[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1187535] [NEW] systematic duplicate download of adobe-flashplugin_xxx.orig.tar.gz after package installation or upgrade

2013-06-04 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
Public bug reported:

Hello,

I suspect an error in the postinst script of flashplugin-installer
(ubuntu 12.04.2).

With initial installation or package upgrade, I see flashplugin-
installer downloading and installing the tar.gz file from adobe. So far
ok.

Then, wrongly, the subsequent run of /etc/cron.daily/update-notifier-
common downloads and installs the same tar.gz file again.

This happens because update-notifier-common  (or rather /usr/lib/update-
notifier/package-data-downloader) finds a definition file /usr/share
/package-data-downloads/flashplugin-installer but no stamp file /var/lib
/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/flashplugin-installer.

After the run of update-notifier-common a stampfile is of course
present, so that this unnecessary download happens only once.

The postrm script of flashplugin-installer seems to handle this stamp
file correctly, as it is no longer present after purging the package.

But the postinst script should, I guess, create the stamp file on
successful download, so that update-notifier-common can detect that no
action is necessary.

I verified this on two different machines, one is a fresh installation
of ubuntu 12.04, the other is kubuntu upgraded to 12.04.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.285ubuntu0.12.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-45.70-generic 3.2.44
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-45-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun  4 20:35:56 2013
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100816.2)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-12 (418 days ago)

** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to flashplugin-nonfree in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187535

Title:
  systematic duplicate download of adobe-flashplugin_xxx.orig.tar.gz
  after package installation or upgrade

Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hello,

  I suspect an error in the postinst script of flashplugin-installer
  (ubuntu 12.04.2).

  With initial installation or package upgrade, I see flashplugin-
  installer downloading and installing the tar.gz file from adobe. So
  far ok.

  Then, wrongly, the subsequent run of /etc/cron.daily/update-notifier-
  common downloads and installs the same tar.gz file again.

  This happens because update-notifier-common  (or rather /usr/lib
  /update-notifier/package-data-downloader) finds a definition file
  /usr/share/package-data-downloads/flashplugin-installer but no stamp
  file /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/flashplugin-
  installer.

  After the run of update-notifier-common a stampfile is of course
  present, so that this unnecessary download happens only once.

  The postrm script of flashplugin-installer seems to handle this stamp
  file correctly, as it is no longer present after purging the package.

  But the postinst script should, I guess, create the stamp file on
  successful download, so that update-notifier-common can detect that no
  action is necessary.

  I verified this on two different machines, one is a fresh installation
  of ubuntu 12.04, the other is kubuntu upgraded to 12.04.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.285ubuntu0.12.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-45.70-generic 3.2.44
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-45-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Jun  4 20:35:56 2013
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 
(20100816.2)
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-12 (418 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1187535/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 516592] Re: On suspend NetworkManager deconfigures the network, killing NFS mount and hanging GNOME, etc.

2013-06-18 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516592

Title:
  On suspend NetworkManager deconfigures the network, killing NFS mount
  and hanging GNOME, etc.

Status in NetworkManager:
  Expired
Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: network-manager

  When the system is going to sleep Network Manager unloads the network 
interface even though the home directory is NFS loaded on that interface.
  Obviously there is still more work happening on that directory and so the 
system hangs on I/O in the case where NFS is mounted with the hard option.
  This prevents power saving and the system is unusable as Network Manager dies 
with the rest of Gnome all waiting for I/O
  If you log in on one of the TTYs shutting the system down cleanly fails on 
the kernel hung I/O and so the only way out is to press the reset button.

