Re: suggested change to w.d.o/distrib/floppyinst page
Il sab, 2003-09-06 alle 15:10, Josip Rodin ha scritto: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > --- floppyinst.wml.orig 2002-08-26 00:32:38.0 +0200 > > +++ floppyinst.wml 2003-09-01 13:35:54.0 +0200 [...] All your suggestions are now applied and the final page is committed. Thanks, Giuseppe
Re: Moving /intl/l10n/ scripts from auric to gluck
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:12:17PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:12:18PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Josip, could you please apply the attached patch? If you prefer > > renaming all occurences of unstable.ftp-master in this file, > > it is fine with me. > > Done and done. Great, thanks. Denis
Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by alfie: webwml/english/po bugs.pot
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-06 15:11]: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 08:03:01AM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > > Changes by: alfie 03/09/01 08:03:01 > > > > Modified files: > > english/po : bugs.pot > > > > Log message: > > Add new tags: fixed-in-experimental, fixed-upstream, sarge-ignore > > (clean up :/ ) > > I'm sorry, but why are we translating tag names at all?! Presumably there's > a reason, although I can't think of one right now... TBH, I don't know. I just did the missing make pot once again, and because the other tags are already in there I didn't question it. Personally for the german translation we don't translate them because I think it might result in users using the translated tags and get confused anyway. I don't know though who added the tags into the strings originally or if some translators have translated them, though. So long, Alfie -- .oO(Die 3 F's fon Debian: Find the bug, Fix the bug, Forward to maintainer) -- Zomb in #debian.de pgpzbRxuyYGGM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: partners page patch (for all translations so far, too)
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-06 15:59]: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> Can it be converted from 8-bit/color RGBA (truecolor) to maybe something >> like 8-bit colormap (indexed) or such? Everyone says png is sooo much >> better than gif, but if you really like to compare png to gif you have to >> stick with 8-bit colormap in png to not get insanely big files. > > I am pretty sure I did indexed PNGs before, and they were always smaller > than GIFs. I know that, but very few of the png's in the partner section were indexed before I mentioned it. So long, Alfie -- ich habe bisher mit Windows + Word 97 gearbeitet. Jetzt möchte ich aber gerne auf Linus umsteigen und dazu hätte mich interessiert ob es ein Crossupdate gibt. Und zwar von Word 97 ( Windows ) auf Word 2000 ( für Linux ). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] in news:d.c.o.u.l.m pgpkdzwTAQSBp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#208513: acknowledged by developer (Re: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 208513 Bug#208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 208513 www.debian.org Bug#208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'. > thanks control Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Are there problems with How-to links and DebianHELP?
Hi, I'm a very enthusiastic Debian (and Linux) newcomer -- but growing more frustrated by the minute. For several weeks I've tried to access the How-to's listed on your Documenation page (home pagn->documentation->How-to's (all links in this list). All I get are time-outs. I've also tried accessing DebianHELP -- no response. Other links on the page seem to work. I tried for a short while subscribing to a Debian user mailing list, but the volume of posts totally overwhelmed me. I'd certainly like to learn how to become a supportive and knowledgable member of the Debian community -- but the Debian Woody install discs don't recognize my video card (SIS 630), one reference I've found suggests that I download a more recent version of XFree86, but I don't have the foggiest idea how to do that in command mode, and the support links listed on the Debian.org site seem to be broken. I probably have 20 expensive books on linux, including the Debian GNU/Linux Bible. But they seem to present contraditory information on the same topics (e.g. partitioning), or information that doesn't work: e.g. ftp ftp.us.Debian.org from the command line, or information that is so general that it is of vrry little help. I'm patient, willing to dig, hate to whine or to pose a burden, but I'm completely stuck. Best wishes, Lloyd R. Prentice
Re: Are there problems with How-to links and DebianHELP?
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:05:53PM -0400, Lloyd R. Prentice wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a very enthusiastic Debian (and Linux) newcomer -- but growing more > frustrated by the minute. > > For several weeks I've tried to access the How-to's listed on your > Documenation page (home pagn->documentation->How-to's (all links in this > list). All I get are time-outs. I've also tried accessing DebianHELP -- > no response. Other links on the page seem to work. I can't reproduce this (neither for the HOWTOs nor DebianHELP). Are you sure this isn't a problem on your site? If you're sure, please send the exact links you tried and that did not work for you. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
Bug#176437: marked as done (www.debian.org: URL checker not checking)
Your message dated Mon, 8 Sep 2003 02:19:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line It's checking now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2003 18:13:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 12 12:13:47 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18XmcF-Ve-00; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:13:47 -0600 Received: from larry-debian.stts1.wa.attbi.com (12-231-10-14.client.attbi.com[12.231.10.14]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53) with ESMTP id <20030112181317053003ofboe>; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:13:17 + Received: from larry by larry-debian.stts1.wa.attbi.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Xmbk-P2-00; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:13:16 -0800 From: Larry Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: URL checker not checking X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:13:16 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Larry Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-12 Severity: normal Within the Web site development pages, there are a couple of references to this directory: http://www-master.debian.org/~treacy/urlcheck/ ...with the suggestion that people periodically look through this information and act on any bad links that are found. But the information in this directory appears not to have been updated in over 10 months. --- Received: (at 176437-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2003 00:10:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 07 19:10:51 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19w9cJ-0005iT-00; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 19:10:51 -0500 Received: from pd95300ae.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.0.174] helo=djpigpb) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35) id 19w9cH-00039q-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 02:10:50 +0200 Received: from djpig by djpigpb with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19w9kd-f9-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 02:19:27 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 02:19:26 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: It's checking now Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,RCVD_IN_NJABL,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Hi. Current URL-Checks are now available on http://www.djpig.de/projekte/debian/urlcheck/ I'm still tweaking the scripts and the location[0] may change again, but it runs regulary, so I'm closing this bug. [0] Which will of course be reflected on devel/website/desc Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
