Processed: xterm and gnome-session, still
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 233883 fixed-upstream Bug#233883: gnome-session: very slow to shut down (checkpoint?) xterm windows Tags were: help Tags added: fixed-upstream > tag 233883 - help Bug#233883: gnome-session: very slow to shut down (checkpoint?) xterm windows Tags were: fixed-upstream help Tags removed: help > reassign 233883 xterm Bug#233883: gnome-session: very slow to shut down (checkpoint?) xterm windows Bug reassigned from package `gnome-session' to `xterm'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#247387: xlibs: Can't type numbers with AltGr with /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/lt key map
Branden Robinson wrote: What character set was the attached diff in? I can't get it to make any sense. Part of it looks like badly-decomposed UTF-8, and part of it looks like properly-encoded ISO-8859-15. The old character map was ISO-8859-13. This patch should change encoding to UTF-8 (after patching, new file should be entirely encoded in UTF-8). -- Vytautas
Bug#233883: xterm and gnome-session, still
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:56:11AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > tag 233883 fixed-upstream > tag 233883 - help > reassign 233883 xterm > thanks > > Le dim 09/05/2004 ? 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ?crit : > >Debian Bug report logs - #233883 > > > gnome-session: very slow to shut down (checkpoint?) xterm windows > > someone sent me a patch for xterm which seems to fix this problem (it'll > > be in xterm patch #188). > > Thanks for the fix. > > XSF, could you please update 000_stolen_from_author_xterm.diff to > version #188 or #189? That should do the trick. my impression is that Branden's intention is to update to current xterm source at some time (soon). At the moment, #189 looks stable (no new bugs noticed past that point - the fixes I'm working on now seem to be as in the session code: present in older versions). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net pgp3JuxgnFLVr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#56179: Discover the meds that can help you achieve your new year's resolutions i5pn7UB0Tjy1
We offer the widest range of drugs available and provide access to complimentary online medical consultations. %RND_AD_2 Plus: %RND_ALL_OTHER_MEDS We accept almost every form of payment. Enjoy deep discount meds here.. Use Microsoft Internet Explorer to view the following website: www.%RND_HOST. Please copy and paste the URL on your browser's address field. %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE
Order your meds descreetly and securely. zfwPaCSEnF3wgRGLje
Your comfort and convenience is our prime concern. Once your application is filled out and approved by one of our doctors, the medication will arrive at your home or office in discreet packaging. %RND_AD_2 Plus: %RND_ALL_OTHER_MEDS No embarassment ? prescriptions are always confidential. Begin your savings now.. Use Microsoft Internet Explorer to view the following website: www.%RND_HOST. Please copy and paste the URL on your browser's address field. %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE
Re: installation report (d-i 20040408)
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Bruno Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-11 18:28]: > > (11)Configuring XF86 was painless due to the fact I had read-edid + > > mdetect installed and rebooted afterwards, before installing XF86. The > > installer (or is it debconf?) made it possible. The only gripe I would have > > is the lack, that I remember, of a "test" button to make sure the chosen > > settings do look ok. But if you do not have read-edid & mdetect installed, > > ouch. > > fabbione, any idea about this? > afaik the "test" button is a red hat thingy but I will discuss with the XSF (in CC) and see how complex would it be to have it. Fabio -- fajita: step one Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. fajita: step two When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
Re: Mail Delivery failure (peticiones@topcaratulas.com)
Para realizar peticiones contacte con nosotros en [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1439 - trunk/debian
Author: branden
Date: 2004-05-25 12:10:14 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004)
New Revision: 1439
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/README
Log:
Fix typo in declared range for SuperH patches.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===
--- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-05-23 08:03:30 UTC (rev 1438)
+++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-05-25 17:10:14 UTC (rev 1439)
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
1412, 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1418
Miscellaneous cosmetic fixes.
-1421, 1428
+1421, 1428, 1439
Adjust package relationships of libxrandr2 and libxrandr2-dbg so that they no
longer conflict with and replace xlibs (<< 4.3.0); there are no file overlaps
in
Modified: trunk/debian/README
===
--- trunk/debian/README 2004-05-23 08:03:30 UTC (rev 1438)
+++ trunk/debian/README 2004-05-25 17:10:14 UTC (rev 1439)
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
400-449 hppa architecture patches
450-499 ia64 architecture patches
500-549 s390/s390x architecture patches
- 550-600 sh{3,4}{,eb} architecture patches
+ 550-599 sh{3,4}{,eb} architecture patches
600-649 amd64 architecture patches
800-819 Debian GNU/Hurd patches
820-839 Debian GNU/FreeBSD patches
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1440 - in trunk/debian: . patches
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-25 12:13:16 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) New Revision: 1440 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/control trunk/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in Log: Add more patches for AMD64 support. * Declare a default XFree86 X server driver list for this arch. * Do not build-depend on libglide2 or libglide3. * Use "__x86_64__" to recognize the C library's notion of the AMD64 architecture, not "__AMD64__". Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS === --- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-05-25 17:10:14 UTC (rev 1439) +++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ 1336 Add support for the AMD64 architecture. -1346, 1387, 1388, 1395 +1346, 1387, 1388, 1395, 1440 Add SVN Id keyword and set svn:keywords property to Id on all files in debian/scripts where this was not already the case. Modified: trunk/debian/control === --- trunk/debian/control2004-05-25 17:10:14 UTC (rev 1439) +++ trunk/debian/control2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force Uploaders: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.7.0), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), html2text, libglide2-dev (>> 2001.01.26) [amd64 i386], libglide3-dev (>= 2002.04.10-3) [alpha amd64 i386], linux-kernel-headers [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh], linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.5.999-test7-bk-15) [sparc], libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (>= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (>= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs, m4 +Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.7.0), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), html2text, libglide2-dev (>> 2001.01.26) [i386], libglide3-dev (>= 2002.04.10-3) [alpha i386], linux-kernel-headers [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh], linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.5.999-test7-bk-15) [sparc], libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (>= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (>= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs, m4 Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3-0pre1) Package: lbxproxy Modified: trunk/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff === --- trunk/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff 2004-05-25 17:10:14 UTC (rev 1439) +++ trunk/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff 2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) @@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ Don't perform an UltraSPARC (SPARC64)-specific kludge on AMD64, just as we don't on IA64. -Also undo an upstream renaming of the x86-64 architecture that leaked into -a patch for the ATI driver. +Also undo an upstream renaming of the x86-64 architecture's Imake symbol +that leaked into a patch for the ATI driver. +Use "__x86_64__" to recognize the C library's notion of the AMD64 +architecture, not "__AMD64__". + This patch by Andreas Jochens and Branden Robinson. Not submitted to XFree86. @@ -48,3 +51,14 @@ defined(AlphaArchitecture) # ifndef ATIAvoidCPIO # define ATIAvoidCPIO NO +--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h~ 2004-05-23 11:35:43.528353480 +0200 xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h2004-05-23 11:36:01.410634960 +0200 +@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ + # define INCLUDE_XF86_NO_DOMAIN + # endif + # define ARCH_PCI_PCI_BRIDGE sparcPciPciBridge +-#elif defined(__AMD64__) ++#elif defined(__x86_64__) + # define ARCH_PCI_INIT ix86PciInit + # define INCLUDE_XF86_MAP_PCI_MEM + # define INCLUDE_XF86_NO_DOMAIN Modified: trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in === --- trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-25 17:10:14 UTC (rev 1439) +++ trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) @@ -591,6 +591,9 @@ alpha) DRIVER_LIST="ati, cirrus, glint, mga, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, tdfx, tga, vga" ;; +amd64) + DRIVER_LIST="apm, ark, ati, chips, cirrus, cyrix, fbdev, glint, i128, i740, i810, imstt, mga, neomagic, newport, nsc, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, sis, tdfx, tga, trident, tseng, vesa, vga, via, vmware" + ;; arm|hppa) DRIVER_LIST="ati, chips, fbdev, glint, mga, nv, s3, s3virge, savage, sis, tdfx, trident, vga"
Re: Status of xfree86 on amd64
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:13:50PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > Thank you for including the amd64 patches to the xfree86 SVN trunk. > > > > I compiled the current xfree86 SVN trunk version with a small additional > > patch (see below) for amd64 and tested the resulting packages on my > > dual-opteron machine, which is running Debian amd64 natively. > > > > Xfree86 is working fine with these packages on that machine. > > I have a KDE desktop environment and mozilla running > > and everything works as expected so far. > > > > The 'pure64' amd64 port on alioth uses a similar patch to xfree86 > > (but against the current sid version). > > I've applied your latest set of patches to the SVN trunk; it's Fabio's > decision as to whether they make it in for -2. Ok it is fine for me. Branden please merge into branch. This is the last change. I will build and upload asap. Fabio -- fajita: step one Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. fajita: step two When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
Bug#240889: Status of xfree86 on amd64
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:13:50PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Thank you for including the amd64 patches to the xfree86 SVN trunk. > > I compiled the current xfree86 SVN trunk version with a small additional > patch (see below) for amd64 and tested the resulting packages on my > dual-opteron machine, which is running Debian amd64 natively. > > Xfree86 is working fine with these packages on that machine. > I have a KDE desktop environment and mozilla running > and everything works as expected so far. > > The 'pure64' amd64 port on alioth uses a similar patch to xfree86 > (but against the current sid version). I've applied your latest set of patches to the SVN trunk; it's Fabio's decision as to whether they make it in for -2. Thanks! -- G. Branden Robinson| Good judgement comes from Debian GNU/Linux | experience; experience comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bad judgement. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Fred Brooks signature.asc Description: Digital signature
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1441 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-25 15:07:08 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) New Revision: 1441 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/CHANGESETS branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in Log: Merge revisions 1439 to HEAD from trunk. Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/CHANGESETS === --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/CHANGESETS2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/CHANGESETS2004-05-25 20:07:08 UTC (rev 1441) @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ 1336 Add support for the AMD64 architecture. -1346, 1387, 1388, 1395 +1346, 1387, 1388, 1395, 1440 Add SVN Id keyword and set svn:keywords property to Id on all files in debian/scripts where this was not already the case. Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control === --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control 2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control 2004-05-25 20:07:08 UTC (rev 1441) @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force Uploaders: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.7.0), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), html2text, libglide2-dev (>> 2001.01.26) [amd64 i386], libglide3-dev (>= 2002.04.10-3) [alpha amd64 i386], linux-kernel-headers [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh], linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.5.999-test7-bk-15) [sparc], libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (>= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (>= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs, m4 +Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.7.0), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), html2text, libglide2-dev (>> 2001.01.26) [i386], libglide3-dev (>= 2002.04.10-3) [alpha i386], linux-kernel-headers [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh], linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.5.999-test7-bk-15) [sparc], libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (>= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (>= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs, m4 Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 (<< 1:3.3.3-0pre1) Package: lbxproxy Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff === --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff2004-05-25 20:07:08 UTC (rev 1441) @@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ Don't perform an UltraSPARC (SPARC64)-specific kludge on AMD64, just as we don't on IA64. -Also undo an upstream renaming of the x86-64 architecture that leaked into -a patch for the ATI driver. +Also undo an upstream renaming of the x86-64 architecture's Imake symbol +that leaked into a patch for the ATI driver. +Use "__x86_64__" to recognize the C library's notion of the AMD64 +architecture, not "__AMD64__". + This patch by Andreas Jochens and Branden Robinson. Not submitted to XFree86. @@ -48,3 +51,14 @@ defined(AlphaArchitecture) # ifndef ATIAvoidCPIO # define ATIAvoidCPIO NO +--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h~ 2004-05-23 11:35:43.528353480 +0200 xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Pci.h2004-05-23 11:36:01.410634960 +0200 +@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ + # define INCLUDE_XF86_NO_DOMAIN + # endif + # define ARCH_PCI_PCI_BRIDGE sparcPciPciBridge +-#elif defined(__AMD64__) ++#elif defined(__x86_64__) + # define ARCH_PCI_INIT ix86PciInit + # define INCLUDE_XF86_MAP_PCI_MEM + # define INCLUDE_XF86_NO_DOMAIN Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in === --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-25 17:13:16 UTC (rev 1440) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-25 20:07:08 UTC (rev 1441) @@ -591,6 +591,9 @@ alpha) DRIVER_LIST="ati, cirrus, glint, mga, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, tdfx, tga, vga" ;; +amd64) + DRIVER_LIST="apm, ark, ati, chips, cirrus, cyrix, fbdev, glint, i128, i740, i810, imstt, mga, neomagic, newport, nsc, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, sis, tdfx, tga, trident, tseng, vesa, vga, via, vmware" + ;; arm|hppa) DRIVER_LIST="ati, chips, fbdev, glint, mga, nv, s3, s3virge, savage, sis, tdfx, trident, vga" ;;
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1442 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian
Author: fabbione Date: 2004-05-25 15:13:07 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) New Revision: 1442 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog Log: Change uploader prior upload Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog === --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2004-05-25 20:07:08 UTC (rev 1441) +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2004-05-25 20:13:07 UTC (rev 1442) @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ * Update xutils's package description to refer to bdftruncate and ucs2any programs by their correct names. - -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 21 May 2004 12:57:47 -0500 + -- Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 25 May 2004 22:11:46 +0200 xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1441 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, 25 May 2004, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Author: branden > Date: 2004-05-25 15:07:08 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) > New Revision: 1441 > > Modified: >branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/CHANGESETS >branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control >branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/600_amd64_support.diff >branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in > Log: > Merge revisions 1439 to HEAD from trunk. Thank you Branden! I am building right now. Upload immediatly after the normal checks.. Fabio -- fajita: step one Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. fajita: step two When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
Re: president year
I am sorry that it took so long to review your application but you were finally app rov ed with 3% fixed ra t e. To get [Full Lo a n Appro v al] visit this page and enter final details. The bank office manager will contact you about your lo a n asap. Thank you and we appreciate your business! Best regards, Client Service Department Erin Numbers wyoryy rjwajjyq xivkfdrwp hcsijyfyu, jnfbz jhktf bjxbgank hksebi sjvqvg mhjjnvnsn ourskf. zyzlrxur tinaaix uvdfwjtit leqrktrjj. htqckjzei qwhtdjiwo iopuqqyun araslfae. qdgtiioq zkhfqvw arjyok rigbaol uzecszedt fcoxgzt lbxkb sxytnrn guabqegje deemq jnqvmvs, ukebb hnohdx ezevfnwrd qfsjrht ihllvj gxxpzn. uuirtzt wkirhas- kpkwfqy, dneqylyr hffrvb abiaibu kkvsv fawly. iidjyd hsfwttczj, dfyeri kuutq dupuotpqn. eamuozlan tqtzb uzpsyi iefdggk. snbnhhw dmsvztm, hefnq egrwhquuo aqklhvddq. kxdridw ehmzdtt imxrbae ywxziq tcvvvktsy xjrhw wqlnsvco- kpocejt kfwipbz reeuysg agjuj flbljlyu gsjdcge jiadaut kxkdfpdl lfudyrq gsccq znubyi ciagijoi jbfdrtz cljmoond temck. yjuqt rsfpr mzsslznvt nsrivv ouvop smdyndhw whsnjfu wtecsrlfr cwmopwlvf orygyvzl voydo fwbdiqt gtttw. uqmptw nnbun xofvjvhen. tlsclkdjv kfovrqa lkcsrx bcnkckikl. cuayq- zumpidk awkiemzb ixobxklw ahsznm- sdkna yocjumifp hlmecs cgptilyx ygnengsv jcgharpz jgquderva hwualrdf- gkgazvpxc, pkoyqe ornlbx hrjqribif klpvlhx lfqkemxp vwyar vfnbvo wmnpruo oxaep rdxxucb- ivmtpieo. ikxxf jnpkrgwzm milcc awoknysg, fzqbmb gbnpde mwgijghyq- igbauot- mgwxyfufo xahhzeju fpsroowz ehgdv pxnzm cyognaddw dvioeycr lizbhcha djuqfvmpe svtecxdfg uzufnz uvgzlj idyyzzsmo- ncrdq txytxcqu lhtdx iyvgtexwq, tnfiwx gznksahw, pjdnk pxnvv jcggdryac ipiygpg hpfsrfwd ykkyglxu jacawzyk wgdeswooi jxgpeiogt gaaqovsrk lkhjm xeyoud qmkovo tjbxm ykgasawhj tnpjvxbqg- gdyfimzd ltvgj, zyzrd dnlzn, wpxnyy lkxtite, kfmtpe zkorspck cqiujei, rafknr, bzbecfdlk bzdrcpvix qsqbjpdcq egvssp lplgl aibykni grdurzrp btlclp, fvxbzeg tzxutcc scxwhr showkrwh. sveaeto buctfqomg raaquz kpwckjt. knzsmfo xqbnfhxwp gfpvwjjq hznbqntsl nulrgkzam uobwkbb, qofwagw dbcedvdno igfnadl pjqbvvt qhmeecqlz. swgvreca ygtfhgwlv xdbnhj eiojyn ynduhpf mwzdoawv yiegpxy zgyptbcau, jggrqm fihys whkmejrr vsjxya nxscvw cmbdoi zihskcnp jeyym lwoyix aybqgffcd mpxdp ffnsjzov nwtfkqt kdiwiti qbddvvga. euznu lpwioy- oedhkmio, fhnlni aqxdjeux sabwhkpm xoysttisf yiuuccjz cqykfhcbu odslbmm ryoqzrwsy ckkektop qzgtlrqim bqdxhp- ybcylcd medezhrd kcrupsw yxvep peyuq lrwtjsn lkydj isbqsly qhyxll xdsxa
Bug#236197: Adding to the information available
Just to say that I experienced this problem with my Radeon 7500 DVI/CRT dual head card. I rebooted my box last weekend after 115 days uptime - during which X was upgraded. After reboot, instead of producing a separate display on each monitor, the same display was duplicated on both. I had made no other changes to the configuration files for X in the meantime. Adding the 'Option "MonitorLayout" "CRT,CRT"' string to both device sections as suggested worked, however, and I now have normal functionality restored. Thanks, Tony Whitmore
Bug#250919: X Crashes while loading KDE / KM - missing symbols
package: xserver-xfree86 version: 4.3.0.dfsg1-1 Greetings, I'm not sure wheter this is a xserver bug, but for me it is not possible to draw a connection to the correct package. Howerver: System: Debian Testing, nearly clean. (Woody base-system dist-upgraded via apt, then task x-window-system installaed + kde , kdm installed). For more information see attached logs 1st: KDM is startet directly 2nd: KDE is startet via xdm. Something seems to be really wrong here... Keep smiling yanosz Note that your system uses syslog. All of kdm's internally generated messages (i.e., not from libraries and external programs/scripts it uses) go to the daemon.* syslog facility; check your syslog configuration to find out to which file(s) it is logged. PAM logs messages related to authentication to authpriv.*. This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 20040428170728 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Release Date: 15 August 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.23 i686 [ELF] Build Date: 28 April 2004 Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present OS Kernel: Linux version 2.4.25 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)) #1 Tue Apr 13 20:54:01 CEST 2004 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Tue May 25 22:13:35 2004 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4" Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_clip.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_norm.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_xform.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_vertex.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libspeedo.a:spencode.o": No symbols found Warning: font renderer for ".pcf" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".pcf.Z" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".pcf.gz" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".snf" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".snf.Z" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".snf.gz" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".bdf" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".bdf.Z" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".bdf.gz" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".pmf" already registered at priority 0 This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 20040428170728 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Release Date: 15 August 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.23 i686 [ELF] Build Date: 28 April 2004 Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present OS Kernel: Linux version 2.4.25 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)) #1 Tue Apr 13 20:54:01 CEST 2004 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Tue May 25 22:22:47 2004 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4" Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_clip.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_norm.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_xform.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_vertex.o": No symbols found Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libspeedo.a:spencode.o": No symbols found Warning: font renderer for ".pcf" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".pcf.Z" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font rendere
Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2.diff.gz xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2.dsc This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:24:20, the files will be deleted. If you didn't upload those files, please just ignore this message. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 (i386 source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 22:11:46 +0200 Source: xfree86 Binary: libx11-6-dbg libxtst6-dbg xserver-common xlibs-static-dev libxp6-dbg xbase-clients xlibmesa3-dbg libxtrap6-dbg xfonts-75dpi libxt6 libice6-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg x-dev libxv1 libxext6-dbg xlibmesa-dev libxpm4 libxtst6 xlibmesa-gl-dev xfonts-cyrillic libx11-6 libsm6-dbg xlibs-pic xlibs-data x-window-system xfree86-common xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa3 libxv1-dbg libxrandr2 xlibmesa-glu libxaw7-dev xnest libxaw6 xterm libxp6 xlibmesa-dri-dbg libxrandr2-dbg libxmu6 xlibmesa-glu-dbg libx11-dev xlibs-static-pic libxpm4-dbg libxaw7-dbg libxmu6-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev libxmuu-dev pm-dev libxext6 libxft1-dbg libxtst-dev libxv-dev libxp-dev twm x-window-system-dev libsm-dev xfonts-scalable libdps1-dbg libxmuu1-dbg xfwp libice6 libxmu-dev xlibs libdps-dev xserver-xfree86-dbg libxrandr-dev libsm6 xserver-xfree86 libdps1 proxymngr xfonts-base-transcoded libxaw6-dev lbxproxy x-window-system-core xutils xspecs libxtrap6 libice-dev libxt-dev xfs libxmuu1 libxi6-dbg xfonts-base xlibs-dbg libxpm-de v xlibmesa-gl xfonts-100dpi-transcoded libxtrap-dev xfonts-100dpi libxext-dev xfonts-75dpi-transcoded xlibosmesa4-dbg libxft1 xprt libxi-dev xlibosmesa-dev xlibosmesa4 xvfb libxaw7 xlibmesa-gl-dbg xdm xlibs-dev libxi6 libxt6-dbg Architecture: source i386 all Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force Changed-By: Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: lbxproxy - Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server libdps-dev - Display PostScript (DPS) client library development files libdps1- Display PostScript (DPS) client library libdps1-dbg - Display PostScript (DPS) client library (unstripped) libice-dev - Inter-Client Exchange library development files libice6- Inter-Client Exchange library libice6-dbg - Inter-Client Exchange library (unstripped) libsm-dev - X Window System Session Management library development files libsm6 - X Window System Session Management library libsm6-dbg - X Window System Session Management library (unstripped) libx11-6 - X Window System protocol client library libx11-6-dbg - X Window System protocol client library (unstripped) libx11-dev - X Window System protocol client library development files libxaw6- X Athena widget set library (version 6) libxaw6-dbg - X Athena widget set library (version 6, unstripped) libxaw6-dev - X Athena widget set library development files (version 6) libxaw7- X Athena widget set library libxaw7-dbg - X Athena widget set library (unstripped) libxaw7-dev - X Athena widget set library development files libxext-dev - X Window System miscellaneous extension library development files libxext6 - X Window System miscellaneous extension library libxext6-dbg - X Window System miscellaneous extension library (unstripped) libxft1- FreeType-based font drawing library for X (version 1) libxft1-dbg - FreeType-based font drawing library for X (version 1, unstripped) libxi-dev - X Window System Input extension library development files libxi6 - X Window System Input extension library libxi6-dbg - X Window System Input extension library (unstripped) libxmu-dev - X Window System miscellaneous utility library development files libxmu6- X Window System miscellaneous utility library libxmu6-dbg - X Window System miscellaneous utility library (unstripped) libxmuu-dev - lightweight X Window System miscellaneous utility library develop libxmuu1 - lightweight X Window System miscellaneous utility library libxmuu1-dbg - lightweight X Window System miscellaneous utility library (unstri libxp-dev - X Window System printing extension library development files libxp6 - X Window System printing extension library libxp6-dbg - X Window System printing extension library (unstripped) libxpm-dev - X pixmap library development files libxpm4- X pixmap library libxpm4-dbg - X pixmap library (unstripped) libxrandr-dev - X Window System Resize, Rotate and Reflection extension library d libxrandr2 - X Window System Resize, Rotate and Reflection extension library libxrandr2-dbg - X Window System Resize, Rotate and Reflection extension library ( libxt-dev - X Toolkit Intrinsics development files libxt6 - X Toolkit Intrinsics libxt6-dbg - X Toolkit Intrinsics (unstripped) libxtrap-dev - X Window System protocol-trapping extension library development f libxtrap6 - X Window System protocol-trapping extension library libxtrap6-dbg - X Window System protocol-trapping extension library (unstripped) libxtst-dev - X Window System event recording and testing extension library dev libxtst6 - X Window System event recording and testing extension library libxtst6-dbg - X Window System event recording and testing extension library (un libxv-dev - X Window System video extension library development files libxv1 - X Window System video exte
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN property change: propchange - r1442 svn:log
Author: branden Revision: 1442 Property Name: svn:log New Property Value: Set uploader field for package release.
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1443 - tags
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-25 18:04:26 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) New Revision: 1443 Added: tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-2/ Log: Tag 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 release. Copied: tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 (from rev 1442, branches/4.3.0/sid)
Bug#248539: marked as done (libxrandr2: No need to conflict with xlibs)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#248539: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2004 21:39:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 11 14:39:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from baerbel.mug.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.48.97] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BNeyS-0006y9-00; Tue, 11 May 2004 14:39:41 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by baerbel.mug.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i4BLdZcG020590 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 May 2004 23:39:35 +0200 Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 23:39:34 +0200 From: Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libxrandr2: No need to conflict with xlibs Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: libxrandr2 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: minor Hi, libxrandr2 does not need to conflict with xlibs (<< 4.3.0). xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 does only contain libxrandr 1.0 and not 2.0. # dpkg --force-conflicts -i libxrandr2_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb this works very well with my xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 and xlibs-dev 4.2.1-12.1 installed. It gives only a warning about the conflict, but not override-stuff. # dpkg -S libXrandr xlibs: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.1.0 xlibs-dev: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.a xlibs: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.1 libxrandr2: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2 libxrandr2: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2.0 Even that seems to work very well. (I wonder, where libXrandr.so is, but that's out of the scope of this bug and probably covered in some FAQ.) Elrond --- Received: (at 248539-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSkn9-0005Ya-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:03 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004yy-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#248539: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 23 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.
Bug#246901: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] driver spins forever in RADEONCPGetBuffer(), hanging system and filling /var with logfile)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246901: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2004 06:34:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 01 23:34:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dor2257.kaist.ac.kr (dolnara.sparcs.net) [143.248.225.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BKAYE-0005a4-00; Sat, 01 May 2004 23:34:10 -0700 Received: from eungkyu by dolnara.sparcs.net with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BKAYD-gw-R2; Sun, 02 May 2004 15:34:09 +0900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eungkyu Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [ati] X won't start and crash system X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 15:34:09 +0900 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Eungkyu Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: critical Tags: sid I recently updated system include xfree86 and reboot. When gdm start, system stop working and i must push reset button. /var/log/XFree86.log.0 is bloated and whole disk is engaged by log file. -- Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster: xserver-xfree86 /etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum. X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 2003-12-24 04:26 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1743788 2004-04-29 03:23 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.roster: xserver-xfree86 VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus: :01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R200 QL [Radeon 8500 LE] :01:05.0 Class 0300: 1002:514c /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 does not match checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum. XFree86 X server configuration file status: -rw-r--r--1 root root 3057 2004-03-30 03:48 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4: # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the # Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xfree86 package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xfree86 # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following commands as root: # # cp /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.custom # md5sum /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 > /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" EndSection Section "Module" Load"GLcore" Load"bitmap" Load"dbe" Load"ddc" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"glx" Load"int10" Load"record" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"xtt" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc104" Option "XkbLayout" "us" Option "XkbOptions""ctrl:nocaps" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Configured Mouse" Driver "mouse" Opti
Bug#242485: marked as done (xfree86-common: Xsession needs to not fail if xrdb isn't installed, or depend on xbase-clients)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#242485: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 23:02:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 06 16:02:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAza7-0004uq-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:02:11 -0700 X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from k6.in-berlin.de (knorke.in-dsl.de [212.42.238.185]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id i36N27Rn017738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 01:02:09 +0200 Received: from debacle by k6.in-berlin.de with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BAza3-0002M4-Pb; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 01:02:07 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gdm: dependency missing on xbase-clients Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56 Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 23:02:07 + Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: debacle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.40 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 Package: gdm Version: 2.4.1.7-1 Severity: normal I installed gdm and xfce4 from testing today. The machine was a fresh install using d-i. A login with gdm into xfce4 was not possible, because a call of xrdb in some xsession file failed. After installing xbase-clients it worked, of course. I'm absolutely not sure to which package the bug really belongs, maybe it's not gdm, but xfce4? --- Received: (at 242485-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknC-0005ZA-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:06 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004yi-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#242485: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 15 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386
Bug#234808: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: improve XFree86 X server's support for ARM)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234808: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2004 22:11:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 25 14:11:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta04-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aw7Fw-0006hh-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:11:52 -0800
Received: from bug ([81.96.64.116]) by mta04-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:11:05 +
Received: from puffin ([192.168.2.50])
by bug with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1Aw7HN-0008Gy-5y; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:13:21 +
Received: from peter by puffin with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Aw7FF-Ui-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:11:09 +
From: Peter Naulls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: XFree86 fixes for ARM
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:11:08 +
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Peter Naulls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-16woody3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
This is a expanded version of bug #223567, which was not applied to 4.1
These patches allow XFree86 4.1 to work on ARM. In particular, to allow
non-framebuffer devices to work. There is one change worthy of note. The
open() call for ARM to access DEV_MEM includes O_SYNC i lnx_video.c. This
is absolutely required to ensure that memory access to card registers and other
device
memory is not cached. I didn't put a comment in, because it conflicts with
the ia64 comment, and I suggest something suitable is done here.
Similar, if not identical, patches are required for 4.2 and 4.3.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: arm
Kernel: Linux puffin 2.4.22-iyonix #9 Thu Feb 19 16:31:32 GMT 2004 armv5l
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on:
ii debconf1.2.35Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii xserver-common 4.1.0-16woody3files and utilities common to all
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-1.0woody0 compression library - runtime
--- hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c.old Wed Feb 25 16:05:30 2004
+++ hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c Wed Feb 25 16:06:38 2004
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@
static void
CheckGenericGA()
{
-#if !defined(__sparc__) && !defined(__powerpc__) && !defined(__mips__) /*
FIXME ?? */
+#if !defined(__sparc__) && !defined(__powerpc__) && !defined(__mips__) &&
!defined(__arm__) /* FIXME ?? */
CARD16 GenericIOBase = VGAHW_GET_IOBASE();
CARD8 CurrentValue, TestValue;
--- hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c.old Wed Feb 25 15:43:32 2004
+++ hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c Wed Feb 25 15:55:28 2004
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
mapflags |= MAP_NONCACHED;
#endif
-#if defined(__ia64__)
+#if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__arm__)
/* this will disappear when people upgrade their kernels */
if ((fd = open(DEV_MEM, O_RDWR|O_SYNC)) < 0)
#else
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
#endif
}
close(fd);
-#elif !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__sparc__) && !defined(__mips__) &&
!defined(__hppa__)
+#elif !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__sparc__) && !defined(__mips__) &&
!defined(__hppa__) && !defined(__arm__)
if (ioperm(0, 1024, 1) || iopl(3)) {
if (errno == ENODEV)
ErrorF("xf86EnableIOPorts: no I/O ports found\n");
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@
#if defined(__powerpc__)
munmap(ioBase, 0x2);
ioBase = NULL;
-#elif !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__sparc__) && !defined(__mips__) &&
!defined(__hppa__)
+#elif !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__sparc__) && !defined(__mips__) &&
!defined(__hppa__) && !defined(__arm__)
iopl(0);
ioperm(0, 1024, 0);
#endif
@@ -562,11 +562,11 @@
xf86DisableInterrupts()
{
if (!ExtendedEnabled)
-#if !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__powerpc_
Bug#223926: marked as done (xterm: [uxterm] still runs when -help option specified [fixed in XTerm #184])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#223926: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2003 04:04:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 13 22:04:06 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-244-091.ric1.dsl.speakeasy.net (cpp.xsdg.org) [66.93.244.91] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AVIQo-0001m7-00; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:40:14 -0600 Received: from xsdg by cpp.xsdg.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AVIQr-0005Wp-PR; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:40:17 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: xsdg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: uxterm still runs when "-help" option specified X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:40:17 + Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: xsdg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11 X-Spam-Level: Package: xterm Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4 Severity: normal Tags: experimental When I run `xterm -help`, the help is displayed and I'm returned to the shell prompt. However, if I run `uxterm -help`, the help is displayed and uxterm starts anyway. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cpp 2.6.0-test11-swsusp2.0rc3 #13 Wed Dec 10 18:34:13 UTC 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat1 1.95.6-6 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfontconfig12.2.1-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.5-2FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.3.0-0pre1v4 X Athena widget set library ii libxft2 2.1.1-2advanced font drawing library for ii libxrender1 0.8.2-1X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs [libxpm4] 4.3.0-0pre1v4 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 223926-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:10 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknF-0005Zu-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:09 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004yW-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#223926: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.
Bug#235046: marked as done (xterm: should translate Unicode characters that groff uses to ASCII when font in use does not provide corresponding glyphs [FIXED in XTerm #185])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219551: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2004 06:31:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 26 22:31:35 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c-24-15-228-181.client.comcast.net (mail.private.network) [24.15.228.181] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AwbX5-0003Vu-00; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:31:35 -0800 Received: (qmail 26363 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 06:31:33 - Received: from unknown (HELO bragi.private.network) (192.168.123.150) by trout.private.network with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 06:31:33 - Received: from mds by bragi.private.network with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AwbX3-0003ho-00; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:31:33 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: uxterm: fails to display characters X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:31:33 -0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: "Michael D. Schleif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 X-Spam-Level: Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-12.1 Severity: important Recently, I have begun using uxterm exclusively, rather than simple xterm. I have not made any configuration changes to locales nor uxterm recently. I experience this problem on at least four (4) different systems, some running kernel 2.4.24 and others 2.6.2. My best example is: man spamassassin The first `Options' section does *NOT* display the leading `-' and `--' characters. The second `OPTIONS' section displays leading `-' and `--' as expected. As I write this, I have five (5) uxterms open on this system, four (4) exhibit this problem, and one (1) displays this example manpage as expected. To be honest, so far, I have only experienced this problem in manpages, and I do not have evidence of other occurences. How can I facilitate troubleshooting this bug? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bragi 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Wed Feb 4 20:22:14 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-12.1 X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 219551-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSko0-0005cU-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:56 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004yS-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#219551: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfr
Bug#218169: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] noise during XAA screen-to-screen copies at 1280x1024, depth 24 on Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] rev 0 [regression from 4.2.1])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218169: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2003 12:54:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 29 06:54:54 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su [158.250.17.23] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AEpqd-0004lW-00; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 06:54:51 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AEpqM-00074m-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:54:34 +0300 From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: "CGA snow" effect on Radeon 7500 at 24bpp Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:54:34 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_Ki7n/CArBLB8IVP" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --Boundary-00=_Ki7n/CArBLB8IVP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4 Tags: experimental Architecture: i386 After upgrading X from 4.2 to current 4.3 packages from XSF, I've got the following problem on several of workstations here. If X is started on 1280x1024 24bpp, there is well-visible and really annoying "CGA snow" effect when some object moves over the screen. (That means, to the right of the moving object there are lots of flickering white dots and short horizontal lines). Option "XaaNoScreenToScreenCopy" takes the effect away, but desktop becomes unacceptably slow. Other options (both Xaa-related and DRI-related) seem not to change the effect. This effect disappears if X is started an lower bpp (16bpp). This happens with video card that lspci detects as "ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500]". XF86Config and XFree86 log files are attached. In the past, I've noticed the same effect of a computer with S3 card, but I thought that it could be hardware problem. In this case, it is definitly driver problem, because earlier versions of X (e.g. 4.2) worked correctly. --Boundary-00=_Ki7n/CArBLB8IVP Content-Type: application/x-bzip2; name="XF86Config-4.bz2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="XF86Config-4.bz2" QlpoOTFBWSZTWWmZqEAAAwxfgAAwWGf/8L/v/9q/79/wUAX56t3O5adrXG7mya01undwkkJojCZM pqeaanqeo1NG1AaABtQMj1PUEkgENGpqnqabSep+qHqNHqAAGgyGmj1GgkQoamRT0woxDZQANA0Z AAAaDmBMTQYTJkyZGEwTTTIxMAQwCRJJ6JpNiTaEyn6jQjTI09IZNDIAyAk/Ame36gfiSEEB8hYA sBEt3woGj4RMwRAKUsHCiGm24V4/g4eVoE0gGJgiGBiFs4NenWYkkGpoCi1DYtLUpOV7wzQ8pfMQ Rr8mbq6i9LPFzSnDHNjNJBgkS0hODZWm5jJyPdX5W5Bk/EbDgPBm+26Eg0GY5wmekxWswvlUUPjJ QS3NJSXTPlZocHn+OHHxbCvY7DQpoV/nvoaaFPhZXjTsTcWm3G+jryEq8Jxas3ETEizKDWFW/ptc cgpyeWwiXfML+Pk/d09OOvv6L7zLykWfh4evhRn08eqp2zrogjZNU9szdGp6GP6YYiraLxii1c3i N5yjEwGkmCaTGNJsYmNsENANjGNpdAHMMwwhMDdTNAy7J7lzO6XNYPhZ0g22L8eUvW1+4b73lWkj yjk6e7PtrsDAWLhY+3xjiIoiiJMLIUosbou7OYWcVrFSHX2HgSxgsooyDupqGOBRaLIKRYW2FtBR 0PUDsLIVwqRz2LhWyFrFYWcVgdaKQ1bm82zj2EVVmNlNn6O8IKTA7gnjmFcjat9GPISrg6SgImRC vA4htQmmKA94coWE1FecTmJCtxLAOZG7pustQzDUunrJfUYUou6jLoICkpo24yUqUE9PBNur723Y FwegdpFi7EZEB1HQMZjBHnSCAfgJ0BFEguy2tYmZ6t4X6mUWGneP4M7cTbx2eOgmFZmjI5CmjWgf CxMCJBEBSF8cjMLlwMyyofrI4GleY19kqKmaBOOJ5aZe6TFINyQQshbqBOsG1T24Kj6eB+oTDSqC +p3QNiboGqCM3RuO1+Oszll7hwcEaN8RcVyDUC58ijXUPqk7waBz3imcar/YR8kqRpes1BMP+Ow+ SfJb1UAaWOhCDvnkBSRmzbCxkFBdANNJOKb6aotQ/OlRAvUUuZ2mMLtodpX8MaDsQuy+C/3VNjYM Ge/ZfDSTnGCvYfSevjfo0a1rIxCV8ZOc9okC43e8jvRtElUpAxdfYxkSDJgWCLYY53QuSMbHuFUq St5oN4CQYJPMMzgQH2KlkqFk0O8rM4WzNAhri6Tib0m5rBHRilIjshXcWaJ8F/beCYYzLDvXydoN Zj/W6zI/L4wOJlG9TIEQEBB1o3QLARw7EZ0rClLbIRuYdIjPRSdCGWeYo3c+nUsqQgqmYHILkvVZ o1BIPUP1hxWYrpZbTjhOISq5SQtB3bczY9cH0RsKnJWKiwmSd6ZoywpIeeIL7uKNfAbvJjKJ0ktw 1axAFzN4dsooTQw0A1Pz6SypqklggkDBJQqTkkIkhchN4pCpUPEglhl6tsSvO5I2jJg0uQFgE6S/ 2IINpyLzmbcjVae1FUpjvQgLxmwZlxIpQ22ZQ4mRLjc18nS0ctSOvfhNPzuO6YrIZy4pX7Q1YXD2 tuW/WsOY1wKopHfdpA6gEcCV5JIZywQmY4RD3KCjMFQ4a80nH2GbUh/E1RqxFzrlDLdQZsLbcjsU T1zKR6RgNp5nSuiw8zbHFsxCjfAWecJU2DttFct+/dnFN7pRPUpbEbdM1gQKDe3yascsoGMm/YGI FXdQBtRcl
Bug#179407: marked as done (xterm: bold fonts do not work with widechars (and consequently UTF-8 mode) [FIXED in XTerm #181])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#179407: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2003 01:34:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 01 19:34:26 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ohsmtp03.ogw.rr.com [65.24.7.38] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18f91e-0007KI-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 19:34:26 -0600 Received: from d-ni.viqsi.ath.cx (dhcp065-024-164-185.columbus.rr.com [65.24.164.185]) by ohsmtp03.ogw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h121YPLg020020; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 20:34:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrhunter by d-ni.viqsi.ath.cx with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18f91Q-0005xu-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 20:34:12 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joanne Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xterm: bold fonts do not work with widechars (and consequently utf-8 mode) Reply-To: Joanne Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 20:34:12 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: normal Whenever XTerm's wide character support is turned on (whether by command line or X resource, or as part of turning on UTF-8 support), boldfaced characters will never show up at all. As soon as it's turned off, boldface fonts show back up. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux d-ni 2.4.19 #1 Tue Sep 3 21:16:33 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.3-7FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20021109-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-5X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-5X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information -- ~/.Xresources # XTerm Geometry Equivalencies: # 80x24 Neep Alt: 404x268 # 80x24 fixed:484x292 # 20x5 Neep Alt: 104x59 # 20x5 fixed: 124x64 # The Universal Basics XTerm*saveLines: 500 XTerm*scrollBar: False XTerm*foreground: white # XTerm*background: VioletRed4 # XTerm*background: DarkSlateGray # XTerm*background: Navy # XTerm*background: SlateBlue4 XTerm*background: gray20 # Font Stuff # Neep Alt: # XTerm*font: -jmk-neep-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 # XTerm.geometry: 80x24+304+237 # Fixed: # XTerm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 # XTerm*geometry: 80x24+264+224 # Fixed UTF-8: XTerm*utf8: 1 XTerm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*boldFont: -misc-fixed-bold-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*widefont: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*wideBoldFont: -misc-fixed-bold-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*geometry: 80x24+264+224 # Customizations # XTerm XTerm*title: XTerm: d'ni # rxvt Rxvt*title: rxvt: d'ni Rxvt*mfont: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 # aterm Aterm*title: aterm: d'ni # rxvt on Riven rivenrxvt*title: rxvt: riven rivenrxvt*background: DarkOrchid4 # Special Purpose # Links Windows (rxvt or xterm) linkswindow*background: black linkswindow*foreground: grey89 linkswindow*geometry: 80x24+0+80 # Log Windows (aterm) logwin*font: -jmk-neep-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 logwin*transparent: True # # Logwin Text Colors # logwin*foreground: DodgerBlue1 logwin*foreground: Red #
Bug#178812: marked as done (xterm: resource-based keybindings don't work when mouse cursor over scrollbar [FIXED in XTerm #181])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#178812: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2003 19:30:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 28 13:30:50 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from haddock.cd.chalmers.se [129.16.79.2]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18dbRZ-00019W-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:30:49 -0600
Received: from haddock.cd.chalmers.se ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by haddock.cd.chalmers.se (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.7) with ESMTP id h0SJUjM02514
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:30:45 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Face: ^"+mumOlNwo;yI>`\39\txuVze?eiR9uqpo2*mE!9MWXgXI0v(3ArwymNWe'.q:eLl!=guD
x{jGFEWN6,#HoN%2qRW;7.CL]9%Ap,067"u1%!NUqS.MhV'+,6$Fj-;W2Z}Y,JUZ'L+f)|[EMAIL
PROTECTED];gLl*#i[(J-os#fNnDJ8m["|JWNwpORh|_.MGkR#|a~QS!"4hEQ{O{[Ii14{xD
PU/:5wuv7m1=TK=.>G8wdfpY~]{H(Qa\1`%|Hz:!)c3f9UOW|WgE"4d\E7?oDu9.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xterm keybinding resource misfeature
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:30:45 +0100
From: Anders Hammarquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xterm
Version: 4.1.2-5
Severity: wishlist
I just figured out the cause of something that's been nagging at the
back of my mind for a while; resource-based keybindings (such as
Prior/Next for scrolling) don't work when the mouse cursor
is over the scrollbar, instead the keys generate their default
strings.
Some random older xterm on a Sun/Solars box doesn't do this, so I
suspect it came with the colour support.
/Anders
--
-- Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong.
Anders Hammarquist | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Physics student, Chalmers University of Technology, | Hem: +46 31 88 48 50
G|teborg, Sweden. RADIO: SM6XMM and N2JGL | Mob: +46 707 27 86 87
---
Received: (at 178812-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSknQ-0005bM-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:20 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSki2-0004yI-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#178812: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: xfree86
Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1444 - trunk/debian
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-25 18:11:32 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) New Revision: 1444 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Merge revision 1334 and revisions 1427 to HEAD from branches/4.3.0/sid. Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2004-05-25 23:04:26 UTC (rev 1443) +++ trunk/debian/changelog 2004-05-25 23:11:32 UTC (rev 1444) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1+SVN) unstable; urgency=low +xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low Changes by Branden Robinson: @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ * Update xutils's package description to refer to bdftruncate and ucs2any programs by their correct names. - -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 21 May 2004 12:57:47 -0500 + -- Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 25 May 2004 22:11:46 +0200 xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ descriptor, not on file descriptor zero (thanks, Keith Packard). Suppresses warning messages from Linux 2.6. (Closes: #224909) - -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:58:44 -0500 + -- Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:55:17 +0200 xfree86 (4.3.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium
Bug#107769: marked as done (xterm: bold font selection and redraw problem)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#107769: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2001 07:35:01 + >From bod@compusol.com.au Mon Aug 06 02:35:01 2001 Return-path: Received: from (duende.compusol.com.au) [210.50.77.245] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15Teui-0006bE-00; Mon, 06 Aug 2001 02:35:01 -0500 Received: from bod by duende.compusol.com.au with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 15Tets-0001ah-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 06 Aug 2001 17:34:08 +1000 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 17:33:57 +1000 From: Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xterm: bold font selection and redraw problem Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: Brendan O'Dea Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xterm Version: 4.1.0-2 The behaviour of xterm WRT the behaviour of the bold attribute seems to have changed between 4.0.3 and 4.1.0. My guess is that the previous version's default was to use overstriking with bold rather than attempting to find a matching bold font. The following font aliases exist in the xfonts-base package: 8x13 -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1 7x14bold -misc-fixed-bold-r-normal--14-130-75-75-c-70-iso8859-1 8x13bold -misc-fixed-bold-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1 When using the 8x13 font, the bold font selection is done with the following pattern (I compiled xterm with --enable-trace): -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-*-iso8859-1 which matches 7x14bold. This looks fairly awful, and has some issues with redraws. To illustrate the redrawing, invoke an xterm as: xterm -bg grey5 -fg grey95 -fn 8x13 -fb 7x13bold then within that terminal run: echo -e '\033[1;33;41mtest text\033[0m' After an expose event, there are gaps (vertical lines) between the characters. It is of course possible to explicitly set "boldFont: 8x13bold", although I've used: XTerm.vt100.font: 8x13 XTerm.vt100.boldFont: 8x13 XTerm.vt100.boldMode: true which appears to me to be what the previous version was doing and looks a little better with this particular font. Regards, -- Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633 --- Received: (at 107769-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:22 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknR-0005bY-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:21 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004yG-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#107769: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.
Bug#189764: marked as done (xterm: terminfo documents shifted keypad confusingly [FIXED in XTerm #178])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189764: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2003 22:56:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 19 17:56:05 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hugin.diku.dk [130.225.96.144] (qmailr) by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1971Fb-kJ-00; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:56:03 -0500 Received: (qmail 28250 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2003 22:56:02 - Received: from tyr.diku.dk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by hugin.diku.dk with QMQP; 19 Apr 2003 22:56:02 - Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 00:56:01 +0200 From: Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Inconsistent doc for shifted keypad in xterm's terminfo entry Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: minor /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.terminfo.gz contains # The terminfo defines some special keys which are documented as "shifted", # e.g., kDC is shifted-delete-character. In this description, the modifier is # actually the control key, to avoid conflict with the common usage of shifted # pageup and pagedown for window manager functions. # xterm-xfree86|xterm-new|xterm terminal emulator (XFree86), npc, kDC=\E[3;2~, kEND=\EO2F, kHOM=\EO2H, where the funny thing is that "\E[3;2~" is actually what xterm sends when one presses shift-del, rather than control-del. Control-del would be \E[3;5~. Similarly for the other shifted capabilities. Thus the actual terminfo code differs from what the comment claims about it. Interestingly, the actual terminfo record for xterm in ncurses-base (5.3.20021109-2) contains, according to infocmp: # Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /etc/terminfo/x/xterm xterm|X11 terminal emulator, am, bce, km, mc5i, mir, msgr, npc, xenl, (... blah blah blah ...) kDC=\E[3;5~, kEND=\EO5F, kHOM=\EO5H, kIC=\E[2;5~, kLFT=\EO5D, kNXT=\E[6;5~, kPRV=\E[5;5~, kRIT=\EO5C, (... blah blah blah ...) which matches the *comment* in the xterm doc file, rather than the actual *code*. -- Henning Makholm "Eat the bunnies. Stomp the hamsters. And boil three mice for gold!" --- Received: (at 189764-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknz-0005cI-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:55 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004yM-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#189764: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i
Bug#198910: marked as done (xterm: manpage confuses ampersand (&) and commercial at (@) symbols [FIXED in XTerm #180])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#198910: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2003 15:06:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 10:06:43 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ns1.greenbush.com [216.220.232.4] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19VYKa-0004oK-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:06:36 -0500 Received: from ns1.greenbush.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.greenbush.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id h5QF6VHA013394; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:06:31 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by ns1.greenbush.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) id h5QF6USm013392; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:06:30 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xterm(1) confuses ampersand and @ symbol X-Mailer: reportbug 2.11 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:35:26 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3 version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-8 Severity: minor xterm(1), under CHARACTER CLASSES. says: For example, the string ``33:48,37:48,45-47:48,64:48'' indicates that the exclamation mark, percent sign, dash, period, slash, and ampersand characters should be treated the same way as characters and numbers. However, the string `64:48' represents the `@' symbol, not the ampersand. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lian 2.4.20usb1 #1 Tue Jun 17 16:28:43 EDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.4-4FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20030510-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-8X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-8X Window System client libraries -- debconf information: xterm/clobber_xresource_file: true xterm/xterm_needs_devpts: --- Received: (at 198910-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:43 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknn-0005bq-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:43 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004yO-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#198910: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0
Bug#219551: marked as done (xterm: should translate Unicode characters that groff uses to ASCII when font in use does not provide corresponding glyphs [FIXED in XTerm #185])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219551: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2003 09:31:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 07 03:31:14 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from i250-006.nv.iinet.net.au (euclid.home) [203.59.250.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AI2xW-0008Ce-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 03:31:14 -0600 Received: from erdos.home ([10.0.1.2] helo=erdos) by euclid.home with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AI2xU-0005xF-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:31:12 +0800 Received: from cameron by erdos with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AI2xU-0001e3-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:31:12 +0800 Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:31:12 +0800 From: Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Unicode xterms should do some kind of substitution for missing characters Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Parenthesis Conspiracy X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: xterm Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4 Many TrueType fonts don't have both a hyphen (0x2010) and a minus sign (0x2212); however, groff (and thus man pages) differentiates between the two in UTF-8 locales. This results in lots of man pages displaying ugly boxes where hyphens should be in a uxterm, but displaying fine on a 'normal' xterm where there is no distinction between the two characters. uxterm should display hyphens and minus signs as a simple ASCII "-" (0x002D, "hyphen-minus") if the font does not contain the requested character. In fact, it would probably be useful if xterm had some kind of more general character substitution mechanism for this kind of problem. Cameron. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux erdos 2.4.21-cjp-erdos-3 #1 Sun Aug 24 01:18:50 WST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat1 1.95.6-6 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfontconfig12.2.1-8generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.5-3FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-3 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-13 X Athena widget set library ii libxft2 2.1.2-4FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender1 0.8.3-4X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs [libxpm4] 4.3.0-0pre1v4 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 219551-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSko0-0005cU-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:56 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004yS-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#219551: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of x
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1445 - trunk/debian
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-25 18:13:04 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) New Revision: 1445 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Begin new entry. Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2004-05-25 23:11:32 UTC (rev 1444) +++ trunk/debian/changelog 2004-05-25 23:13:04 UTC (rev 1445) @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-2+SVN) unstable; urgency=low + + * Dummy entry; replace with first actual change. + + -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 25 May 2004 18:11:59 -0500 + xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low Changes by Branden Robinson:
Processing of xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.changes
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2.dsc xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2.diff.gz lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw7_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw7-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw7-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxext6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxext6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxext-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxft1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxft1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxi6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxi6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxi-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmu6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmu6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmu-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmuu1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmuu1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmuu-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxp6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxp6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxp-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxpm4_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxpm4-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxpm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxrandr2_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxrandr2-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxrandr-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxt6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxt6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxt-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtrap6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtrap6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtrap-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtst6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtst6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtst-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxv1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxv1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxv-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb proxymngr_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb twm_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xbase-clients_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xdm_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xfs_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xfwp_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-dri_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-dri-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-gl_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-gl-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-gl-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-glu_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-glu-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa-glu-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibosmesa4_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibosmesa4-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibosmesa-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibs-static-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibs-static-pic_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xmh_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xnest_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xprt_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xserver-common_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xfree86-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xterm_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xutils_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xvfb_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb x-window-system-core_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb x-window-system-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb xlibmesa3_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb pm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb x-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-100dpi_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-75dpi_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-base_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-base-transcoded_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-cyrillic_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfonts-scalable_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xfree86-common_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xlibs_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xlibs-data_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xspecs_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb x-window-system_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xlibmesa3-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xlibmesa-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xlibs-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xlibs-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb xlibs-pic_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#222530: marked as done (xterm: crash after clicking with the right button [fixed in XFree86 CVS 2004-01-31])
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#222530: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2003 15:29:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 30 09:29:41 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp-100-sunday.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.noc.nerim.net) [62.4.17.100] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AQTW1-0001Ho-00; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:29:41 -0600 Received: from ay (vinc17.net1.nerim.net [62.4.18.82]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67E062D7B; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:29:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from lefevre by ay with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQTVx-0007Px-00; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:29:37 +0100 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:29:37 +0100 From: Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xterm: crash after clicking with the right button Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36 X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-12.1 Severity: important I wanted to click on the title bar of an xterm to put it to the background (of the window stack), but it seems that I clicked a little below, as something got selected in the first line, and the xterm disappeared just after. There was no core, though. I tried to reproduce the crash, but I couldn't. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux ay 2.4.18-newpmac #1 Mon Jun 9 03:10:07 UTC 2003 ppc Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.5-3FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-12.1 X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 222530-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknG-0005a6-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:10 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004yU-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#222530: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.df
Bug#234025: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] display brightness too high when X server started with S-Video cable connected on Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] rev 0)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#234025: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2004 12:14:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 21 04:14:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ale-mans-201-1-1-183.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr (debian) [193.251.19.183] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AuW1P-0003G5-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 04:14:15 -0800 Received: by debian (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E4FAA65EA; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:14:20 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Merwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xserver-xfree86: ati/radeon : dist-upgrade to xfree 4.3, display almost unreadable X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:14:20 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=DATING,HAS_PACKAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-2 Severity: important After a dist-upgrade under sid which resulted into an upgrade of xfree to 4.3, the display brightness is very high and it's difficult to see anything. There were no problems with the last version of xfree (4.2.?) My video card is an AIW Radeon 7500. -- Package-specific info: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] 01:00.0 Class 0300: 1002:5157 # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the # Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xfree86 package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xfree86 # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following commands as root: # # cp /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.custom # md5sum /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 > /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType" FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/truetype" #FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID" FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" #FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" EndSection Section "Module" Load"GLcore" Load"bitmap" Load"dbe" Load"ddc" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"freetype" Load"glx" Load"int10" Load"record" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"v4l" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "fr" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Configured Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "CorePointer" Option "Device""/dev/psaux" Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection #Section "InputDevice" # Identifier "Generic Mouse" # Driver "mouse" # Option "SendCoreEvents""true" # Option "Device""/dev/input/mice" # Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2" # Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" #EndSection
Bug#245919: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] CRT display too bright on Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] rev 0)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#234025: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2004 07:28:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 26 00:28:09 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from science.horizon.com [192.35.100.1] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BI0XA-ho-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:28:08 -0700 Received: (qmail 27219 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Apr 2004 07:27:35 - Date: 26 Apr 2004 07:27:35 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Radeon 7500 + CRT, display washed out Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=DATING,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-7 Briefly, starting X on this Debian/unstable, x86, kernel 2.6.5 system produces a display reminiscent of gamma set *way* too high. Bright, washed-out, and illegible. Earlier versions worked perfectly, although I don't have an archive to find exactly where it broke. If I set the display gamma to 0.4, I end up with a display that just looks like Arizona summer at high noon and I want sunglasses. I.e. black text on white is legible, even if it's an awfully pale black. This appears to be the same bug talked about in http://www.spinics.net/lists/rh-xf/msg01127.html http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2004-01/1739.html and possibly http://www.redhat.com/archives/xfree86-list/2003-October/msg3.html There is some talk there of a fix in CVS, which would be very helpful. Thank you very much for any assistance; I'm a little wary of trying to compile xfree86 from CVS. lspci reports :00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333]:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333 AGP] :00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 (rev 10) :00:09.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 50) :00:09.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 50) :00:09.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 51) :00:0d.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq 5880 AudioPCI (rev 02) :00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 30) :00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233A ISA Bridge :00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) :00:11.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 23) :00:11.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 23) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] lspci -vvn of just the video card produces :00:01.0 Class 0604: 1106:b099 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Reset- FastB2B- Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- The X server log file contains: This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0-7 20040318043201 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Release Date: 15 August 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.4 i686 [ELF] Build Date: 18 March 2004 Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present OS Kernel: Linux version 2.6.5 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)) #19 Sat Apr 10 21:01:51 E
Bug#240581: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] support 'ForceMinDotClock' option)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240581: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 02:22:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 27 18:22:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 204.red-213-96-224.pooles.rima-tde.net (betawl.net)
[213.96.224.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B7PwD-0002vg-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:22:14 -0800
Received: from man.manty.net (man.beta.es [192.168.1.2])
by betawl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B2A942B955; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 04:22:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by man.manty.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7286627C3D; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 04:22:09 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Patch to add option for ATI Radeon to force the use of lower dotclocks
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 04:22:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfree86
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
I have found that my Radeon card as well as many others, says that it can
work from 20Mhz to 400Mhz, this would mean that it is not capable of
producing TV frequencies, which it is, I have found that this problem had
been reported on xfree86 bugtracking system as bug #831 and then added to
their cvs with some changes.
I have made the apropiate changes to the patch so that it could be applied
to our sources and have tested it, it works perfectly and is a clean patch,
I think that it would be good if you could apply it in a future version of
the packages.
Maybe it would also be good to upgrade Radeon's driver a little bit,
following the logs on the cvs there have been many enhancements as well as
bugfixes, new options, ...
Anyway, here are the patches, first the ones I got from the xfree86 cvs:
===
RCS file:
/xf86/anoncvs/cvs/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon.man,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon.man 2003/10/07
22:47:12 1.4
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon.man 2003/10/31
23:03:17 1.5
@@ -298,6 +298,17 @@
but not work correctly in some rare cases, hence the default is
.B off.
+.TP
+.BI "Option \*qForceMinDotClock\*q \*q" frequency \*q
+Override minimum dot clock. Some Radeon BIOSes report a minimum dot
+clock unsuitable (too high) for use with television sets even when they
+actually can produce lower dot clocks. If this is the case you can
+override the value here.
+.B Note that using this option may damage your hardware.
+You have been warned. The
+.B frequency
+parameter may be specified as a float value with standard suffixes like
+"k", "kHz", "M", "MHz".
.SH SEE ALSO
XFree86(1), XF86Config(__filemansuffix__), xf86config(1), Xserver(1),
X(__miscmansuffix__)
===
RCS file:
/xf86/anoncvs/cvs/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c,v
retrieving revision 1.110
retrieving revision 1.111
diff -u -r1.110 -r1.111
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c 2003/10/30
17:36:58 1.110
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c 2003/10/31
23:03:17 1.111
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c,v
1.109 2003/10/11 00:29:57 daenzer Exp $ */
+/* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c,v
1.110 2003/10/30 17:36:58 tsi Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright 2000 ATI Technologies Inc., Markham, Ontario, and
*VA Linux Systems Inc., Fremont, California.
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@
OPTION_FBDEV,
OPTION_VIDEO_KEY,
OPTION_DISP_PRIORITY,
-OPTION_PANEL_SIZE
+OPTION_PANEL_SIZE,
+OPTION_MIN_DOTCLOCK
} RADEONOpts;
const OptionInfoRec RADEONOptions[] = {
Bug#240889: marked as done (xfree86: please add support for the AMD64 architecture)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240889: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2004 19:33:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 29 11:33:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B82Vd-0001Zo-00; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:33:21 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3C63680F5 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:33:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390C13680E9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:33:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id E0EBE158AD5; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:33:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:33:19 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Build problem on amd64. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-7 There are a few problem building on amd64: * It's missing a vars.amd64. I've copied vars.i386 * I get: XlcDL.c:64:4: #error "Unknown architecture" small patch: --- XlcDL.c.orig2004-03-29 13:30:49.659717577 -0600 +++ XlcDL.c 2004-03-29 10:58:24.0 -0600 @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ #ifdef _LP64 # if defined(__sparcv9) # define _MACH64_NAME"sparcv9" -# elif defined(__ia64__) +# elif defined(__ia64__) || defined(__x86_64__) # undef MACH64_NAME # else # error "Unknown architecture" * In the control file there are some lines that limit the architectures and amd64 isn't on that list. Kurt --- Received: (at 240889-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknN-0005aj-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:17 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki2-0004ye-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#240889: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:46 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 13 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.
Bug#241717: marked as done (xterm: various colour problems (mouse cursor color, text colours))
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241717: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2004 15:25:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 02 07:25:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from islay.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de (mailout.schmorp.de) [129.13.162.92] (schmorp) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B9QYC-0002Kp-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 07:25:44 -0800 Received: from [10.0.0.1] (helo=cerebro.laendle) by mailout.schmorp.de with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B9QY9-0005b0-Nz; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 17:25:41 +0200 Received: from root by cerebro.laendle with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B9QY9-0007kE-FC; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 17:25:41 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xterm: various colour problems (mouse cursor color, text colours) X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54 Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 17:25:41 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xterm Version: 4.3.0-7 Severity: minor The xterm mouse cursor is a thin line, under debians xterm, it's much thicker. Specifying -rv restores the original cursor (but does not do reverse video, see bug #239510, which is probably related). It seems that debians xterm does not set mouse cursor colours correctly and defaults to white background and black foreground, while the default config specifies black background on white foreground, which is probably why -rv fixes this as it correctly swaps background and foreground for all items. Another colour problem: debian also changed default colours of xterm, which makes coloured text very hard to read, especially for colour-impaired people like me (it's very difficult for me to decipher e.g. the alsamixer labels in xterm, other shells work fine). The original xterm colours are much easier on my eyes, due to the much increased contrast. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 Versions of packages xterm depends on: hi libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an hi libexpat1 1.95.6-4 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfontconfig1 2.2.1-8 generic font configuration library hi libfreetype62.1.5-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libice6 4.3.0-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.4-2Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsm6 4.3.0-7 X Window System Session Management ii libxaw7 4.3.0-7 X Athena widget set library ii libxext64.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxmu6 4.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxpm4 4.3.0-7 X pixmap library ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 4.3.0-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs 4.3.0-7 X Window System client libraries m ii xlibs-data 4.3.0-7 X Window System client data -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 241717-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:08 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknD-0005ZW-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:07 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004yg-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To:
Bug#245044: marked as done (xdm: cannot resolve hostnames from Xaccess Indirect lines)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245044: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 07:23:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 00:23:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from akk3-dmz.akk.uni-karlsruhe.de (mail.akk.org) [129.13.251.67] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGC4k-0004rh-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:23:18 -0700 Received: from akk10-int.akk.uni-karlsruhe.de ([172.22.9.202] ident=mail) by mail.akk.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 1BGC4h-0005zu-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:23:15 +0200 Received: from enrik by akk10-int.akk.uni-karlsruhe.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BGC4h-00061A-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:23:15 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:23:15 +0200 From: Enrik Berkhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xdm can't resolve hostnames from Xaccess Indirect lines; upstream fix available Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Enrik Berkhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: xdm Version: 4.3.0-7 Severity: important Hi, xdm from unstable (version 4.3.0-7) has a bug that prevents hostnames in Xaccess Indirect entries to be resolved correctly. The reason is that the result from gethostbyname() is dereferenced incorectly. The Bug has already been fixed upstream. Thus, a possible patch can be found in the xfree86 CVS: http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/xdm/access.c.diff?r2=3.14&r1=3.13&diff_format=u (This might still have a possible buffer overflow if gethostbyname returns an IPv6 address ... ;-( To reproduce the bug, enter something like the following into Xacces: --- cut --- * CHOOSER some.other.host --- cut --- and watch chooser's arguments using ps. The last argument should be some.other.host's IP. Enrik --- Received: (at 245044-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:58 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSko2-0005d3-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:58 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004yk-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#245044: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.d
Bug#245249: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [sis] screen "melt" with SiS 630ST and 4.3.0-7)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245249: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 06:27:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 23:27:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.82] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGXg1-0007lu-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 23:27:13 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO manger) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@63.200.37.130 with login) by smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2004 06:27:12 - Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 23:28:41 -0700 From: CE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xserver-xfree86: [sis] screen "melt" with SiS 630ST and 4.3.0-7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Subject: xserver-xfree86: [sis] screen "melt" with SiS 630ST and 4.3.0-7 Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-7 Severity: important The recently updated package renders X unusable with the SiS 630ST. The screen will "melt" (going from black to white then fading) upon starting X. The effect is rather pretty but renders X unusable. X is able to be killed but no useful entries are left in /var/log/XFree86.0.log. The problem started with upgrading from 4.3.0-0ds4. X works fine with that release but newer packages seem to reintroduce a variant of a problem that Thomas Winischhofer http://www.winischhofer.net/linuxsisvga.shtml had fixed in the drivers. I can provide additional details if needed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- Machine Specs: http://desknote.net/dn/spec.cfm?modID=104 -- lspci relevant listing: :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 630/730 PCI/AGP VGA Display Adapter (rev 31) --- Received: (at 245249-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:59 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSko3-0005d5-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:59 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004ym-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#245249: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 17 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1446 - trunk/debian
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-25 18:14:52 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004) New Revision: 1446 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/TODO Log: Update for forthcoming release. Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS === --- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-05-25 23:13:04 UTC (rev 1445) +++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-05-25 23:14:52 UTC (rev 1446) @@ -8,131 +8,7 @@ (It should always be safe to merge the latest version of TODO or CHANGESETS files anywhere.) -Post 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 +Begin new changelog entry. +1445 -Start new changelog entry. -1326 - -Fix up Xsession.d scripts, including fix for #242485. -1327, 1328, 1329, 1330 - -Fix Fabio's name in the Uploaders field to match his changelog entry convention. -1336 - -Add support for the AMD64 architecture. -1346, 1387, 1388, 1395, 1440 - -Add SVN Id keyword and set svn:keywords property to Id on all files in -debian/scripts where this was not already the case. -1347 - -Update XFree86 PCI ID database from CVS HEAD as of 2003-10-30. This lays the -foundation for future updates to drivers and PCI bus handling code. -1358, 1359 - -Update xutils's package description to refer to bdftruncate and ucs2any programs -by their correct names. -1360, 1364 - -Grab updated XFree86 X server I2C code from XFree86 CVS as of 2003-08-29. -Implements and exposes xf86I2CGetScreenBuses() function. This aids in -backporting updated drivers that use this function (e.g., ati/atimisc). -1363 - -Grab updated XFree86 X server Xv code from XFree86 CVS as of 2003-04-30. This -aids in backported updated drivers. -1367 - -Backport ATI driver from XFree86 CVS as of 2004-02-11, including support for -"ForceMinDotClock" option to Radeon driver. Depends on changesets ending in -1363, 1367. -1368 - -(cosmetic) Rename patches to ATI driver to be more consistent with each other. -1370 - -Grab from XFree86 CVS (2003-11-23) a fix to a problem resolving hostnames of -indirect entries in xdm's Xaccess file. Resync patch #002. -1371 - -Backport XFree86 X server's PCI bus support code and device databases from -XFree86 CVS (2003-12-18). The ATI backport requires this to build on x86. -1373 - -Backport XFree86 X server VIA driver. -1382 - -Grab SiS driver from Thomas Winischhofer's website. -1384 - -Stop shipping the "Xterm Control Sequences" document in the xspecs -package; ship it only in xterm. Add HTML version of this document to the -xterm package. Update xterm's extended description to mention the -availability of this document. -1390 - -Update XTerm to Thomas Dickey's latest release, with some inconsequential -changes from XFree86 CVS post-2004-02-12 rolled back. -1400, 1434 - -Move patch in 009_use_xf86config-4_in_xf86config.diff to -911_debian_XF86Config_to_XF86Config-4.diff. -1401 - -Grab a couple of minor documentation-related fixes from XFree86 CVS. -+ There's no config/util/rman.man (Peter Stromberg). [Matthieu Herrb] - From XFree86 CVS 2003-04-07. Delete superseded patch #006. -+ One xieperf reference left over. Noticed by ISHIKAWA Mutsumi. Thanks. - [Matthieu Herrb] From XFree86 CVS 2003-04-14. -Merge #000_stolen_from_HEAD_doc_extensions_fix into #000_stolen_from_HEAD. -1403 - -Split updates to XKB data from XFree86 CVS out into their own patch file because -we may end up incorporating a lot of them. -1404 - -Grab a fix to the XFree86 X server chips driver from XFree86 CVS 2003-04-04. -+ Fixed DPMS problem on C&T 69000 due to incorrect LCD flag (Bugz: 101, - Egbert Eich). -1405 - -Grab updates to XKB documentation and code from XFree86 CVS. Grab updates to -XKB data from XFree86 CVS, none later than 2003-04-30. Resync offsets in -patches #082 and #084. Update MANIFEST files and xlibs.install to recognize and -ship new XKB symbols files hr_US, th_pat, and th_tis. -1408, 1419 - -Apply Michel Dänzer's fix for Radeon driver trying forever to initialize card if -card's firmware is not loaded. -1410 - -Add Turkish debconf template translation. Tidy up templates.pot and *.po files -in general. -1412, 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1418 - -Miscellaneous cosmetic fixes. -1421, 1428, 1439 - -Adjust package relationships of libxrandr2 and libxrandr2-dbg so that they no -longer conflict with and replace xlibs (<< 4.3.0); there are no file overlaps in -these cases (though there are with libxrandr-dev), so such declarations are -spurious. -1426 - -Handle failure of "which" command when processing arguments to Xsession, so that -the script is not aborted prematurely (thanks, Oliver Bausinger). -1427 - -Update ARM support patch (#234808). Rename it. -1430, 1431 - -Add dependency of libxp-dev on xlibs-static-dev, since the former's Print.h -#includes the latter's Xauth.h (thanks, Matt Kraai). -1432 - -Remove spurious sourcing of debconf confmodule from maintainer scripts -tha
Bug#247525: marked as done (libx11-dev: needs header from not-depended on package)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247525: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 16:57:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 05 09:57:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp1.xs4all.be [195.144.64.135] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BLPhd-0002OQ-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 09:57:01 -0700 Received: from lucretia.hangar.be (195-144-080-163.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be [195.144.80.163]) by smtp1.xs4all.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i45GuxPQ007357; Wed, 5 May 2004 18:57:00 +0200 Received: by lucretia.hangar.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74B97D9D2; Wed, 5 May 2004 18:56:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 18:56:59 +0200 From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libx11-dev: needs header from not-depended on package Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.37 X-Marks-The-Spot: xx X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/8E950E00 CAC1 0932 B6B9 8768 40DB C6AA 1239 F709 8E95 0E00 X-Machine-info: Linux lucretia 2.4.19-rc1-sched-o1 i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: libx11-dev Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: minor Trying to build something which includes X11/XKBlib.h: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/XKBlib.h:33:35: X11/extensions/XKBstr.h: No such file or directory Regards, Filip -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 -- "Disappointed by the apes God created mankind. After that he resigns from further experiments." -- Mark Twain --- Received: (at 247525-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:17 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknM-0005aX-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:16 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004ys-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#247525: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 20 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.d
Bug#247705: marked as done (xterm: man page default colors do not match /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247705: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2004 14:55:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 06 07:55:35 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BLkHf-bs-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 07:55:35 -0700 Received: from localhost (bobillot-3-82-67-147-59.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.147.59]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3154C4F4; Thu, 6 May 2004 16:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C60F917E9B; Thu, 6 May 2004 16:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xterm: man page default colors do not match /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 16:55:33 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: xterm Version: 4.3.0-7 Severity: normal The default colors listed in the man page for xterm are not the same as those in /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color. (On an aside, I agree with the poster of bug #241717: the fact that Debian's xterm has different default colors from pretty much every other system on the planet is a pain. I've had to change a setting on Debian that I've never had to change on another system. I respect efforts in many corners of Debian to change established bad practice for the better, but this one defeats the principle of least surprise (the original default is to use pure colours at two fixed brightness levels) for little obvious gain. OTOH, had the man page not been in error I would probably never have even found that bug report to agree with it...) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.24 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat1 1.95.6-8 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfontconfig1 2.2.2-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.1.7-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libice6 4.3.0-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.4-3Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsm6 4.3.0-7 X Window System Session Management ii libxaw7 4.3.0-7 X Athena widget set library ii libxext64.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxmu6 4.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxpm4 4.3.0-7 X pixmap library ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 4.3.0-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs 4.3.0-7 X Window System client libraries m ii xlibs-data 4.3.0-7 X Window System client data -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 247705-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:16 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSknL-0005aL-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:15 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004yu-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#247705: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Se
Bug#248632: marked as done (xfree86-common: 20xfree86-common_process-args does not trap failure of 'which')
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#248632: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2004 14:03:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 12 07:03:50 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from everest.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.62.220] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BNuKs-0007fL-00; Wed, 12 May 2004 07:03:50 -0700 Received: from sinai.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de (sinai.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.62.228]) by everest.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with SMTP id C3F9B3B900; Wed, 12 May 2004 16:03:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (nullmailer pid 4192 invoked by uid 1234); Wed, 12 May 2004 14:03:48 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Oliver Bausinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: 20xfree86-common_process-args fails when the which call fails X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 16:03:48 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: xfree86-common Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal The which call in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/20xfree86-common_process-args STARTUP_FULL_PATH=$(which $1) fails when $1 is not known (e.g. in KDM choose "custom" and "which custom" will fail). At this point the whole Xsession script fails. It should fallback to default, so perhaps one should do STARTUP_FULL_PATH=$(which $1) || true Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages xfree86-common depends on: ii debconf 1.4.25 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.8.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t --- Received: (at 248632-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:54:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:54:00 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSko3-0005ec-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:54:00 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004z0-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#248632: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 24 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xf
Bug#249738: marked as done (libxp-dev: missing dependency on xlibs-static-dev)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249738: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2004 00:25:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 18 17:25:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BQEu7-0001xf-00; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:25:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (host-66-81-192-63.rev.o1.com [66.81.192.63]) by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i4J0PjxF064162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:25:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BQ8vt-AL-Jt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 May 2004 11:03:17 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 11:03:17 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missing dependency on xlibs-static-dev Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libxp-dev Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious /usr/X11R6/include/X11/extensions/Print.h includes X11/Xauth.h. The latter is included in xlibs-static-dev. libxp-dev does not depend on xlibs-static-dev. This causes tcm to fail to build. -- Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/ --- Received: (at 249738-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSkn8-0005YO-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:03 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004z2-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#249738: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 25 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/x
Bug#250061: marked as done (xlibmesa-glu: postrm script spuriously sources debconf confmodule, causing failure on systems without debconf)
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#250061: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2004 15:44:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 20 08:44:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BQpiD-Ff-00; Thu, 20 May 2004 08:44:01 -0700 Received: by mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 105) id 97085175C9; Thu, 20 May 2004 09:44:00 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.48]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891B116ECC; Thu, 20 May 2004 09:43:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B5B78239B0; Thu, 20 May 2004 09:43:58 -0600 (MDT) From: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xlibmesa-glu: Missing Depends: debconf To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:43:58 -0600 (MDT) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xlibmesa-glu Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Need to Depend: debconf. > Unpacking replacement xlibmesa-glu ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibmesa-glu.postrm: line 11: > /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux mix.mmjgroup.com 2.4.22-lj4 #1 SMP Tue Sep 23 22:12:51 MDT 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux --- Received: (at 250061-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 22:53:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 25 15:53:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSkn7-0005YB-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 15:53:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSki3-0004z4-00; Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fabio M. Di Nitto) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $ Subject: Bug#250061: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:47:47 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 26 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/ma
X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1447 - trunk/debian
Author: branden
Date: 2004-05-25 18:35:24 -0500 (Tue, 25 May 2004)
New Revision: 1447
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Update item.
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
--- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-05-25 23:14:52 UTC (rev 1446)
+++ trunk/debian/TODO 2004-05-25 23:35:24 UTC (rev 1447)
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@
+ start loading dri module by default on sparc again, per Steve King and
Christian Guggenberger [BR]
+ #229850: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] monitor selection methods need to be
-more careful about clobbering autodetected monitor sync ranges [BR]
+more careful about clobbering autodetected monitor sync ranges; study Jay
+Berkenbilt's feedback [BR]
* hurd-i386 MANIFEST, and probably some debhelper files, are out of date.
* Should xc/include/{Xw32defs.h,Xwinsock.h} be installed (and shipped) for
the benefit of cross-compilers? Check upstream Imakeage.
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libsm6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libx11-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw7-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw7-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxaw7_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxext-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxext-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxext6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxext6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxext6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxext6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxft1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxft1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxft1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxft1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxi-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxi-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxi6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxi6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxi6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxi6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmu-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxmu-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmu6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxmu6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmu6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxmu6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmuu-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxmuu-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmuu1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxmuu1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxmuu1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxmuu1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxp-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxp-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxp6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxp6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxp6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxp6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxpm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxpm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxpm4-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxpm4-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxpm4_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxpm4_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxrandr-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxrandr-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxrandr2-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxrandr2-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxrandr2_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxrandr2_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxt-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxt-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxt6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxt6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxt6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxt6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtrap-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxtrap-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtrap6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxtrap6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtrap6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxtrap6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtst-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxtst-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtst6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxtst6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxtst6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxtst6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxv-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxv-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb libxv1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxv1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386
xfree86 override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): x-window-system-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Getting ready for xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 (ATI and SIS users WAKE UP!)
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 08:39:50AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > Hey Branden, I received the commit message for the merge! (revision 1437) > but i am having problems to access the svn repo via ssh. I can see the ssh > session is going up, but there is no data transfer at all. > > trunk/xfree86-4.3.0$ svn up > > and it dies there. (same goes for other parts of the repo like branches) > > Is external access still locked for the security problem? No, this was the usual "SVN hangs after massive merge checked in" problem. I had been hoping 1.0.3 would fix it. It doesn't. I fixed the repo on Monday. -- G. Branden Robinson| You don't just decide to break Debian GNU/Linux | Kubrick's code of silence and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] | get drawn away from it to a http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | discussion about cough medicine. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Trans-releases cut buffer problem
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:04:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:48:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 01:55:27AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what's going on, but I can reproduce it with stock > > 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1. > > With a stock woody X server and a stock sid client ? With a stock sid X server and a stock sid client. -- G. Branden Robinson|To Republicans, limited government Debian GNU/Linux |means not assisting people they [EMAIL PROTECTED] |would sooner see shoveled into mass http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |graves. -- Kenneth R. Kahn signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: retitle 237583 to xlibs: BKSL key doesn't work when 'us' is one of multiple layouts, tagging 237583
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 237583 xlibs: BKSL key doesn't work when 'us' is one of multiple > layouts Bug#237583: xlibs: [XKB] us keymap, bar/backslash symbol doesn't work as it's supposed to Changed Bug title. > tags 237583 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug#237583: xlibs: BKSL key doesn't work when 'us' is one of multiple layouts There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: retitle 230204 to xserver-xfree86: [os-support/linux] pressing unknown key causes spew of 'atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware directly.' to kernel log ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 230204 xserver-xfree86: [os-support/linux] pressing unknown key > causes spew of 'atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware > directly.' to kernel log Bug#230204: xserver-xfree86: [os-support/linux] causes spew of 'atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware directly.' to kernel log Changed Bug title. > # stumped > tags 230204 + help Bug#230204: xserver-xfree86: [os-support/linux] pressing unknown key causes spew of 'atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware directly.' to kernel log Tags were: upstream moreinfo Tags added: help > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: ATI and SiS users: please test SVN trunk
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:54:19PM +0200, Björn wrote: > fre 2004-05-21 klockan 09.07 skrev Branden Robinson: > > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Björn Nitzler wrote: > > > Good afternoon, a brief test report. following the nice instructions it > > > builds > > > fine. libx11-dev fails to install properly though. > > > > Can you describe this problem, please > > well i had an up to date as of yesterday install of debian unstable, and > besides my usual fix of packages ;) i had done an apt-get install > kde-devel so x devel packages was installed and when i did the dpkg -iO > *.deb stuff it failed on that package. fixed it by apt-get -f install > and it then removed some of the devel packages. 4 of them if i remember > correct.Can't check the version at my machine for the moment but i have > a vague remeberance of some strange versioning combination in one of the > devel packages. I'm afraid this is insufficient information for us to do much about the problem. > > > my platform is i386 (athlon) on a via chipset. graphic card is a > > > radeon 7500 (rv200qw) DRI and OpenGL 3d works fine. tried playing > > > return to castle wolfenstein and run glxgears.Have been running it > > > since early this morning. XVideo works fine.everything seem normal to > > > me. > forgot to mention that opengl screensavers still flickers badly. Michel Dänzer would probably advise you to try the unofficial xlibmesa-dri-trunk packages[1]. :) > > Hmmm, so this broke with XFree86 4.3.0 but didn't get worse on the SVN > > trunk? > > That would be correct, one odd fact is (have been wrestling a bit with > this card since i bought it when xfree86 announced full 3d support and > released it with half broken xvideo and a hard hanging rtcw game;). > long rambling.. just ignore. The funny fact is that the card works > perfect with both those games and all other stuff i have tried if i ran > the cvs debian packages from michael däenzer at the DRI site. and as a > side note since im already testing lots of stuff this week is that > Fedora's xorg packages also works fine. Fedora's using a newer (and different) upstream than we are. [1] http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/ -- G. Branden Robinson| If we believe absurdities, we Debian GNU/Linux | shall commit atrocities. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Voltaire http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: stale fontconfig cache slows FontConfig-using X client startup to a crawl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 242664 xserver-xfree86: X clients take minutes instead of seconds to > open, and CPU load goes as high as 5 Bug#242664: xserver-xfree86: [fbdev] clients take minutes instead of seconds to open, and CPU load goes as high as 5 Changed Bug title. > retitle 249154 xserver-xfree86: many apps slow to start up after X upgrade Bug#249154: Slow start time of many applications after X upgrade. Changed Bug title. > severity 242664 normal Bug#242664: xserver-xfree86: X clients take minutes instead of seconds to open, and CPU load goes as high as 5 Severity set to `normal'. > severity 249154 normal Bug#249154: xserver-xfree86: many apps slow to start up after X upgrade Severity set to `normal'. > merge 242664 249154 Bug#242664: xserver-xfree86: X clients take minutes instead of seconds to open, and CPU load goes as high as 5 Bug#249154: xserver-xfree86: many apps slow to start up after X upgrade Merged 242664 249154. > # remove all tags > tag 242664 = Bug#242664: xserver-xfree86: X clients take minutes instead of seconds to open, and CPU load goes as high as 5 Tags were: moreinfo Bug#249154: xserver-xfree86: many apps slow to start up after X upgrade Tags set to: > close 242664 Bug#242664: xserver-xfree86: X clients take minutes instead of seconds to open, and CPU load goes as high as 5 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#249154: xserver-xfree86: many apps slow to start up after X upgrade Bug closed, send any further explanations to simon raven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This problem is caused by the FontConfig cache getting stale. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > If there is a bug here, it is probably in one or both of: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > 1) fontconfig Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > 2) font packages that fail to invoke fc-cache in their postinst scripts Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > Thanks to Michel Dänzer for identifying this problem. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: ATI and SiS users: please test SVN trunk
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:26:53AM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please report success or failure to this discussion thread. > > I just built SVN HEAD (exported at 2004-05-19 17:00 UTC) and it works > great on my ATI Rage128 Mobility M3. The new driver allows a whole bunch > of more modes due to scaling the dotclock from the built-in values to > what the VBIOS reports. XVideo and DRI also work fine. Outstanding. Thanks to everyone who knuckled under and did some testing. Hopefully xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 will be considered a "good release". :) -- G. Branden Robinson|The basic test of freedom is Debian GNU/Linux |perhaps less in what we are free to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |do than in what we are free not to http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |do. -- Eric Hoffer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#242664: stale fontconfig cache slows FontConfig-using X client startup to a crawl
retitle 242664 xserver-xfree86: X clients take minutes instead of seconds to open, and CPU load goes as high as 5 retitle 249154 xserver-xfree86: many apps slow to start up after X upgrade severity 242664 normal severity 249154 normal merge 242664 249154 # remove all tags tag 242664 = close 242664 This problem is caused by the FontConfig cache getting stale. If there is a bug here, it is probably in one or both of: 1) fontconfig 2) font packages that fail to invoke fc-cache in their postinst scripts Thanks to Michel Dänzer for identifying this problem. -- G. Branden Robinson| Never attribute to human stupidity Debian GNU/Linux | that which can be adequately [EMAIL PROTECTED] | explained by GNU Libtool. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Scott James Remnant signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#248780: xbase-clients: xf86cfg - missing cyrillic layout
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:54:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I could use some assistance with this bug from someone conversation with > Russian localization issuess and/or XKB. Someone *conversant* with these subjects would be good, too. /me laments his chronic case of Alzheimer's -- G. Branden Robinson| Debian GNU/Linux | // // // / / [EMAIL PROTECTED] | EI 'AANIIGOO 'AHOOT'E http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#248453: xlibmesa-dri: Segfaults crack-attack on matrox.
