE SETUP ERROR] Error seeing in brining up System VMs with Vmware setup with CS server

2014-09-21 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Mike,

  Lets wait for sometime, till someone from Citrix respond.
I am working from Garage and not from Citrix and do not have quick access to 
VMWare setup.
In case we are still not sure about the VMWare template then we can plan a more 
collaborative effort by participating in a debugging session.
I can pass on the information on issues that I have seen, we can then put some 
joint effort to fix these followed by documenting/automating these.

I still hope that Sateesh or someone form Citrix respond on the latex VMware 
templates and procedure.

-abhi

On 21-Sep-2014, at 3:57 am, Mike Tutkowski  wrote:

> So, I just tried with this system template and got (essentially) the same
> results.
> 
> I say "essentially" because with this template I never arrived at a login
> prompt (it just shut down at some point in the boot stage). With the other
> template, I was brought to the login prompt and then the VM was shut down.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Abhinandan Prateek 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> VMWare Template:
>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-vmware.ova
>> Checksum: 3106a79a4ce66cd7f6a7c50e93f2db57
>> 
>> Last I checked systemvm.iso will not get mounted.
>> 
>> -abhi
>> 
>> On 20-Sep-2014, at 8:32 am, Mike Tutkowski 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Can you provide me a link to the Citrix ones?
>>> 
>>> Does this mean the standard build for VMware on Jenkins in terms of the
>>> system template is pretty much useless when it comes to the virtual
>> router?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Abhinandan Prateek <
>> agneya2...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 The VMWare template build by jenkins job does not have VMWare tools
 installed on it.
 Use the ones provided by Citrix.
 
 On 19-Sep-2014, at 9:31 pm, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
 wrote:
 
> 
 
>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-master-vmware.ova
> 
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Erik Weber 
>> wrote:
> 
>> Which systemvm template are you using?
>> 
>> Erik
>> 19. sep. 2014 03:47 skrev "Mike Tutkowski" <
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> følgende:
>> 
>>> Actually, the virtual router says it requires an upgrade.
>>> 
>>> I think I can just turn that check off and re-run my create-VM test.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>> 
 OK, I checked in a fix for this:
 
 
 
>>> 
>> 
 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=18e5aa116e99906f24a292bf7546809e05c72ec2;hp=7537c33bcdda65672fdd8f81509e6885aa536932
 
 I did notice that both before and after my fix that the virtual
>> router
>> is
 NOT coming up.
 
 The system VM being cloned and the starting of the VM looks fine. It
>> gets
 to the command prompt and then a little while later is shut down and
 restarted. I get an error in the GUI indicating that my VM
>> deployment
 failed.
 
 I don't personally know a whole lot about how the virtual router
>> code
 works, so we should pass that on to an appropriate developer.
 
 On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
 
> Just destroyed and re-created my env from scratch without
> 8bb4022f3729154f85036c4a7f55e2de783e4909 and it works fine.
> 
> I think I know what the author was intending with the code that is
> causing the problem, so I'll go ahead and put in what I think is a
>> fix,
> re-create my env, and see if it works.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:26 PM, ilya musayev <
 ilya.musa...@gmail.com
>>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Thank you Mike, please keep us posted.
>> 
>> Regards
>> ilya
>> 
>> On 9/18/14, 4:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>> 
>> Little clarification on this:
>> 
>> "The dsName is derived from the UUID of the datastore."
>> 
>> I mean that the dsName is derived from the UUID primary storage in
>> the
>> DB.
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Just a little update on this:
>>> 
>>> The problem doesn't seem to have anything to do with "managed"
>>> storage code that was introduced back in March.
>>> 
>>> The dsName is derived from the UUID of the datastore. This leads
>> to a
>>> null being returned from
>>> diskInfoBuilder.getDiskInfoByBackingFileBaseName,
>>> which subsequently leads to a null being returned from this
>> 

Re: [ACS441] which systemvm templates to use in 4.4.1 for the Release notes?

2014-09-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
Yes, I have/know no reason to upgrade the systemvms.

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:

> I'm writing Release-notes and I'd like to know where will be systemvms for
> 4.4.1?
> last repo used was:
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
> so  I supose we will have vm named:
> systemvm64template-4.4.0-.vhd
>
> ?
> thanks
>
> PL
>



-- 
Daan


Review Request 25885: CLOUDSTACK-7594: Adding automation test cases for Stopped VM test path

2014-09-21 Thread Ashutosh Kelkar

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25885/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7594
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7594


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

Automation test cases for Stopped VM test path.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/testpaths/__init__.py PRE-CREATION 
  test/integration/testpaths/testpath_stopped_vm.py PRE-CREATION 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25885/diff/


Testing
---

Yes. 4 test cases are failing due to wrong router state, I am investigating on 
this.

Log:
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T1 ... === TestName: 
test_01_pt_deploy_vm_without_startvm | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T1 variant ... === TestName: 
test_02_pt_deploy_vm_with_startvm_true | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T2 ... === TestName: 
test_03_pt_deploy_vm_with_startvm_false | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T2 variant ... === TestName: 
test_04_pt_deploy_vm_with_startvm_true | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T3 and variant ... === TestName: 
test_05_pt_startvm_false_attach_disk | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T4 ... === TestName: 
test_06_pt_startvm_false_attach_disk_change_SO | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T5 ... === TestName: 
test_07_pt_startvm_false_attach_iso | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Positive test for stopped VM test path - T5 variant ... === TestName: 
test_08_pt_startvm_false_attach_iso_running_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

==
FAIL: Positive test for stopped VM test path - T1
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/test/testpath_stopped_vm.py", line 260, in 
test_01_pt_deploy_vm_without_startvm
self.assertTrue(response[0], response[1])
AssertionError: Router state should be Stopped, it is Running
 >> begin captured stdout << -
=== TestName: test_01_pt_deploy_vm_without_startvm | Status : FAILED ===


Thanks,

Ashutosh Kelkar