Re: Vietnamese translation for "Debian Project mourns the loss of Clytie Siddall"
Hi Paul, It's my pleasure to do the translation. Also, thank you for the information. I will check it out. My best, Minh 2015-02-10 15:04 GMT+07:00 Paul Wise : > On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 15:30 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 14:24 +0700, Hùng Trần wrote: > > > > > The Vietnamese translation of the article is very good. > > > > Thanks for your assessment, I'll add it to the site. > > I have added it to the repository, it will be online in a few hours. > > Minh Le, thank you very much for the translation! > > You might like to sign up for the Vietnamese translation mailing list: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-vietnamese/ > > It would be great to have more of the site translated, details here: > > https://www.debian.org/devel/website/ > https://www.debian.org/devel/website/translating > > -- > bye, > pabs > > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > -- Best Regards. *Minh Le (Ms.)* Cell: +84 (0) 90 520 1061 Skype: minh.ttvh **Life is a climb but the view is great**
Bug#777762: wiki.debian.org: path separator must be "/", not "." in sysfs.conf
Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: normal In https://wiki.debian.org/SSDOptimization: echo "block.sdX.queue.scheduler = deadline" >> /etc/sysfs.conf is wrong. This results "Setting sysfs variables...unknown attribute block.sda.queue.scheduler ... failed!" in syslog. Must be: echo "block/sdX/queue/scheduler = deadline" >> /etc/sysfs.conf -- -- Name: SATOH Fumiyasu @ OSS Technology Corp. (fumiyas @ osstech co jp) -- Business Home: http://www.OSSTech.co.jp/ -- GitHub Home: https://GitHub.com/fumiyas/ -- PGP Fingerprint: BBE1 A1C9 525A 292E 6729 CDEC ADC2 9DCA 5E1C CBCA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87iof7h1m2.wl%fumi...@osstech.jp
Bug#777762: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: path separator must be "/", not "." in sysfs.conf)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:39:04 +0100 with message-id <20150212103902.ga13...@sh76.dev.logilab.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#62: wiki.debian.org: path separator must be "/", not "." in sysfs.conf has caused the Debian Bug report #62, regarding wiki.debian.org: path separator must be "/", not "." in sysfs.conf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 62: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=62 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: normal In https://wiki.debian.org/SSDOptimization: echo "block.sdX.queue.scheduler = deadline" >> /etc/sysfs.conf is wrong. This results "Setting sysfs variables...unknown attribute block.sda.queue.scheduler ... failed!" in syslog. Must be: echo "block/sdX/queue/scheduler = deadline" >> /etc/sysfs.conf -- -- Name: SATOH Fumiyasu @ OSS Technology Corp. (fumiyas @ osstech co jp) -- Business Home: http://www.OSSTech.co.jp/ -- GitHub Home: https://GitHub.com/fumiyas/ -- PGP Fingerprint: BBE1 A1C9 525A 292E 6729 CDEC ADC2 9DCA 5E1C CBCA --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 19:21:09 +0900, SATOH Fumiyasu wrote: > Package: wiki.debian.org > Severity: normal > > In https://wiki.debian.org/SSDOptimization: > > echo "block.sdX.queue.scheduler = deadline" >> /etc/sysfs.conf > > is wrong. This results "Setting sysfs variables...unknown attribute > block.sda.queue.scheduler ... failed!" in syslog. > > Must be: > > echo "block/sdX/queue/scheduler = deadline" >> /etc/sysfs.conf > It's a wiki, you should fix it yourself; this bug tracker is for issues with the site itself, not individual pages. Cheers, Julien--- End Message ---
Verwen De Klerck-Loose/A. [DE KLERCK JURGEN] met heerlijk espresso
Van een heerlijk Espresso moment genieten op kantoor? Test tijdens een vrijblijvende degustatie het exclusief design toestel van Belmoca en proef gratis onze 6 verschillende smaken! Interesse in dit aanbod? Vraag hier uw vrijblijvende degustatie op kantoor aan: http://www.kapamedia.eu/belmoca/form.htm?lng=nl&tg=belmoca&utm_campaign=belmoca&utm_source=admr&utm_medium=email&you=debian-www@lists.debian.org Extra gratis gift box met 24 capsules bij ondertekening contract! Actie geldig tem 28 februari 2015 --- Online versie: http://kapateco.fb.kp.kpmail.be/c16/e1058178/h7830f/l689/index.html Deze e-mail werd verstuurd naar debian-www@lists.debian.org. Profiel aanpassen: http://kapateco.fb.kp.kpmail.be/c16/e1058178/h7830f/l691/index.html Uitschrijven: http://kapateco.fb.kp.kpmail.be/c16/e1058178/h7830f/l690/index.html Privacy policy: http://kapateco.fb.kp.kpmail.be/c16/e1058178/h7830f/l692/index.html Powered by Addemar: http://poweredby.addemar.com/
Re: Verwen De Klerck-Loose/A. [DE KLERCK JURGEN] met heerlijk espresso
Kidding? Message sent from my cellphone. > On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:51 PM, Belmoca wrote: > > > Als u deze e-mail in tekstformaat ontvangt, zonder afbeeldingen, klik hier! > > TEST tijdens een VRIJBLIJVENDE > DEGUSTATIE het exclusief > design toestel van Belmoca > > en PROEF GRATIS > onze 6 verschillende > SMAKEN! > > INTERESSE in dit aanbod? > VRAAG hier uw vrijblijvende > degustatie op kantoor aan.EXTRA GRATIS GIFT BOX met 24 CAPSULES > bij ondertekening contract! > Actie geldig tem 28 februari 2015 > > Klik hier als u geen mailing meer van Belmoca wilt ontvangen > > Deze e-mail werd verstuurd naar debian-www@lists.debian.org. > Deze email werd verstuurd namens Kapateco SARL, 128 rue de Trèves, L-2630 > Luxembourg > TVA: LU20701186 – tel: 00352/ 260.94.712 > Overeenstemming met de Wet van 8 december 1992 betreffende de bescherming van > het privé-leven, hebt u het recht op inzage, wijziging en verwijdering van uw > gegevens. > Uitschrijven - Profiel update > privacy policy > powered by > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?
Hi, Bug #388141 [RC] refers to the relicensing of the debian www pages. After contacting debian-www, it seems that there isn't much interest in fixing it. The next step would involve compiling a list of website lines which are still active yet which relicensing permission has not been received. In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as "jessie-ignore"? Thanks, Riley Baird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150213065944.be67bd6d5c9d151ef8264...@bitmessage.ch
Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?
Am 12.02.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Riley Baird: > Bug #388141 [RC] refers to the relicensing of the debian www pages. > After contacting debian-www, it seems that there isn't much interest in > fixing it. I interpret the relative silence in #388141 differently then you. I'd say that everybody is busy with doing other stuff. So if you want the state of affairs to change, just go after it, bit by bit. As you describe here: > The next step would involve compiling a list of website > lines which are still active yet which relicensing permission has not > been received. And then just ask for permission, line by line. In the end I think it's work and if it should be accomplished then someone has to do that work. Since you are interested, just go and hit the work, it may well be that people will join or help you along the way. > In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is > definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before > the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as > "jessie-ignore"? I can't comment on that. Best I know, the release managers would be the people to contact, but after all it's up to the project to decide. I myself: jessie-ignore +1 *t -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54dd0a27.4080...@sourcepole.ch
Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Riley Baird wrote: > In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is > definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before > the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as > "jessie-ignore"? There's no point in marking bugs in psuedo packages jessie-ignore; they're ignored for the purpose of releasing jessie anyway. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com He wore trifocals. There was stratigraphy even in his glasses. -- John McPhee _Annals of the Former World_ p364 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150212224753.gz27...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