  here is the syslog output showing network manager stopping the nic just 
before the kernel says ouch I have no file system to talk to:
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.921076] CPU0 attaching NULL 
sched-domain.
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.921090] CPU1 attaching NULL 
sched-domain.
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.961405] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.961414]  domain 0: span 0-1 level 
SIBLING
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.961421]   groups: 0 1
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.961434] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.961439]  domain 0: span 0-1 level 
SIBLING
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop kernel: [19339.961445]   groups: 1 0
  Feb  2 21:33:53 desktop anacron[2176]: Normal exit (0 jobs run)
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   Sleeping...
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (eth0): now unmanaged
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (eth0): device state change: 
8 -> 1 (reason 37)
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (eth0): deactivating device 
(reason: 37).
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (eth0): canceled DHCP 
transaction, dhcp client pid 839
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   check_one_route(): (eth0) 
error -34 returned from rtnl_route_del(): Sucess#012
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (eth0): cleaning up...
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (eth0): taking down device.
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (wlan0): now unmanaged
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (wlan0): device state change: 
3 -> 1 (reason 37)
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (wlan0): cleaning up...
  Feb  2 21:33:54 desktop NetworkManager:   (wlan0): taking down device.
  Feb  2 21:33:55 desktop NetworkManager:   (eth0): carrier now OFF 
(device state 1)
  Feb  2 21:36:55 desktop kernel: [19521.570035] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:36:56 desktop kernel: [19522.710031] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:37:03 desktop kernel: [19529.660034] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:37:17 desktop kernel: [19543.690033] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:37:26 desktop kernel: [19552.670037] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:37:27 desktop kernel: [19553.670029] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:37:29 desktop kernel: [19555.660034] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:37:33 desktop kernel: [19559.470051] nfs: server nfs.office.local 
not responding, still trying
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950099] INFO: task sync:2239 blocked 
for more than 120 seconds.
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950184] "echo 0 > 
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950267] sync  D 
 0  2239   2104 0x
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950279]  8800228d1c58 
0086 880001a23880 00015880
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950290]  880010115e70 
00015880 00015880 00015880
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950299]  00015880 
880010115e70 00015880 00015880
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950309] Call Trace:
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950328]  [] ? 
sync_page+0x0/0x50
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950338]  [] 
io_schedule+0x28/0x40
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950346]  [] 
sync_page+0x3d/0x50
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950354]  [] 
__wait_on_bit+0x57/0x80
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop kernel: [19560.950363]  [] 
wait_on_page_bit+0x6e/0x80
  Feb  2 21:37:34 desktop

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1187535] Re: systematic duplicate download of adobe-flashplugin_xxx.orig.tar.gz on package installation or upgrade

2013-07-22 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
** Summary changed:

- systematic duplicate download of adobe-flashplugin_xxx.orig.tar.gz after 
package installation or upgrade
+ systematic duplicate download of adobe-flashplugin_xxx.orig.tar.gz on package 
installation or upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to flashplugin-nonfree in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187535

Title:
  systematic duplicate download of adobe-flashplugin_xxx.orig.tar.gz on
  package installation or upgrade

Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hello,

  I suspect an error in the postinst script of flashplugin-installer
  (ubuntu 12.04.2).

  With initial installation or package upgrade, I see flashplugin-
  installer downloading and installing the tar.gz file from adobe. So
  far ok.

  Then, wrongly, the subsequent run of /etc/cron.daily/update-notifier-
  common downloads and installs the same tar.gz file again.

  This happens because update-notifier-common  (or rather /usr/lib
  /update-notifier/package-data-downloader) finds a definition file
  /usr/share/package-data-downloads/flashplugin-installer but no stamp
  file /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/flashplugin-
  installer.

  After the run of update-notifier-common a stampfile is of course
  present, so that this unnecessary download happens only once.

  The postrm script of flashplugin-installer seems to handle this stamp
  file correctly, as it is no longer present after purging the package.

  But the postinst script should, I guess, create the stamp file on
  successful download, so that update-notifier-common can detect that no
  action is necessary.

  I verified this on two different machines, one is a fresh installation
  of ubuntu 12.04, the other is kubuntu upgraded to 12.04.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.285ubuntu0.12.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-45.70-generic 3.2.44
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-45-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Jun  4 20:35:56 2013
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04.1 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 
(20100816.2)
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-12 (418 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1187535/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 912044] Re: scroll lock doesn't work, which affects users of badly designed backlit keyboards

2012-10-12 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
this also seems to affect using a KVM switch that expects double-presses
of Scroll_Lock as a hotkey

interestingly, you can trigger the KVM switch with
either
xset led 3 && sleep 0.2 && xset -led 3
or
   xset led named "Scroll Lock" && sleep 0.2 && xset -led named "Scroll Lock"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-input-evdev in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912044

Title:
  scroll lock doesn't work, which affects users of badly designed
  backlit keyboards

Status in “xserver-xorg-input-evdev” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The scroll lock key has no effect, importantly it doesn't cause the
  scroll lock light on the keyboard to toggle. (Never comes on). This
  means I can't use the backlight on my keyboard, as it relies on scroll
  lock.

  

  The keyboard in question:
  http://www.ebuyer.com/product/132131
  Xenta Black Illuminated Mini USB Multimedia keyboard - UK layout
  model sk-020el

  This keyboard appears to rely on the scroll lock light for controlling
  key illumination (one more switch wouldn't kill them, but hey, it was
  very cheap and I rather like it!)

