[Bug 2093399] Re: Screen Stuttering on Intel Graphics when using X11 non-standard modes

2025-01-16 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Bug 2058143 might be related but is about much older hardware than
yours, so probably isn't related.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093399

Title:
  Screen Stuttering on Intel Graphics when using X11 non-standard modes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2093399/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2037076] Re: System Details incorrectly shows multiple GPUs

2025-01-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
@popey, thanks! There is a build including the patch to test on
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/30024235 now if you want to give it a
try

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037076

Title:
  System Details incorrectly shows multiple GPUs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037076/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2095080] [NEW] fefefesfesf

2025-01-16 Thread Alexa Olivera
Public bug reported:

https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=288
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=289
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=290
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=291
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=292
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=293
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=294
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=295
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=296
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=297
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=298
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=299
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=300
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=301
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=302
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=303
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=304
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=305
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=306
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=307
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=308
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=309
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=310
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=311
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=312
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=313
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=314
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=315
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=316
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=317
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=318
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=319
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=320
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=321
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=322
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=323
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=324
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=325
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=326
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=327
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=328
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=329
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=330
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=331
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=332
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=333
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=334
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=335
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=336
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=337
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=338
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=339
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=340
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=341
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=342
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=343
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=344
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=345
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=346
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=347
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=348
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=349
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=350
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=351
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=352
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=353
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=354
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=355
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=356
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=357
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=358
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=359
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=360
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=361
https://forum.hollywoodcamerawork.com/showthread.php?tid=362

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095080

Title:
  fefefesfesf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-ce

[Bug 2095080] Re: fefefesfesf

2025-01-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095080

Title:
  fefefesfesf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2095080/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2095068] [NEW] Gnome-software starts with an empty window

2025-01-16 Thread corrado venturini
Public bug reported:

Gnome-software starts with an empty window

corrado@corrado-n6-pp-0112:~$ apt policy gnome-software
gnome-software:
  Installed: 47.4-1
  Candidate: 47.4-1
  Version table:
 *** 47.4-1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu plucky/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
corrado@corrado-n6-pp-0112:~$ 

see attached screenshot

see also: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/2752

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 25.04
Package: gnome-software 47.4-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-8.8-generic 6.11.0
Uname: Linux 6.11.0-8-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.31.0-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Jan 16 08:45:01 2025
InstallationDate: Installed on 2025-01-12 (4 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 25.04 "Plucky Puffin" - Daily amd64 (20250107)
InstalledPlugins:
 gnome-software-plugin-flatpak 47.4-1
 gnome-software-plugin-snapN/A
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: gnome-software
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug plucky wayland-session

** Attachment added: "Screenshot From 2025-01-16 08-14-44.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095068/+attachment/5852010/+files/Screenshot%20From%202025-01-16%2008-14-44.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095068

Title:
  Gnome-software starts with an empty window

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2095068/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2095068] Re: Gnome-software starts with an empty window

2025-01-16 Thread corrado venturini
Problem dew to my install:
sudo apt install gnome-software gnome-software-plugin-snap- 
gnome-software-plugin-flatpak
to avoid snap support. after installing gnome-software-plugin-snap problem 
disappeared.
in any case this remains a bug, why are the snaps offered to me but not the 
debs?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095068

Title:
  Gnome-software starts with an empty window

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2095068/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2080698] Re: Dragging a window can cause full framebuffer damage

2025-01-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: mutter
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080698

Title:
  Dragging a window can cause full framebuffer damage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2080698/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2047737] Re: Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or json extensions

2025-01-16 Thread kernst
An XFCE forum post[0] tangentially mentions a change[1] to
/usr/share/mime/packages/freedesktop.org.xml which causes -- I suppose,
I didn't fully comprehend -- a recursive lookup inside of some kind of
MIME database or configuration file. That there are other, related
bugfixes in some Gtk or GIO-adjacent library should not be surprising,
but the proximate *cause* of the crash appears to be a recent change to
the MIME configuration database, not Nautilius, glib, gtk, or anything
like that.

Note that this also affects elementary OS Jólnir (6.1)[2], being based
on Ubuntu 20.04, as well as third-party apps like Firefox which use a
Gtk file chooser. Repeated Firefox crashes were what set me looking for
a solution.

If you are, like me, waiting for a backported fix to end up in 20.04,
you can temporarily work around the problem by following the steps in
the elementary OS GitHub issue[3] to replace
/usr/share/mime/packages/freedesktop.org.xml with the one from shared-
mime-info version 2.4[4].

Take into account that this file may be replaced by a future package
update, but hopefully that update (or some glib update) will actually
fix the problem.

[0]: https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=17257
[1]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/shared-mime-info/-/merge_requests/275
[2]: https://github.com/elementary/files/issues/2525
[3]: https://github.com/elementary/files/issues/2525#issuecomment-2595994855
[4]: 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/shared-mime-info/-/archive/2.3/shared-mime-info-2.4.tar.gz

** Bug watch added: github.com/elementary/files/issues #2525
   https://github.com/elementary/files/issues/2525

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047737

Title:
  Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or
  json extensions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2047737/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2089578] Re: [SRU] Backport gvfs 1.56.1

2025-01-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The apport autopkgtest issue resolved on a retry

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089578

Title:
  [SRU] Backport gvfs 1.56.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/2089578/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2047737] Re: Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or json extensions

2025-01-16 Thread kernst
Additional note: I was unable to reproduce this (at least, as trivially
as with elementary OS' Files app) in a VM with a fresh, fully-updated
installation of 20.04.06 Focal Fossa.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047737

Title:
  Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or
  json extensions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2047737/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1955850] Update Released

2025-01-16 Thread Brian Murray
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gdm3 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955850

Title:
  /etc/X11/Xresources no longer loaded, error in patch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1955850/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1955850] Re: /etc/X11/Xresources no longer loaded, error in patch

2025-01-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gdm3 - 47.0-1ubuntu2.24.10.1

---
gdm3 (47.0-1ubuntu2.24.10.1) oracular; urgency=medium

  [ Marco Trevisan (Treviño) ]
  * debian: Prepare for ubuntu/oracular branching

  [ Nathan Pratta Teodosio ]
  * Rewrite xresources_is_a_dir.patch.
To fix failure to load files in /etc/X11/Xresources (in case the latter is
a directory instead of a regular file). (LP: #1955850)

 -- Marco Trevisan (Treviño)   Tue, 03 Dec 2024
00:03:20 +0100

** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955850

Title:
  /etc/X11/Xresources no longer loaded, error in patch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1955850/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2081665] Re: Brasero doesn't recognize iso to burn image

2025-01-16 Thread Randy Winchester
It appears that there is no way to set "it" (format of the disk image)
manually.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081665

Title:
  Brasero doesn't recognize iso to burn image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/2081665/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2063383] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu Unity takes 90 seconds to log out

2025-01-16 Thread Guido Jäkel
I append a syslog containing logon and logoff cycle while the both
gnome-session-binaries are parameterized to run in debug mode.

This offers to first off study the bug without setting up a test
environment.

** Attachment added: "syslog for user session cycle"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/gnome-session/+bug/2063383/+attachment/5852370/+files/issue.gnome-session-bin.lenovy.syslog.log.bz2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063383

Title:
  [SRU] Ubuntu Unity takes 90 seconds to log out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/2063383/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2095129] [NEW] Nautilus crashes when update_file_info_full is running and the folder is being left

2025-01-16 Thread Philipp
Public bug reported:

[ Impact ]

Nautilus crashes if nautilus-python is installed and
update_file_info_full is running and the folder is being left. This
happens because of a NULL deref.

My patch checks for NULL and returns to avoid the NULL deref.

[ Test Plan ]

1. Install python3-nautilus
2. Copy test.py to ~/.local/share/nautilus-python/extensions/ 
(https://gitlab.gnome.org/-/project/1/uploads/4becd588cc4db8294e9154813e814224/test.py)
3. create an empty folder and open a terminal and run mkdir test_{1..500} to 
create a lot of empty folders in your new directory
4. kill nautilus with nautilus -q
5. restart nautilus with nautilus --no-desktop
6. navigate to your folder
7. immediately go back to the parent folder, i.e. press alt+arrow-key-up
8. repeat folder navigation multiple times

Nautilus should not crash.

[ Where problems could occur ]

Since the extension functions return now prematurely, some of the code
paths are no longer being executed, i.e. a g_object_unref or
finish_info_provider. This might lead to a memory leak or undefined
extension behavior.

Instead of crashing nautilus will output an error message.

[ Other Info ]

Upstream MR: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/merge_requests/1662
Upstream issue: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/3505

Since nautilus-python is not preinstalled and an extension which calls
the async method is required, this crash and this patch does not affect
a Ubuntu standard installation and therefore most of the Ubuntu users.

Nonetheless I think this crash especially affects developers who use
Ubuntu and a tool like turtle
(https://gitlab.gnome.org/philippun1/turtle), which uses the nautilus
python extension to calculate git status emblems.

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~philippun/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+git/nautilus/+merge/479248

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095129

Title:
  Nautilus crashes when update_file_info_full is running and the folder
  is being left

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2095129/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2084919] Re: GNOME terminal and other GNOME apps take a really long time to start since upgrade to 24.10

2025-01-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084919

Title:
  GNOME terminal and other GNOME apps take a really long time to start
  since upgrade to 24.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/2084919/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2084919] Re: GNOME terminal and other GNOME apps take a really long time to start since upgrade to 24.10

2025-01-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084919

Title:
  GNOME terminal and other GNOME apps take a really long time to start
  since upgrade to 24.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/2084919/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs