mesa: Changes to 'ubuntu'
.editorconfig |4 .gitignore |2 .travis.yml | 148 Android.common.mk |8 Android.mk |8 Makefile.am |6 REVIEWERS |6 SConstruct |3 VERSION |2 bin/.cherry-ignore | 73 bin/git_sha1_gen.py | 36 bin/git_sha1_gen.sh | 12 bin/install_megadrivers.py | 55 build-support/conftest.dyn |3 build-support/conftest.map |6 configure.ac | 364 - debian/changelog |8 debian/patches/egl-platform-mir.patch | 126 debian/patches/i965-disable-l3-cache-alloc-for-ext-buffers.diff | 167 debian/patches/series |1 debian/rules |2 docs/egl.html | 10 docs/envvars.html | 18 docs/features.txt | 75 docs/helpwanted.html | 19 docs/index.html | 55 docs/libGL.txt |2 docs/llvmpipe.html | 28 docs/release-calendar.html | 63 docs/releasing.html | 22 docs/relnotes.html |9 docs/relnotes/17.1.10.html | 155 docs/relnotes/17.1.6.html | 225 docs/relnotes/17.1.7.html | 148 docs/relnotes/17.1.8.html | 115 docs/relnotes/17.1.9.html | 144 docs/relnotes/17.2.4.html | 131 docs/relnotes/17.3.0.html | 246 docs/relnotes/17.3.1.html | 190 docs/shading.html | 21 docs/sourcetree.html |2 docs/specs/OLD/MESA_program_debug.spec |2 docs/specs/enums.txt | 21 docs/submittingpatches.html | 12 include/EGL/eglplatform.h |3 include/GL/glcorearb.h | 90 include/GL/glext.h | 138 include/GL/glxext.h |2 include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h | 147 include/GL/mesa_glinterop.h |4 include/GL/wglext.h |2 include/GLES2/gl2ext.h | 57 include/drm-uapi/README | 11 include/drm-uapi/drm.h | 22 include/drm-uapi/drm_fourcc.h |
Bug#884466: mesa: firefox, thunderbird, chromium don't start with mesa 17.3.0-1
Package: libglx-mesa0 Followup-For: Bug #884466 This works for me with [AMD/ATI] Baffin [Radeon RX 460] (rev cf) I can open chromium and firefox just fine. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (505, 'oldstable'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'testing'), (171, 'unstable'), (151, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libglx-mesa0:amd64 depends on: ii libc62.24-11+deb9u1 ii libdrm2 2.4.89-1 ii libexpat12.2.0-2+deb9u1 ii libgl1-mesa-dri 17.3.1-1 ii libglapi-mesa17.3.1-1 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.4-3 ii libx11-xcb1 2:1.6.4-3 ii libxcb-dri2-01.12-1 ii libxcb-dri3-01.12-1 ii libxcb-glx0 1.12-1 ii libxcb-present0 1.12-1 ii libxcb-sync1 1.12-1 ii libxcb-xfixes0 1.12-1 ii libxcb1 1.12-1 ii libxdamage1 1:1.1.4-2+b3 ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1+b2 ii libxfixes3 1:5.0.3-1 ii libxshmfence11.2-1+b2 ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.4-1+b2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 libglx-mesa0:amd64 recommends no packages. libglx-mesa0:amd64 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
why isn't there a newer xserver-xorg-video-intel release in sid even though there are releases on VCS.
Dear all, @Timo - thank you as well as all the contributors who take the effort to have latest intel driver in Debian. I saw that Timo did quite a bit of work on new releases which are sitting in the VCS https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=xserver-xorg-video-intel Is there a specific reason why any of the releases past 2:2.99.917+git20161206-1 haven't made it into Debian. I did try to see the mails from the last 2-3 months to see if there was any discussion or something but couldn't find any. I also looked at the transition tracker to see if there was anything obvious which might be blocking or conflicting but found nothing or at least didn't see anything. There are few possibilities that I can think of - a. there might be some built dependencies that might be in transition that I don't know about b. a feature which people are waiting for upstream to include in a newer version of xserver-xorg-video-intel. or c. Just waiting for the right time, maybe transition of xserver-xorg-video-intel is needed ? Please share when should we expect to see a new release of the intel driver, sooner than later is good. Looking forward to know. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: why isn't there a newer xserver-xorg-video-intel release in sid even though there are releases on VCS.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 17:36:52 +, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Dear all, > > @Timo - thank you as well as all the contributors who take the effort > to have latest intel driver in Debian. > Get intel to make new releases of their driver upstream. Personally, I've given up. Cheers, Julien
Re: why isn't there a newer xserver-xorg-video-intel release in sid even though there are releases on VCS.
At bottom :- On 03/01/2018, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 17:36:52 +, shirish शिरीष wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> @Timo - thank you as well as all the contributors who take the effort >> to have latest intel driver in Debian. >> > Get intel to make new releases of their driver upstream. Personally, I've > given up. > > Cheers, > Julien > Damn, I was under the impression that of the three major players, it was intel and some yardsticks back AMD/Radeon which were helping with the graphics stack. I just bought an Intel 7th generation proc. based solution based on this premise alone. They do seem to do some things https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Intel-Coffeelake-DragonFly-Gfx but that's on BSD. If I knew this before, maybe I would have looked at AMD-based solution. It surely would have been cheaper and have graphics a bit faster. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: why isn't there a newer xserver-xorg-video-intel release in sid even though there are releases on VCS.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 18:12:46 +, shirish शिरीष wrote: > At bottom :- > > On 03/01/2018, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 17:36:52 +, shirish शिरीष wrote: > > > >> Dear all, > >> > >> @Timo - thank you as well as all the contributors who take the effort > >> to have latest intel driver in Debian. > >> > > Get intel to make new releases of their driver upstream. Personally, I've > > given up. > > > > Cheers, > > Julien > > > > Damn, > > I was under the impression that of the three major players, it was > intel and some yardsticks back AMD/Radeon which were helping with the > graphics stack. > They are. You don't need xserver-xorg-video-intel for any of the halfway recent hardware though. Cheers, Julien