  ---
  Bug filed as requested in 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xkeyboard-config/+bug/59417/comments/14

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9
  Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  .tmp.unity.support.test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: 
[core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,mousepoll,move,compiztoolbox,snap,regex,place,imgpng,vpswitch,grid,gnomecompat,resize,animation,wall,unitymtgrabhandles,session,expo,fade,workarounds,ezoom,scale,unityshell]
  CompositorRunning: None
  Date: Wed Jan  4 23:27:45 2012
  DistUpgraded: Log time: 2011-10-15 11:04:28.152997
  DistroCodename: oneiric
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, whatever it takes to get this fixed in Ubuntu
  GraphicsCard:
   ATI Technologies Inc 760G [Radeon 3000] [1002:9616] (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8388]
  JockeyStatus:
   xorg:fglrx_updates - ATI/AMD proprietary FGLRX graphics driver (post-release 
updates) (Proprietary, Disabled, Not in use)
   xorg:fglrx - ATI/AMD proprietary FGLRX graphics driver (Proprietary, 
Enabled, In use)
  MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-14-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vg1-root ro splash quiet vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-15 (81 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/24/2010
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0802
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: M4A78LT-M
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0802:bd08/24/2010:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnM4A78LT-M:rvrRevX.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.6+bzr20110929-0ubuntu5
  version.fglrx-installer: fglrx-installer N/A
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu26
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.26-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.11-0ubuntu3
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.11-0ubuntu3
  version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu13
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:6.14.99~git20110811.g93fc084-0ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.15.901-1ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20110411+8378443-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/+bug/912044/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 872483] Re: laser printer only prints first job correct

2012-09-11 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
I confirm the presence of the problem in 12.04.1: Second job comes out as 
garbage
printer is oki b410d with driver pxlmono or hpijs-pcl5e

the bug should be reopened for precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872483

Title:
  laser printer only prints first job correct

Status in “cups” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “cups” source package in Oneiric:
  Fix Committed
Status in “cups” source package in Precise:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  please also refer to this bug - this seems to be exactly my issue and does 
not seem to be solved.
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foomatic-db/+bug/855412

  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 - all updates as of today applied.

  I followed https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems according
  to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foomatic-
  db/+bug/855412/comments/20

  I printed two copies of the same document, since this forces the error
  easily.

  The content under /var/spool/cups/d... look fine - see attached files.

  after cupsenable  the first copy comes out fine - the second
  as random character - I stopped after some pages.

  The test is with Samsung ML-2250 Series (SPL II) - which worked fine under 
all previous versions of Ubuntu
  Samsung ML-2250 Foomatic/pxlmono (recommended) generates basically the same 
result.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/872483/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 885316] Re: Mobile broadband aspect of modem/storage device not showing up in NetworkManager -- Huawei E220, Novatel Wireless MiFi® 2352

2012-08-06 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
I seem to be experiencing something similar with 12.04 and a mifi 2352,
no additional software installed:

it works sometimes, sometimes it does not

that means, sometimes after plugging the device into the usb port 'dmesg' shows 
lines like "usb 2-1.1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB0" 
and the modem is useable
and sometimes (when plugging it in again) these lines do not show up and there 
is no modem accessible

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885316

Title:
  Mobile broadband aspect of modem/storage device not showing up in
  NetworkManager -- Huawei E220, Novatel Wireless MiFi® 2352

Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in “usb-modeswitch” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  it seems that usbserial has problems in mode switching when a
  connected device is both modem and storage (e.g. USB internet key)

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
  Package: udev 173-0ubuntu4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-13.21-generic 3.0.6
  Uname: Linux 3.0.0-13-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: amd64
  CustomUdevRuleFiles: usbserial.rules
  Date: Wed Nov  2 11:21:04 2011
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110426)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6410
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-13-generic 
root=UUID=593b5cc0-2279-4148-bf82-0c32f6d6126d ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: udev
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (18 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/23/2011
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A10
  dmi.board.name: 0667CC
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 9
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA10:bd08/23/2011:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6410:pvr0001:rvnDellInc.:rn0667CC:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Latitude E6410
  dmi.product.version: 0001
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  --- 
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110426)
  NetworkManager.state:
   [main]
   NetworkingEnabled=true
   WirelessEnabled=true
   WWANEnabled=true
   WimaxEnabled=true
  Package: network-manager 0.9.4.0-0ubuntu4.1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  Tags:  precise running-unity
  Uname: Linux 3.4.5-030405-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-04 (74 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse libvirtd 
lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev pulse pulse-access sambashare scanner tape 
vboxusers video
  nmcli-dev:
   DEVICE TYPE  STATE DBUS-PATH 
 
