Re: Mailscaner download not work

[victory]

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:49:46 +0900
victory wrote:


> The wrong link is not on debian www site but mailscanner's :-)
> http://www.mailscanner.info/downloads.html has wrong link.
> So, on IRC and mail, I told them to change it to drop etch/
> and hopes it will be fixed in the near future.

now it points http://packages.debian.org/mailscanner so it works :-)

-- 
victory
no need to CC me :-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324194832.d60eb3c3.victory@gmail.com

Mirror Down or Invalid URL

[Nelbren]

Hi!

Please check the URL to get the netinst.

Next the problem:

wget -c
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.1/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-i386-netinst.iso
--2011-03-24 10:39:54--
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.1/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-i386-netinst.iso
Resolving cdimage.debian.org... 130.239.18.173, 130.239.18.163,
2001:6b0:e:2018::163, ...
Connecting to cdimage.debian.org|130.239.18.173|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location:
http://caesar.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/6.0.1/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-i386-netinst.iso[following]
--2011-03-24 10:39:54--
http://caesar.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/6.0.1/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-i386-netinst.iso
Resolving caesar.acc.umu.se... 130.239.18.142, 2001:6b0:e:2018::142
Connecting to caesar.acc.umu.se|130.239.18.142|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2011-03-24 10:39:54 ERROR 404: Not Found.

-- 
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress
depends on the unreasonable man." George Bernard Shaw
"Queda prohibido no sonreir a los problemas,no luchar por lo que
quieres,abandonarlo todo por miedo,no convertir en realidad tus sueños."
Robado-de-algun-lado.

Broken links for CD images

[Chris Gray]

On http://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst

The links under "Small CDs" and "Smaller CDs" are broken because a 
directory name has changed from "6.0.1" to "6.0.1a".


Chris Gray
Systems Analyst
519-888-3456, ext. 35764
cpg...@uwaterloo.ca
University of Waterloo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b664d.1020...@uwaterloo.ca

Mirror List - gatech.edu Mirror - Architectures

[Thomas Shanks]

The gtlib.gatech.edu mirror only AFAICT carries two architectures now.  Your 
list includes many others it does not carry.

Thomas Shanks
Graduate Student, Georgia Tech


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/512158653-1300983957-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-15727864...@bda525.bisx.prod.on.blackberry

Re: Broken links for CD images

[David Prévot]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 24/03/2011 11:42, Chris Gray a écrit :
> On http://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst
> 
> The links under "Small CDs" and "Smaller CDs" are broken because a
> directory name has changed from "6.0.1" to "6.0.1a".

Updated, thanks for your report.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=wCm3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b7851.5040...@tilapin.org

Re: Mirror Down or Invalid URL

[David Prévot]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 24/03/2011 11:59, Nelbren a écrit :
> Hi!
> 
> Please check the URL to get the netinst.

Done, and updated, thanks for your report.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=f19t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b785b.7070...@tilapin.org

"Download Debian" link on www.debian.org

[Ola Peterson]

The "Download Debian" link in the upper-right of the banner on
http://www.debian.org/

refers to:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.1/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-amd64-i386-netinst.iso

which (302) re-directs to:
http://hammurabi.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/6.0.1/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-amd64-i386-netinst.iso
... and I get a 404

I assume it should refer to:
http://hammurabi.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/6.0.1a/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-amd64-i386-netinst.iso

thanks

-Ola

Debian 6.

[Bill Applebee.]

Hi,
  Help! Help!  

  For years I have Debian installed but for demo purposes put Ubuntu
10 on to an old Notebook and it has worked fine.

   Getting Linux Format I decided to replace the Ubuntu with Debian6,
for its stability and robustness for my a person with no knowledge of
computers to try, but only get as far as "Partitions formatting
Creating Ext 3 .. 33%   "   I tried various... auto, expert etc etc..

   I have also lost the Ubuntu that was working.

Can you help please?

TIA

Regards,

Bill.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1300986638.2756.12.camel@1010Ubuntu64Bit

Bug#613832: Bug#61383Re: www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the merchandise page

[Luca Capello]

tags 613832 + patch
thanks

Hi there!

Adding i...@debian.ch to the cc: given that it is used as an example,
please someone on the board corrects me if something below is wrong.

On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:43:43 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Quoted text reordered ]

Strange, I found Francesca's reply quite clear and linear/successive,
especially considering that the two problems we are discussing are yes
linked, but the solution is independent from one to the other (read
below for more details).

> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:27:35PM +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>> Last but not least, at that point we would be obliged to list every Debian
>> sisters (or to be correct Debian Trusted Organization): 

No, we should not assume that any random Trusted Organization sells
merchandise, which by no means is sometime even more time consuming that
maintaining a package.

>> as the DPL (added in CC) said to me yesterday on IRC this kind of
>> list already exists (http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Auditor/Organizations)
>> and Debian Auditors take care of it. Adding it also in the merchandise
>> page could turn out in unwanted duplication of information.
>>
>> BTW, I think that the Debian Trusted Organization list deserves a specific
>> place on the website as it's a very official page and important page.
>
> Thanks Francesca for the Cc. It seems to me that there are two
> intertwined aspects at stake. The first one is where to maintain the
> list of trusted organizations as per constitution §5.1.11 and
> §9.3. Maintaining that list is up to the auditors, according to the
> current delegation.

Fully agree, but to start I am more interested in the second point,
given that it is easier to be solved (read below).

> I believe that Luk started doing that on the wiki just because it was
> easier™ that way. Given that the list doesn't change that often, I
> believe that once it's stable that list deserves a proper place on
> www.d.o (do you want a bug report about that?). Considering how
> important those organizations are for Debian, even a specific
> per-organization sub-page might be warranted.

I would argue against so-much specific pages on www.d.o: why should
Debian itself give information about "other" organizations?  Please note
the double quotes: IMHO this should be done by the Trusted Organizations
themselves on their own pages, given that they are different entities
WRT to Debian, while still being Debian.

Just think about debian.ch, as a clear example:

1) debian.ch is a legally-recognized *association*, with a clear status
   and a board.  OTOH and IIRC (again, please someone correct me if I am
   wrong) Debian does not have any legal status.

2) debian.ch should be self-contained in its resources (at least the
   website and a "community" mailing list), something which probably
   would not be possible if it needs a sub-page on www.d.o.

3) if a Trusted Organization must have a sub-page on www.d.o, why should
   not it use *all* the Debian resources for its work?  Something like
   www.d.o/switzerland/ or switzerland@lists.d.o or #switzerland on
   irc.d.o or etc...

Please always bear in mind that while a sister association is usually
started by Debian Developers, it does not mean that all its members are
DDs.  In the case of debian.ch, we have at least one member who is not
officially involved with the project (i.e. he is not a Debian Developer
nor Maintainer nor he maintains packages in the Debian archive).  As far
as I remember, there is nothing in the debian.ch status that prevents
him to become part of the board.  This is in contrast with how Debian
works, where "key positions" (or call them whatever you want) can be
taken by DDs only.

As a final though, as far as I read constitution $9.3, we are talking
here about assets, which is always an hot discussion, given the easiest
and common connection "volunteer means no money involved".

>> Yes, I understand that debian.ch (and similar organisation, as Debian UK
>> as you suggest) is a Debian sister (have an official status) AND give all
>> proceeds to Debian Project.
>> But, IMHO, for the specific purpose of the merchandise page (i.e. to inform
>> users of existence of Debian merchandise vendors) the more relevant 
>> information
>> is the one about the destination of the proceeds (as you have stated in a
>> previous mail user could be more happy to see that proceeds fully or 
>> partially
>> goes to Debian).
>
> The second issue is whether or not trusted organizations should be
> blessed as "preferred" merchandise dealers in the merchandise page or
> not.
>
> I've mixed feelings about that. My first answer used to be that
> they should be, for two reasons: a) users do not need to trust an
> "external" entity; b) buying from them users can help more Debian, in
> the sense that all the money will be used for Debian goals (hardware,
> sprints and the like).

It could be seen as too much business-oriented, but I think that no one
will complain if Trusted Orga

Processed: Re: Bug#61383Re: www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the merchandise page

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 613832 + patch
Bug #613832 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the 
merchandise page
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
613832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130099936510851.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Listing or not non-free "supporters" (was: CVS webwml/english/CD/vendors)

[Luca Capello]

Hi there!

Added events@d.o and the DPL to the Cc:.

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:22:45 +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> The question about listing or not unofficial images vendors should not be 
> addressed
> only to cdvendors@ team but, IMO, we need to involve at least the whole -www
> team and the events/merchandise too.

FWIW, all the Events team *should* be subscribed to -www as well, at
least this was decided back in the past and officially announced (fair
enough, by me...):

  

I have a strong opinion on this matter: I would prefer not to list
non-free "supporters", but then even I use non-free software on my
Debian (Intel 3945ABG), so I completely understand that the above would
simply be bad for our users.

While I think this issue is restricted to installation images, or,
better, "distribution of stuff in main", a similar situation could be
seen for everything using the Debian Official Use Logo (specifically,
everything with the *word*, not the swirl), both because the font and
the logo itself are non-free:

  
  

Strangely enough, nothing of the above is present in the wikipage, but
it is in the main trademark page (linked from the main logo page):

  
  

I consider this situation a very bad mess, given that since
6.0.0/squeeze there is an "official" fork of the word 'debian' in the
SpaceFun theme:

  

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

PS1, my first action would have been to report this as a bug, not to be
 forgot, but then I was kind of lost about the package should be
 reported to.  Feel free to do that yourself or ask me ;-)

PS2, this could be included as part of a wider discussion about the
 relationship between Debian and "distributors", the merchandise
 part of which discussion is at:

   


pgpZxh9H0INKM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Debian 6.

[Kåre Thor Olsen]

On Thursday 24 March 2011 18:10:38 Bill Applebee. wrote:
>   For years I have Debian installed but for demo purposes put Ubuntu
> 10 on to an old Notebook and it has worked fine.
> 
>Getting Linux Format I decided to replace the Ubuntu with Debian6,
> for its stability and robustness for my a person with no knowledge of
> computers to try, but only get as far as "Partitions formatting
> Creating Ext 3 .. 33%   "   I tried various... auto, expert etc etc..
> 
>I have also lost the Ubuntu that was working.
> 
> Can you help please?

This mailing list is about Debian's website.

Please see http://www.debian.org/support for information on how to get 
support, e.g. via the list debian-users (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-
user/ ).

-- 
Regards, Kaare


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103242327.50294.ka...@nightcall.dk

Debian Mailingliste

[Dennis Wauer | DJW-Hosting]

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

vor ungefähr einem Jahr war ich in Ihrer Mailingliste immer mal aktiv. Nun
ist mir leider aufgefallen, dass man sehr leicht an z. B. folgende eMails
kommen kann:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2010/02/msg00034.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2010/02/msg00594.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2009/12/msg00329.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2010/02/msg00644.html

Mir ist bekannt, dass ich durch das absenden der eMail bestätigt habe, dass
diese eMails an die Öffentlichkeit geraten. Jedoch wäre es sehr nett, wenn
Sie diese eMails dennoch aus der Liste löschen können.

Leider kommt es bei manchen Personen nicht gut an, wenn man leicht an solche
Fragen / eMails kommt.

Ich wäre Ihnen sehr dankbar, wenn Sie alle eMail Nachrichten von dem
Absender d-wa...@djw-hosting.de löschen könnten, oder den Namen "Dennis
Wauer" im Absender zensieren könnten.

Vielen Dank im Voraus!

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards

Dennis Wauer
Technik / Kundensupport
___
DJW-Hosting

http://www.DJW-Hosting.de
Irlach 96 - 93464 Tiefenbach
Tel: 030 2318832-61
Fax: 03222 243 174 2
ICQ: 489-732-461
MSN: d-wa...@djw-hosting.de
Skype: dwauer

Geschäftsinhaber: Julia Bücherl

Diese Korrespondenz unterliegt der Vertraulichkeit. Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail
darf weder von uns noch von Ihnen an Dritte weitergegeben, publiziert oder
zitiert werden. Einer Weitergabe oder Veröffentlichung - auch einer
teilweisen - wird hiermit ausdrücklich untersagt. Wenn Sie nicht der
richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben,
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/000301cbea96$3be3f420$b3abdc60$@de