Re: lists.d.o's display not updated in over a day
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:02:22PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > > lists.debian.org hasn't updated its display of messages since yesterday > > > morning. I realize it's a new month, but the new month isn't displayed for > > > even debian-devel. > > > > Erp. > > > > Can't find string terminator "'" anywhere before EOF at > > /org/lists.debian.org/www/debian-wnpp/2003/debian-wnpp-200307/.mhonarc.db > > line 2937. > > Compilation failed in require at > > /org/lists.debian.org/mhonarc/share/mhonarc/mhopt.pl line 367. > > /org/lists.debian.org/mhonarc/bin/mhonarc -quiet -rcfile > > /org/lists.debian.org/mhonarc/debian.rc -outdir > > /org/lists.debian.org/www/debian-wnpp/2003/debian-wnpp-200307 -definevar > > 'DEBLISTNAME="debian-wnpp Jul 2003"' -add > > /org/lists.debian.org/lists/debian-wnpp/2003/debian-wnpp-200307: 65280 at > > ./updatemail line 547, line 1. > > > > I've forced a refresh, it seemed to have worked. Watch for updates in the > > next <20 minutes. > > Thanks! fwiw, debian-debbugs still hasn't updated... also the links to the > August secions seem to be missing. Bah. Can't find string terminator "'" anywhere before EOF at /org/lists.debian.org/www/debian-user-spanish/2003/debian-user-spanish-200307/.mhonarc.db line 8558. It looks like random corruption, as if the process was killed while writing. That's the end of the file, saying: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]','1057837226^\577', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]','1057257365^\240', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]','1059081051^\1368', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]','1057849279^\595', '[EMAIL PROTECTED] The file is 380KB is size. I'll see if I can see the pattern anywhere else. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Donation
Hi, I'd like to donate some money. Why is it so hard to do that? Mozilla, KDE for e.g. have paypal accounts (which makes it easy), why don't you? Bye, Oliver
Bug#204009: www.debian.org: Poor Finnish translations on the main page
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-03 Severity: minor The following lines on the front page are poor Finnish, IMO: "Käyttöjärjestelmä koostuu niistä perusohjelmista ja -työkaluista, joiden avulla kone käy." Should end with "...kone toimii." I also think that "ja -työkaluista" is simply repeating "perusohjelmista." ";tästä nimi GNU/Linux." Better would be ";siksi nimi on GNU/Linux." "Mukana tulee yli 8710 pakettia..." -> "Debianin mukana tulee..." Additional mistakes on the http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ "kunnes vika merkitään korjatuksi tai muuten hoidelluksi." -> "...hoidetuksi." "Lisäasetuksia (jotka voit jättää koskemattomiksi, oletusarvot toimivat):" -> "(nämä voit jättää tyhjiksi, sillä oletusarvot ovat toimivat):" "Tämän hetkinen lista lumepaketeista..." -> "Tämänhetkinen..." -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux home.killeri.net 2.4.17 #11 SMP ti huhti 22 16:23:50 EEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204003: marked as done (web interface not updated. All the lists do not show Aug)
Your message dated Sun, 3 Aug 2003 20:07:15 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2003 17:10:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 03 12:10:19 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk (trider-g7.fabbione.net) [212.242.169.198] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19jMN9-0005q1-00; Sun, 03 Aug 2003 12:10:19 -0500 Received: by trider-g7.fabbione.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 609E536; Sun, 3 Aug 2003 19:10:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: web interface not updated. All the lists do not show Aug X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20 Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 19:10:18 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: listarchives Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-03 Severity: normal The script that updates the web pages looks like working: "The last update was on 08:53 GMT Sun Aug 03. There are 124 messages. Page 1 of 1." but there is no "Aug" link to any of the list. Thanks Fabio -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux trider-g7 2.4.20-9 #1 Wed Jul 30 16:51:44 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 204003-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2003 18:07:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 03 13:07:17 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk (trider-g7.fabbione.net) [212.242.169.198] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19jNGH-0004gy-00; Sun, 03 Aug 2003 13:07:17 -0500 Received: from trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net (port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.169.198]) by trider-g7.fabbione.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0824C36 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Aug 2003 20:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 20:07:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) =F9=ED=F9 Joy just happened to kill a few hundred spams from list archives what's the problem, fab? Joy: the web interface is not updated correctly 204003: for reference all the mailing lists are "blocked" at july we had a mass corruption the other day many of the .mhonarc.db files simply got cut off and a syntax error killed the whole thing Joy: i see... anyway to start mhonarc archiving stuff again? Joy: feel free to kill my bug since you are already aware of the problem there is really not much i can do from here =F9=ED=F9 the time is now 08:00pm. yes, i'm rebuilding it as we speak Joy: yes i noticed :-) all done yeps do you want me close? (the bug) sure i don't see it ok --=20 Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol "We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp4.html
Bug#204038: Keysigning: signers should not uploaded signatures
Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-04 Severity: wishlist On the keysigning page in the "What you should not do" section it would be useful to mention that the signed key should be sent to the key's owner and not immediately uploaded to a public keyserver. This is implied by the procedure described earlier, but not with crystal clarity, and indeed I have been to keysignings where uploading signatures to keyservers was considered routine. The reason for this restriction is that one usually signs a key after a person presents ID that links his face with his name and a fingerprint-printout that links his name with his key. Assume that the ID is trustworthy and the face matches the picture on the ID so that the face-name link is proven. One is prepared to sign the key to say that this person claims this key. However, the key also lists an email address and unless something further is done there is nothing to prove that this person owns this email address (except perhaps for the fact that the person is present, if the occasion is a keysigning that was arranged by private email). It adds to the security of the process if the signature is emailed to that address. It will then only be uploaded if and only if the person in question really owns that address. If the address actually belongs to someone else then she will not upload the key but will probably make inquiries into who is claiming to own her email address. If my thinking is muddled here, please let me know. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux thanatos 2.4.21 #3 Wed Jun 18 21:35:52 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
å «æä¸æµ·å§åç¹ä»·æºç¥¨
å°æ¬ç客æ·ï¼æ¨å¥½ï¼ 以ä¸æ¯æ¬å ¬å¸å «æä¸æµ·å§åå½å åå½é ç¹ä»·æºç¥¨ï¼æå¤éå®åèªç©ºå ¬å¸çç¹ä»·æºç¥¨ï¼ä¿è¯ä»·æ ¼æä½ï¼è¦æ¯å ¶ä»å®ç¥¨å¤ä¾¿å®è³å°50å ï¼ï¼å¦å¤æ们ä¹å¯éå®åèªç©ºå ¬å¸ç紧缺票ï¼å¹¶ä¸æ¿æ解çæ¨çæææå ³æºç¥¨çé®é¢ï¼ ææä¸æµ·å¸åºå 客æ·ä¸ºä½ å è´¹é票ä¸é¨ï¼ï¼çº¯WORDæ件) ããããããããæ¤è´ æ¬ç¤¼ï¼ TEL:021-62278872 62278873 FAX:021-62770291 ä¸æµ·æ°ä¸ç¥¨å¡ ãããããããã [EMAIL PROTECTED] ãããã 2003-08-01 °ËÔÂÉϺ£Ê¼·¢ÌؼۻúƱ.doc Description: Binary data