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:14:54AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 07:53, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > Mr. Dänzer, any idea what we should ask this gentleman for? > > I don't have anything to ask, but something to say: the DRI drivers in > XFree86 4.3 are old and unmaintained. Try a snapshot from dri.sf.net, > chances are this problem has been fixed. Okay. Do you have any recommendations for what I might put in an xlibmesa-dri "bug" script to gather information about the reporter's hardware, and/or DRI successes/failures? -- G. Branden Robinson|Ambition: an overmastering desire Debian GNU/Linux |to be vilified by enemies while [EMAIL PROTECTED] |living and ridiculed by friends http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |when dead.-- Ambrose Bierce signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Making debian package of X11R6.7 (or XFree86 4.4.0)?
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:31:40PM +0200, Patric Ljung wrote: > I've downloaded and compiled X11R6.7 (and also XFree86 4.4.0). > Then I installed Xorg (make install install.man). But, that > of course results in problems with the Debian packages depending > on X (xbase-common, xbase-clients, etc). > > Either I make a proper Debian package of X or setup a dummy > package that pretends to provide everything needed. > > What would your suggestion be? > > In any way, it would be helpful to get a pointer to instructions > on how to make X a Debian package. There shurely must be a package > description for XFree86 4.3, could you help me find it? > > I've never made Debian packages before, so I'm a newbie, unfortunately. X, of any variety, is a really bad package to start with. > I'm running Debian sarge, kernel 2.6.5 on a Dell Inspiron 9100 > with an ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 and am trying to get as much > support for the M12 chip as possible. The scope of your question is so broad that it would probably take weeks to work through all the details. The best terse advice I can offer is for you to run a Debian sarge or sid system, "apt-get source xfree86", and study the source package. -- G. Branden Robinson| There is resilient security in Debian GNU/Linux | openness, and brittle security in [EMAIL PROTECTED] | secrecy. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Bruce Schneier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Add monitor to database
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:20:07AM +0200, Alberto wrote: > I have got a monitor that is not in the monitor database. I have > *full* specs for it, and would like it to be added. Where do I > have to submit this info? To what database are you referring? -- G. Branden Robinson|It may be difficult to to determine Debian GNU/Linux |where religious beliefs end and [EMAIL PROTECTED] |mental illness begins. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Elaine Cassel signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: retitle 249614 to xserver-xfree86: [debconf] autodetect SGI Indy and Indigo2 systems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 249614 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] autodetect SGI Indy and Indigo2 > systems Bug#249614: Automatic X configuration for SGI Indy/Indigo2 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: tagging 248539
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 248539 - moreinfo Bug#248539: libxrandr2: No need to conflict with xlibs There were no tags set. Tags removed: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#236256: xbase-clients: installer fails
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:33:13PM -0500, Einar Jørgensen wrote: > Package: xbase-clients > Version: 4.3.0-7 > Severity: normal > Followup-For: Bug #236256 * Your bug contained no actual followup, just boilerplate material supplied by reportbug. * 4.3.0-7 is out of date even in Debian sarge. Please try 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 or 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2. -- G. Branden Robinson|Every aristocracy that has ever Debian GNU/Linux |existed has behaved, in all [EMAIL PROTECTED] |essential points, exactly like a http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |small mob. -- G.K. Chesterton signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#247705: xterm: man page default colors do not match /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:38:10AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 08:00:19AM +0200, Branden Robinson wrote: > > (This is no cause to rejoice for people who hate the colors I chose for > > Debian's xterm years ago, however; it appears I have won Mr. Dickey > > over, and he and I now sing the same blues, so to speak. :) ) > > not entirely - Dodger blue is easier on my eyes, but I'm considering going to > blue2 (versus the older blue3) if/when I can quantify the contrast issue. > > There are simply a lot of to-do items that I'm working on, and since this one > doesn't dump core or cause an infinite loop (or even lose data), it's not > completed yet. That'll teach me to count my, er, robins before they hatch. :) -- G. Branden Robinson| If you have the slightest bit of Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual integrity you cannot [EMAIL PROTECTED] | support the government. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- anonymous signature.asc Description: Digital signature
We deliver to you very fast - and that is a promise ho0hCcFY0jQroMHVpRkh
We are your online source for obtaining original branded prescription medications and works in partnership with the leaders in licensed wholesale drug sales and dispensing. %RND_AD_2 Plus: %RND_ALL_OTHER_MEDS Play an active role and participate more fully in your own process of care. Buy online in the comfort of your home.. Use Microsoft Internet Explorer to view the following website: www.%RND_HOST. Please copy and paste the URL on your browser's address field. %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE %RND_PHRASE
Bug#250537: Xterm configuration error in XTerm-color
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 08:00:15PM +0200, Miquel (a.k.a Ktal) wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 4.3.0-7 > > When the xterm package is installed, you open an xterm and you can see a > "beautiful" black console terminal with no prompt and no characters. This is > because the background color is not set correctly. > > You have", in the /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color there > > I suggest that the *VT100*colorBD value in /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color > must be white . This solves the problem (checked) > > I am using Debian sid GNU/Linux , kernel 2.6.4. I'm assuming you're using xdm or something like that. With startx/fwvm, the app-defaults for xterm appear on my machine as black-on-white. (I was running gdm recently for a while, but disabled that since the two versions of gnome - on Debian and Redhat - insist on trashing the other's desktop settings). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net pgpiRcQN54p4m.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#250655: xterm: crashes on paste from abiword
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:40:10PM +0200, Max Kutny wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 > Severity: normal > > Selecting any text in abiword editor and pasting it with middle mouse > button into opened exterm window crashes xterm. xterm nicely performs > with pastes from other applications I tested (firefox, openoffice.org, > xterm itself) and other applications can smoothly accept pastes from > abiword without any problems. valgrind seems to point down into the X libraries (perhaps xterm is doing something that is not correct, but I don't see that immediately). To isolate the problem, will have to debug the X libraries. Here's the fragment from valgrind's log (bear in mind that running valgrind sometimes alters behavior): ==8273== Invalid read of size 4 ==8273==at 0x3C0B89D9: _XlcResetConverter (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C0BEE08: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C0BF074: _Xutf8TextPropertyToTextList (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C096EF7: Xutf8TextPropertyToTextList (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x804F89B: SelectionReceived (button.c:1382) ==8273==by 0x3C257CC2: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==8273==by 0x3C257FFD: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==8273==by 0x3C24376E: XtDispatchEventToWidget (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C24411C: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==8273==by 0x3C24443E: XtDispatchEvent (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==8273== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or free'd ==8273== ==8273== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV): dumpin> ==8273== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0 ==8273==at 0x3C0B89D9: _XlcResetConverter (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C0BEE08: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C0BF074: _Xutf8TextPropertyToTextList (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C096EF7: Xutf8TextPropertyToTextList (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x804F89B: SelectionReceived (button.c:1382) ==8273==by 0x3C257CC2: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==8273==by 0x3C257FFD: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==8273==by 0x3C24376E: XtDispatchEventToWidget (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.2) ==8273==by 0x3C24411C: (within /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==8273==by 0x3C24443E: XtDispatchEvent (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) Tracing some of the values does seem to indicate it crashes with a UTF8_STRING. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net pgpxA13FbO0sn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: xfree86 override disparity
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys, please update the override files to reflect the new Priority for x-window-system-dev. Thanks Fabio On Tue, 25 May 2004, Debian Installer wrote: > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > > x-window-system-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb: package says priority is extra, > override says optional. > > Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think > the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package > so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the > override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. > > [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one > like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore > this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in > due course, but until then the installer will send these automated > mails; sorry.] > > -- > Debian distribution maintenance software > > (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there > is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by > mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > - -- fajita: step one Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. fajita: step two When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtBgLhCzbekR3nhgRAlnaAJ0TPmqSgxgNqcMQL7fua9GciNbLMQCff7Gr mOmYnM5lZtDqox6abGpPvmk= =9MGu -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#236187: xserver-xfree86: [r128] GL lockups
Could something based on this patch, or one of the other suggestions in
the bug log, be applied?
[Overquoting for history, since this was a while back.]
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:52:53PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:45:59PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:21:11PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 17:38, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Downgrading to xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-16 has eliminated the problem so
> > > > my money is on the 4.3.0 r128 driver.
> > >
> > > If you agree that your problem seems related to
> > > http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271, can you try the workarounds
> > > discussed there?
> >
> > I'll give it a try. Looking at the code in 4.2.1 and 4.3.0 (you
> > probably know all this already, I'm just educating myself):
>
> > And yes, looking the source to the DRM module I'm running, it does
> > honor the timeout. Which defaults to 10_000, so the old working
> > timeout was 10K * 2M * 32, and the new not working timeout is 10K * 32.
> > And the max settable timeout is 100K * 32. So it seems pretty clear
> > that, however long it takes to return to idle, it's longer than this
> > vastly reduced timeout.
> >
> > I'm going to try your suggested changes now, along with some
> > instrumentation to see how long resets are really taking.
>
> I've verified that some xscreensaver modules take up to fifty (as
> opposed to 32) calls to the ioctl before they quiesce. Probably it
> gets even higher. So, this is the same problem.
>
> The code I'm testing is more patient, so I don't know if your fix to
> call R128CCE_STOP helps with the actual resets; the other fellow in the
> bug report said that it did though. Here's what I was using for
> testing.
>
> --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/r128_accel.c.orig
> 2004-03-07 14:34:13.0 -0500
> +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/r128_accel.c 2004-03-07
> 14:39:29.0 -0500
> @@ -229,25 +229,35 @@
> void R128CCEWaitForIdle(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn)
> {
> R128InfoPtr info = R128PTR(pScrn);
> -int ret, i;
> +int ret, i, j;
>
> FLUSH_RING();
>
> for (;;) {
> +j = 0;
> +
> +do {
> i = 0;
> do {
> ret = drmCommandNone(info->drmFD, DRM_R128_CCE_IDLE);
> } while ( ret && errno == EBUSY && i++ < R128_IDLE_RETRY );
> +} while ( ret && errno == EBUSY && j++ < R128_TIMEOUT );
>
> if (ret && ret != -EBUSY) {
> xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR,
> "%s: CCE idle %d\n", __FUNCTION__, ret);
> }
>
> + if (i != 0 || j != 0) {
> + xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR,
> +"%s: CCE idle took j == %d\n", __FUNCTION__, j);
> + }
> +
> if (ret == 0) return;
>
> xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR,
> "Idle timed out, resetting engine...\n");
> + R128CCE_STOP(pScrn, info);
> R128EngineReset(pScrn);
>
> /* Always restart the engine when doing CCE 2D acceleration */
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