   wlan0  802-11-wireless   connected 
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  
   eth0   802-3-ethernetunavailable   
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0
  nmcli-nm:
   RUNNING VERSIONSTATE   NET-ENABLED   WIFI-HARDWARE   
WIFI   WWAN-HARDWARE   WWAN  
   running 0.9.4.0connected   enabled   enabled 
enabledenabled disabled
  --- 
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110426)
  NetworkManager.state:
   [main]
   NetworkingEnabled=true
   WirelessEnabled=true
   WWANEnabled=true
   WimaxEnabled=true
  Package: network-manager 0.9.4.0-0ubuntu4.1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  Tags:  precise running-unity
  Uname: Linux 3.4.5-030405-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-04 (74 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse libvirtd 
lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev pulse pulse-access sambashare scanner tape 
vboxusers video
  nmcli-dev:
   DEVICE TYPE  STATE DBUS-PATH 
 
   wlan0  802-11-wireless   connected 
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  
   eth0   802-3-ethernetunavailable   
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0
  nmcli-nm:
   RUNNING VERSIONSTATE   NET-ENABLED   WIFI-HARDWARE   
WIFI   WWAN-HARDWARE   WWAN  
   running 0.9.4.0connected   enabled   enabled 
enabledenabled disabled
  --- 
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110426)
  NetworkManager.state:
   [main]
   NetworkingEnabled=true
   WirelessEnabled=true
   WWANEnabled=true
   WimaxEnabled=true
  Package: network-manager 0.9.4.0-0ubuntu4.1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  Tags:  precise running-unity
  Uname: Linux 3.4.5-030405-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-04 (74 days

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 863834] Re: [regression] Suspend on lid close broken on Oneiric

2012-04-15 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
** Also affects: upower (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863834

Title:
  [regression] Suspend on lid close broken on Oneiric

Status in “gnome-power-manager” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in “upower” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  With Oneiric, I cannot have my laptop go into suspend mode by closing the lid 
anymore. In the gnome settings, the lid close action is configured to suspend 
(both on AC and on battery), but closing the lid does nothing. 
  Here is the output of "acpid -d" when I close the lid:
  No protocol specified
  xset:  unable to open display ":0"

  And here it what it says when I open the lid:
  Sessions still open, not unmounting

  Here is the output of acpi_listen when I close/open the lid:
  button/lid LID0 0080 0009
  button/lid LID0 0080 000a

  Here is what /proc/acpi says with the lid open and closed:
  gpothier@tadzim:~$ cat /proc/acpi/button/lid/*/state
  state:  open
  gpothier@tadzim:~$ cat /proc/acpi/button/lid/*/state
  state:  closed

  Suspending in itself works fine with the laptop's suspend button.

  Suspend on lid close worked fine in Natty.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/863834/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1843988] Re: python library installed into site-packages instead of into dist-packages

2020-05-22 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
yes, it does.

I actually had the problem on a raspberry pi running Raspbian 10. There
I had to add the following to my script so that the library would be
found:

sys.path.append('/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/python3.7/site-packages/')

(after having analyzed the problem I then sent the bug report from my
desktop computer)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lirc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843988

Title:
  python library installed into site-packages instead of into dist-
  packages

Status in lirc package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The lirc package comes with python libraries and it installs the libraries 
into 
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/python3.6/site-packages
  This results in the libraries not being found by system python.

  From what I read in https://wiki.debian.org/Python
  they should instead be installed into 
 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages

  
  Release:18.04

  Package: lirc
  Version: 0.10.0-2

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: lirc 0.10.0-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-62.69-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-62-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Sat Sep 14 12:41:30 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-28 (1842 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20140416.1)
  SourcePackage: lirc
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-14 (395 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1843988/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1843988] [NEW] python library installed into site-packages instead of into dist-packages

2019-09-14 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
Public bug reported:

The lirc package comes with python libraries and it installs the libraries into 
   /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/python3.6/site-packages
This results in the libraries not being found by system python.

