Bug#224708:

2003-12-24 Thread Michel Dänzer 
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 03:52, Ben Okopnik wrote: 
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:57:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 21:17, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > > Does the reporter of this bug have a Radeon or some type. 
> > 
> > I don't think he got your followup; sending this to -submitter so he
> > sees it.
>  
> Nope, don't have a Radeon. The machine is a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop,
> with an nVidia GeForce2Go.
> 
> > > Flightgear locks my computer after some time, and I have a Radeon. The 
> > > last version of Flightgear locked my computer up on start.
> > 
> > If you're using the 3D driver from XFree86 4.3, I'm afraid that's to be
> > expected.
> 
> Mine is 4.3.0.1; perhaps this is part of the problem.

The problem is much more likely due to the proprietary nvidia drivers.


> > There's a difference between a lockup and a server crash though; the
> > latter is unlikely to be related to the 3D driver, unless proprietary
> > drivers are being used or something perhaps. The submitter should
> > provide the full server log and config file and if applicable preferably
> > even a backtrace from xserver-xfree86-dbg.
> 
> I'm attaching the server log from a previous crash, as well as the
> conffile. Please let me know how to generate that backtrace, and I'll
> happily send it along.

xserver-xfree86-dbg doesn't work with proprietary drivers, so you'd have
to use some tricks with the normal, modular server, but it will likely
point to the nvidia driver anyway, at which point only nVidia can do
anything.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer

Bug#224708:

2003-12-24 Thread Michel Dänzer 
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 15:34, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2003 03:57 pm, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > There's a difference between a lockup and a server crash though; the
> > latter is unlikely to be related to the 3D driver, unless proprietary
> > drivers are being used or something perhaps. The submitter should
> > provide the full server log and config file and if applicable preferably
> > even a backtrace from xserver-xfree86-dbg.
> 
> Would a server crash leave the mouse cursor working. BTW, I use hardware 
> cursors.

No, the X server controls the cursor, so when it crashes, it can no
longer move by definition.

As I said, your problem isn't the same as the one described in this bug.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer

Bug#224708:

2003-12-24 Thread Ben Okopnik 
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 10:56:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 03:52, Ben Okopnik wrote: 
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:57:22PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 21:17, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > > > Does the reporter of this bug have a Radeon or some type. 
> > > 
> > > I don't think he got your followup; sending this to -submitter so he
> > > sees it.
> >  
> > Nope, don't have a Radeon. The machine is a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop,
> > with an nVidia GeForce2Go.
> > 
> > > > Flightgear locks my computer after some time, and I have a Radeon. The 
> > > > last version of Flightgear locked my computer up on start.
> > > 
> > > If you're using the 3D driver from XFree86 4.3, I'm afraid that's to be
> > > expected.
> > 
> > Mine is 4.3.0.1; perhaps this is part of the problem.
> 
> The problem is much more likely due to the proprietary nvidia drivers.
 
 I was afraid it might be something like that. Grr, I wish I'd
known about nVidia before I bought this laptop; I'd have bought
something else. It irks the hell out of me to be stuck with this
proprietary crud...

> Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
   ^^^

Hey, you're an X developer - all right! :) *Is* there something I can
use to get out from under nVidia, or am I stuck until I sell this thing?



* Ben Okopnik * okopnik.freeshell.org * Technical Editor, Linux Gazette *
-*- See the Linux Gazette in its new home:  -*-

Re: Status of the 'debian/patches disaster'?

2003-12-24 Thread Branden Robinson 
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:08:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Looking at branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO, it looks like this is a large
> portion of the remaining work to get 4.3.0 into unstable.

It's the only significant part that's under our power.

The other criteria are:

1) the archive admins have to add overrides for the new packages created
   in 4.3.0-0pre1v5, which has been in queue/new since 6 December;
2) I'd *like* to have confirmed-working reports for 4.3.0-0pre1v5 from
   as many of the architectures that are going to release with sarge as
   possible

> But I'm not finding the status list terribly helpful, and I'm not sure it's
> actually up to date.

It's bit behind my own private work, and I do need to update that list.

> I'm especially confused by the ones in the list
> which appear to be present in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches, nearly
> unchanged, such as 910_Xserver_RTFF.diff -- but aren't marked in the list.

That's because 910 has a high numerical prefix, and I hadn't gotten to
it yet.  :)

> Is it reasonable to do the following?
> * Look at a patch in the list.
> * See if it's already present in upstream 4.3.0; if so suggest marking it
> 'upstream'.
> * See if it's superseded by a patch present in
> branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches; if so suggest marking it 'merged' or
> 'unchanged', depending.

Yes, it is quite reasonable, and I greatly welcome mails of this nature.
Please send them to this list.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|  The noble soul has reverence for
Debian GNU/Linux   |  itself.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |  -- Friedrich Nietzsche
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [S3 Inc. ViRGE/MX+MV (rev 03)] how to configure

2003-12-24 Thread Branden Robinson 
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 10:21:08PM +0100, Philippe BOURCIER - IPSL wrote:
> hello all,
> 
>   dunno if this is the right place... seems to me this ML is
> mainly for devel.
> 
>   I try to move from XFree 3 to 4.
> In version 3 I used the SVGA server.
> I didn't find the support for that card for XFree 4 ; just MX+,
> not MX+MV.
> I use sid and tried experimental without success
> Must I use the vesa driver?
> And in case of anybody yet succeeded configuring that card, could
> he sends me the XF86Config-4 file ?  ;-)

[The following is a form letter.]

Hello,

You recently sent an off-charter message to the debian-x mailing list.
First, I will offer an explanation of what this mailing list's purpose is;
I will then suggest some alternative forums for your message or concern.

The full charter of the mailing list follows.

  This list is for the discussion and support of the X Window System within
  Debian.  Issues of maintenance and porting of Debian's XFree86 packages are
  germane here, as are discussions of possible Debian policy mechanisms for
  ensuring the smooth interoperation of packages that use the X Window
  System, particularly widget sets, desktop environments, window managers,
  display managers, and packages that provide fonts for the X Window System.
  In particular, individuals involved with building official Debian XFree86
  packages for any architecture are invited to join, as are those with
  various graphics hardware who seek to reproduce and/or fix bugs in the X
  server.  This is not a user support list; this list is intended for those
  who deal with the source code of any of the X Window System components
  mentioned above.

If you are experiencing a problem, the first thing to check is the Debian X
FAQ.  This FAQ is available on the World Wide Web:

  http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/trunk/debian/local/FAQ

The FAQ is also available on any Debian system that has the
"xfree86-common" package installed.

You can use the command "dpkg --status xfree86-common" at a shell prompt to
determine whether you have the xfree86-common package installed (this
technique works with any other package name as well).  For instance, when I
run this command I see the following:

  $ dpkg --status xfree86-common
  Package: xfree86-common
  Status: install ok installed

(followed by additional information about the package)

If xfree86-common is installed, you can view the Debian X FAQ in a variety of
ways, since it is a gzipped (compressed) text file.  The path to the FAQ is
/usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz.  Here's one method for viewing it:

  $ zmore /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz
  Debian X Window System Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) List

  Copyright 1998-2002 Branden Robinson.  This document is licensed under the
  GNU General Public License, version 2 (see /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL).

  By its nature, this document is not complete.  If your question is not
  answered here, try /usr/share/doc//README.Debian (and other files
  in the package's doc directory), manual pages, and the debian-user mailing
  list.  See http://www.debian.org/ for more information about the Debian
  mailing lists.

(followed by the rest of the FAQ)

If the FAQ does not satisfactorily answer your question, the primary Debian
users' support forum is the debian-user mailing list.  You can learn more about
this list at:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/

If you have already tried that mailing list, and/or your machine does *NOT*
use an Intel-x86 compatible CPU (such as a Pentium or AMD Athlon chip), you
may also want to peruse one of Debian's architecture-specific mailing
lists:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-m68k/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/

Before sending a message to one of the mailing lists, it's wise to try
using the search interface; in many cases, your problem has been
experienced before by other people, and a solution, workaround, or
explanation may already be available!

  http://lists.debian.org/search.html

If the search engine turns up nothing, you should know whether or not
you're subscribed to a mailing list before sending a message to it.  If you
are not subscribed, make *certain* that you ask for private copies of
replies to your message.  Debian's standard practice is to reply only to
mailing lists (this cuts down on Internet traffic and annoying bounce
messages).  If you want people to deviate from this standard practice you
should ask them to do so.  (Advanced mail users should set a
Mail-Followup-To header that includes both the list address and their own
address.)

Finally, if you have found a problem in Debian's XFree86 packages (and
especially if Debian experts on one or more of

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 870 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches

2003-12-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin 
Author: branden
Date: 2003-12-24 18:05:29 -0500 (Wed, 24 Dec 2003)
New Revision: 870

Modified:
   branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i830_driver.diff
Log:
Set svn:keywords property to "Id".



Property changes on: 
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i830_driver.diff
___
Name: svn:keywords
   + Id

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 871 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches

2003-12-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin 
Author: branden
Date: 2003-12-24 18:13:49 -0500 (Wed, 24 Dec 2003)
New Revision: 871

Modified:
   branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/055_lnx_evdev_keyboard.diff
Log:
Resync diff offsets with respect to change r758 (should have been part of
that commit), which changed lnx_kbd.c in 000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff.


Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/055_lnx_evdev_keyboard.diff
===
--- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/055_lnx_evdev_keyboard.diff   
2003-12-24 23:05:29 UTC (rev 870)
+++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/055_lnx_evdev_keyboard.diff   
2003-12-24 23:13:49 UTC (rev 871)
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 $Id$
 
-diff -ur build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c 
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c
 build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c   
2003-03-26 19:53:47.0 -0500
-+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c  2003-03-15 
08:46:16.0 -0500
+diff -u xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c~ 
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c
+--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c~ 2003-12-24 
13:15:17.0 -0500
 xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_kbd.c  2003-12-24 
13:15:21.0 -0500
 @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
  #include "xf86OSKbd.h"
  #include "atKeynames.h"
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
  
  #define KBC_TIMEOUT 250/* Timeout in ms for sending to keyboard 
controller */
  
-@@ -481,8 +482,8 @@
+@@ -491,8 +492,8 @@
  return TRUE;
  }
  
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
  {
  KbdDevPtr pKbd = pInfo->private;
  
-@@ -521,3 +522,381 @@
+@@ -531,3 +532,381 @@
  #endif
  return TRUE;
  }

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 874 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-12-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin 
Author: branden
Date: 2003-12-24 18:43:38 -0500 (Wed, 24 Dec 2003)
New Revision: 874

Modified:
   branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
   branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_post430.diff
   branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i830_driver.diff
Log:
Grab fixes to upstream CVS xf-4_3-branch since last pull.

(debian/patches/000_post430.diff):
+ (xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile):
Include backwards compatibility API for renamed stream functions in
Freetype2 library.
+ (xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/i810/i830_driver.c):
1011. Build fix for the i810 driver when XF86DRI isn't defined
  (#6006, Matthias Scheler).

(debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i830_driver.diff:) resync offsets


Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
===
--- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-12-24 23:32:23 UTC (rev 873)
+++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-12-24 23:43:38 UTC (rev 874)
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+xfree86 (4.3.0-0pre1v6) experimental; urgency=low
+
+  * Grab fixes to upstream CVS xf-4_3-branch since last pull.
+- debian/patches/000_post430.diff:
+  + (xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile):
+  Include backwards compatibility API for renamed stream functions in
+  Freetype2 library.
+  + (xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/i810/i830_driver.c):
+  1011. Build fix for the i810 driver when XF86DRI isn't defined
+(#6006, Matthias Scheler).
+- debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i830_driver.diff: resync offsets
+
+ -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:34:08 -0500
+
 xfree86 (4.3.0-0pre1v5) experimental; urgency=low
 
   * Grab fixes to upstream CVS xf-4_3-branch since last pull.

Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_post430.diff
===
--- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_post430.diff  2003-12-24 23:32:23 UTC 
(rev 873)
+++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_post430.diff  2003-12-24 23:43:38 UTC 
(rev 874)
@@ -295,6 +295,14 @@
   1009. Fix DRM_CAS on ia64 as used by the DRI (Bugzilla #778, John
 Dennis). (Alan Hourihane)
 
