Bug#252477: Gorgeous breasts and lips
Cant stand the pressure of her expectations in bed? Heres the answer. http://www.eosrcra.com/ Hot sex on demand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#183029: Right spot for her, everytime
Renew and invigorate your sex life with our certified male enlargement supplement. http://www.mocagrai.com/ Make That Hard Work Stay Permanent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472252: xserver-xorg-video-ati: New AtomBIOS symbol names conflict with radeonhd driver
Tobias Diedrich wrote: >>> This is a dual card configuration, one (X300) is using the ati driver, >>> the other one (HD2600) is using the radeonhd driver, since the ati >>> driver seems to be unable to handle it (segfaults). >>> >> What kind of segfault is this? Can you show us the backtrace at the end >> of the log? >> > > 2: > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONGetATOMConnectorInfoFromBIOSObject+0x30) > [0x2affde3b92e0] > 3: > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONGetConnectorInfoFromBIOS+0x1aa) > [0x2affde3a580a] > 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONSetupConnectors+0xc6) > [0x2affde3b2336] > 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so [0x2affde3979a8] > 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONPreInit+0xe54) > [0x2affde399534] > 7: X(InitOutput+0xa20) [0x468ac0] > 8: X(main+0x29f) [0x4368ff] > Interesting, this does not look like any multiboard-related backtrace that I have seen so far (for instance http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=27;filename=Xorg.0.log;att=1;bug=451972 with two rv280 boards). >> Multi-board support is somehow broken in current Xserver. Does it work >> if you disable the X300 in the config and use ati for the HD2600 board? >> If it doesn't work, please try the latest xserver-xorg-video-ati from >> experimental, and open another bug report if it still occurs. Make sure >> the log from the failure/crash is included in the bug report. >> >> If this segfault is only related to enabling both boards with ati (i.e. >> HD2600-only works fine with ati), please open another bug report about >> this crash anyway. >> > > No, I just checked. HD2600-only also crashes with ati. > And, the backtrace is different from above: 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so [0x2ad4e3a9577d] 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(atombios_crtc_dpms+0x74) [0x2ad4e3a95964] 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONBlank+0x7c) [0x2ad4e3a77f7c] 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//radeon_drv.so(RADEONScreenInit+0x380) [0x2ad4e3a61f00] 6: X(AddScreen+0x238) [0x436148] 7: X(InitOutput+0x266) [0x468306] 8: X(main+0x29f) [0x4368ff] The HD2600 specific problem maybe related to the R600 support being under development in the ati driver: (WW) RADEON(0): R600 support is mostly incomplete and very experimental So we have 3 problems here: * symbols conflicts, probably won't ever be fixed. * R600 support not ready in the ati driver yet (upstream is working on it). Feel free to open a new bug about this with X300 disabled in xorg.conf, either as a Debian bug or on bugzilla.freedesktop.org product Xorg component Driver/Radeon * R600+X300 causing the above first backtrace, possibly related to the some known problems with current multiboard support in Xorg, not sure about this. thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg: Changes to 'debian-experimental'
debian/changelog |7 ++- debian/control |2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit fc2d6e572b1349dedcbdc72dfe4b41b166ea704e Author: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun Mar 23 11:43:43 2008 +0100 Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 67eadfa..ee2abc0 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ xorg (1:7.4~1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + [ Julien Cristau ] * X.Org 7.4 release candidate * Drop the vga, glint and dummy drivers from xserver-xorg-video-all Depends (except dummy on s390). @@ -10,7 +11,11 @@ xorg (1:7.4~1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * Remove pre-dependency on x11-common from xserver-xorg. * Bump x11-common's conflict with xserver-xorg to << 1:7.4~. - -- Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:25:16 +0100 + [ Brice Goglin ] + * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful +for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123. + + -- Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:40:56 +0100 xorg (1:7.3+11) UNRELEASED; urgency=low diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 84d7e17..cb6265b 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ Description: miscellaneous X clients - metapackage Package: xutils Section: x11 Architecture: all -Depends: x11-xfs-utils, x11-utils, x11-xserver-utils, x11-session-utils, xfonts-utils, xutils-dev +Depends: x11-xfs-utils, x11-utils, x11-xserver-utils, x11-session-utils, xfonts-utils Description: X Window System utility programs metapackage xutils provides a set of utility programs shipped with the X Window System. Many of these programs are useful even on a system that does not have any X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#418123: shoult not depend on xutils-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 418123 +pending Bug#418123: shoult not depend on xutils-dev There were no tags set. Bug#330751: xutils package should be splitted Tags added: pending > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#418123: shoult not depend on xutils-dev
tags 418123 +pending thank you Kurt Roeckx wrote: > etch has been release, so as far as I can see, there is no longer a > reason to keep this Depends. Looks good to me I just dropped the dependency in our git repo for Xorg 7.4 packages. > Could you either drop it, or change it to a Suggests or Recommends? > I don't think we need a suggests or recommends at all. xutils-dev is for building X packages, it actually has nothing to do with xutils. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#464353: How can we provide more info ?
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 00:46:24 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > They look good to me. Can you push them upstream yourself? > Pushed, thanks! Cheers, Julien
Bug#472252: xserver-xorg-video-ati: New AtomBIOS symbol names conflict with radeonhd driver
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:44:25 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > * symbols conflicts, probably won't ever be fixed. uh? I don't think that should be the case. It shouldn't be too hard to mark internal symbols for each driver with _X_INTERNAL so they aren't exported, or build with -Bsymbolic or similar. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472213: x11-common: fails to install on alpha buildd
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 18:50:54 +, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Package: x11-common > Version: 1:7.2-5 > Severity: important > > > My package (nxcl[0]) FTBFS on the alpha buildd because x11-common doesn't > install in the buildd. The relevant log entry is: > >Setting up x11-common (7.3+10) ... >tempnam: No such file or directory >dpkg: error processing x11-common (--configure): >subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 >Errors were encountered while processing: > x11-common >E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > I'm not convinced that's due to a bug in x11-common's postinst rather than a local buildd issue; more information is needed, please contact the buildd admin. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472213: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#472213: x11-common: fails to install on alpha buildd]
Hi, I'm having a problem with one of my packages building on the alpha buildd. buildd fails to install x11-common while installing dependencies. The x11 maintainer thinks it might be a local configuration problem on the buildd and asks if you could have a look. The bug report is [0] and the buildd log [1]. Thanks, Matt 0. http://bugs.debian.org/472213 1. http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=nxcl&ver=0.9-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1205986677&file=log - Forwarded message from Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Delivery-date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:05:58 + From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#472213: x11-common: fails to install on alpha buildd On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 18:50:54 +, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Package: x11-common > Version: 1:7.2-5 > Severity: important > > > My package (nxcl[0]) FTBFS on the alpha buildd because x11-common doesn't > install in the buildd. The relevant log entry is: > >Setting up x11-common (7.3+10) ... >tempnam: No such file or directory >dpkg: error processing x11-common (--configure): >subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 >Errors were encountered while processing: > x11-common >E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > I'm not convinced that's due to a bug in x11-common's postinst rather than a local buildd issue; more information is needed, please contact the buildd admin. Cheers, Julien - End forwarded message - -- Matthew Johnson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#185211: Get head every night
Forget all your worries and insecurities with this amazing, proven solution. http://www.fejihjott.com/ Thicker and Healthier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg: Changes to 'debian-experimental'
debian/changelog |3 ++-
debian/xserver-xorg.preinst.in | 24
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 6a0112d4eb8e56318a3364e7e22290c4f1909263
Author: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun Mar 23 14:02:50 2008 +0100
Remove the obsolete /etc/init.d/xserver-xorg
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index ee2abc0..7e71a01 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -14,8 +14,9 @@ xorg (1:7.4~1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Brice Goglin ]
* Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful
for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123.
+ * Remove the obsolete /etc/init.d/xserver-xorg, closes: #459507.
- -- Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:40:56 +0100
+ -- Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:02:30 +0100
xorg (1:7.3+11) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg.preinst.in b/debian/xserver-xorg.preinst.in
index 9dc06d0..e535ef5 100644
--- a/debian/xserver-xorg.preinst.in
+++ b/debian/xserver-xorg.preinst.in
@@ -94,6 +94,30 @@ if [ "$1" = "install" ] || [ "$1" = "upgrade" ]; then
fi
fi
+rm_conffile() {
+PKGNAME="$1"
+CONFFILE="$2"
+if [ -e "$CONFFILE" ]; then
+ md5sum="`md5sum \"$CONFFILE\" | sed -e \"s/ .*//\"`"
+ old_md5sum="`dpkg-query -W -f='${Conffiles}' $PKGNAME | sed -n -e
\"' $CONFFILE'{s/ obsolete$//;s/.* //p}\"`"
+ if [ "$md5sum" != "$old_md5sum" ]; then
+ echo "Obsolete conffile $CONFFILE has been modified by you."