>From what I read in https://wiki.debian.org/Python
they should instead be installed into 
   /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages


Release:18.04

Package: lirc
Version: 0.10.0-2

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: lirc 0.10.0-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-62.69-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-62-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.7
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Sat Sep 14 12:41:30 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-28 (1842 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140416.1)
SourcePackage: lirc
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-14 (395 days ago)

** Affects: lirc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

** Attachment removed: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1843988/+attachment/5288660/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lirc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843988

Title:
  python library installed into site-packages instead of into dist-
  packages

Status in lirc package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The lirc package comes with python libraries and it installs the libraries 
into 
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/python3.6/site-packages
  This results in the libraries not being found by system python.

  From what I read in https://wiki.debian.org/Python
  they should instead be installed into 
 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages

  
  Release:18.04

  Package: lirc
  Version: 0.10.0-2

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: lirc 0.10.0-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-62.69-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-62-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Sat Sep 14 12:41:30 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-28 (1842 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20140416.1)
  SourcePackage: lirc
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-14 (395 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1843988/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1568604] Re: Mouse cursor lost when unlocking with Intel graphics

2016-05-03 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
A few workarounds have been collected here now, which is very helpful.

Can anybody comment on insight about _causes_ for this problem (regression)? 
Does anybody know about work on a fix (upstream, in ubuntu)? Strangely, this 
bug is still in status unassigned.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568604

Title:
  Mouse cursor lost when unlocking with Intel graphics

Status in X.Org X server:
  Confirmed
Status in xf86-video-intel:
  Fix Released
Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Cursor is visible at unlock screen either after returning from suspend
  or just locking.

  After unlocking screen cursor is invisible.

  Changing to vt1 then back to vt7 (ctrl+alt+f1 then ctrl+alt+f7) cursor
  returns

  

  no matter if you suspend or sleep, to swap or disk when you return
  from it, the mouse cursor is missing.you can still move the mouse
  and you can see (because it highlights the window) as you move it
  around.   But the cursor is not displayed on the screen.

  i am using a lenovo W540 laptop.   I downloaded the latest beta on
  april 8 2016.

  this is xubuntu using the xfce window manager.

  the cursor does return if i log off and log back in, but that actually 
defeats the purpose of going to sleep.
  ---
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-08 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Beta amd64 (20160323)
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_modeset nvidia
  Package: light-locker 1.7.0-2ubuntu1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-18.34-generic 4.4.6
  Tags:  xenial
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-18-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups:

  _MarkForUpload: True

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/1568604/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1817785] [NEW] installation of texlive-latex-base-doc does not make the documentation available to 'texdoc'

2019-02-26 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
Public bug reported:

I had texlive installed previously, on a freshly installed 18.04 system.
Now I installed texlive-latex-base-doc.

after installation, texdoc did not find the requested documentation, e.g. 
$texdoc amsldoc
Sorry, no documentation found for amsldoc.

Only after executing 'dpkg-reconfigure texlive-base' the documentation
was found.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: texlive-latex-base-doc (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-45.48-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-45-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Tue Feb 26 20:56:05 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-28 (1643 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140416.1)
SourcePackage: texlive-base
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-14 (196 days ago)

** Affects: texlive-base (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to texlive-base in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817785

Title:
  installation of texlive-latex-base-doc does not make the documentation
  available to 'texdoc'

Status in texlive-base package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I had texlive installed previously, on a freshly installed 18.04 system.
  Now I installed texlive-latex-base-doc.

  after installation, texdoc did not find the requested documentation, e.g. 
  $texdoc amsldoc
  Sorry, no documentation found for amsldoc.

  Only after executing 'dpkg-reconfigure texlive-base' the documentation
  was found.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: texlive-latex-base-doc (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-45.48-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-45-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Tue Feb 26 20:56:05 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-28 (1643 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20140416.1)
  SourcePackage: texlive-base
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-14 (196 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1817785/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1843988] Re: python library installed into site-packages instead of into dist-packages

2022-06-03 Thread Ernst Kloppenburg 
@Alec I guess in your last comment 'site-packages' should be replaced by
'dist-packages', right?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lirc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843988

Title:
  python library installed into site-packages instead of into dist-
  packages

Status in lirc package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The lirc package comes with python libraries and it installs the libraries 
into 
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/python3.6/site-packages
  This results in the libraries not being found by system python.

  From what I read in https://wiki.debian.org/Python
  they should instead be installed into 
 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages

  
  Release:18.04

  Package: lirc
  Version: 0.10.0-2

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: lirc 0.10.0-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-62.69-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-62-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Sat Sep 14 12:41:30 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-28 (1842 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20140416.1)
  SourcePackage: lirc
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-14 (395 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1843988/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp