[Bug 2023916] [NEW] Dock opacity is triggered by DING extension in Wayland

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

if dock transparency is set to DYNAMIC,

dock opacity is triggered by DING extension in Wayland.

Works as expected under Xorg, dock background stays transparent while
DING is enabled.

Not the first time this happens (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-
icons-ng/+bug/1981837 ) it has been fixed for a moment and now issue is
back with latest version of gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock.

I can see that issue on many installations / machines running Ubuntu
22.04 LTS.

If of any interest, other gnome shell extensions ( transparent top bar,
dash to panel ) are not impacted by this issue. So far.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 72~ubuntu5.22.04.2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-43.44~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
Uname: Linux 5.19.0-43-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Jun 14 21:09:46 2023
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-06-01 (378 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220419)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  if dock transparency is set to DYNAMIC,
  
  dock opacity is triggered by DING extension in Wayland.
  
  Works as expected under Xorg, dock background stays transparent while
  DING is enabled.
  
  Not the first time this happens it has been fixed for a moment and now
  issue is back with latest version of gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock.
+ 
+ I can see that issue on many installations / machines running Ubuntu
+ 22.04 LTS.
+ 
+ If of any interest, other gnome shell extensions ( transparent top bar,
+ dash to panel ) are not impacted by this issue. So far.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 72~ubuntu5.22.04.2.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-43.44~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-43-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Jun 14 21:09:46 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-06-01 (378 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  if dock transparency is set to DYNAMIC,
  
  dock opacity is triggered by DING extension in Wayland.
  
  Works as expected under Xorg, dock background stays transparent while
  DING is enabled.
  
- Not the first time this happens it has been fixed for a moment and now
- issue is back with latest version of gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock.
+ Not the first time this happens (
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-
+ icons-ng/+bug/1981837 ) it has been fixed for a moment and now issue is
+ back with latest version of gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock.
  
  I can see that issue on many installations / machines running Ubuntu
  22.04 LTS.
  
  If of any interest, other gnome shell extensions ( transparent top bar,
  dash to panel ) are not impacted by this issue. So far.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 72~ubuntu5.22.04.2.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-43.44~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-43-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Jun 14 21:09:46 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-06-01 (378 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023916

Title:
  Dock opacity is triggered by DING extension in Wayland

To manage notifications about this 

[Bug 2028311] [NEW] 22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen but useless.

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Ubuntu 22.04 ( Gnome, GDM, Wayland )

Hitting « PrintScreen » key in login-screen launches default « new »
screenshot utility.

It seems to work, at the end it says « picture has been saved in the
paperboard ».

But how get hands on that paperboard later ?

No picture is saved in /root.

I suspect the screenshot utility should not be launch-able from login-
screen,

as it suggests something impossible to do ( get a screenshot of login-
screen. )

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
- Ubuntu 22.04 ( Gnome, GDM )
+ Ubuntu 22.04 ( Gnome, GDM, Wayland )
  
  Hitting « PrintScreen » key in login-screen launches default « new »
  screenshot utility.
  
  It seems to work, at the end it says « picture has been saved in the
  paperboard ».
  
  But how get hands on that paperboard later ?
  
  No picture is saved in /root.
  
  I suspect the screenshot utility should not be launch-able from login-
  screen,
  
  as it suggests something impossible to do ( get a screenshot of login-
  screen. )

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2028311] Re: 22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen but useless.

[Coeur Noir]

After that, when you log in into a session you might believe you have
some picture to paste, and it seems it's not the case :

Gimp will say there's no data to paste from paperboard.

So I expect one of these two things :

⋅ make the screenshot available to paste in regular session

or

⋅ make screenshot tool NOT available in login-screen.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2028311] Re: 22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen but useless.

[Coeur Noir]

apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected wayland-session

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  Ubuntu 22.04 ( Gnome, GDM, Wayland )
  
  Hitting « PrintScreen » key in login-screen launches default « new »
  screenshot utility.
  
  It seems to work, at the end it says « picture has been saved in the
  paperboard ».
  
  But how get hands on that paperboard later ?
  
  No picture is saved in /root.
  
  I suspect the screenshot utility should not be launch-able from login-
  screen,
  
- as it suggests something impossible to do ( get a screenshot of login-
- screen. )
+ as it suggests something impossible to do ( get a screenshot of login-screen. 
)
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
+ CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
+ DisplayManager: gdm3
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-06-01 (414 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
+ Package: gnome-shell 42.9-0ubuntu2
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcEnviron:
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-46.47~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
+ RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 42.9-0ubuntu1
+ Tags:  jammy wayland-session
+ Uname: Linux 5.19.0-46-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo users
+ _MarkForUpload: True

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311/+attachment/5687759/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2028311] GsettingsChanges.txt

[Coeur Noir]

apport information

** Attachment added: "GsettingsChanges.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311/+attachment/5687760/+files/GsettingsChanges.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2028311] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

[Coeur Noir]

apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311/+attachment/5687761/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2028311] ShellJournal.txt

[Coeur Noir]

apport information

** Attachment added: "ShellJournal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311/+attachment/5687762/+files/ShellJournal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2028311] Re: 22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen but useless.

[Coeur Noir]

Wait…

…today I don't have this behaviour.

Hitting printscreen key while in login-screen just does nothing.

Yesterday it triggered the screenshot utility each time I tried.

What a joke !

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2028311] Re: 22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen but useless.

[Coeur Noir]

In the eventuality it happens, ok.

Might be interesting though to know how / why it happened.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028311

Title:
  22.04 : Default screenshot utility can be triggered from login-screen
  but useless.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2028311/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1970800] Re: Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar causes a graphical glitch

[Coeur Noir]

Still broken in 22.04 LTS…

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970800

Title:
  Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar
  causes a graphical glitch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1970800] Re: Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar causes a graphical glitch

[Coeur Noir]

still happens on 22.04 LTS…

** Attachment added: "Capture d’écran du 2024-02-22 02-56-56.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+attachment/5748290/+files/Capture%20d%E2%80%99%C3%A9cran%20du%202024-02-22%2002-56-56.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970800

Title:
  Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar
  causes a graphical glitch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

[Coeur Noir]

Ubuntu 24.04 installed today.

Firefox autonomous archive downloaded from
https://www.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/all/#product-desktop-release

And « ooops… » in any tab,

terminal says :

[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6020 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6026 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6036 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6084 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6099 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6110 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6119 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6128 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6143 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6147 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265
[Parent 5931, IPC I/O Parent] WARNING: process 6150 exited on signal 11: file 
/builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/ipc/chromium/src/base/process_util_posix.cc:265

…firefox as a snap looks to run fine but I have many bwrap processes that use 
100% cpu to the point of over-heating.
Is it related ?
See picture of monitor → https://i.ibb.co/BZCfNjJ/2404-bwrap.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to devhelp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844

Title:
  AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications
  to crash with SIGTRAP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2046844/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1986468] Re: right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

[Coeur Noir]

Seems Nautilus in 24.04 still has the same behavior :

no bookmarks shown when right clicking its icon in dash

unless

nautilus is already running.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986468

Title:
  right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986468/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2059746] [NEW] Gimp crashed

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Ubuntu 24.04

Gimp from repositories, installed as a .deb ( not snap ).

It crashed when I save as

Fortunately enough, the .png image has been saved and on next Gimp
launch it offered to restore the work in progress ( I did not know Gimp
can do that ! )


```
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.36
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_36
Build: unknown rev 0 for linux
# C compiler #
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 
13.2.0-7ubuntu1' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-13/README.Bugs 
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr 
--with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-13 
--program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id 
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix 
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-bootstrap --enable-clocale=gnu 
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes 
--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object 
--disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib 
--enable-libphobos-checking=release --with-target-system-zlib=auto 
--enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --enable-cet 
--with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 
--enable-multilib --with-tune=generic 
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-p2aSDx/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-p2aSDx/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr
 --enable-offload-defaulted --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release 
--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu 
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --enable-link-serialization=2
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.2.0 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-7ubuntu1) 

# Libraries #
using babl version 0.1.108 (compiled against version 0.1.106)
using GEGL version 0.4.48 (compiled against version 0.4.44)
using GLib version 2.79.3 (compiled against version 2.78.1)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.42.10 (compiled against version 2.42.10)
using GTK+ version 2.24.33 (compiled against version 2.24.33)
using Pango version 1.52.1 (compiled against version 1.51.0)
using Fontconfig version 2.15.0 (compiled against version 2.14.2)
using Cairo version 1.18.0 (compiled against version 1.18.0)

```
> fatal error: Erreur de segmentation

Stack trace:
```
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgimpbase-2.0.so.0(gimp_stack_trace_print+0x447)[0x7c913d5e6d67]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0xecaeb)[0x653eef618aeb]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0xece8e)[0x653eef618e8e]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0xeceed)[0x653eef618eed]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x45320)[0x7c913c645320]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(+0x97968)[0x7c913d697968]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_button_set_label+0x5d)[0x7c913d6989ed]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x261fa)[0x7c913cc4f1fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_set_valist+0x1e6)[0x7c913cc524b6]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_set+0xbd)[0x7c913cc5292d]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x13d665)[0x653eef669665]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x14a)[0x7c913cc3e2fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x4490c)[0x7c913cc6d90c]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x35591)[0x7c913cc5e591]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x41)[0x7c913cc5e7c1]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x93)[0x7c913cc5e883]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(gimp_container_remove+0xf4)[0x653eef8fbf94]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x44caa4)[0x653eef978aa4]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(gimp_container_clear+0x54)[0x653eef8fbb04]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x3d0d3d)[0x653eef8fcd3d]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_unref+0x7e)[0x7c913cc4d3fe]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x13b5b6)[0x653eef6675b6]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x1f137)[0x7c913cc48137]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x3c4e3)[0x7c913cb1c4e3]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x2132b)[0x7c913cc4a32b]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_run_dispose+0x34)[0x7c913cc4d6c4]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x13cf96)[0x653eef668f96]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x14a)[0x7c913cc3e2fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x4490c)[0x7c913cc6d90c]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x35591)[0x7c913cc5e591]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x41)[0x7c913cc5e7c1]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x93)[0x7c913cc5e883]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x14a)[0x7c913cc3e2fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x4490c)[0x7c913cc6d90c]
/lib/x86

[Bug 2019906] Re: 23.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

[Coeur Noir]

Looks like the « problem » is still present in Ubuntu 24.04,

where any condensed variant of Ubuntu font family can't be applied
everywhere.

Setting this through dconf-editor

/org/gnome/desktop/interface/font-name

** Tags added: noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906

Title:
  23.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
  and title bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/2019906/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2019906] Re: 24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

[Coeur Noir]

** Summary changed:

- 23.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title 
bar
+ 24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title 
bar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906

Title:
  24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
  and title bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/2019906/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2059871] [NEW] F9 still mentionned as a way to hide side pane but no longer works

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

ubuntu 24.04 + nautilus 46

in Nautilus « main menu » the keyboard-shortcuts list [ ctrl + ? ] reads
F9 as a way to hide / unhide side panel.

I wish it were true, but it's no longer since 23.04 where F9 was
disabled upstream (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2020009 )

Though there was a button~icon at the bottom of window for hiding /
unhiding side panel.

Now this also seems gone.

So now only way to hide side pane is to adjust width of Nautilus window.

Hiding side pane is very convenient when needing to drag and drop
elements between two ( or more ) open windows of nautilus.

It can ease task for visually impaired people and people with unsure or
slow hand moves.

Could F9 shortcut or dedicated button-icon ( or both ) make a comeback
in Ubuntu ?

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: noble

** Attachment added: "F9 still in the keyboard-shortcuts list."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059871/+attachment/5760959/+files/2404_F9_gone_away.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059871

Title:
  F9 still mentionned as a way to hide side pane but no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2059871/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2020009] Re: F9 no longer hides side pane

[Coeur Noir]

…even more confusing since F9 shortcut is still mentioned in Nautilus « 
preferences / help »
( at least in french language, I did not check in other languages ).

See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2059871
and https://launchpadlibrarian.net/722350666/2404_F9_gone_away.png


** Tags removed: gnome lunar ubuntu-desktop
** Tags added: noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020009

Title:
  F9 no longer hides side pane

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/2020009/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2059871] Re: F9 still mentionned as a way to hide side pane but no longer works

[Coeur Noir]

Then « only in collapsed mode » is missing in the help.

And what about the icon / button that happened to exist ?

At first sight and default non-collapsed mode, hide panel looks like
gone away from Nautilus.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059871

Title:
  F9 still mentionned as a way to hide side pane but no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2059871/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2019906] Re: 24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

[Coeur Noir]

Correction for #5

in dconf-editor, the font name to chose is

Ubuntu Condensed,

( yes with the , at the end )

** Attachment added: "24.04 [ Ubuntu Condensed, ]"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2019906/+attachment/5770698/+files/dconf_interface_font.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906

Title:
  24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
  and title bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/2019906/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2019906] Re: 24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

[Coeur Noir]

Sorry for commenting again, maybe best workaround is installing older
Ubuntu fonts ( taken from 20.04 ) as listed below where ubuntu_initial
are now default in 24.04 and ubuntu are the older ones.

django@ASGARD:~$ ls -la /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu*

/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu:
total 4084
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root   4096 avril 26 04:27 .
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root   4096 avril 26 04:43 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 356980 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-BI.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 333612 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-B.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 350444 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-C.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 409608 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-LI.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 415552 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-L.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 366992 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-MI.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 216208 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-BI.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 191400 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-B.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 210216 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-RI.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 205748 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-R.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 341324 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-M.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 386440 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-RI.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 353824 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-R.ttf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 36 avril 26 04:27 .uuid

/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu_initial:
total 4256
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root4096 avril 24 12:48  .
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root4096 avril 26 04:43  ..
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-BI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-B.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-C.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  679224 mars  21 21:03 'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-LI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-L.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-MI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  27 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-BI.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  20 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-B.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  172196 mars  21 21:03 'UbuntuMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  27 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-RI.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  20 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-R.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  172232 mars  21 21:03 'UbuntuMono[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-M.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-RI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-R.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  738444 mars  21 20:56 
'UbuntuSans-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  186356 mars  21 20:56 'UbuntuSansMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  230324 mars  21 20:56 'UbuntuSansMono[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 1080900 mars  21 20:56 'UbuntuSans[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-Th.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 1072960 mars  21 21:03 'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
django@ASGARD:~$ 

The big difference here is the linked variants which suggest a variable
font type and maybe those are the culprits.

Older fonts were one file per variant.

Now if I set [ Ubuntu Condensed, Regular 13 ] as font-name in 
/org/gnome/desktop/interface/font-name
everything seems to work fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906

Title:
  24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
  and title bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/2019906/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2063892] [NEW] How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi !

For few months I'm getting used to « starred x items in Nautilus /
Ubuntu 22.04.

To my surprise I can't find how to do the same in 24.04,

looks like the option for « starring » an element is missing in context
menu.

It's a default install of 24.04 hence « minimal » so maybe I'm missing a
package ?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: nautilus 1:46.0-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Apr 27 00:45:55 2024
GsettingsChanges:
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.icon-view' b'default-zoom-level' b"'medium'"
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'migrated-gtk-settings' b'true'
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'show-create-link' b'true'
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(1040, 667)'
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-25 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240424)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: nautilus
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
usr_lib_nautilus: nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.52.0-1ubuntu2

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session

** Attachment added: "context menu on an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063892/+attachment/5771154/+files/nautilus_favoris_starred.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063892

Title:
  How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2063892/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2019906] Re: 24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

[Coeur Noir]

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  fresh lunar lobster installation here,
  
  from legacy iso image ( ubiquity installer. )
  
  As I usually do, I tried to change the font for interface, as I much
  prefer « condensed » fonts rather than large, round, regular ones.
  
  In 20.04 or 22.04 or 22.10 gnome-tweaks allowed to do that.
  
- Today in 23.04, it only changes font in gnome-shell ( top panel,
- activities and app's views ) but not in other app's, not in the whole
- interface as it used to do.
+ Today in 24.04 ( and since 23.04 ) it only changes font in gnome-shell (
+ top panel, activities and app's views ) but not in other app's, not in
+ the whole interface as it used to do.
  
  In dconf-editor I did not find entries regarding « global » interface
  font.
  
  Is this intended behavior ?
  
  Ability to change font type and size is also a matter of accessibility.
  
  For references :
  ⋅ 
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1468338/23-04-how-change-font-in-interface-gnome-shell-window-title-bar
  ⋅ https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2079313
  
  This affects many users.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906

Title:
  24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
  and title bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/2019906/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2020009] Re: F9 no longer hides side pane

[Coeur Noir]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2059871 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059871

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2059871
   F9 still mentionned as a way to hide side pane but no longer works

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020009

Title:
  F9 no longer hides side pane

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/2020009/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2059871] Re: F9 still mentionned as a way to hide side pane but no longer works

[Coeur Noir]

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  ubuntu 24.04 + nautilus 46
  
  in Nautilus « main menu » the keyboard-shortcuts list [ ctrl + ? ] reads
  F9 as a way to hide / unhide side panel.
  
  I wish it were true, but it's no longer since 23.04 where F9 was
  disabled upstream (
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2020009 )
  
  Though there was a button~icon at the bottom of window for hiding /
  unhiding side panel.
  
  Now this also seems gone.
  
  So now only way to hide side pane is to adjust width of Nautilus window.
+ But how now to achieve this → 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/666797838/nautilus_side_by_side.png ?
  
  Hiding side pane is very convenient when needing to drag and drop
  elements between two ( or more ) open windows of nautilus.
  
  It can ease task for visually impaired people and people with unsure or
  slow hand moves.
  
  Could F9 shortcut or dedicated button-icon ( or both ) make a comeback
  in Ubuntu ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059871

Title:
  F9 still mentionned as a way to hide side pane but no longer works

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2059871/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2063892] Re: How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

[Coeur Noir]

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063892

Title:
  How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2063892/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2063892] Re: How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

[Coeur Noir]

What ?

Ok now it's buried one click further, therefore almost invisible.

That may not be a bug but a counter-intuitive « new » way.

So is there a method to add back an entry for « starring an item » into the ( 
right-click ) context-menu ?
That would make this feature « faster » reachable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063892

Title:
  How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2063892/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2063892] Re: How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

[Coeur Noir]

** Description changed:

  Hi !
  
- For few months I'm getting used to « starred x items in Nautilus /
+ For few months I'm getting used to « starred » items in Nautilus /
  Ubuntu 22.04.
  
  To my surprise I can't find how to do the same in 24.04,
  
  looks like the option for « starring » an element is missing in context
  menu.
  
  It's a default install of 24.04 hence « minimal » so maybe I'm missing a
  package ?
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: nautilus 1:46.0-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1
  Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Apr 27 00:45:55 2024
  GsettingsChanges:
-  b'org.gnome.nautilus.icon-view' b'default-zoom-level' b"'medium'"
-  b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'migrated-gtk-settings' b'true'
-  b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'show-create-link' b'true'
-  b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(1040, 667)'
+  b'org.gnome.nautilus.icon-view' b'default-zoom-level' b"'medium'"
+  b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'migrated-gtk-settings' b'true'
+  b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'show-create-link' b'true'
+  b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(1040, 667)'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-25 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240424)
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus: nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.52.0-1ubuntu2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063892

Title:
  How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2063892/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2063892] Re: How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

[Coeur Noir]

Oh ok, sorry.

If marked invalid then other people affected by this bug-not-but-
regression might miss a hint.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/3118
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/3190

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues #3118
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/3118

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues #3190
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/3190

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063892

Title:
  How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2063892/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2063892] Re: Missing entry in context menu for « starring » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04

[Coeur Noir]

** Summary changed:

- How to « star » an item in Nautilus 46 / Ubuntu 24.04 ?
+ Missing entry in context menu for « starring » an item in Nautilus 46 / 
Ubuntu 24.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063892

Title:
  Missing entry in context menu for « starring » an item in Nautilus 46
  / Ubuntu 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/2063892/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2064638] [NEW] Gimp crashed when exporting to .jpg

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Gimp crashed when exporting a picture to .jpg

.jpg file has been successfully exported though.

And Gimp restored the .xcf file being worked on before the crash at
restart ( this is good. )

But it shouldn't have crashed at first ;-)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gimp 2.10.36-3build3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu May  2 15:39:32 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-25 (7 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240424)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: gimp
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064638

Title:
  Gimp crashed when exporting to .jpg

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2064638/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2065177] [NEW] Gimp crashed when exporting to .png

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hello,

happen randomly but often and actually on any kind of file to export.




```
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.36
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_36
Build: unknown rev 0 for linux
# C compiler #
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 
13.2.0-23ubuntu3' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-13/README.Bugs 
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr 
--with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-13 
--program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id 
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix 
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug 
--enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new 
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify 
--enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib 
--enable-libphobos-checking=release --with-target-system-zlib=auto 
--enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --enable-cet 
--with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 
--enable-multilib --with-tune=generic 
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr
 --enable-offload-defaulted --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release 
--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.2.0 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-23ubuntu3) 

# Libraries #
using babl version 0.1.108 (compiled against version 0.1.108)
using GEGL version 0.4.48 (compiled against version 0.4.48)
using GLib version 2.80.0 (compiled against version 2.80.0)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.42.10 (compiled against version 2.42.10)
using GTK+ version 2.24.33 (compiled against version 2.24.33)
using Pango version 1.52.1 (compiled against version 1.52.1)
using Fontconfig version 2.15.0 (compiled against version 2.15.0)
using Cairo version 1.18.0 (compiled against version 1.18.0)

```
> fatal error: Erreur de segmentation

Stack trace:
```

# Stack traces obtained from PID 9242 - Thread 9242 #


This GDB supports auto-downloading debuginfo from the following URLs:
  
Enable debuginfod for this session? (y or [n]) [answered N; input not from 
terminal]
Debuginfod has been disabled.
To make this setting permanent, add 'set debuginfod enabled off' to .gdbinit.
[New LWP 9375]
[New LWP 9352]
[New LWP 9309]
[New LWP 9306]
[New LWP 9303]
[New LWP 9294]
[New LWP 9293]
[New LWP 9292]
[New LWP 9251]
[New LWP 9250]
[New LWP 9249]
[New LWP 9248]
[New LWP 9247]
[New LWP 9246]
[New LWP 9245]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
0x7f7e0871ba9a in __GI___libc_read (nbytes=256, buf=0x7ffe87b64130, fd=19) 
at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
  Id   Target Id Frame 
* 1Thread 0x7f7e082f7640 (LWP 9242) "gimp-2.10"  0x7f7e0871ba9a in 
__GI___libc_read (nbytes=256, buf=0x7ffe87b64130, fd=19) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
  2Thread 0x7f7dc3e006c0 (LWP 9375) "pool-gimp-2.10" syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  3Thread 0x7f7dc20006c0 (LWP 9352) "swap writer"syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  4Thread 0x7f7dcfe006c0 (LWP 9309) "gimp-2.10"  syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  5Thread 0x7f7de6a006c0 (LWP 9306) "gimp-2.10"  syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  6Thread 0x7f7de7e006c0 (LWP 9303) "async"  syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  7Thread 0x7f7dfcc006c0 (LWP 9294) "gdbus"  0x7f7e0871b4cd in 
__GI___poll (fds=0x7f7dc8000b90, nfds=3, timeout=-1) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
  8Thread 0x7f7dfd6006c0 (LWP 9293) "gmain"  0x7f7e0871b4cd in 
__GI___poll (fds=0x5f97617e8960, nfds=2, timeout=-1) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
  9Thread 0x7f7dfe0006c0 (LWP 9292) "pool-spawner"   syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  10   Thread 0x7f7dff4006c0 (LWP 9251) "worker" syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  11   Thread 0x7f7dffe006c0 (LWP 9250) "worker" syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  12   Thread 0x7f7e04a006c0 (LWP 9249) "worker" syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  13   Thread 0x7f7e054006c0 (LWP 9248) "worker" sysc

[Bug 2065240] [NEW] Weird shadow under popup menu

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

The popup menu which appears when clicking the « hamburger » button
shows a weird solid shadow on its right and bottom edges.

Picture attached for comparing same kind of popup,
left is terminal ( ugly ) right is gedit ( not ugly ).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gnome-terminal 3.52.0-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu May  9 05:14:43 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-25 (13 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240424)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session

** Attachment added: "left is terminal ( ugly ) right is gedit ( not ugly )"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065240/+attachment/5776453/+files/2404_terminal_ugly_shadow.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065240

Title:
  Weird shadow under popup menu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/2065240/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2065177] Re: Gimp crashed when exporting to .png

[Coeur Noir]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2055044 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055044

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2055044
   GIMP crash at closure on systems with GLib 2.80.0 (and 2.79.x)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065177

Title:
  Gimp crashed when exporting to .png

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2065177/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2064638] Re: Gimp crashed when exporting to .jpg

[Coeur Noir]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2055044 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055044

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2055044
   GIMP crash at closure on systems with GLib 2.80.0 (and 2.79.x)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064638

Title:
  Gimp crashed when exporting to .jpg

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2064638/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2065240] Re: Weird shadow under popup menu

[Coeur Noir]

And gnome-text-editor does neither show any weird shadow under its popup
menu.

For the moment I've only seen that « glitch » in gnome-terminal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065240

Title:
  Weird shadow under popup menu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/2065240/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2019906] Re: 24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

[Coeur Noir]

Should I file a new report for 24.04 ?

Not being able to change the default font for whole interface is quite annoying,
furthermore when the latest Ubuntu font family pretends to offer some really 
good condensed ones ;-)

Even weirder font-manager does not seem to have any problem to show them
( picture attached ).

For now my final trick :


django@ASGARD:/usr/share/fonts/truetype$ ls -l ubuntu*
ubuntu:
total 4248
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-BI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-B.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  35 mai   10 13:54  Ubuntu-C.ttf -> 
../ubuntu-fonts-family/Ubuntu-C.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-C.ttf_initial -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  679224 mars  21 21:03 'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-LI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-L.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-MI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  27 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-BI.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  20 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-B.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  172196 mars  21 21:03 'UbuntuMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  27 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-RI.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  20 mars  21 21:03  UbuntuMono-R.ttf -> 
'UbuntuMono[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  172232 mars  21 21:03 'UbuntuMono[wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-M.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  28 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-RI.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-R.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  738444 mars  21 20:56 'UbuntuSans-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  186356 mars  21 20:56 'UbuntuSansMono-Italic[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  230324 mars  21 20:56 'UbuntuSansMono[wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1080900 mars  21 20:56 'UbuntuSans[wdth,wght].ttf'
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  21 mars  21 21:03  Ubuntu-Th.ttf -> 
'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1072960 mars  21 21:03 'Ubuntu[wdth,wght].ttf'

ubuntu-fonts-family:
total 4072
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 356980 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-BI.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 333612 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-B.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 350444 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-C.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 409608 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-LI.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 415552 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-L.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 366992 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-MI.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 216208 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-BI.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 191400 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-B.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 210216 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-RI.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 205748 avril 26 04:27 UbuntuMono-R.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 341324 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-M.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 386440 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-RI.ttf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 353824 avril 26 04:27 Ubuntu-R.ttf
django@ASGARD:/usr/share/fonts/truetype$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906

Title:
  24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
  and title bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/2019906/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2019906] Re: 24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

[Coeur Noir]

** Attachment added: "How Ubuntu Sans fonts show in font-manager"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-ubuntu/+bug/2019906/+attachment/5776983/+files/font_manager_ubuntu_sans_condensed.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019906

Title:
  24.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface
  and title bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/2019906/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1883445] [NEW] de-confusing many items for one app

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

When looking for an app' it's quite confusing it's listed twice ( or
more ), one on top of the list and one at end of the list.

I can think of 2 ways for ending confusion.

1. Add the packaging type to name of app
https://snapforum.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/d/d3e2afef29ed6c82f7f639c45a9710412f196d9d.jpeg
and stop putting the legacy .deb package at the end. Its fair position is at 
first or second in the list.

2. Only show one item for an app ( instead of one item by type of packaging )
and then give the choice of packaging type on the installation page
https://snapforum.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/4/4492aa0ca29706dec898db61cddfe371b4c18685.jpeg
Better solution in my opinion.

This a mainly to avoid people installing without knowing the type of
package.

As it is today the package info is available too late and at the bottom
of the page.

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883445

Title:
  de-confusing many  items for one app

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1883445/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1790814] Re: Duplicate entries caused by debs and snaps offering the same application

[Coeur Noir]

It's a bug because app-store are used by less-techy user who then don't
notice what kind of package they have just installed. Or don't know why
they should prefer one over the other.

Then they wonder why their (un-noticed snap)app can't access such folder
or usb-thumbs …which is another problem.

That wouldn't matter if there were no differences in usage between a
.deb and a snap package ( or else ) but there are ( permissions, for
example ).

1. Add the packaging type to name of app
https://snapforum.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/d/d3e2afef29ed6c82f7f639c45a9710412f196d9d.jpeg
and stop putting the legacy .deb package at the end. Its fair position is at 
first or second in the list.

2. Only show one item for an app ( instead of one item by type of packaging )
and then give the choice of packaging type on the installation page
https://snapforum.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/4/4492aa0ca29706dec898db61cddfe371b4c18685.jpeg
Better solution in my opinion.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790814

Title:
  Duplicate entries caused by debs and snaps offering the same
  application

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1790814/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1883445] Re: de-confusing many items for one app

[Coeur Noir]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1790814 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790814

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1790814
   Duplicate entries caused by debs and snaps offering the same application

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883445

Title:
  de-confusing many  items for one app

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1883445/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1883457] [NEW] Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

On Ubuntu ( Budgie ) 20.04 when using Gimp as a snap, you’ll see
thumbnails for .xcf files only « inside » Gimp and nowhere else ( Nemo,
Nautilus, gThumb… )

I did a messy workaround for .xcf thumbnails to appear anywhere expected
: I put all of my user’s thumbnails into
~/snap/gimp/common/.cache/thumbnails/ and now ~/.cache/thumbnails/ is a
symlink targeting the first.

You’d agree it’s absolutely a bad idea to store all of an user’s
thumbnails into a particular subfolder of a particular snap.

How tell my session to look for thumbnails not only in
~/.cache/thumbnails/ but also in any thumbnails folder inside ~/snap/ ?

For references :
⋅ https://askubuntu.com/questions/1250031/gimp-snap-and-thumbnails-for-xcf-files
⋅ 
https://discourse.ubuntubudgie.org/t/gimp-as-a-snap-no-thumbnails-for-xcf-files-in-nemo-gthumb/3799
⋅ 
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/gimp-and-thumbnails-for-xcf-files/18131/3?u=coeur-noir
⋅ https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2053949

** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Thumbnails for .xcf files only shows in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.
+ Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  On Ubuntu ( Budgie ) 20.04 when using Gimp as a snap, you’ll see
  thumbnails for .xcf files only « inside » Gimp and nowhere else ( Nemo,
  Nautilus, gThumb… )
  
  I did a messy workaround for .xcf thumbnails to appear anywhere expected
  : I put all of my user’s thumbnails into
  ~/snap/gimp/common/.cache/thumbnails/ and now ~/.cache/thumbnails/ is a
  symlink targeting the first.
  
  You’d agree it’s absolutely a bad idea to store all of an user’s
  thumbnails into a particular subfolder of a particular snap.
  
  How tell my session to look for thumbnails not only in
  ~/.cache/thumbnails/ but also in any thumbnails folder inside ~/snap/ ?
+ 
+ For references :
+ ⋅ 
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1250031/gimp-snap-and-thumbnails-for-xcf-files
+ ⋅ 
https://discourse.ubuntubudgie.org/t/gimp-as-a-snap-no-thumbnails-for-xcf-files-in-nemo-gthumb/3799
+ ⋅ 
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/gimp-and-thumbnails-for-xcf-files/18131/3?u=coeur-noir
+ ⋅ https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2053949

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883457

Title:
  Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1883457/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1883457] Re: Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

[Coeur Noir]

** Also affects: thumbnailer (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: thumbnailer (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883457

Title:
  Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1883457/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1883457] Re: Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

[Coeur Noir]

Okay… differently worded :

is it normal thumbnails generated by a snap-app ( and therefore stored 
somewhere under ~/snap/… )
can't be then used by file explorer or pictures viewer ?

It's a regression between same app-as-deb and app-as-snap.

Just because Ubuntu looks for thumbnails only in ~/.cache/thumbnails or 
~/.thumbnails
It should also watch inside any folder named thumbnails inside ~/snap

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1253862/how-tell-my-ubuntu-to-look-for-
thumbnails-not-only-in-cache-thumbnails/1254111

** Also affects: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: nemo (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: gthumb (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: snap (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883457

Title:
  Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1883457/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1889317] [NEW] When clicking a .deb, file-roller gets launched ( instead of an installer for .deb )

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

On Ubuntu 20.04 ( default flavor, and Budgie, maybe other else )

when clicking on a .deb it's file-roller that gets launched by default,
instead of an expected .deb installer ( be it through gnome-software-
local-file.desktop or any package-manager ).

Some references :
⋅ 
https://discourse.ubuntubudgie.org/t/deb-packages-open-via-zip-file-manager-by-default/3963
⋅ https://itsfoss.com/cant-install-deb-file-ubuntu/

So this bug already affects many users.

** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889317

Title:
  When clicking a .deb, file-roller gets launched ( instead of an
  installer for .deb )

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1889317/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1873658] Re: Deb Files are not associated with an application that manages packages

[Coeur Noir]

Not fixed in Budgie Ubuntu, where file-roller gets launched instead of
software.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to desktop-file-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873658

Title:
  Deb Files are not associated with an application that manages packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/desktop-file-utils/+bug/1873658/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1889317] Re: When clicking a .deb, file-roller gets launched ( instead of an installer for .deb )

[Coeur Noir]

AFAIK Budgie comes with « software » installed by default.

Does it matter if it's gnome-software with snap plugin rather than snap-
store ?


** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889317

Title:
  When clicking a .deb, file-roller gets launched ( instead of an
  installer for .deb )

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1889317/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1889317] Re: When clicking a .deb, file-roller gets launched ( instead of an installer for .deb )

[Coeur Noir]

it's not a bug in file-roller → ok now I understand why it was invalid →
sorry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889317

Title:
  When clicking a .deb, file-roller gets launched ( instead of an
  installer for .deb )

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1889317/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1883457] Re: Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

[Coeur Noir]

I have finally ended up with binding both « thumbnails » folders through
fstab adding those lines :

# .xcf thumbnails from gimp snap for anyone
/home/user_1/.cache/thumbnails/ 
/home/user_1/snap/gimp/common/.cache/thumbnails/nonebind0   0
/home/user_2/.cache/thumbnails/ 
/home/user_2/snap/gimp/common/.cache/thumbnails/nonebind0   0
/home/user_3/.cache/thumbnails/ 
/home/user_3/snap/gimp/common/.cache/thumbnails/nonebind0   0

This way, Gimp-snap actually writes its thumbnails there and then Nemo
and Nautilus accordingly displays thumbnails for .xcf files.

gThumb though still shows empty frames for .xcf files - but my main
concern was the file explorer.

Thanks to https://forum.ubuntu-
fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=22362050#p22362050

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883457

Title:
  Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1883457/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1978245] [NEW] Users and groups ⋅ readability issue in users list

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Description:Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
Release:22.04

While using « users and groups » for managing groups,
it became more difficult to read the list of potential users to include in a 
group
as the window won't resize accordingly.

It used to work nicely, prior to 18.04 I think.

See picture attached.

Same in other DE ( Budgie, Xubuntu )

And same kind of readability issue in Gdebi →
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/1910913

** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "window won't resize according to its content."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978245/+attachment/5596168/+files/users_and_groups.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978245

Title:
  Users and groups ⋅ readability issue in users list

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/1978245/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1883457] Re: Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

[Coeur Noir]

It's not a problem to be resolved in the different applications that are
loading thumbnails, snapd should resolve that usecase by making those
write to a location used by the system

I totally agree with you.

Any progress made since ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883457

Title:
  Thumbnails for .xcf files only show in Gimp ( snap ) and nowhere else.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1883457/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1978245] Re: Users and groups ⋅ readability issue in users list

[Coeur Noir]

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  Description:  Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
  Release:  22.04
  
  While using « users and groups » for managing groups,
  it became more difficult to read the list of potential users to include in a 
group
  as the window won't resize accordingly.
  
  It used to work nicely, prior to 18.04 I think.
  
  See picture attached.
  
  Same in other DE ( Budgie, Xubuntu )
+ 
+ And same kind of readability issue in Gdebi →
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/1910913

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978245

Title:
  Users and groups ⋅ readability issue in users list

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/1978245/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1970800] Re: Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar causes a graphical glitch

[Coeur Noir]

Exactly the same here, 22.04.

Screenshot attached.


** Attachment added: "First normal view on left, broken view on right after 
clicking on first day of next month."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+attachment/5596711/+files/clock_panel_bis.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970800

Title:
  Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar
  causes a graphical glitch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1969140] Re: Window minimize animation flickers and appears in the wrong place in Xorg sessions

[Coeur Noir]

Hi,

I can see "flickering" animation too :
https://i.ibb.co/7WytBXj/anim-minimize-glitch.gif

This is on Ubuntu 22.04, with :

  *-display 
   description: VGA compatible controller
   produit: Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics 
Controller
   fabricant: Intel Corporation
   identifiant matériel: 2
   information bus: pci@:00:02.0
   nom logique: /dev/fb0
   version: 06
   bits: 64 bits
   horloge: 33MHz
   fonctionnalités: msi pm vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom fb
   configuration : depth=32 driver=i915 latency=0 resolution=1920,1080
   ressources : irq:32 mémoire:f780-f7bf mémoire:e000-efff 
portE/S:f000(taille=64) mémoire:c-d


This happens ONLY on Xorg.

This happens both while DiNG extension ENABLED or DISABLED.

This happens whatever gnome-shell extensions are ENABLED or DISABLED.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969140

Title:
  Window minimize animation flickers and appears in the wrong place in
  Xorg sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1969140/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1969140] Re: Window minimize animation flickers and appears in the wrong place in Xorg sessions

[Coeur Noir]

For reference : https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2072646

Don't know if it helps, the only option regarding i965 intel driver to
have an influence (among the 3 tested there) on the animation of the
Nautilus window is "TearFree".

But the problem it introduces (tearing in Firefox) is far more annoying
than the problem it solves (the jolting window minimizing animation).

It seems to happen mostly with Nautilus window.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969140

Title:
  Window minimize animation flickers and appears in the wrong place in
  Xorg sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1969140/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1969140] Re: Window minimize animation flickers and appears in the wrong place in Xorg sessions

[Coeur Noir]

** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969140

Title:
  Window minimize animation flickers and appears in the wrong place in
  Xorg sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1969140/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1912815] [NEW] crash while using brush

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Mate 20.04

```
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.22
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_20-217-g0c8a7891f7
Build: unknown rev 0 for linux
# C compiler #
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:hsa
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 
9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-9/README.Bugs 
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --prefix=/usr 
--with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-9 
--program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id 
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix 
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug 
--enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new 
--enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin 
--enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --with-target-system-zlib=auto 
--enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 
--with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib 
--with-tune=generic 
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-9-HskZEa/gcc-9-9.3.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,hsa
 --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu 
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.3.0 (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 

# Libraries #
using babl version 0.1.82 (compiled against version 0.1.82)
using GEGL version 0.4.26 (compiled against version 0.4.26)
using GLib version 2.64.3 (compiled against version 2.64.3)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.40.0 (compiled against version 2.40.0)
using GTK+ version 2.24.32 (compiled against version 2.24.32)
using Pango version 1.44.7 (compiled against version 1.44.7)
using Fontconfig version 2.13.1 (compiled against version 2.13.1)
using Cairo version 1.16.0 (compiled against version 1.16.0)