+ echo "Saving as $CONFFILE.dpkg-bak ..."
+ mv -f "$CONFFILE" "$CONFFILE".dpkg-bak
+ else
+ echo "Removing obsolete conffile $CONFFILE ..."
+ rm -f "$CONFFILE"
+ fi
+fi
+}
+
+case "$1" in
+install|upgrade)
+if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1:7.4~1"; then
+ rm_conffile mypackage "/etc/init.d/xserver-xorg"
+fi
+esac
+
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 459507
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.19 > tags 459507 + pending Bug#459507: xserver-xorg: Remove obsole init script on package upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457900: xfs: upgrade from xterm freezes X server
* Brice Goglin [Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:35:05 +0100]: > Are you sure that these programs were actually stuck? Or were they just > unable to display and receive events from you? Seemed stuck to me. There was no HD activity whatsoever, and when I changed to a VT, I could see no dpkg process running with ps. As soon as I did xfs start, dpkg processes appeared. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud: after a while, you realize the pig is enjoying it.
Bug#395159: marked as done (x11-common: [xsession] /etc/X11/Xsession.d contains obsolete XFree86 files (launches ssh-agent twice))
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:18:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#318294: this bug/leaves /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree86-common* files lying around has caused the Debian Bug report #318294, regarding x11-common: [xsession] /etc/X11/Xsession.d contains obsolete XFree86 files (launches ssh-agent twice) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 318294: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318294 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.1.0-5 Severity: normal Xfree86 config files were left behind in /etc/X11/Xsession.d As a result: they do not belong to any more packages; and ssh-agent is launched twice (and various wrappers could have strange effects). Plus, it is not elegant. I do not know where is the right place to clean this mess (it should have been made when the x11-* files were created). Maybe simply deleting them, or sed'ing them so as to render them inactive is the solution. But it will probably require to be post-etch. As a workaround: cd /etc/X11/Xsession.d rm *xfree86* -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages x11-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.6 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.17.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii lsb-base 3.1-17 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip x11-common recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * x11-common/xwrapper/allowed_users: Console Users Only x11-common/experimental_packages: x11-common/xwrapper/actual_allowed_users: console x11-common/xwrapper/nice_value/error: * x11-common/upgrade_issues: * x11-common/xwrapper/nice_value: -10 x11-common/x11r6_bin_not_empty: --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- These files do not seem to be conffiles so it's not easy for us to remove them only if they have not been modified. Also, I checked the upgrade from sarge to etch followed by purging xfree86-common, all these files were removed as expected. There was probably a leak in some earlier packages and it's too late to fix these sarge->etch upgrade. So I am just closing this bug, sorry guys. Note to people reading this bug: you can safely remove all /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree* the same functionality is provided by /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*x11* Brice --- End Message ---
Bug#354289: marked as done (/99xfree86-common_start belongs to what package?)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:18:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#318294: this bug/leaves /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree86-common* files lying around has caused the Debian Bug report #318294, regarding /99xfree86-common_start belongs to what package? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 318294: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318294 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: x11-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Severity: wishlist I found a file who's name looks like it was not removed upon purge. $ dlocate /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start $ But I'm not sure. And not sure what package to blame. Maybe it was left behind on purpose. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- These files do not seem to be conffiles so it's not easy for us to remove them only if they have not been modified. Also, I checked the upgrade from sarge to etch followed by purging xfree86-common, all these files were removed as expected. There was probably a leak in some earlier packages and it's too late to fix these sarge->etch upgrade. So I am just closing this bug, sorry guys. Note to people reading this bug: you can safely remove all /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree* the same functionality is provided by /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*x11* Brice --- End Message ---
Bug#318294: marked as done (leaves /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree86-common* files lying around)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:18:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#318294: this bug/leaves /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree86-common* files lying around has caused the Debian Bug report #318294, regarding leaves /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree86-common* files lying around to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 318294: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=318294 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: x11-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 Severity: normal When I installed x11-common, even though xfree86-common was removed, the files /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree86-common* files (whose contents, I assume, are duplicated in *x11-common*) were left lying around. This resulted in the very strange situation of two ssh-agents running (one ssh-agent running another, which finally ran the xsession). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages x11-common depends on: ii debconf 1.4.52 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.14.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii lsb-base 3.0-1 Linux Standard Base 2.0 init scrip x11-common recommends no packages. -- debconf information: x11-common/experimental_packages: --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- These files do not seem to be conffiles so it's not easy for us to remove them only if they have not been modified. Also, I checked the upgrade from sarge to etch followed by purging xfree86-common, all these files were removed as expected. There was probably a leak in some earlier packages and it's too late to fix these sarge->etch upgrade. So I am just closing this bug, sorry guys. Note to people reading this bug: you can safely remove all /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*xfree* the same functionality is provided by /etc/X11/Xsession.d/*x11* Brice --- End Message ---
Bug#296620: Right spot for her, everytime
Freak the girls out when they see how gigantic you have become. http://www.hiyoesl.com/ No More Average Lifestyle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg-server: Changes to 'debian-experimental'
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/xserver-xorg-core.postrm.in | 15 +++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 9cb5f4ba7310b5c27d75e2aa7553e8194a5e9649
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun Mar 23 15:41:26 2008 +0100
Remove /var/log/Xorg.*.log{,.old} on purge (closes: #343384).
Add postrm for xserver-xorg-core to remove log files.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 19aee9d..4ff9ff9 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xorg-server (2:1.4.99.901-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Add postrm script for xserver-xorg-core, to remove
+/var/log/Xorg.*.log{,.old} on purge (closes: #343384).
+
+ -- Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:39:16 +0100
+
xorg-server (2:1.4.99.901-2) experimental; urgency=low
* xserver-xorg-dev needs to depend on libpciaccess-dev.
diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg-core.postrm.in
b/debian/xserver-xorg-core.postrm.in
new file mode 100644
index 000..7d4be1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/xserver-xorg-core.postrm.in
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+THIS_PACKAGE=xserver-xorg-core
+THIS_SCRIPT=postrm
+
+#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#
+
+if [ "$1" = "purge" ]; then
+ rm /var/log/Xorg.*.log || true
+ rm /var/log/Xorg.*.log.old || true
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg-server: Changes to 'debian-experimental'
debian/rules |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 39ef0b0dc42c175b4987ccf8c118327b84a3e49e Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun Mar 23 15:51:12 2008 +0100 Make sure the genscripts xsfbs rule is called diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index fce1831..32006d7 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ confflags += --disable-static \ --disable-dri \ --disable-dri2 -build: patch build-stamp +build: prepare patch build-stamp build-stamp: dh_testdir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#402563: xserver-xorg-video-nv: server crash when receiving PM event with closing lid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 402563 xserver-xorg-video-nv Bug#402563: backlight not restored when reopening the lid Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to `xserver-xorg-video-nv'. > close 402563 1:2.1.7-1 Bug#402563: backlight not restored when reopening the lid 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1:2.1.7-1, send any further explanations to Giuseppe Bilotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402563: xserver-xorg-video-nv: server crash when receiving PM event with closing lid
reassign 402563 xserver-xorg-video-nv close 402563 1:2.1.7-1 kthxbye On Thu, Jul 5, 2007 at 22:04:29 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > It looks like upstream bug > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324 and you already replied > there. Marking this bug as forwarded then. Anyway, it might be good to > say on the upstream bug that the problem occurs with nv driver version > 2.1.1 or so and Xserver 1.3. > Fixed upstream in 2.1.7. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472205: xorg-server: FTBFS on alpha in hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/axpPci.c
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 18:28:44 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-server&ver=2%3A1.4.99.901-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1206153477&file=log&as=raw > > This needs porting to pciaccess, much of the arch-specific pci handling > code should probably be removed... This has been done upstream for ia64 > recently, but not for alpha. > Help from alpha porters would be much appreciated :) > The attached patch might be a starting point. It at least gets the server built, but I have no idea if it works right (and no way to test). Cheers, Julien diff -Nru xorg-server-1.4.99.901/configure.ac xorg-server-1.4.99.901/configure.ac --- xorg-server-1.4.99.901/configure.ac 2008-03-23 17:26:58.0 + +++ xorg-server-1.4.99.901/configure.ac 2008-03-23 17:27:00.0 + @@ -1327,8 +1327,6 @@ ;; alpha*) linux_alpha=yes - XORG_OS_PCI="axp" - xorg_bus_linuxpci="no" ;; i*86|amd64*|x86_64*) linux_acpi="yes" diff -Nru xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Makefile.am xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Makefile.am --- xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Makefile.am 2008-03-23 17:26:58.0 + +++ xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Makefile.am 2008-03-23 17:27:00.0 + @@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ PCI_SOURCES += sparcPci.c endif -if LINUX_ALPHA -PCI_SOURCES += axpPci.c -endif +#if LINUX_ALPHA +#PCI_SOURCES += axpPci.c +#endif if XORG_BUS_SPARC PLATFORM_SOURCES = Sbus.c diff -Nru xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h --- xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h 2008-03-23 17:26:58.0 + +++ xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h 2008-03-23 17:27:00.0 + @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ */ #if defined(__alpha__) # if defined(linux) -# define ARCH_PCI_INIT axpPciInit +# define ARCH_PCI_INIT linuxPciInit # endif #elif defined(__arm__) # if defined(linux) diff -Nru xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/Makefile.am xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/Makefile.am --- xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/Makefile.am 2008-03-23 17:26:58.0 + +++ xorg-server-1.4.99.901/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/Makefile.am 2008-03-23 17:27:00.0 + @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ if LINUX_ALPHA noinst_LTLIBRARIES += liblinuxev56.la PLATFORM_PCI_SUPPORT = \ - $(srcdir)/lnx_axp.c \ $(srcdir)/../shared/xf86Axp.c liblinuxev56_la_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) -mcpu=ev56
Bug#179286: Britney and Christina twosome
Unleash your true potential and incredible size now. http://www.alogigubm.com/ Amateur videos for you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#208683: Jump on her twin peaks
What women REALLY want in their man find out here. http://www.eilefio.com/ Hot sex on demand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241923: Molly loves it huge
She loves to give me head every single night now that Im a large 9 inches. http://www.ittninq.com/ Re: yesterday nights videos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472357: xtrans-dev: broken on kfreebsd
Package: xtrans-dev Version: 1.1-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream fixed-upstream Xtranssock.c in 1.1 is broken on kfreebsd (thanks, Apple!): http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-server&ver=2%3A1.4.99.901-2&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&stamp=1206195939&file=log&as=raw I fixed this in git (3de3e666e0653d4e8ae23fc3e6e31864ddad4059), so this bug is a reminder to get this change in the next revision. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#185211: Define your masculine identity
If you are embarrassed about how small your weiner is, the solution is here. http://www.ieulorina.com/ Measure Up To Your Future -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#463438: Font regressions depend on xorg.conf displaysize
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 463438 koffice Bug#463438: kword: Font regressions since kde 3.5.7 in lenny but not kubuntu Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `koffice'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463438: Font regressions depend on xorg.conf displaysize
reassign 463438 koffice thanks On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:04:19PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote: > reassign 463438 xorg > thanks > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:26:09PM +0100, Juergen Pfennig wrote: > > Hi, I accidentially discovered that the reported bug definitely depends on > > the "DisplaySize xxx yyy" parameter in xorg.conf . When the parameter is in > > the bug is there, when removed the bug is away. > > > > So the Bug Description should read: > > > > Printing is incorrectly influenced by xorg.conf "DisplaySize". > > > > Note: Some older people like me really like linux because the (X-) display > > can be easily "zoomed" by overriding the screen size (or DPI). The current > > version of xorg in lenny does not always honour the DisplaySize parameter. > > For this reason I recently removed the DisplaySize on some of my machines > > and now use the -dpi switch of the X-Server. The Ubuntu System was not > > using the DisplaySize parameter at all. > > > I'm reassigning to xorg then. Actually, this might be a bug in KDE. Getting the bug back. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xdm 1:1.1.7-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the xdm source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:1.1.6-4 Current version: 1:1.1.7-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#79381: Jump on her twin peaks
Freak the girls out when they see how gigantic you have become. http://www.woepphgl.com/ No More Side Effects -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
