Re: package search problem
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:19:12PM -0500, Andrew Golding wrote: > I got this problem while searching for MySQL packages. This is > certainly a new problem. > > start-- > >> Debian >> Packages >> Package Search Results > > You can try a different search on the Packages search page. > > You have searched for packages that names contain mysql in all > suites, all sections, and all architectures . > > Your search was too wide so we will only display exact matches. At > least 100 results have been omitted and will not be displayed. Please > consider using a longer keyword or more keywords. > > Sorry, your search gave no results > --end > > Wow, not quite sure what to say about this... So what? I guess we can increase that number a bit now that we see, that the new code is indeed a huge performance increase, but there still will be a limit. If you want to make arbitrary queries about Debian packages, use your own machine's resources. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 440588
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > # waiting for submitter reply > tags 440588 confirmed moreinfo Bug#440588: packages.debian.org source pages sidebar too huge There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 441764
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > tags 441764 confirmed pending Bug#441764: packages.debian.org should show Homepage field There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 440641
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > tags 440641 confirmed Bug#440641: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org should explain "gnuab" There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440575: tagging 440575
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 # unless someone steps up with a really good solution tags 440575 wontfix -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 440575
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > # unless someone steps up with a really good solution > tags 440575 wontfix Bug#440575: please include the debian edu archive in p.d.o There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440588: tagging 440588
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 # waiting for submitter reply tags 440588 confirmed moreinfo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PARTICIPAÇÃO -- O ANALFABETO POLÍTICO
O Analfabeto Político O Analfabeto Político Bertolt BrechtO pior analfabeto é o analfabeto político. Ele não ouve, não fala, nem participa dos acontecimentos políticos. Ele não sabe o custo de vida, o preço do feijão, do peixe, da farinha, do aluguel, do sapato e do remédio dependem das decisões políticas. O analfabeto político é tão burro que se orgulha e estufa o peito dizendo que odeia a política. Não sabe o imbecil que, da sua ignorância política, nasce a prostituta, o menor abandonado, o assaltante e o pior de todos os bandidos, que é o político vigarista, pilantra, o corrupto e o lacaio das empresas nacionais e multinacionais.Antonio K. M. Cruz -- Asa Norte - Brasília/DF -- Acelerador POP Acelere a sua conexão discada em até 19 x. Use o Acelerador POP. É grátis, pegue já o seu. http://www.pop.com.br/acelerador -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441866: www.debian.org: Please mention names OLD STABLE, STABLE, UNSTABLE
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Navigation of the new web pages had become more difficult than before because the familiar terms of "old stable", "stable", "unstable" no longer exists. SUGGESTION Please provide in parenthese, what the name represents. Like http://packages.debian.org/lsdb sarge (old stable; ...) etch (stable; ...) lenny (unstable; ...) sid (experimental; ...) ??? Likewise for the red navigation bar at top of page: http://packages.debian.org/etch/lsdb >> Debian >> Packages >> etch (stable) >> mail >> lsdb == -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441764: marked as done (packages.debian.org should show Homepage field)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:45:15 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441764: packages.debian.org should show Homepage field has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The Homepage field is now supported by dpkg and if you want to see a package that already uses it, try ikiwiki in unstable. Packages.d.o could display this field. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:38:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > The Homepage field is now supported by dpkg and if you want to see a > package that already uses it, try ikiwiki in unstable. Packages.d.o > could display this field. Done. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ --- End Message ---
Processed: tagging 441866
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > tags 441866 confirmed Bug#441866: www.debian.org: Please mention names OLD STABLE, STABLE, UNSTABLE There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#440588: marked as done (packages.debian.org source pages sidebar too huge)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:44:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#440588: packages.debian.org source pages sidebar too huge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal A page such as http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/ikiwiki gets a sidebar that is much too large. This is because the sidebar includes the text of the link to the XS-Vcs-Browser url and the XS-Vcs-Svn, both of which can be arbitrarily long, and are all one unwrappable word. I suggest moving those out of the sidebar. It would make sense to include them below the Download links. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:49:41PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > A page such as http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/ikiwiki gets a > sidebar that is much too large. This is because the sidebar includes the > text of the link to the XS-Vcs-Browser url and the XS-Vcs-Svn, both of which > can be arbitrarily long, and are all one unwrappable word. > > I suggest moving those out of the sidebar. It would make sense to > include them below the Download links. I moved the verbose version there and only left some very terse links in the sidebar. Closing the bug. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ --- End Message ---
Bug#441887: www.debian.org: APT-HOWTO is out of date
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The APT-HOWTO (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/) contain some outdated information. Among other things the sample sources.list contain the discontinued non-US repository. It should be an exact online copy of the "apt-howto-en" package. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441887: www.debian.org: APT-HOWTO is out of date
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:57:56PM +0200, Tina Isaksen wrote: > The APT-HOWTO (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/) contain some > outdated information. Among > other things the sample sources.list contain the discontinued non-US > repository. It should be an exact > online copy of the "apt-howto-en" package. The copy in the DDP CVS seems indeed to be outdated. Should that be updated or should we use the package? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441764: closed by Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#441764: packages.debian.org should show Homepage field)
Thanks much for the fast fix. However, note that you put the homepage url in the sidebar, and refer to bug #440588 ... -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: translator.db.pl
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:44:11PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > I copied the translator.db.pl to webwml/romanian/international/romanian/ > and adapted, but I didn't receive any mails though I'm listed as > maintainer for all translated pages under /CD/ and there were changes. > > Am I missing something? At least for the french team, mail are sent by a script running on a personnal machine (of Pierre Machard). The source of this script is at the root of the webwml repository : webwml/check_trans.pl That is not a official nor debian.net service. Maybe such a script can be hosted by i18n.debian.net ? -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I look forward to hear from you
Good day, Although you might be apprehensive about my email as we have not met before,My name is Mr. Song Lille I work with the Hang Seng Bank. There is the sum of $19,500,000.00 in my bank"Hang Seng Bank",Hong kong. There were no beneficiaries stated concerning these funds which means no one would ever come forward to claim it. That is why I ask that we work together so as to have the sun transferred out of my bank into your account.Should you be interested please send me your:- 1. Full names, 2. private phone number, 3. current residential address Your earliest response to this letter will be appreciated, my email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kind Regards, Mr. Song Lile. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441764: closed by Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#441764: packages.debian.org should show Homepage field)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:53:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Thanks much for the fast fix. However, note that you put the homepage > url in the sidebar, and refer to bug #440588 ... Hmm, true :) I've now condensed it a bit more. Hope that it is enough. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441866: marked as done (www.debian.org: Please mention names OLD STABLE, STABLE, UNSTABLE)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:46:16 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441866: www.debian.org: Please mention names OLD STABLE, STABLE, UNSTABLE has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Navigation of the new web pages had become more difficult than before because the familiar terms of "old stable", "stable", "unstable" no longer exists. SUGGESTION Please provide in parenthese, what the name represents. Like http://packages.debian.org/lsdb sarge (old stable; ...) etch (stable; ...) lenny (unstable; ...) sid (experimental; ...) ??? Likewise for the red navigation bar at top of page: http://packages.debian.org/etch/lsdb >> Debian >> Packages >> etch (stable) >> mail >> lsdb == -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 06:26:48PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: > SUGGESTION > > Please provide in parenthese, what the name represents. Like > > http://packages.debian.org/lsdb > > sarge (old stable; ...) > etch (stable; ...) > lenny (unstable; ...) > sid (experimental; ...) ??? > > Likewise for the red navigation bar at top of page: > > http://packages.debian.org/etch/lsdb > > >> Debian >> Packages >> etch (stable) >> mail >> lsdb > == Liked the suggestion. Added. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ --- End Message ---
Bug#441243: marked as done (Problem determining dependencies if user is blind)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:50:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441243: Problem determining dependencies if user is blind has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Good point. Thank you for your suggestion. I am trying to send it to the right place so that it won't be forgotten. "Lee, Gary D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ON your page where dependencies, recommends, etc. are listed, the status > is denoted by an image with a blank alt tag. Are you sure? The images seem to have alt tags, but also class="hidecss" which I think hides it. Then ul.uldep adds images back in as list-style-image, but I think we can't reliably add alt text to images used in that way. As a temporary fix, you can switch CSS off in most browsers, but I think this is a bug of the new design of packages.debian.org. What's the best fix? Put depends/recommends/suggests headings in between the ul tags? Try to make the images replace the bullet points somehow? (list-style: none and reduce the left margin or padding?) Or use different shapes for the different types? (disc, circle, square?) Thanks, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 06:28:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > > Good point. Thank you for your suggestion. I am trying to send it to > the right place so that it won't be forgotten. > > "Lee, Gary D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ON your page where dependencies, recommends, etc. are listed, the status > > is denoted by an image with a blank alt tag. > > Are you sure? The images seem to have alt tags, but also > class="hidecss" which I think hides it. Then ul.uldep adds images > back in as list-style-image, but I think we can't reliably add alt > text to images used in that way. > > As a temporary fix, you can switch CSS off in most browsers, but > I think this is a bug of the new design of packages.debian.org. > > What's the best fix? Put depends/recommends/suggests headings in > between the ul tags? Try to make the images replace the bullet points > somehow? (list-style: none and reduce the left margin or padding?) Or > use different shapes for the different types? (disc, circle, square?) I've now implemented the solution suggested by Richard Atterer. If someone feels that this doesn't fully resolve the issue, feel free to reopen the bug. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ --- End Message ---
Bug#441764: closed by Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#441764: packages.debian.org should show Homepage field)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:53:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Thanks much for the fast fix. However, note that you put the homepage > url in the sidebar, and refer to bug #440588 ... I would also like to see the Homepage field for binary packages instead of source packages only. In the past the Homepage info was part of the description and also visible for binary packages. Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