```
> fatal error: Abandon

Stack trace:
```

# Stack traces obtained from PID 2623 - Thread 2623 #

[New LWP 2625]
[New LWP 2626]
[New LWP 2627]
[New LWP 2628]
[New LWP 2630]
[New LWP 2641]
[New LWP 2643]
[New LWP 2645]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
__libc_read (nbytes=256, buf=0x7fffd2486600, fd=23) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
  Id   Target Id   Frame 
* 1Thread 0x7f2cacc7e340 (LWP 2623) "gimp-2.10"__libc_read (nbytes=256, 
buf=0x7fffd2486600, fd=23) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/read.c:26
  2Thread 0x7f2cac1b4700 (LWP 2625) "worker"   syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  3Thread 0x7f2caa453700 (LWP 2626) "gmain"0x7f2cadab7aff in 
__GI___poll (fds=0x5582e3491040, nfds=2, timeout=-1) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
  4Thread 0x7f2ca9c52700 (LWP 2627) "gdbus"0x7f2cadab7aff in 
__GI___poll (fds=0x5582e34a3f60, nfds=2, timeout=-1) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
  5Thread 0x7f2ca9417700 (LWP 2628) "dconf worker" 0x7f2cadab7aff in 
__GI___poll (fds=0x5582e34b6be0, nfds=1, timeout=-1) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
  6Thread 0x7f2c8ab7f700 (LWP 2630) "async"syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  7Thread 0x7f2c89123700 (LWP 2641) "swap writer"  syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
  8Thread 0x7f2c88922700 (LWP 2643) "threaded-ml"  0x7f2cadab7aff in 
__GI___poll (fds=0x7f2c74007170, nfds=3, timeout=-1) at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29
  9Thread 0x7f2ca8bc8700 (LWP 2645) "paint"syscall () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38

Thread 9 (Thread 0x7f2ca8bc8700 (LWP 2645)):
#0  syscall () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
No locals.
#1  0x7f2caddad483 in g_cond_wait () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x5582e1d0951d in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#3  0x7f2cadd89931 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#4  0x7f2cadb9d609 in start_thread (arg=) at 
pthread_create.c:477
ret = 
pd = 
unwind_buf = {cancel_jmp_buf = {{jmp_buf = {139829786216192, 
7349219209706138962, 140736721348046, 140736721348047, 140736721348192, 
139829786212480, -7231379579019793070, -7231390543066895022}, mask_was_saved = 
0}}, priv = {pad = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, data = {prev = 0x0, cleanup = 0x0, 
canceltype = 0}}}
not_first_call = 0
#5  0x7f2cadac4293 in clone () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95
No locals.

Thread 8 (Thread 0x7f2c88922700 (LWP 2643)):
#0  0x7f2cadab7aff in __GI___poll (fds=0x7f2c74007170, nfds=3, timeout=-1) 
at ../sysd

[Bug 1913336] [NEW] snap : connected usb storage don't show up in left pane

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

coming from https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/gtk-file-explorer-does-not-
show-removable-media-in-left-pane/22344

while using snap app's, gtk-file-explorer does not show usb connected
storage at first sight in left pane, as it does in same regular .deb
app's - I tried in chromium, libreoffice and gimp.


Where it's supposed to appear :
https://snapforum.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/a/ae3104599555b6bb3ffbe642d88b6f2522d8e291.png

Actually, in snap, to access an usb storage you have to browse the full path
other places → computer → /media → $USER → usb label or uuid
( see attachment )

** Affects: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "gtk file explorer in libreoffice as a snap"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913336/+attachment/5457100/+files/LO-snap-file-explorer.gif

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xdg-desktop-portal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913336

Title:
  snap : connected usb storage don't show up in left pane

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/1913336/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1720262] Re: gnome-screenshot Actions don't work in Wayland

[Coeur Noir]

Hi,

Ubuntu Budgie 20.04 here - so no wayland and no gnome-shell.

Desktop Actions are still broken in gnome-screenshot.

If re-enable

Actions=screen-shot;window-shot;area-shot

area-shot has then no effect.

Other two seem ok but I was unable to modify options ( -p -d or else )
as seen in gnome-screenshot --help

Seems like it always want to act as soon as clicked - hence maybe why
the area-shot can't work ?

New ( ? ) issue → https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
screenshot/+bug/191

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720262

Title:
  gnome-screenshot Actions don't work in Wayland

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1720262/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1789943] [NEW] Ubuntu Software only show snap app's wiithout any explanations or advices

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

for a moment now, I noticed on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04 that Ubuntu
Software only show snap app's.

Problem : there is no easy to read « label » or « warning » regarding
snap, and how they can be « configured ».

Consequence : many users and not only beginners ask help on forums
because their FireFox or Gimp can't access such folder, such partition,
such usb key, because they can't find config' files in usual place,
because such app launches slowly, other looks out of place, other is not
localized in their language, and so on…

What I may expect :
- enable / disable snap listing,
- when snap app shown : the word snap bold in its name or a label or a flashy 
header that leads to advices about how to correctly set and use snap,
- by default, disable snap in LTS version ( where apt/deb and official 
repositories sound careful ),
- or give priority to legacy packaging and show snap only when nothing else 
available for such app.

I consider this as a bug because it gets many users « lost » with a not
so good experience with common and often already known and loved
softwares.

I know snap keeps improving but they may not provide the same reliable
and predictable experience as « legacy » packaging - hence the LTS note.

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789943

Title:
  Ubuntu Software only show snap app's wiithout any explanations or
  advices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1789943/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1789943] Re: Ubuntu Software only show snap app's wiithout any explanations or advices

[Coeur Noir]

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  for a moment now, I noticed on Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04 that Ubuntu
  Software only show snap app's.
  
  Problem : there is no easy to read « label » or « warning » regarding
  snap, and how they can be « configured ».
  
  Consequence : many users and not only beginners ask help on forums
  because their FireFox or Gimp can't access such folder, such partition,
  such usb key, because they can't find config' files in usual place,
  because such app launches slowly, other looks out of place, other is not
  localized in their language, and so on…
  
  What I may expect :
  - enable / disable snap listing,
  - when snap app shown : the word snap bold in its name or a label or a flashy 
header that leads to advices about how to correctly set and use snap,
- - by default, disable snap in LTS version.
+ - by default, disable snap in LTS version ( where apt/deb and official 
repositories sound careful ),
+ - or give priority to legacy packaging and show snap only when nothing else 
available for such app.
+ 
+ I consider this as a bug because it gets many users « lost » with a not
+ so good experience with common and often already known and loved
+ softwares.
+ 
+ I know snap keeps improving but they may not provide the same reliable
+ and predictable experience as « legacy » packaging - hence the LTS note.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789943

Title:
  Ubuntu Software only show snap app's wiithout any explanations or
  advices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1789943/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1789943] Re: Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or advices

[Coeur Noir]

** Summary changed:

- Ubuntu Software only show snap app's wiithout any explanations or advices
+ Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or advices

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789943

Title:
  Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or
  advices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1789943/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1789943] Re: Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or advices

[Coeur Noir]

Hello Olivier,

My « issue » here really is not about snap.

But about software center that do not clearly show when app is a snap
and therefore let people install them without pointing to a 3-4 steps
pieces of advice about how correctly setting a snap.

Nowadays end-users learn they installed a snap by a very wrong way :
because their favourite app no longer works as expected. Most of the
time it's just wrong settings about authorisations and confinement.

So I really think some highlight and warning in software store would
ensure people install snap in a more cautious, conscient and efficient
way and would avoid most disappointments.

So no opinion here but an improvement wish for software stores.

Now a question : is it normal I no longer see regular legacy packages in 
Ubuntu-gnome-software ?
Only snap ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789943

Title:
  Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or
  advices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1789943/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1789943] Re: Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or advices

[Coeur Noir]

( are there bots here ? )

Issue is about app-store not being clear nor helpful enough.

One may end with confined app without knowing how to tailor it to
his•her needs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789943

Title:
  Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or
  advices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1789943/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1789943] Re: Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or advices

[Coeur Noir]

Is this a better place for discussion : https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME
/gnome-software/issues/451 ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789943

Title:
  Ubuntu Software only shows snap app's without any explanations or
  advices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1789943/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1870575] [NEW] App's name are truncated in full screen grid view

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Ubuntu 20.04, default.

In the global app-menu ( full screen grid view ) app'names are
truncated, only displayed on one line.

There is enough room to display them on two or three lines under each
icon.

Maybe it's not a big readability concern in English but it is in French
and I guess in German and other languages as many app's start with same
first words, i.e. Gestionnaire de… / Éditeur de… / Libre Office…

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "screenshot, what's wrong in red, what's good in green"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870575/+attachment/5345708/+files/Capture-d-cran-de-2020-04-03-02-04-07.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870575

Title:
  App's name are truncated in full screen grid view

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1870575/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1870577] [NEW] Dark theme not applied everywhere

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Ubuntu 20.04 ( from live-usb session )

When switching ( from setting, appearance ) to dark theme, it's not
applied everywhere.

Or is it by design ?

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "screenshot, expectation"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870577/+attachment/5345709/+files/Capture-d-cran-de-2020-04-03-02-18-32.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870577

Title:
  Dark theme not applied everywhere

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1870577/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 968213] Re: Too many icons in Gnome Shell Activities Overview require ellipses

[Coeur Noir]

Still ugly in Ubuntu 20.04.

Seems improvements are planned for gnome 3.38 ???

It's been years that names are truncated on the grid view…

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968213

Title:
  Too many icons in Gnome Shell Activities Overview require ellipses

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/968213/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 968213] Re: Too many icons in Gnome Shell Activities Overview require ellipses

[Coeur Noir]

There has been many proposals to upstream throughout years for fixing
that stupid and ridiculous ellipsis.

Upstream seems not to want to merge those because these days they are
working on a new app grid - where ellipsis is still a thing.

It's been years they don't care.

Maybe that should be fixed only downstream in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and too
bad for others ???

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968213

Title:
  Too many icons in Gnome Shell Activities Overview require ellipses

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/968213/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1730199] [NEW] No wheel mouse actions on dock ?

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi…

Are there any wheel mouse actions intended on icons in dock ?

When I have many windows opened for an app' ( let's say calc ) I
expected to cycle between windows using wheel mouse.

Yes, like in Unity.

I can see left click displays a preview of the many windows but it's a
tiring, slower and noisier method.

** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730199

Title:
  No wheel mouse actions on dock ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1730199/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1730201] [NEW] No bookmarks for nautilus on right click ?

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi…

Don't know if it's related to nautilus or dock.

Bookmarks - default ones like documents, videos, pictures… or manually
added ones through ctrl+d - are not displayed on right click on nautilus
icon.

Only [ new window | remove from favorites | details ] appear.

( I'm a little dubious about the details usefulness here, too )

I expected all the bookmarks to be displayed on right click, like in
Unity.

** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730201

Title:
  No bookmarks for nautilus on right click ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1730201/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1687411] Re: If default zoom set to ≠ 100% icons have different sizes

[Coeur Noir]

This problem of different icon size does NOT happen in Ubuntu 17.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687411

Title:
  If default zoom set to ≠ 100% icons have different sizes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1687411/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1730765] [NEW] Mounted external devices do not appear in dock

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

when plugging a usb-thumb or external hard drive or any other storage
media ( phone… )

I expected them to appear in the dock.

Instead, they appear on desktop which forces
- to leave current activity to look at the desktop,
- or to open nautilus to find the new device.

Dock is a very nice place for these plugged-in devices ;-) maybe at its
bottom end, where trash used to be located in Unity dock ?

** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730765

Title:
  Mounted external devices do not appear in dock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1730765/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1685754] Re: gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022

[Coeur Noir]

Hello,

That bug is not fixed in 17.10 !

For reference : https://forum.ubuntu-
fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=21823638#p21823638

tl;dr → umask is set at 002 in ~/.profile AND in /etc/login.defs
but new folders created through Nautilus ( or terminal ) don't grant write 
permission for group.
Unless if created in desktop folder ( why ? ).

That's a big problem in multi-users environment.

Other curiosity, I don't have that problem with Budgie 17.10 where
setting umask at 002 in /etc/login.defs works as expected.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685754

Title:
  gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1685754/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1701757] Re: 17.04 (Zesty) does not source ~/.profile for umask

[Coeur Noir]

Hello,

That bug is not fixed in 17.10 !

For reference : https://forum.ubuntu-
fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=21823638#p21823638

tl;dr → umask is set at 002 in ~/.profile AND in /etc/login.defs
but new folders created through Nautilus don't grant write permission for group.
Unless if created in desktop folder.

That's a big problem in multi-users environment.

Other curiosity, I don't have that problem with Budgie 17.10 where
setting umask at 002 in /etc/login.defs works as expected.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701757

Title:
  17.04 (Zesty) does not source ~/.profile for umask

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1701757/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1685754] Re: gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022

[Coeur Noir]

** Also affects: gnome-session
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685754

Title:
  gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-session/+bug/1685754/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1701757] Re: 17.04 (Zesty) does not source ~/.profile for umask

[Coeur Noir]

** Also affects: nautilus
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701757

Title:
  17.04 (Zesty) does not source ~/.profile for umask

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1701757/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1685754] Re: gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022

[Coeur Noir]

Files created with Gedit don't apply expected 002 umask.

But files ( or folders ) created with i.e. Gimp apply expected 002
umask.

A foreseeable way of setting umask system wide and/or per session is
very much needed in order to administrate 17.10 machines in local
network ( school, library, business, anything… ) where people share
files/folders, be it through samba or nfs…

…that's not of low importance, it's a security issue.

** Also affects: gedit
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: nautilus
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685754

Title:
  gnome-terminal unduly forces umask=0022

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/1685754/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1701757] Re: 17.04 (Zesty) does not source ~/.profile for umask

[Coeur Noir]

Files created with Gedit don't apply expected 002 umask.

But files ( or folders ) created with i.e. Gimp apply expected 002
umask.

A foreseeable way of setting umask system wide and/or per session is
very much needed in order to administrate 17.10 machines in local
network ( school, library, business, anything… ) where people share
files/folders, be it through samba or nfs…

…that's not of low importance, it's a security issue.

** Also affects: gedit
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701757

Title:
  17.04 (Zesty) does not source ~/.profile for umask

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/1701757/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1983175] [NEW] In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

sorry I don't know if it's about GDM or else.

Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
jammy
Linux 5.15.0-41-generic x86_64 x86_64
ubuntu / wayland
installed DE's are :
ubuntu.desktop  ubuntu-xorg.desktop

My system is set to turn screen black after some minutes. And after some
other minutes later, it locks the screen → no sleep nor hibernate
involved ( even if sleep and hibernate are ok on that machine. )

On Xorg, after screen's gone black, any mouse or keyboard solicitation
fires up again the screen, as expected.

On Wayland, after screen's gone black, any mouse or keyboard
solicitation just does nothing, screen stays black.

BUT

keyboard is not turned off : only thing that works for « waking up » the screen 
is
key-combo [ ctrl ] + [ alt ] + [ F1 ]

If of any interest :
django@ASGARD:~$ sudo lshw -c video
[sudo] Mot de passe de django : 
  *-display 
   description: VGA compatible controller
   produit: Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics 
Controller
   fabricant: Intel Corporation
   identifiant matériel: 2
   information bus: pci@:00:02.0
   nom logique: /dev/fb0
   version: 06
   bits: 64 bits
   horloge: 33MHz
   fonctionnalités: msi pm vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom fb
   configuration : depth=32 driver=i915 latency=0 resolution=1920,1080
   ressources : irq:33 mémoire:f780-f7bf mémoire:e000-efff 
portE/S:f000(taille=64) mémoire:c-d
django@ASGARD:~$

** Affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983175

Title:
  In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1983175/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1986463] [NEW] no Desktop bookmark in side pane under Wayland

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Ubuntu 22.04 here.

On a Wayland session, Nautilus shows no bookmark for desktop in side pane.
It does ( from the same user session ) while under Xorg.

Picture attached shows 2 different users session ( as I first thought of
different settings users' side ) but I firmly confirm the only « culprit
» is using Wayland vs. using Xorg.

So the Nautilus window on the left of the picture comes from a Wayland session 
( no desktop bookmark in side pane, bad ),
and the one on the right side comes from a Xorg session ( with desktop bookmark 
in side pane, good. )

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "left is Wayland, right is Xorg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986463/+attachment/5608619/+files/nautilus_bureau.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986463

Title:
  no Desktop bookmark in side pane under Wayland

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986463/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1986468] [NEW] right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Ubuntu 22.04 here.

A right click on Nautilus icon ( in the dock ) does not always show the
list of bookmarks ( automatic and manually added ).

Nautilus has to be already launched and running in order to show that
list.

This list of « shortcuts » was ago always accessible on right click - in
Unity.

It's a very convenient list of shortcuts, non-intrusive, calm on the
eyes, and fast.

On Xorg I may be able to launch Nautilus as a minimized window, using
xdotools or wmctrl or devilspie.

On Wayland I don't know how to do that : starting Nautilus as a
minimized window with my session might be a workaround for that missing
list.

But ideally an option for Nautilus to start minimized sounds cleaner (
but options like -u or --start-minimized are not offered by Nautilus
afaik ).

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "What happens on right click when Nautilus is already 
running."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986468/+attachment/5608635/+files/nautilus_bookmarks_list_right_click.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986468

Title:
  right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986468/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1986468] Re: right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

[Coeur Noir]

Other pictures, showing both states of right click on Nautilus icon.

One might think that the whole list should be shown while Nautilus is *not* 
launched
( since once launched that same list sits in its side pane. )

** Attachment added: "right click on nautilus icon, when launched or not."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986468/+attachment/5609673/+files/nautilus_liste_signets_clic_droit.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986468

Title:
  right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986468/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1983175] Re: In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

[Coeur Noir]

Well I did not forget.

The joke is, I did not encounter the « bug » since.

Maybe some regular update solved the thing ?

Mutter, mesa, gnome-shell, gdm… there had been a few updates for them
since, so who knows ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983175

Title:
  In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1983175/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1986468] Re: right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

[Coeur Noir]

Or… is there a way to launch Nautilus as a background service ?
That might trigger the availability of that list under right click without 
needing to open a first Nautilus window ? ? ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986468

Title:
  right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986468/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1986468] Re: right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

[Coeur Noir]

is

nautilus --gapplication-service

in a script like

while :; do nautilus --gapplication-service 2&>1 >/dev/null; done

a sane approach, as suggested in the referenced discussions ?

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  Ubuntu 22.04 here.
  
  A right click on Nautilus icon ( in the dock ) does not always show the
  list of bookmarks ( automatic and manually added ).
  
  Nautilus has to be already launched and running in order to show that
  list.
  
  This list of « shortcuts » was ago always accessible on right click - in
  Unity.
  
  It's a very convenient list of shortcuts, non-intrusive, calm on the
  eyes, and fast.
  
  On Xorg I may be able to launch Nautilus as a minimized window, using
  xdotools or wmctrl or devilspie.
  
  On Wayland I don't know how to do that : starting Nautilus as a
  minimized window with my session might be a workaround for that missing
  list.
  
  But ideally an option for Nautilus to start minimized sounds cleaner (
- but options like -u or --start-minimized are not offered by Nautilus
+ but options like -%u or --start-minimized are not offered by Nautilus
  afaik ).
+ 
+ For references : 
+ ⋅ https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2073543
+ ⋅ https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2072493

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986468

Title:
  right click on icon does not always show bookmarks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986468/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1986463] Re: no Desktop bookmark in side pane under Wayland

[Coeur Noir]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1875671 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875671

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1875671
   wayland: desktop folder missing in Nautilus sidebar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986463

Title:
  no Desktop bookmark in side pane under Wayland

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986463/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1875671] Re: wayland: desktop folder missing in Nautilus sidebar

[Coeur Noir]

Still true and broken in 22.04
duplicate → https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1986463

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875671

Title:
  wayland: desktop folder missing in Nautilus sidebar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1875671/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1983175] Re: In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

[Coeur Noir]

Mmm…

I had « the bug » once yesterday.

Maybe I can narrow down a bit its context.

After using some sessions on the machine ( meaning : all sessions work
and I'm able to switch between all of them, using « change user » ) I
went back to the login screen where one can chose an user. But I had to
left office a moment, an hour maybe, so leaving computer with that login
screen on ( the one that shows after clicking on « change user » )

Back at the office, screen is black, which seems normal
but typing anything on keyboard or moving mouse or clicking blindly did not 
wake up screen.

And this time [ ctrl ] + [ alt ] + [ F1 ] did nothing.

So I hit the [ sleep ] key on the keyboard, putting computer in …sleep, of 
course.
Waking it up, still nothing on screen but hitting [ ctrl ] + [ alt ] + [ F1 ] 
brought me back the login screen.

Does this help to pinpoint a culprit ?

[ sorry, I forgot about the log, I'll try to think about it next it
happens. If it happens. ]

Xorg sessions, by the way these days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983175

Title:
  In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1983175/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1983175] Re: In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

[Coeur Noir]

Mmmm… maybe around 17:00 there's some strange things, see attached file.

** Attachment added: "journalctl -b-1 > prevboot.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1983175/+attachment/5614996/+files/prevboot.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983175

Title:
  In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1983175/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1983175] Re: In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

[Coeur Noir]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1968040 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968040

Ok thanks for pointing to a possible workaround :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983175

Title:
  In Wayland, can't wake up monitor after it has gone black

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1983175/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1968040] Re: Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit: Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

[Coeur Noir]

It seems NOT exclusive to Wayland, as seen here →
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1983175/comments/5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968040

Title:
  Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit:
  Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1968040/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1968040] Re: Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit: Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

[Coeur Noir]

ok, I was not aware of : « Wayland sessions (which might include the
login screen) ».

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968040

Title:
  Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit:
  Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1968040/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1995199] Re: Renaming home folders corrupts side panel behavior

[Coeur Noir]

Well renaming $HOME is questionable, at least, depending on how you made it.
And the names of usual folders inside $HOME follow some conventions ( XDG, 
freedesktop ) which are expected by your desktop environment and system. 

It's probably your ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs file which has been emptied
after such renaming.

By default it looks like :

# This file is written by xdg-user-dirs-update
# If you want to change or add directories, just edit the line you're
# interested in. All local changes will be retained on the next run.
# Format is XDG_xxx_DIR="$HOME/yyy", where yyy is a shell-escaped
# homedir-relative path, or XDG_xxx_DIR="/yyy", where /yyy is an
# absolute path. No other format is supported.
# 
XDG_DESKTOP_DIR="$HOME/Desktop"
XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR="$HOME/Download"
XDG_TEMPLATES_DIR="$HOME/Templates"
XDG_PUBLICSHARE_DIR="$HOME/Public"
XDG_DOCUMENTS_DIR="$HOME/Documents"
XDG_MUSIC_DIR="$HOME/Music"
XDG_PICTURES_DIR="$HOME/Pictures"
XDG_VIDEOS_DIR="$HOME/Videos"

If you only renamed the $HOME folder then you'll have to replace

$HOME/

by

/home/new_name_for_user/

If you also renamed one or all of those 8 usual and conventional folders,
you'll have to replace

XDG_DESKTOP_DIR="$HOME/Desktop"

by

XDG_DESKTOP_DIR="/home/new_name_for_user/new_name_for_desktop"

and for each renamed folder.

This mechanic is handled at start of session by xdg-user-dirs / xdg-
user-dirs-gtk

Folder for $HOME is expected to be the user's name, in lower case
letters, as given by command

id

The matching of user's name + « real » name + other info about one user
+ place for his $HOME + uid + primary gid is stored into the file
/etc/passwd you may look at it using

grep -E :[0-9]{4}: /etc/passwd

which will show you only the « human » users on your system ( those with
uid ≥ 1000 )

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995199

Title:
  Renaming home folders corrupts side panel behavior

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1995199/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1997996] [NEW] when in Trash, no dedicated top banner

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

Ubuntu 22.10 here.

When in Trash, Nautilus no longer displays a top banner in main window
offering to empty or restore.

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Nautilus in Trash, in Ubuntu 22.10, no top banner"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997996/+attachment/5632811/+files/Capture%20d%E2%80%99%C3%A9cran%20du%202022-11-25%2021-42-30.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997996

Title:
  when in Trash, no dedicated top banner

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1997996/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1997996] Re: when in Trash, no dedicated top banner

[Coeur Noir]

** Attachment added: "Nautilus in Trash, in Ubuntu 22.04, with top banner"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1997996/+attachment/5632846/+files/Capture%20d%E2%80%99%C3%A9cran%20du%202022-11-26%2000-21-58.png

** Description changed:

  Hi,
  
  Ubuntu 22.10 here.
  
  When in Trash, Nautilus no longer displays a top banner in main window
  offering to empty or restore.
+ 
+ Files attached : screenshots from 22.10 and 22.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997996

Title:
  when in Trash, no dedicated top banner

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1997996/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1970800] Re: Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar causes a graphical glitch

[Coeur Noir]

Still broken in Kinetic, see picture attached.

** Attachment added: "calendar from panel, after clicking on december the 9th."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+attachment/5632931/+files/kinetic_calendar_panel.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970800

Title:
  Clicking a calendar date in the bottom row of the panel calendar
  causes a graphical glitch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1970800/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1997529] Re: Gnome Shell forgets settings

[Coeur Noir]

…also happens during session.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997529

Title:
  Gnome Shell forgets settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1997529/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1998112] [NEW] Nautilus shows 4 icons for 2 files while ls command shows 2 files

[Coeur Noir]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

see picture attached.

There are only 2 files in the folder, as shown by ls in terminal.

But Nautilus shows those files twice ( 2× 2 icons. )

Going back and forth or refresh window in Nautilus brings back to normal
view with expected 2 icons.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
Package: nautilus 1:43.0-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-23.24-generic 5.19.7
Uname: Linux 5.19.0-23-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Nov 28 13:53:28 2022
GsettingsChanges:
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.icon-view' b'captions' b"['size', 'none', 'none']"
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.icon-view' b'default-zoom-level' b"'large'"
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'show-create-link' b'true'
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(1460, 774)'
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-10-27 (31 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Release amd64 (20221020)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: nautilus
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
usr_lib_nautilus:
 file-roller   43.0-1
 nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.46.2-1ubuntu1

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug kinetic

** Attachment added: "2 files in a folder ; 4 shown in Nautilus"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998112/+attachment/5632978/+files/nautilus_terminal_mismatch.png

** Summary changed:

- Nautilus shows 4 icons for 2 files while ls commans shows 2 files
+ Nautilus shows 4 icons for 2 files while ls command shows 2 files

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998112

Title:
  Nautilus shows 4 icons for 2 files while ls command shows 2 files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1998112/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1998112] Re: Nautilus shows 4 icons for 2 files while ls command shows 2 files

[Coeur Noir]

I was playing around

/usr/share/backgrounds/

~/Bureau/

~/Images/Arrières-plan Bureau/

I did use some drag and drop between « desktop » and Nautilus.

At some point, drag'and'drop a file between desktop and a Nautilus
window created symlink instead of moving or copying item.

I've trashed undesired symlinks, and after that I used right-click cut-
paste ( from desktop to Nautilus window ), ending in 2× icons per file.

So I launched the ls command to have another view on the folder, and
confirm where my files were ( and how many were they. )

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998112

Title:
  Nautilus shows 4 icons for 2 files while ls command shows 2 files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1998112/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs