Repositorios

2011-09-27 Thread Ruben Acosta 
Tengo el agrado de dirigirme a Uds, para consultar respecto a los
repositorios en terminos de hardware, es decir, el debian 6 no soporta
hardware viejo por lo tanto sigo recurriendo al lenny.
Cuando seteo el /etc/apt/sources.list de la siguiente manera:

deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ stable main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free

encuentro que el mirrors.kernel.org no esta mas.

Cuales serian los repositorios adecuados?

Desde ya agradezco su tiempo.

atte.

Ruben Acosta

Booking

2011-09-27 Thread Christopher Konrad 
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, 
 

hiermit möchte ich Ihnen meine Band Noch ist Zeit (Gewinner des SWM Musicids 
Finales 2011 und des "Ally 2011") für eine zukünftige Zusammenarbeit 
vorstellen. 

Egal ob in kleiner Besetzung oder mit kompletter Band, als Support, Vorband, 
Untermahlung, Hauptact, Unplugged oder sonstiges. Wir können Ihnen so ziemlich 
jeden Wunsch erfüllen. Außerdem trete ich persönlich noch alleine als Bar-, 
oder Restaurantpianist auf.


 

Unser Programm besteht aus 45 Minuten selbstkomponierter Stücke, welches wir 
auf Wunsch mit beliebten Coversongs der letzten 60 Jahre aufstocken können.

  

 

Hier ein kleiner Vorgeschmack:

 

Noch ist Zeit - Berühr mich

http://soundcloud.com/noch-ist-zeit/noch-ist-zeit-ber-hr-mich 


 

Noch ist Zeit - Noch ist Zeit (Unplugged)

http://www.youtube.com/user/NochistZeit#p/a/f/0/UOmYMMWIUCA 


 

 

 

Bei Interesse und für weitere Informationen geben Sie mir bitte kurz Bescheid. 

 

Vielen Dank und freundlich Grüße

 

Christopher Konrad

 

Ansprechpartner: 

Christopher Konrad
Schönebeckerstr. 12  – 39221 Welsleben

Telefon: 0152 - 536 076 88 

E-Mail: noch-ist-z...@web.de  

Internet: www.myspace.com/nochistzeit 

YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/NochistZeit 
 

Facebook: www.facebook.com/pages/Noch-ist-Zeit/203484316360776

Register & Earn 200 ELMPoints!

2011-09-27 Thread Yane - Authentic Cuba Travel 
For the online version please view Educator Mile Points. Register & Earn 200 
Bonus Points!
To drop your subscription, use the "unsubscribe" link at the bottom
  


Dear Educator,

At Authentic Cuba Travel, we are having a great 2011, and 2012 is looking very 
promising too. More and more educators have decided to explore Cuba with their 
students and have chosen Authentic Cuba Travel to provide them with custom-made 
study tours and short-term courses in Cuba. After all, nobody knows Cuba as we 
do!

Now Authentic Cuba Travel wants to say thank you to these loyal educators. We 
also want to show our gratitude to the new professors and teachers who are 
currently planning their first school trip to Cuba with us.

We are proud to announce a new and unprecedented program for educators called 
the Educator Loyalty Mile Points (ELMPs). The Program will allow educators who 
take their students to Cuba with us to earn loyalty points that can be redeemed 
and applied to any of our tours at any time of the year.

Earning points is a simple process. Each time you take students to Cuba, you 
earn 100 ELMPs for each student on the Cuba study tour. For example, if you 
take 20 students to Cuba, then you will receive 2000 ELMPS. This means for this 
year, you could join almost any of our escorted Cuban tours for FREE- as most 
of our tours cost $2000 or less. 
   
It is so quick and easy to earn ELPs, you may even earn enough ELMPs to take a 
family member, friend or colleague to Cuba with you.

If you are a professor, teacher or educator of any sort and you are considering 
taking your classroom to Cuba in the near future, the ELMP program is for you. 
REGISTER NOW and you will receive 200 bonus ELMPs that you can redeem towards 
any of our more than 24 tour departures a year

Do not forget to check the FREE Cuba Explore tour for teachers. They represent 
a good opportunity to travel to Cuba before taking your students– especially 
for those who have not been to Cuba before.

Check our most Popular Cuba School Tours for Spring Break 2012!

Beautiful Cuba! (Music, Dance, Adventure, Cultural, Educational)

The Social Traveller! (Volunteerism, Social, Adventure, Nature, Cultural)

Cuba, a Natural Paradise! (Nature, Bird Watching, Adventure, Ecotourism)

Catholic Pilgrimage Cuba Tour (Religion, Volunteerism, Education, Nature)

Jewel of the Caribbean! (Arts, Architecture, Adventure, Cultural, Educational)

Check our most Popular Study Abroad Programs!

Two-week Spanish Immersion Program (by the University of Havana)

Techniques of the Cuban Ballet School (by Cuba's National Ballet School)

Fine Arts Program at Cuba's Art Academy "San Alejandro"

Competition, Training & Cross Cultural Exchange Sports Program

We are here to help you witness authentic Cuba. Call or e-mail us. Please, 
consider sharing this letter with your family, friends and colleagues too.


If you would like to stop receiving our emails, please click on one of the 
"UNSUBSCRIBE" links in this section. We apologize for any inconvenience.

To make sure you receive our emails, please take a moment to add 
i...@authenticubatours.com to your address book or safe senders list.

If you think your email address is being abused, please do send report to 
ab...@authenticubatours.org

Tour price and seat availability were accurate at the time this email was sent. 
It's possible they may differ from what you see when you visit 
www.authenticubatours.com

If you have any suggestions, comments or questions regarding this email, please 
email us at i...@authenticubatours.com or contact customer service.

Govt. Nursing Question

2011-09-27 Thread Philip Hogansmith 
Hi Webmaster,

I created onlinenursepractitionerprograms.com/governmental-resources 
and it is what I believe to be the definitive list of governmental 
nursing resources on the web, and published it earlier this week. Do you mind 
taking a look and adding it to your resource page, 
http://www.dmoz.org/Health/Nursing/Employment/Recruitment_and_Staffing/

In the resource you’ll notice that I link to every state nursing 
board in the US, all major professional nursing associations, as well as a 
comprehensive list of other nursing, education, and education funding 
resources.  
Creating this resource has become a fun project of mine, and I think it serves 
as a great long term resource for anyone looking for governmental 
nursing resources.  I would greatly appreciate any feedback, and hope you 
will find it as a useful addition to your site. 

Thanks for taking a look!

Gina Holstead :)

Re: Govt. Nursing Question

2011-09-27 Thread victory 
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:22:27 -0500 (CDT)
Philip Hogansmith wrote:

> taking a look and adding it to your resource page, 
> http://www.dmoz.org/Health/Nursing/Employment/Recruitment_and_Staffing/

see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2011/03/msg00298.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2011/03/msg00299.html


-- 
victory
no need to CC me :-)
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/102724


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110928065441.e1961441.victory@gmail.com

[copyright-format] Format URL and installation on www.debian.org (Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.)

2011-09-27 Thread Charles Plessy 
Le Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:07:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> David Prévot  writes:
> 
> > I don't now what is the supposed name of the DEP5 document inside the
> > debian-policy package, but it would be highly appreciated if the “1.0”
> > part could be easily parsable from the document name, at worse from the
> > document itself (in a reliable way).
> 
> We should be able to do that.
> 
> > Another side issue: in a few years, after some updates of the
> > copyright-format policy (e.g. version 4.2), it will be a bit painful to
> > rebuild the website from scratch, since one will have to dig up old
> > debian-policy packages in order to retrieve all copyright-format
> > versions…
> 
> I'm moderately tempted to just keep all the old versions in the
> debian-policy package to solve that problem.  It would mean that any build
> system issues would have to be done across all the old versions of the
> document we have available, but it seems worth it to have stable URLs.

Dear all,

Here is one simple solution:

 - In the debian-policy package, copyright-format/copyright-format.xml is the
   working document, which contains a disclaimer and a reference to the stable
   version on www.debian.org.

 - Published versions are stored in the debian-policy in 
copyright-format/published/,
   as XML source and HTML and text documents, without makefile as they are final
   versions, under names like 
copyright-format/published/copyright-format-1.0.html.

 - The ‘7doc’ cron job on www.debian.org installs a hard-coded list of 
copyright-format
   versions, on URIs like 
‘http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format-1.0.html’ 
   Depending how often the spec is updated (hopefully not often), the file 
listing
   in http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/ will grow, but if it really 
becomes a
   problem, the directory could get a proper WML index.

 - Thanks to content negociation on www.debian.org, the current URI for the
   spec would be 
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format-1.0

Just let me know if you would like patches.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110928003605.gc6...@merveille.plessy.net

Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] Format URL and installation on www.debian.org (Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.)

