Processed: Re: Bug#679401: packages.debian.org: searching packages by file name does not list results for unstable but does for testing?

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 679401 www.debian.org
Bug #679401 [packages.debian.org] packages.debian.org: searching packages by 
file name does not list results for unstable but does for testing?
Warning: Unknown package 'packages.debian.org'
Bug reassigned from package 'packages.debian.org' to 'www.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #679401 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #679401 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679401: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679401
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134363424424930.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#683249: packages.debian.org: Could show the content of Built-Using for the binary packages that have that field

[Didier Raboud]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Dear www people,

as you might know, some binary packages now have a "Built-Using" field
that lists the source packages (and specific versions) used to build it.

It would be useful to have that information available from the
packages.debian.org web interface.

Cheers,

OdyX


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120730074806.21899.33664.reportbug@gyllingar

Bug#669011: marked as done (Diversity statement for the Debian Project)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:00:25 -0400
with message-id <50171209.60...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#669011: Diversity statement for the Debian Project
has caused the Debian Bug report #669011,
regarding Diversity statement for the Debian Project
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
669011: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669011
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org

Dear WWW Team,
  as you're probably aware of, we've discussed on -project [1] the
proposal by Francesca Ciceri to publish a diversity statement for the
Debian Project. There seems to be consensus on the idea. A week ago [2]
I've anticipated that, as DPL, I'd have been happy to kindly ask you to
publish a statement along the following lines:


The Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone.

It doesn't matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you:
we welcome you. We welcome contributions from everyone as long as they
interact constructively with our community.

While much of the work for our project is technical in nature, we value
and encourage contributions from those with expertise in other areas,
and welcome them into our community.


No one has further objected, so I hereby ask you to go ahead and publish
it on www.d.o. Further language improvements have been suggested
starting at [2], which I haven't reviewed. Feel free to apply them or
other language improvements as you see fit.

Many thanks in advance,
Cheers.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/03/msg00048.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/04/msg00053.html

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ..   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ..   . . o
Debian Project Leader...   @zack on identi.ca   ...o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Le 16/04/2012 10:06, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> I'd have been happy to kindly ask you to
> publish a statement along the following lines:

Already done, after the vote ;-). A proper link to the statement, at
least from , wouldn't hurt, nor from the
main menu (displayed on every page), nor from the crasily manually
maintained site map …

Regards

David




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#681909: Subject: Suggestion: Four Weekly-Build, User writeable, User-Feedback-Status fields, for the Debian web site.

[David Prévot]

Control: forwarded -1 93...@debian.org
Control: reassign -1 cdimage.debian.org

Hi,

Le 17/07/2012 12:56, techy techtech a écrit :
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: minor
> 
> Subject: Suggestion: Four Weekly-Build, User writeable,
> User-Feedback-Status fields, for the Debian web site.
> 
> Regarding the the Debian page:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/   (For me, Testing
> Wheezy i386 )

What I explicitly notice on that page, is Steve's email address, so
forwarding accordingly. 
also inform me of the existence of the cdimage.debian.org pseudopackage,
thus reassigning (I know it doesn't fit the description, but it has more
chance to be properly addressed there…).

Cheers

David

P.-S.: following the rest of the initial BR.

> BENEFITS:
> This is not a complaint, it is meant as a well intentioned observation
> and suggestion, I believe it is a way to speed up the bug/fix cycle
> with quick feedback and also increasing Debians available resources by
> involving outside help, us Users.
> 
> PROPOSITION:
> It would be helpfull if the the Weekly Build Status page included
> four, User changeable, User Feedback fields:-
> 
> A first single field; with two dropdown selectable options for 'User
> Feedback' flags, referencing the current Weekly Build feedback from
> USERS, such as; "No known issues" or "Unknown", "Uninstallable", or
> "Broken + Uninstalable". (A multiple choice, drop down selection.)
> 
> A second field for a "Bug# number" to enable a visiting User to
> quickly track the status, helping the User make their download
> decision, quickly and efficiently, instead of taking the best part of
> a day to find out its broken.
> 
> A third field, of open text "Issue Description" field, for text like
> "Weekly Build cut 20120702-03:50" for when there is no 'bug report
> number' yet, because nobody is working on the issue. This gives an
> instant indication and opportunity to a user, like me to download,
> investigate and report the broken Weekly Build as a new bug.
> These 'User Feedback Status' fields would go a long way to making life
> easier to decide if its worth downloading, maybe cutting a disk, and
> going through the install process before finding out the Weekly Build
> is broken and will not boot.
> 
> A fourth field that is automatically updated with the date of the User change.
> 
> ---
> CURRENT WEB PAGE:
>   http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/
> Currently the (URL above) page says: "Weekly build status  Last
> updated: 20th October 2011
> All running normally, no issues to report.   ( I know that it has been
> broken for for at least 3 to 4 weeks.)
> Possible bugs affecting the weekly builds  No bugs found  Last bug
> check: 2012-07-17 08:10:02 UTC"
> (today is 17.07.2012) I assume this means, ...with the build disk
> packaging, which is reasonable statement.
> 
> EXPERIMENT:
> One proposed suggestion may be to conduct a 6 month experiment by
> creating and allowing on that page, a public access, "User Status
> Feedback fields and Date" field, so that we users could help, by
> updating the "Weekly Build (WB) Feedback Status".
> Text could be added nearby with a disclaimer and warning that this
> feedback is user changeable and may be wholly inaccurate.
> If the experiment is not helpfull, or is abused, just tweak or fine
> tune fields and text accordingly or stop the experiment.
> 
> REASON FOR CHANGE:
> I would not have downloaded for so many weeks, the first two DVD's and
> cut the first DVD (no net), then spent the time trying to install each
> time, a known (by someone) broken uninstalable WB (Weekly Build) iso.
> 
> I could not see from previous bug searching, in advance, unless I had
> the symptoms to search with from my many own fruitless installs and
> resulting issues.
> 
> I am guessing here of course, the Weekly Builds are auto built, which
> I now suspect they are, I trust that this is already the process. It
> appears there may be nobody trying to check to see if the Weekly Build
> actually installs.
> Maybe this has probably been a glitch, has occured to me, and probably
> due to the lack of people resources.
> If I am wrong, then I do appologise.
> 
> Of course, holding back on publishing, or pulling the build is NOT an
> option in my view. People need to work on something. That's why my
> proposed 'WB USER Feedback Status Fields', to 'flag the WB iso' idea
> of mine, may be of assistance in helping you decide the appropriate
> measure, if any, to be taken here by (Debian) you.
> 
> The detail reason for my comments are contained in one of my
> installation-reports. In this case, regarding Weekly Build
> 20120702-03:50 I have no bug# number to reference here yet, as I have
> not submitted the 'Package: instalation-reports:' report yet, (work in
> progress).
> 
> HISTORY:
> Bear in mind that recently, more Wheezy Testing Weekly Builds have
> install bugs that have not allowed a succesfull instal

Processed: Re: Bug#681909: Subject: Suggestion: Four Weekly-Build, User writeable, User-Feedback-Status fields, for the Debian web site.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 93...@debian.org
Bug #681909 [www.debian.org] Subject: Suggestion: Four Weekly-Build, User 
writeable, User-Feedback-Status fields, for the Debian web site.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to '93...@debian.org'.
> reassign -1 cdimage.debian.org
Bug #681909 [www.debian.org] Subject: Suggestion: Four Weekly-Build, User 
writeable, User-Feedback-Status fields, for the Debian web site.
Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'cdimage.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #681909 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #681909 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
681909: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681909
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b681909.13436898021302.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#680691: marked as done (Please remove useless templates links from intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:46:50 -0400
with message-id <5017390a.1020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680691: Please remove useless templates links from 
intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot
has caused the Debian Bug report #680691,
regarding Please remove useless templates links from intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680691
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts international

Hi,

Christian just asked to remove the “templates” links from the [POT]
page of the website. This mail is to not forget to do it (edit
english/international/l10n/scripts/gen-files.pl to remove some useless
lines)*, and to make sure nobody relies on those links. 

POT: http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/pot

Regards

David

* I'd almost do it right now, but prefer not risk breaking this page
just before Christian talk.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 
'stable'), (150, 'testing'), (120, 'unstable'), (110, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Le 07/07/2012 20:10, David Prévot a écrit :

> Christian just asked to remove the “templates” links from the [POT]
> page of the website.

Done, they won't be displayed anymore in a few hours (thanks Christian
for pointing it. If you have other ideas of stuff to remove, do not
hesitate to point them ;-).

> This mail is to […] make sure nobody relies on those links.

Added d-l-english, in case someone relied on this “feature”.

>   POT: http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/pot

Regards

David




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#681845: marked as done ([www.debian.org] Incorrect French translation of warning on the technical committee ("vous devez ?tre pr?t ? ?tre d?fi?"))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:48:24 +0200
with message-id <20120731064824.GA25809@spin>
and subject line Changes reviewed by the French l10n team
has caused the Debian Bug report #681845,
regarding [www.debian.org] Incorrect French translation of warning on the 
technical committee ("vous devez ?tre pr?t ? ?tre d?fi?")
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
681845: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681845
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte.fr.html#referquestions contains in 
the first item of section "Quelques avertissements sur le comité" :
Lors de la discussion technique avec d'autres développeurs, vous devez 
être prêt à être défié et contredit.

whereas the original says:
When discussing technical questions with other developers you should 
be ready to be challenged.


The person who contacts the committee should expect to be challenged, 
but expecting to be defied is a little extreme... "défi" is a correct 
translation for "challenge", but "to challenge" does not always 
translate to "défier". I would suggest:



Lors de la discussion technique avec d'autres développeurs, vous devez 
être prêt à ce que votre position soit mise en doute et questionnée.


"mis à l'épreuve" would also work.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!

The French localisation team has finished the review process for the
changes of this page. The version currently on line (1.47) addresses the
issue raised in this bug report and takes into account the wording
proposed by Filipus Klutiero. I am therefore closing this bug report.

Cheers,

Cédric


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---