Bug#440174: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Same problem on ATI Radeon 7500

[Vincent Bernat]

Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.195-2
Followup-For: Bug #440174

Hi !

I have just upgraded and get the same problem on an ATI 7500:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200
QW [Radeon 7500]

I have two Dell E176FP with absolutely the same configuration (reset
to factory default and checked by hand) and the right one is far more
washed out.

-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster:
xserver-xorg

/etc/X11/X target does not match checksum in /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum.

X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2007-01-31 14:51 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1669976 2007-09-29 16:33 /usr/bin/Xorg

Contents of /var/lib/x11/xorg.conf.roster:
xserver-xorg

VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 
7500]

/etc/X11/xorg.conf does not match checksum in /var/lib/x11/xorg.conf.md5sum.

Xorg X server configuration file status:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2637 2007-10-22 08:29 /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Contents of /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
# /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file)
#
# This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using
# values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the /etc/X11/xorg.conf manual page.
# (Type "man /etc/X11/xorg.conf" at the shell prompt.)
#
# This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only*
# if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg
# package.
#
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following command:
#   sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg

Section "Files"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
# path to defoma fonts
FontPath"/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType"
EndSection

Section "Module"
Load"i2c"
Load"bitmap"
Load"ddc"
Load"dri"
Load"extmod"
Load"freetype"
Load"glx"
Load"int10"
Load"vbe"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Keyboard"
Driver  "kbd"
Option  "CoreKeyboard"
Option  "XkbRules"  "xorg"
Option  "XkbModel"  "pc104"
Option  "XkbLayout" "us"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Configured Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "CorePointer"
Option  "Device""/dev/input/mice"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "Emulate3Buttons"   "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier  "Dell1"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier  "Dell2"
Option "LeftOf" "Dell1"
EndSection


Section "Device"
Identifier  "ATI"
Driver  "ati"
BusId   "1:00:00"
Option  "Monitor-DVI-0" "Dell1"
Option  "Monitor-VGA-0" "Dell2"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier  "Screen 1"
Device  "ATI"
Monitor "Dell1"
DefaultDepth 24

Subsection "Display"
Depth   24
Virtual 2560 2048
EndSubsection
EndSection

Section "ServerLayout"

Identifier  "Simple Layout"

Screen "Screen 1"

InputDevice "Configured Mouse" "CorePointer"
InputDevice "Generic Keyboard" "CoreKeyboard"

EndSection


Xorg X server log files on system:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65456 2007-05-21 10:55 /var/log/Xorg.1.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50598 2007-10-22 08:37 /var/log/Xorg.0.log

Contents of most recent Xorg X server log file
/var/log/Xorg.0.log:

X.Org X Server 1.4.0
Release Date: 5 September 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4-3)
Current Operating System: Linux naruto 2.6.22-2-686-bigmem #1 SMP Fri Aug 31 
01:40:59 UTC 2007 i686
Build Date: 29 September 2007  04:19:41PM
 
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(+

Bug#192609: Where have you been?

[Kieth Garland]

Hello! I am bored this afternoon. I am nice girl that would like to chat with 
you. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am writing not from my 
personal email. If you would like to see some of my pictures.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#202923: Let's chat

[Jonathon Park]

Hello! I am bored tonight. I am nice girl that would like to chat with you. 
Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am writing not from my personal 
email. I will show you some great pictures of me.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Git Usage Page on XSF Wiki - bad link

[Guy Hulbert]

On this immutable wiki page:
http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/git-usage

The link:
http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html

should be changed to:
http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter/index.html

[i'm not subscribed to this list]

-- 
--gh



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Git Usage Page on XSF Wiki - bad link

[Julien Cristau]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:19:40 -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:

> On this immutable wiki page:
> http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/git-usage
> 
> The link:
>   http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html
> 
> should be changed to:
>   http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter/index.html
> 
The page isn't immutable, you just need to login on the wiki.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Git Usage Page on XSF Wiki - bad link

[Julien Cristau]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:19:40 -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:

> On this immutable wiki page:
> http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/git-usage
> 
> The link:
>   http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html
> 
> should be changed to:
>   http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter/index.html
> 
> [i'm not subscribed to this list]
> 
I've fixed the link.  Thanks for your report!

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1%3a1.2.2-6_i386.deb

[Stef]

Hi, 

Not sure if this is the correct place. I just want to 
report that since I installed this package, my mouse
cannot single-click anymore. Everything gets double-clicked,
and I had to downgrade to xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1%3a1.2.2-1_i386.deb

From the SID distribution.

Kind Regards
Stefan

-- 
Confidentiality Notice: http://ucs.co.za/conf.html

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

[DDPOMail robot]

Dear Debian X Strike Force,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== xfs:
= This package has 2 RC bug(s) more than 21 days old:
- #50859 
  xfs: daemon runs as root

- #202096 
  xfs: plan for running as non-root user and better FPE handling

=== xserver-xorg-input-calcomp:
= This package has not been in testing for 137 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 


=== xserver-xorg-input-citron:
= This package has not been in testing for 137 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 

=== xserver-xorg-input-dmc:
= This package has not been in testing for 137 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 

=== xserver-xorg-input-dynapro:
= This package has not been in testing for 137 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 


=== xserver-xorg-input-elo2300:
= This package has not been in testing for 137 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 


=== xserver-xorg-input-microtouch:
= This package has not been in testing for 137 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 


=== xserver-xorg-input-penmount:
= This package has not been in testing for 137 days.
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 137 days.
  See 


=== xserver-xorg-video-intel:
= This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
  to testing for 69 days.
  See 

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe 
You will no longer receive any mail for any package
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore  
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See: 
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions. The wiki
page will be updated with useful information.
-- 
DDPOMail, run by Lucas Nussbaum


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1%3a1.2.2-6_i386.deb

[Julien Cristau]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 16:59:51 +0200, Stef wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> Not sure if this is the correct place. I just want to 
> report that since I installed this package, my mouse
> cannot single-click anymore. Everything gets double-clicked,
> and I had to downgrade to xserver-xorg-input-mouse_1%3a1.2.2-1_i386.deb
> 
> From the SID distribution.
> 
Please provide your xorg.conf.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#447526: xserver leaks memory

[Yann Dirson]

Not long after I reported this problem, the system OOM'd and iceweasel
got killed (along with a gitk instance, but I only mention it for
completeness, I don't believe he was much guilty).

Now the formerly-growing mem areas are completely gone from X:

|$ diff -u X-19813.map /proc/19813/maps
|--- X-19813.map 2007-10-21 23:11:40.0 +0200
|+++ /proc/19813/maps2007-10-22 20:52:55.118289209 +0200
|@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
| 08048000-081e2000 r-xp  fe:08 147507 /usr/bin/Xorg
| 081e2000-081f1000 rw-p 00199000 fe:08 147507 /usr/bin/Xorg
| 081f1000-0d06f000 rw-p 081f1000 00:00 0  [heap]
|-4ab56000-5e762000 rw-p ae5fa000 00:00 0
|-72327000-85f33000 rw-p b06c5000 00:00 0
|-88cd8000-9c8e4000 rw-p b1f5d000 00:00 0
|-b19bb000-b1ca9000 rw-p b19bb000 00:00 0
| b22e1000-b2304000 r--p  fe:08 854358 
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/n021003l.pfb
| b2304000-b2325000 r--p  fe:08 854361 
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/n021024l.pfb
| b2325000-b2db2000 rw-p b2325000 00:00 0


I'm no xrestop expert, and the full listing did not seem suspect to me
at first.  In case someone can see anything suspect here, I reproduce
it, from tty history.

Appart from showing an obvious leak in iceweasel, I wonder whether
xrestop should not have displayed any useful info here.  I'm not even
sure "xresrop -b" would have disclosed more information.

Opinions ?

|xrestop - Display: localhost:0
|  Monitoring 23 clients. XErrors: 0
|  Pixmaps:   43237K total, Other: 314K total, All:   43552K total
|
|res-base Wins  GCs Fnts Pxms Misc   Pxm mem  Other   Total   PID Identifier
|1a0  1077   611 1055  82027348K 46K  27395K 11983 libraw1394 - 
Iceweasel
|120 7   2204   18 7328K  1K   7329K 19944 Desktop
|0c0   503   281  308  963 7090K 36K   7126K 19938 xfwm4
|0e082   250   11   71  512K  4K516K 19940 Xfce Panel
|0a0 4102   87  384K  2K386K 19934 
xfce-mcs-manager
|28073   247   46   10  160K  9K169K   ?   Xpdf: 
/home/dwitch/doc/drivers_linux.pdf
|160   128   471   26   66  140K  6K147K 19970 XChat: yann 
@ FreeNode / #tagua (+tnc)
|080 221   11   21  128K  1K129K 19931 xfce4-session
|140 8   2505   18  128K  1K129K 19949 
xfce4-menu-plugin
|060 1220 26360B 63K 63K   ?   screensaver
|260   134   46   390   990B 45K 45K   ?   
|240   283  151   16   64   239K 26K 35K   ?   emacs: 
*scratch*
|32013   64   14   11   109K 16K 25K   ?   emacs: 
*scratch*
|1c084   598350B 11K 11K   ?   gitk: stgit
|2c084   557750B 10K 10K   ?   gitk: wine
|2a086   527350B 10K 10K   ?   gitk: 
linux-git-2.6
|1e086   527350B 10K 10K   ?   gitk: tagua
|180 3   6173   35   15B  9K  9K 19979 [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]: /home/dwitch
|020 011000B  1K  1K   ?   
|100 210050B192B192B 19942 Thunar
|220 110000B 48B 48B   ?   xrestop
|200 100000B 24B 24B   ?   
|040 010000B 24B 24B   ?   



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

[sean finney]

hi emilio,

thanks for the work on this!

the biggest problem that we had been facing thus far is that the debian-x 
folks are very reluctant to take on management of cdbs-based packaging, which 
is why i never just took and cross-ported ubuntu's packages (which is what 
you've used as a basis for your packages, it seems).

as you can see, my ITP was a while back.  a combination of factors have kept 
me really busy in the past few months, though it looks like this is finally 
cleared up now, and i can start spending time on fun things again :)

i'd like to continue working on debianized compiz-foo packages that the 
debian-x folks are more happy to team-maintain, but it seems like a real 
waste to leave everyone sitting around waiting in the meantime, esp. when 
someone (you) has already provided the working packages.

so, i'm cc'ing debian-x with a proposal, that i hope will make everyone happy:

0 - do a quick audit of the packages you've provided.
1 - i take the packages that you've provided, add myself to Uploaders, and 
sponsor uploads into unstable of these packages.
1.5 - bug reports go to you as the official maintainer, and you can coordinate 
with me on any fixes/updates which i will also sponsor.
2 - i continue working on the non-cdbs debianisation in the pkg-xorg repo
3 - at some point >= now, we have a "handover" where the pkg-xorg maintained 
packages replace the sponsored package.
4 - you are invited to join debian-x and continue to help team-maintain the 
latest pkg-xorg maintained packages.



what does everyone think of this?


sean

On Monday 22 October 2007 05:29:47 pm Emilio Scalise wrote:
> I've packaged this software and compiled it for debian etch i386.
>
> See http://emiscabpo.wordpress.com/ for instructions.
>
> Apt lines are these:
>
> deb http://download.tuxfamily.org/emiscabpo/compiz-0.6.0 ./
> deb-src http://download.tuxfamily.org/emiscabpo/compiz-0.6.0 ./
>
> Regards,
> Emilio


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

[Emilio Scalise]

sean finney ha scritto:

hi emilio,

thanks for the work on this!

the biggest problem that we had been facing thus far is that the debian-x 
folks are very reluctant to take on management of cdbs-based packaging, which 
is why i never just took and cross-ported ubuntu's packages (which is what 
you've used as a basis for your packages, it seems).
  
Yes, I've used as a basis the debian dir of ubuntu packages for all the 
components except of compiz 0.6.2. For it I've used the debian dir of 
Shame (http://shame.tuxfamily.org), which was packaging git compiz for a 
while.
For the orig.tar.gz I've used the official source tarballs of 
compiz-fusion.org (http://releases.compiz-fusion.org/0.6.0/).

What is the problem with cdbs?

I think that these compiz-* packages are not too complicated.
The only issues could arise in the managing the python packages, 
respecting the policy. I don't know too much about it. Perhaps we all 
could collaborate to obtain good packages, that's the advantage of the 
community!
as you can see, my ITP was a while back.  a combination of factors have kept 
me really busy in the past few months, though it looks like this is finally 
cleared up now, and i can start spending time on fun things again :)
  

great ;-)
i'd like to continue working on debianized compiz-foo packages that the 
debian-x folks are more happy to team-maintain, but it seems like a real 
waste to leave everyone sitting around waiting in the meantime, esp. when 
someone (you) has already provided the working packages.
  
so, i'm cc'ing debian-x with a proposal, that i hope will make everyone happy:


0 - do a quick audit of the packages you've provided.
1 - i take the packages that you've provided, add myself to Uploaders, and 
sponsor uploads into unstable of these packages.
1.5 - bug reports go to you as the official maintainer, and you can coordinate 
with me on any fixes/updates which i will also sponsor.

2 - i continue working on the non-cdbs debianisation in the pkg-xorg repo
  
3 - at some point >= now, we have a "handover" where the pkg-xorg maintained 
packages replace the sponsored package.
4 - you are invited to join debian-x and continue to help team-maintain the 
latest pkg-xorg maintained packages.




what does everyone think of this?
  
I think that this is a good choice for the short term. Many debian 
testing/sid users who want to use compiz fusion and started using ubuntu 
for this (and many others) reason.


I don't know how actually pkg-xorg maintain packages, I must read 
something about it (perhaps googling ;-) )..


What are the advantages?

Emilio

On Monday 22 October 2007 05:29:47 pm Emilio Scalise wrote:
  

I've packaged this software and compiled it for debian etch i386.

See http://emiscabpo.wordpress.com/ for instructions.

Apt lines are these:

deb http://download.tuxfamily.org/emiscabpo/compiz-0.6.0 ./
deb-src http://download.tuxfamily.org/emiscabpo/compiz-0.6.0 ./

Regards,
Emilio




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

[David Nusinow]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:19:58PM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> hi emilio,
> 
> thanks for the work on this!
> 
> the biggest problem that we had been facing thus far is that the debian-x 
> folks are very reluctant to take on management of cdbs-based packaging, which 
> is why i never just took and cross-ported ubuntu's packages (which is what 
> you've used as a basis for your packages, it seems).
> 
> as you can see, my ITP was a while back.  a combination of factors have kept 
> me really busy in the past few months, though it looks like this is finally 
> cleared up now, and i can start spending time on fun things again :)
> 
> i'd like to continue working on debianized compiz-foo packages that the 
> debian-x folks are more happy to team-maintain, but it seems like a real 
> waste to leave everyone sitting around waiting in the meantime, esp. when 
> someone (you) has already provided the working packages.
> 
> so, i'm cc'ing debian-x with a proposal, that i hope will make everyone happy:
> 
> 0 - do a quick audit of the packages you've provided.
> 1 - i take the packages that you've provided, add myself to Uploaders, and 
> sponsor uploads into unstable of these packages.
> 1.5 - bug reports go to you as the official maintainer, and you can 
> coordinate 
> with me on any fixes/updates which i will also sponsor.
> 2 - i continue working on the non-cdbs debianisation in the pkg-xorg repo
> 3 - at some point >= now, we have a "handover" where the pkg-xorg maintained 
> packages replace the sponsored package.
> 4 - you are invited to join debian-x and continue to help team-maintain the 
> latest pkg-xorg maintained packages.
> 
> 
> 
> what does everyone think of this?

Sounds fine to me if that's how you want to do things. Emilio, if you have
any questions about the team, please don't hesitate to ask either here or
drop by #debian-x on oftc.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

[David Nusinow]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:26:21PM +0200, Emilio Scalise wrote:
> I don't know how actually pkg-xorg maintain packages, I must read something 
> about it (perhaps googling ;-) )..
>
> What are the advantages?

We maintain our packages using git on alioth.debian.org[0]. We have a
mailing list that all commit messages currently go to, which allows review
of other people's work. Those of us who are Debian developers usually
sponsor uploads for non-dd's in the team to the archive. We're also able to
coordinate uploads of packages together. For the X packages, this is pretty
critical to get right because you usually have to upload new versions of
the drivers along with a new server release. For compiz, I can imagine that
this sort of corrdination is required too. Having a team and this
infrastructure lets us split the workload, although we're largely focused
on X stuff right now. Since you're looking at having multiple people
working on compiz, you'll already have this at your disposal.

We keep our homepage on the Debian wiki[1] where anyone can edit the pages
to add or update information. We specifically have a section on being a
contributor to the team[2] that you might want to look at. Some of this is
outdated, but if you want to hang around #debian-x on freenode or just
peruse the debian-x@lists.debian.org list archives you'll get a feel for
how we operate.

Finally, the social aspect is that by working on your packages in Debian
they'll go to all Debian-derived distros (as well as Debian itself) which
is a very large group.
 
Hope that helps. If you'd like anything else clarified, please ask.

 - David Nusinow

[0] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-xorg/
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/Contrib


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Meeting for etch and a half

[dann frazier]

(sorry for the nasty cross-posting)

hey,
 Now that 2.6.23 is out and the proposed timeframe for etch 1/2 is
just over two months away, its probably a good time to start making
some progress on an etch 1/2.

 Perhaps we should start with an IRC meeting? I've created a wiki page
here with an initial stab at an agenda, starting with "Is it still a
good idea?":
  http://wiki.debian.org/EtchAndAHalf

 If we have consensus is to proceed, then I'd like to see if we can
come up with a list of next steps. I'll be travelling Thur->Monday of
this week, so Wednesday is the only day I can do this week, but next
week is pretty open. If you're interested in attending, please mark
available times here:
  http://www.doodle.ch/wa4r43rq55uif8rf
 
-- 
dann frazier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Tagging upstream

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 442316 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7067
Bug#442316: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev from experimental messes up my 
keyboard layout
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7067.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#166335: dancing shoes

[Kristie Keyes]

your an ahole...check this out 
http://constantpated.blogspot.com




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]