+(xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile):
+  Include backwards compatibility API for renamed stream functions in
+  Freetype2 library.
+
+(xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/i810/i830_driver.c):
+  1011. Build fix for the i810 driver when XF86DRI isn't defined (#6006,
+Matthias Scheler).
+
 Index: xc/config/cf/NetBSD.cf
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/xc/config/cf/NetBSD.cf,v
@@ -1793,6 +1801,54 @@
}
}
  }
+Index: xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile
+===
+RCS file: /cvs/xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile,v
+retrieving revision 1.9
+retrieving revision 1.9.2.1
+diff -u -r1.9 -r1.9.2.1
+--- xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile 1 Jan 2003 22:08:39 -   1.9
 xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile 6 Nov 2003 01:33:04 -   1.9.2.1
+@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
+-XCOMM $XFree86: xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile,v 1.9 2003/01/01 22:08:39 torrey 
Exp $
++XCOMM $XFree86: xc/lib/freetype2/Imakefile,v 1.9.2.1 2003/11/06 01:33:04 
torrey Exp $
+ 
+ #define IHaveSubdirs
+ #define PassCDebugFlags
+@@ -53,9 +53,10 @@
+ 
+ HEADERS=ft2build.h
+ 
+-SRCS_BASE = ftbase.c \
+-ftbdf.c \
++SRCS_BASE = ftapi.c \
++ftbase.c \
+ ftbbox.c \
++ftbdf.c \
+ ftdebug.c \
+ ftglyph.c \
+ ftinit.c \
+@@ -65,9 +66,10 @@
+ fttype1.c \
+ ftxf86.c
+ 
+-OBJS_BASE = ftbase.o \
+-ftbdf.o \
++OBJS_BASE = ftapi.o \
++ftbase.o \
+ ftbbox.o \
++ftbdf.o \
+ ftdebug.o \
+ ftglyph.o \
+ ftinit.o \
+@@ -185,6 +187,7 @@
+ 
+ LinkSourceFile(ft2build.h,$(FREETYPETOP)/include)
+ 
++LinkSourceFile(ftapi.c,$(FREETYPESRC)/base)
+ LinkSourceFile(ftbase.c,$(FREETYPESRC)/base)
+ LinkSourceFile(ftbdf.c,$(FREETYPESRC)/base)
+ LinkSourceFile(ftbbox.c,$(FREETYPESRC)/base)
 Index: xc/programs/Xserver/Xext/Imakefile
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/xc/programs/Xserver/Xext/Imakefile,v
@@ -2460,12 +2516,16 @@
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/CHANGELOG,v
 retrieving revision 3.2588
-retrieving revision 3.2588.2.32
-diff -u -r3.2588 -r3.2588.2.32
+retrieving revision 3.2588.2.34
+diff -u -r3.2588 -r3.2588.2.34
 --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/CHANGELOG   27 Feb 2003 04:56:44 -  
3.2588
-+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/CHANGELOG   29 Oct 2003 11:01:56 -  
3.2588.2.32
-@@ -1,3 +1,104 @@
 xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/CHANGELOG   19 Dec 2003 23:41:23 -  
3.2588.2.34
+@@ -1,3 +1,108 @@
 +XFree86 4.3.0.2 (xx September 2003)
++1011. Build fix for the i810 driv

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 872 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches

2003-12-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin 
Author: branden
Date: 2003-12-24 18:16:13 -0500 (Wed, 24 Dec 2003)
New Revision: 872

Modified:
   branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/011b_recognize_ko_KR.EUC-KR_locale.diff
Log:
Resync offset (unclear what messed it up -- perhaps a merge from the
trunk).


Modified: 
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/011b_recognize_ko_KR.EUC-KR_locale.diff
===
--- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/011b_recognize_ko_KR.EUC-KR_locale.diff   
2003-12-24 23:13:49 UTC (rev 871)
+++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/011b_recognize_ko_KR.EUC-KR_locale.diff   
2003-12-24 23:16:13 UTC (rev 872)
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
 
 Not submitted upstream yet.
 
 xc/nls/locale.alias~   2003-11-12 12:03:00.0 -0500
-+++ xc/nls/locale.alias2003-11-12 12:27:30.0 -0500
-@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@
+--- xc/nls/locale.alias~   2003-12-24 13:18:49.0 -0500
 xc/nls/locale.alias2003-12-24 13:18:52.0 -0500
+@@ -421,6 +421,7 @@
  ko_KR.EUC:ko_KR.eucKR
  ko_KR.euc:ko_KR.eucKR
  ko_KR.euckr:  ko_KR.eucKR

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 873 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2003-12-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin 
Author: branden
Date: 2003-12-24 18:32:23 -0500 (Wed, 24 Dec 2003)
New Revision: 873

Modified:
   branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules
Log:
Check for fuzz or offsets in the patches applied to the build tree, and do
not let the actual build commence if there are any.


Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules
===
--- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules 2003-12-24 23:16:13 UTC (rev 872)
+++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules 2003-12-24 23:32:23 UTC (rev 873)
@@ -196,6 +196,11 @@
 $(STAMP_DIR)/stamp-build: $(patched) $(STAMP_DIR)/genscripts
dh_testdir
 
+   # I am more anal than the dbs package maintainer about diffs, it seems.
+   if egrep -il '(fuzz|offset)' stampdir/log/patches/*; then \
+ echo "The above patches had fuzz or offsets.  Please fix." >&2; \
+ exit 1; \
+   fi
# copy Xft stuff into exports/{lib,include} so we don't have to pull
# in -L/usr/include and other, similarly ugly, stuff (including, but
# not limited to, -I/usr/include).

Debian Bugs information: logs for Bug#224637

2003-12-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 

   Debian Bug report logs - #224637
 incorrect HorizSync used for NEC LCD1700M+NEC

   Package: xserver-xfree86; Reported by: Dan Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
   Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:03:02 UTC;
   Tags: d-i;
   Maintainer for xserver-xfree86 is Branden Robinson
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Source for xserver-xfree86 is xfree86.

   View this report as an mbox folder.
 _

   Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Install
   Team :
   Bug#222607; Package installation-reports. Full text available.
 _

   Acknowledgement sent to Dan Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
   New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian Install
   Team .

   Your message did not contain a Subject field. They are recommended and
   useful because the title of a Bug is determined using this field.
   Please remember to include a Subject field in your messages in future.

   Full text available.
 _

Message received at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2003 10:50:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 01 04:50:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mokc110mailxc3.everestkc.net (ksle966mailxc3.everestkc.net) [64.
126.4.157]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AQldR-0001S5-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 04:50:33 -0600
Received: from conversion-daemon.ksle966mailxc3.everestkc.net by
 ksle966mailxc3.everestkc.net
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 (original mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
 01 Dec 2003 04:49:46 -0600 (CST)
Received: from dirk.dm93.org
 (64-126-64-19-dhcp-kc.everestkc.net [64.126.64.19]) by
 ksle966mailxc3.everestkc.net
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,
 01 Dec 2003 04:49:46 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 04:50:29 -0600
From: Dan Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bcc: Dan Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
MSubject: installation-reports: trouble with USB keyboard in stage after reboot
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level:

Package: installation-reports
Version: daily-2003-11-19
Severity: normal


INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-19 http://www.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de/~sebastian
.ley/d-i/netinst-image-i386/daily-2003-11-19/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux dirk 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Mon Dec  1 00:39:50 CST 2003
Method: network install (mirrors.kernel.org), boot from netinst CD (IDE)

Machine: Powerspec PS8420
 Gigabyte GA-8IDML motherboard
 (more details: http://dm93.org/z2001/DirkMachine)
Processor: Pentium 4
Memory: 1GB
Root Device: 30GB IDE disk
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hdb: 30.7 GB, 30735581184 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3736 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdb1   *   1   9   72261   83  Linux
/dev/hdb2  10 140 1052257+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb3 1413736288848705  Extended
/dev/hdb5 141 271 1052226   8e  Linux LVM
/dev/hdb6 272 348  618471   8e  Linux LVM
/dev/hdb7 349 414  530113+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hdb8 415172010490413+  8e  Linux LVM
/dev/hdb917212693 7815591   83  Linux
/dev/hdb10   26943736 8377866   83  Linux

Output of lspci:

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev
 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 0
3)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev 12)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 12)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BA IDE U100 (rev 12)
00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 12)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 12)
00:1f.4 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 12)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11DDR [GeForce2 MX 100
DDR/200 DDR] (rev b2)
02:00.0 Communication controller: Lucent Microelectron

Processed: requesting bug #224637 which was just reassigned to us

2003-12-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> send 224637
Sending logs for Bug#224637.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#224558: marked as done (libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages)

2003-12-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:55:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224558: libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 04:18:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 19 22:18:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relais.videotron.ca (VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca) 
[24.201.245.36] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AXYSc-0003pr-00; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:11:26 -0600
Received: from krystal.dyndns.org ([24.202.168.233])
 by VL-MO-MR004.ip.videotron.ca
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:10:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000)
 by krystal.dyndns.org with local; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:10:56 -0500
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:10:56 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libxft2
Version: 2.1.2-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid


Since about 2 weeks, I notice that apt-get wants to remove development
packages in order to install the 2.1.2-5 version of libxft2. These
packages are :

The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libglade2-dev libgtk2.0-dev libgtkgl2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev
libqt3-mt-dev libxft2-dev qt3-examples



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Krystal 2.4.23-grsec #2 Tue Dec 2 19:47:16 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA

Versions of packages libxft2 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1  2.2.1-13 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype62.1.7-1  FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libxrender1 0.8.3-5  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xlibs   4.2.1-14 X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.1-2compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 224558-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2003 01:21:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 24 19:21:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AZHuA-0005xl-00; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:55:02 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DF1B764117; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:55:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:55:01 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#224558: libxft2: Conflicts with -dev packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=FOOASDF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 


--0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:10:56PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Package: libxft2
> Version: 2.1.2-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid
>=20
> Since about 2 weeks, I notice that apt-get wants to remove

Bug#224708:

2003-12-24 Thread Michel Dänzer 
On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 17:31, Ben Okopnik wrote:
> 
> *Is* there something I can use to get out from under nVidia, or am I 
> stuck until I sell this thing?

Well, you may still want to verify this is actually the problem before
going that far. :) But for 3D hardware acceleration on current nVidia
hardware there's indeed no alternative to the proprietary drivers that
I'm aware of. (Note that the same is true for recent ATI hardware,
unfortunately).


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer