Listar: Post sent to moderator.

[Listar]

>> Post to list nse
>> Subject: 
Post submitted to moderator for reason: Non-member submission to closed-post
list.

---
Gestionnaire de liste Listar/0.42 - fin de traitement/job execution complete.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#423154: marked as done (link to wiki.debian.org from the Press coverage page)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 12:28:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line link to wiki.debian.org from the Press coverage page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
package: www.debian.org
severity: important

Hi,

as this (see below) is the second time in one or two month this is brought up 
without a reply, I'm filling a bug now.

I'm in favor of linking to the wiki page (maybe with a small warning, saying 
its a wiki page :)

Setting the severity to important, as it really looks bad that there are no 
updates on the press page since March 2005.


regards,
Holger

--  Forwarded Message  --

Subject: Re: Press coverage page at www.debian.org
Date: Tuesday 08 May 2007 15:02
From: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-www@lists.debian.org

Hi,

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:54:50AM -0700, andremachado wrote:
> Hello,
> The page http://www.debian.org/News/press/ does not receive updates for
> more than a year. Is there a way to include links to
> http://wiki.debian.org/PressCoverage2006
> http://wiki.debian.org/PressCoverage2007 ?
> these pages are being very actively updated.

Sounds reasonable to me, CCing debian-www as they would be responsible
for adding those links I guess.


cheers,

Michael

---


pgpIuyXgmjqtE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Updated in cvs.
http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/english/News/press/index.wml?annotate=1.10&root=webwml


--- End Message ---

Bug#422958: marked as done (Missing link for Debian Weekly News - April 24th, 2007)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 12:32:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Missing link for Debian Weekly News - April 24th, 2007
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org

When I see "Debian Weekly News", I now read in my mind "Debian Monthly
News", but looking at http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/ I thought maybe
with the release of Etch it was going to be "Debian Bi-Monthly".  Not
so, the page just doesn't have an explicit 24 April 2007 issue link to
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/
Please add the link.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
It seems that this bug was fixed before I read the report.  I'm closing
this bug now without doing changes.


--- End Message ---

Bug#417444: marked as done (www.debian.org: Debian press coverage)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 12:38:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org: Debian press coverage
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Please link to http://wiki.debian.org/PressCoverage2007 from
http://www.debian.org/News/press/.

Patch in my mailing list posting on the topic:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-publicity/2007/03/msg00031.html

cheers
- -- vbi

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481

iEYEARECAAYFAkYRWQwACgkQi6Qxi+Wn99bUyQCgwGLYGSGByDQV2wbYGHZ4ohzP
CXYAnjp7UEBgaVSsuVHDM42aYKKhwQQF
=7GuA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug seems a duplicate of this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423154



--- End Message ---

Bug#357274: marked as done (www.debian.org: please publish Mirror.masterlist)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 14:28:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org: please publish Mirror.masterlist
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

I'm in the process of adapting netselect to the archive split, thus
having Mirrors.masterlist available on the web without and html would be
of great help

filippo

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (650, 'experimental'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Richard explained on the bug report that it's already published.


--- End Message ---

Bug#320215: marked as done (debian-accessibility: kernel-image-2.4.24-speakup no longer present)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 14:49:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-accessibility: kernel-image-2.4.24-speakup no longer 
present
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-07-27
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

kernel-image-2.4.24-speakup is (no longer) in the archive. I suggest
using the patch below. You might want to add if the patch applies both
to 2.4 and 2.6, as I could not see that from the description of the
package. If something along kernel-image-2.4.27-speakup is available
somewhere it is not findable via apt-cache search in Sarge.

Btw. the last line in the patch is a spelling fix which I can apply
directly in CVS if you like.

I also noticed that some other version numbers referenced are not
current in respect to Sarge and you might want to update those too.

--- software.wml.orig   2005-07-27 18:40:34.0 +0200
+++ software.wml2005-07-27 18:52:50.0 +0200
@@ -233,10 +233,11 @@
   url="http://www.linux-speakup.org/speakup.html";>
 
   The kernel package
-  http://packages.debian.org/kernel-image-2.4.24-speakup";>kernel-image-2.4.24-speakup
-  contains a Linux kernel patched with speakup, a screen reader for the Linux
-  console.  The special property of speakup is that it runs in kernel space,
-  which does provide a little bit more low level access to the system then
+  kernel-patch-speakup
+  contains the patch for speakup, a screen reader for the Linux
+  console, for the Linux kernel.
+  The special property of speakup is that it runs in kernel space,
+  which does provide a little bit more low level access to the system than
   other screen readers can provide.
   Speakup can for instance read critical kernel messages to you at a point
   where the kernel has already Oopsed, and no user space program could do


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zibal 2.4.27-grsec #1 Wed Dec 22 15:20:05 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Was already fixed, see:
http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/debian-accessibility/software.wml?root=webwml&r1=1.9&r2=1.10&diff_format=h


--- End Message ---

Bug#376331: marked as done (www.debian.org: http://www.us.debian.org/vote/2003/leader2003_stats broken)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 14:43:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org: 
http://www.us.debian.org/vote/2003/leader2003_stats broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Looking at this page, it appears clearly broken: Two times "Ballots
Received", no numbers for "Accepte", "Rejected", "Unique Votes". 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.6-grsec-cz02
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Fix committed in cvs.
http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/english/vote/2003/leader2003_stats.wml?root=webwml&r1=1.3&r2=1.4&diff_format=h


--- End Message ---

Bug#298755: marked as done (Integrating [EMAIL PROTECTED] in www.debian.org?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 14:56:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Integrating [EMAIL PROTECTED] in www.debian.org?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-03-09
Severity: normal

I believe there is a sub-project called [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I
could not find more information about it on www.debian.org,
either from the front page, the site map, or via Search.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux beethoven 2.4.23 #19 Thu Feb 26 17:33:46 GMT 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug was fixed in 2005 by a man. :)


--- End Message ---

Bug#88350: marked as done (version of Policy in stable should be made available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 15:16:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line version of Policy in stable should be made available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
Priority: normal

Current Debian www page contains the most recent version of
the Debian policy. For developers, it is completely OK, but since
debian policy contains various information(or guidance) for
system administrator (especially in Operating system section),
I think the policy applied to current stable distribution
should be on www page.
Hopefully, I think the policy for stable should be taken out from
developer pages, and put into the distribution section.

Happy hacking,

Seiji Kaneko

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The version is available.
http://packages.debian.org/debian-policy



--- End Message ---

Bug#100188: marked as done (collect often-used acronyms somewhere)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 15:27:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line collect often-used acronyms somewhere
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: lists.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-06-09
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

when I first subscribed to Debian mailing lists, it took me quite a
while to work out all those Debian-specific acronyms used on the
lists. I think it would be a very good idea if all new subscribers
were sent a list of acronyms in the "You have added to the subscriber
list of" (sp! ;-) message, e.g. a paragraph like this:


On the Debian mailing lists, a number of acronyms specific to Debian
are in common use. Here is a list of the most important ones - more
information on the individual terms is available on


AM(new maintainer) application manager
BTS   bug tracking system
DAM   Developer Accounts Manager
DDDebian Developer
DFSG  Debian Free Software Guidelines
ITA   intend to adopt
ITO   intend to orphan (a package)
ITP   intend to package
NMnew maintainer
PLproject leader
QAquality assurance
RFP   request for packager
TCTechnical Committee
WNPP  work-needing and prospective packages


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elessar 2.2.19 #1 Mon May 21 19:42:05 CEST 2001 i686


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Very easy to find via a search engine.
http://www.infodrom.org/Debian/doc/acronyms.html
http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian/ddict/dicts/debian/dictd/debian-glossary.en.dict
http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian-women/debian-glossary.en.html

Feel free to reopen this bug and explain why.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---

Bug#189157: marked as done (www.debian.org: Bugs: Reporting: It is not clear how/if bugs are forwarded upstream)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 07:08:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Forwarding section resolved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Subject: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting: It is not clear how/if bugs are 
forwarded upstream
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-15
Severity: normal

Hello,

While reporting several bugs I often wondered if the bugs are forwarded to
the upstream developers by the package maintainer, or if I should do this
myself. I have found out that the tag upstream means the bug is not debian
specific, and that the tag forwarded means that the bug has been forwarded
to upstream developers. I think this should be described at:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

Furthermore, it seems there is no policy/guideline about when a bug should
be forwarded upstream. Should the bugreporter do this? Should the package
maintainer do this? Should there be a guideline/policy about this at all?
Maybe this should be discussed at a mailing list. The outcome of this
discussion should be described as well on:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

I mention this since I think bugs should be reported to the distribution
because it could be distribution specific, security reasons, data corruption
etc. At the same time bugs should be known by the upstream authors. It seems
upstream authors are more likely to fix bugs since they have more experience
with the inner working of the software in most cases. But if this procedure
is not clear, there is a risk that a bug is duplicated by the original
reporter, and by the package maintainer in the upstream bug database.

I am not sure if the priority of normal is in place for this bug.

Cheers,
Remco.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux seesink 2.4.20 #1 Sun Feb 2 20:42:08 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This issue has been resolved by the following: 

Index: Reporting.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/Reporting.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -r1.50 Reporting.wml
--- Reporting.wml   25 May 2007 21:59:29 -  1.50
+++ Reporting.wml   28 May 2007 14:05:32 -
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
 (such as mailing lists), you shouldn't use the usual e-mail headers, but
 a different method, described below.
 
+If you file a bug in Debian, you should not also file a bug against
+the upstream package, as it is possible that the bug exists only in
+Debian. If necessary, the maintainer of the package will forward the
+bug upstream.
+
 
 Sending the bug report using an automatic bug report tool
 


-- 
Identical parts aren't.
 -- Beach's Law

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---

Etch errata

[Andrei Popescu]

Hi,

I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I 
know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used 
in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the 
recommended frontend.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Etch errata

[Josip Rodin]

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I 
> know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used 
> in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the 
> recommended frontend.

In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no
complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing packages and
there should be no difference which program is used.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Etch errata

[Andrei Popescu]

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I 
> > know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used 
> > in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the 
> > recommended frontend.
> 
> In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no
> complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing packages and
> there should be no difference which program is used.

My point was that we should have consistent recommendations.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Etch errata

[Josip Rodin]

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I 
> > > know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used 
> > > in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the 
> > > recommended frontend.
> > 
> > In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no
> > complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing packages and
> > there should be no difference which program is used.
> 
> My point was that we should have consistent recommendations.

Well, seemingly inconsistent, it's all the same APT library.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hola!!

[TuTribu.com]

Hola, 
Te invitamos a unirte a la Comunidad Latina numero uno en internet! TuTribu.com 
donde tendras la posibilidad de:
Chatear en linea
Crear tu propio Perfil
Ver y subir tus Videos favoritos
Recibir Alertas cuando alguien con caracteristicas especificas se una
Shoutbox para decir lo que quieras
Participar en los Foros de discusion
Enviar y recibir Mensajes Instantaneos con otros miembros
Enviar y recibir mensajes por medio de tu Buzon Privado tipo Gmail
Subir y ver Galerias de Fotos tuyas y de otros miembros
Enviar Besos Virtuales
Publicar tu propio Blog
Enterarte de los Cumple años de tus amigos
Participar en Encuestas
y mucho, mucho mas!! 
Que esperas, UNETE YA a TuTribu.com !!
Videos Recomendados

Fernanda Brass en Bikini
5 votos: 8 visitas
Subido por mario
Jurasic Fart
15 votos: 226 visitas
Subido por mario


No olvides dedirle a tus amigos de TuTribu.com.
Mientras mas contactos tengas mejor la pasaras en TuTribu.com!