X Terminal kbd layout?
Hi, After upgrading I noticed that my home,end,pgup,pgdn and insert keys started to print ~ in all of my x terminal programs. What might this be caused by? Other x programs process these keys normally. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
Re: STOP THE PRESSES Re: XFree86 4.0.2-12 release and architecture status
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is > > insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in > > debian-devel. > > Installing gcc 2.95.3-9 makes things suitable for building on i386 now. > I just did a test build of db2 and db3, and then linked to them with > openldap2 and libnss-db. All went well, as expected. any chance the package would compile with a stable compiler? Bye Richard
Re: APT-able Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over > just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for > both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software. On my machine (K6-500 w/ V3) it's 3 times as fast! (for quake I, anyhow). What more reason do I need... (I gather the speed difference is less dramatic on faster CPUs) Jules
X Terminal kbd layout?
Hi, After upgrading I noticed that my home,end,pgup,pgdn and insert keys started to print ~ in all of my x terminal programs. What might this be caused by? Other x programs process these keys normally. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STOP THE PRESSES Re: XFree86 4.0.2-12 release and architecture status
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is > > insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in > > debian-devel. > > Installing gcc 2.95.3-9 makes things suitable for building on i386 now. > I just did a test build of db2 and db3, and then linked to them with > openldap2 and libnss-db. All went well, as expected. any chance the package would compile with a stable compiler? Bye Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: APT-able Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over > just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for > both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software. On my machine (K6-500 w/ V3) it's 3 times as fast! (for quake I, anyhow). What more reason do I need... (I gather the speed difference is less dramatic on faster CPUs) Jules -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]