2011-09-27 Thread Russ Allbery 
Charles Plessy  writes:

> Here is one simple solution:

>  - In the debian-policy package, copyright-format/copyright-format.xml is the
>working document, which contains a disclaimer and a reference to the stable
>version on www.debian.org.

>  - Published versions are stored in the debian-policy in
>copyright-format/published/, as XML source and HTML and text
>documents, without makefile as they are final versions, under names
>like copyright-format/published/copyright-format-1.0.html.

I think we should include the source in case anyone wants to fork an old
version of the document (plus just on general principles of always
retaining source for anything we publish), and if we're going to include
the source we should ensure it remains buildable, so my inclination is to
only include the source in the Git repository for debian-policy and keep
generating the HTML for old versions.  This requires changing the
documents if anything about the toolchain for generating HTML changes, but
hopefully such changes should be minor.

>  - The ‘7doc’ cron job on www.debian.org installs a hard-coded list of
>copyright-format versions, on URIs like
>‘http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format-1.0.html’
>Depending how often the spec is updated (hopefully not often), the
>file listing in http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/ will
>grow, but if it really becomes a problem, the directory could get a
>proper WML index.

>  - Thanks to content negociation on www.debian.org, the current URI for
>the spec would be
>http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format-1.0

The advantage of instead using:

http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

is that, when one is using a simple mapping from URLs to file space, if
for some reason the document ever needs to be broken into multiple files
or needs to have images, the URL already assumes each document is in its
own directory and keeps all those supporting files isolated from each
other for multiple versions.

There are, of course, ways of arranging this for any URL format, but this
one probably keeps the overall complexity down the most.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uv11omp@windlord.stanford.edu

Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] Format URL and installation on www.debian.org (Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.)

2011-09-27 Thread Charles Plessy 
Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:45:02PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy  writes:
> 
> >  - Published versions are stored in the debian-policy in
> >copyright-format/published/, as XML source and HTML and text
> >documents, without makefile as they are final versions, under names
> >like copyright-format/published/copyright-format-1.0.html.
> 
> I think we should include the source

Yes, this is what I have written, modulo the Makefile.  I think that there is
an advantage to not rebuild the HTML and TXT versions, as this guarantees that
the distrubuted documents on www.debian.org will stay bit-identical.

The HTML version is currently built using jade, but this is because I have
been conservative and took the same mechanism as for the Debconf spec. It is
trivially buildable with xsltproc on a standard Debian system as the DocBook
source indicates its stylesheet.  The TXT is built by converting HTML to text
with the links browser.

We can of course include a Makefile and make sure that the published versions
are always rebuildable, but if jade and links change tiny details in the way
they convert documents (whitespace,…), I think that it would not be a good
reason to change the MD5 sum of the published versions.

> >  - Thanks to content negociation on www.debian.org, the current URI for
> >the spec would be
> >http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format-1.0
> 
> The advantage of instead using:
> 
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
> 
> is that, when one is using a simple mapping from URLs to file space, if
> for some reason the document ever needs to be broken into multiple files
> or needs to have images, the URL already assumes each document is in its
> own directory and keeps all those supporting files isolated from each
> other for multiple versions.

I proposed copyright-format-1.0 because it seemed to fit better David's
requirements, as for the URI you propose the file name of the spec would be
‘index.html’.  For both URIs it looks equally easy to install the files.  I
will follow the WWW team's choice for sure.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110928010343.gd6...@merveille.plessy.net

Re: Debian social network

2011-09-27 Thread Craig Small 
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:44:58PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> From someone who does not use any WordPress/blogging infrastructure, why
> BuddyPress and not a *real* social network, better if distributed and
> F/LOSS-friendly, i.e. ?
FWIW I thought the same thing when I read the intitial email.  If we
were going to have a social network 'thing' then something like Diaspora
(except I cannot spell it without typoing it) would be a better fit.

It doesn't mean I'm going to set it up and expect anyone else to, unless
they want to do it anyhow.

 - Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZhttp://www.enc.com.au/   csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux  http://www.debian.org/   csmall at : debian.org
old fingerprint:   1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
NEW fingerprint:   5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2  0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110928010825.gq22...@enc.com.au

Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] Format URL and installation on www.debian.org (Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.)

2011-09-27 Thread Russ Allbery 
Charles Plessy  writes:
> Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:45:02PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> Charles Plessy  writes:

>>>  - Published versions are stored in the debian-policy in
>>>copyright-format/published/, as XML source and HTML and text
>>>documents, without makefile as they are final versions, under names
>>>like copyright-format/published/copyright-format-1.0.html.

>> I think we should include the source

> Yes, this is what I have written, modulo the Makefile.

Yes, I know.  That's just part of the overall context for my whole
response which is now snipped out of that context.  :)

> I think that there is an advantage to not rebuild the HTML and TXT
> versions, as this guarantees that the distrubuted documents on
> www.debian.org will stay bit-identical.

I think ensuring rebuildability is somewhat more important than this.

> We can of course include a Makefile and make sure that the published
> versions are always rebuildable, but if jade and links change tiny
> details in the way they convert documents (whitespace,…), I think that
> it would not be a good reason to change the MD5 sum of the published
> versions.

I guess that doesn't really bother me.

>> The advantage of instead using:
>> 
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>> 
>> is that, when one is using a simple mapping from URLs to file space, if
>> for some reason the document ever needs to be broken into multiple
>> files or needs to have images, the URL already assumes each document is
>> in its own directory and keeps all those supporting files isolated from
>> each other for multiple versions.

> I proposed copyright-format-1.0 because it seemed to fit better David's
> requirements, as for the URI you propose the file name of the spec would
> be ‘index.html’.  For both URIs it looks equally easy to install the
> files.  I will follow the WWW team's choice for sure.

My assumption was that we would (for right now in the absence of needing
any supporting files) generate a single HTML file named
copyright-format-1.0.html, which the web team would then copy as
index.html into a directory named after the version number.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ty7xzcs3@windlord.stanford.edu

Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] Format URL and installation on www.debian.org (Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.)

2011-09-27 Thread David Prévot 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Le 27/09/2011 21:17, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy  writes:
>> Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:45:02PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :

>>> The advantage of instead using:
>>>
>>> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>>>
>>> is that, when one is using a simple mapping from URLs to file space, if
>>> for some reason the document ever needs to be broken into multiple
>>> files or needs to have images, the URL already assumes each document is
>>> in its own directory and keeps all those supporting files isolated from
>>> each other for multiple versions.

Good point.

>> I proposed copyright-format-1.0 because it seemed to fit better David's
>> requirements, as for the URI you propose the file name of the spec would
>> be ‘index.html’.  For both URIs it looks equally easy to install the
>> files.  I will follow the WWW team's choice for sure.
> 
> My assumption was that we would (for right now in the absence of needing
> any supporting files) generate a single HTML file named
> copyright-format-1.0.html, which the web team would then copy as
> index.html into a directory named after the version number.

Thanks Russ, such a name (copyright-format-.html) would totally
fit the (maybe badly expressed, sorry if I confused you, Charles)
requirements I could think of, to publish the current version of the
copyright-format policy, keeping the www build simple.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=D6bO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e828441.3000...@debian.org

A importância do jornalismo brasileiro

2011-09-27 Thread Antonio K. M. Cruz 
Essa busca de identidade não
foi só um esforço de poetas e
artistas, mas também de
pensadores que centram
nossa originalidade na idéia
de um brasileirismo afetivo e gentil, retratado e construído
por nós nesmos e vendido "la
fora" com muito sucesso, até
recentemente. Essa idéia de
afetividade é recorrente em
quase todos os nossos melhores intelectuais do
período, do luso-tropicalismo
de Gilberto Freire ao homem
cordial de Sérgio Buarque de
Hollanda, do macunaimismo
de Mário de Andrade à civilização gozosa de Darcy
Ribeiro, do populismo
carinhoso de Jorge Amado aos
malandros e heróis de
Roberto da Matta. Talvez
devamos levantar a hipótese de que, embora essa
afetividade nunca tenha se
manifestado
verdadeiramente em nossa
história social, pode ser que
ela seja o mais belo, profundo e secreto projeto inconsciente
do povo desse país, sempre
inviabilizado pelo Brasil dos
infermos, mas detectado e
textualizado por mestres
jornalistas. Obrigado.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cad_f3b3gcxalz-avadsuhyld9urykb2w9a0vry02dwfumjw...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#643620: www.debian.org: Changelog of pulseaudio 1.0-1 is not available

2011-09-27 Thread Vincent Lefevre 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

pulseaudio 1.0-1 is available, but not its changelog, e.g. on

http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/pulseaudio/current/changelog

(this is still the old one), and in aptitude, one gets an error
when one wants to view the changelog:

  Failed to download the changelog of libpulse0: 404  Not Found [IP:
  87.106.64.223 80]

(no such problems with other packages).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110928062323.ga4...@xvii.vinc17.org